SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400F

32,279 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600

19,036 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14400F and AMD Radeon RX 6600 form a desktop pairing that targets a specific performance tier. The CPU sits at the 83rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 63rd percentile among all graphics cards, creating a combined percentile of 73. This build is characterized by a strong, modern mid-range processor paired with a capable but aging graphics solution, resulting in a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks and delivers solid 1080p gaming performance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400F is built on the Raptor Lake architecture and features 10 cores and 16 threads, a configuration that balances multi-threaded throughput with single-thread responsiveness. Its base clock is 2.50 GHz, which can boost up to 4.70 GHz, allowing it to handle bursty workloads effectively. With a 65 W TDP, it is an efficient processor that does not demand extreme cooling solutions. The CPU is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node and has a die size of 215 mm². Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache, which is substantial for a mid-range chip and helps with data-heavy applications.

Benchmark results show a processor that is far stronger in multi-threaded scenarios than in single-threaded ones. In Cinebench R23, the i5-14400F scores 21645 points in the multi-core test, compared to 3055 points in the single-core test. This multi-core score is 83% of the way to the performance of the top CPU in the database, indicating that this chip can handle demanding productivity tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering with relative ease. The Geekbench scores reinforce this, with a multi-core score of 11268 and a single-core score of 2058. The Passmark data further illustrates this strength; the processor achieves a multithread score of 25470, an integer math score of 81524, and a floating-point math score of 61319. The data encryption score of 16949 and data compression score of 315521 highlight its capability in those specific workloads.

Comparatively, the i5-14400F's average benchmark score of 32279 places it in a tight cluster of competitors. It is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, which has an average score of 32233 and a deltaPct of 0.1%. It also sits close to the Intel Core i9-11900 (score 32226, deltaPct 0.2%) and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS (score 32354, deltaPct -0.2%). This indicates that while the 14400F is a strong performer, it is not a class leader; it is rather a highly competitive option that trades blows with the previous generation's high-end mobile and desktop parts. For real workloads, the 14400F is a dependable workhorse. The high multi-core scores mean that tasks like compiling code, rendering 3D scenes, or exporting video will be completed quickly. The single-core performance, while lower relatively, is still more than sufficient for snappy system responsiveness and for games that are not heavily multi-threaded.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture and the Navi 23 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The GPU has a base clock of 1626 MHz, a game clock of 2044 MHz, and a boost clock of 2491 MHz. Its computational resources include 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 raster operation units, and 28 ray tracing cores. The card is rated for a TDP of 132 W and requires a 300 W power supply, making it relatively power-frugal.

In terms of raw compute, the RX 6600 delivers 8.928 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 17.86 TFLOPS of FP16 performance. Its pixel rate is 159.4 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 279.0 GTexel/s. These numbers suggest a GPU that is well-suited for 1080p gaming and light 1440p workloads. The presence of 28 ray tracing cores means that the hardware supports the feature, but the 8.928 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is a limiting factor for heavy ray-traced scenes. The benchmark data supports this, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1492 and a Passmark G3D score of 15096. The Geekbench scores show a strong Vulkan performance of 67623, but a lower OpenCL score of 28850, indicating that its compute performance is more accessible through certain APIs than others.

The RX 6600's average benchmark score of 19036 places it in a peculiar position, directly alongside several NVIDIA professional and mobile parts. It is essentially tied with the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (score 19030, deltaPct 0%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile (score 19049, deltaPct -0.1%), and the NVIDIA Tesla K20m (score 19089, deltaPct -0.3%). This means that in raw benchmark terms, the RX 6600 offers performance similar to a laptop RTX 4050, though the desktop form factor allows for more consistent power delivery. For rendering and gaming, this translates to solid 1080p performance in most titles. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for current games at 1080p, but it may become a constraint for high-resolution textures or future titles. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is a bottleneck for some compute tasks, but for typical gaming, it is adequate.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmark data shows a system with a significant performance discrepancy between its CPU and GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score is 32279, placing it at the 83rd percentile, while the GPU's average score is 19036, placing it at the 63rd percentile. This 20-point percentile gap is the defining characteristic of this build. The CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is firmly in the mid-range.

The measured gaming performance, which is based on actual data (dataIsMeasured is true), shows an average FPS of 95.2 across all tested games. This average is skewed by high frame rates in esports titles. For example, in Valorant, the system achieves 326 FPS at 1080p, and in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, it reaches 317.1 FPS at 1080p. These numbers are far above the 144 Hz refresh rate of most gaming monitors. However, in more demanding titles, the performance drops significantly. In Cyberpunk 2077, the system manages 41.2 FPS at 1080p, and in Red Dead Redemption 2, it achieves 38 FPS at 1080p. This indicates that the build is not suited for ultra-settings gaming in the most graphically intensive AAA titles.

The pair's rank by FPS is 2876 out of 3732 pairs, which puts it in the lower half of all tested CPU-GPU combinations. This low ranking is a direct result of the GPU holding back the CPU. The CPU is capable of feeding the GPU far more frames than the GPU can render, but the overall system performance is capped by the GPU's output. The combined percentile of 73 reflects this, being a compromise between the high CPU percentile and the lower GPU percentile.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the AMD Radeon RX 6600 is the primary bottleneck in this system. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 63rd percentile ranking shows that the CPU has significant headroom that the GPU cannot utilize. This is most evident in the gaming performance. While the CPU can push over 300 FPS in esports titles, the GPU's limits are seen in the 1080p performance of AAA games, where it often falls below 60 FPS.

For instance, in a game like Control, the system achieves 62.2 FPS at 1080p, which is a playable frame rate but not a high-refresh experience. In contrast, the CPU's single-core score of 3055 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can handle the physics and game logic calculations of these titles without issue. The bottleneck manifests in a different way at higher resolutions. At 1440p, the GPU's workload increases, and the frame rates drop further. In Fortnite, the system goes from 68.6 FPS at 1080p to 45.6 FPS at 1440p, and in Call of Duty: Warzone, it drops from 143.7 FPS to 129.5 FPS. This scaling shows that the GPU is the limiting factor, as the CPU's performance does not vary much with resolution.

The Passmark physics score of 1523 and data encryption score of 16949 further confirm that the CPU is not a weak link in gaming scenarios. For productivity tasks that rely on the CPU, the system is extremely well-balanced, but for gaming, the GPU is the clear limiting factor. The FPS scaling in games like Ark: Survival Ascended, which goes from 22 FPS at 1080p to 13.9 FPS at 1440p, shows a GPU that is overwhelmed by the most demanding titles. This system will perform best when the GPU is used for 1080p gaming with settings adjusted to maintain a stable frame rate, while the CPU handles any background tasks or streaming without a performance hit.

Who Should Build It

This build is for users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads but also want a functional gaming machine. The Intel Core i5-14400F's strong multi-core performance makes it an excellent choice for content creators who work with video editing or 3D modeling. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 and the Geekbench multi-core score of 11268 indicate that rendering tasks, which are typically multi-threaded, will be processed quickly. Software developers who compile large codebases will also benefit from the 10 cores and 16 threads, as the Passmark multithread score of 25470 suggests good parallel processing capability.

For gamers, this system is suited for those who play at 1080p and do not require maximum settings in every title. The measured frame rates in games like Counter-Strike 2 (144.6 FPS at 1080p) and Valorant (326 FPS at 1080p) show that esports enthusiasts will have a highly responsive experience. Students and small business workstations that run office applications, web browsers, and data analysis tools will find the CPU's performance more than adequate for their needs. The i5-14400F's 65 W TDP also makes it a good choice for builds where power consumption and heat output are concerns, as it can be cooled by a capable air cooler. The system is less ideal for those who want to play the latest AAA games at high settings or at resolutions above 1440p, as the GPU will struggle to maintain high frame rates.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The system excels in esports and less demanding titles. In Valorant, it hits 326 FPS at 1080p, and in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, it reaches 317.1 FPS. Even at 1440p, these games remain well above 200 FPS, providing a smooth experience on high-refresh monitors. The CPU's single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 3055, ensures that game logic does not become a bottleneck.

Streaming: The 16 threads of the i5-14400F provide ample headroom for encoding a stream while gaming. The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 25470 suggests it can handle the extra load of x264 encoding without severely impacting game performance, which is already limited by the GPU in most titles.

Video Editing: The multi-core performance is a major asset here. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9090 and the Geekbench multi-core score of 11268 indicate that timeline scrubbing, preview rendering, and export tasks will be handled quickly. The GPU can assist with effects and acceleration, but the CPU is the primary driver.

3D Rendering: The 10 cores and 16 threads shine in rendering workloads. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 places the CPU in the top 17% of all processors, meaning that scenes will render faster than on a typical system. The GPU's 8.928 TFLOPS of FP32 compute can also be used for GPU rendering, though its 8 GB VRAM may be a limitation for complex scenes.

Software Development: The CPU's performance is well-suited for compilation tasks. The Passmark integer math score of 81524 and data compression score of 315521 show that the processor can handle the heavy number-crunching and I/O operations involved in building large projects. The 20 MB of L3 cache helps by keeping frequently accessed data close to the cores.

Student and Office Work: For everyday tasks like word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, this system is massively overqualified. The CPU's single-core performance, while its relative weakness, is still more than enough for a responsive desktop experience. The GPU is more than capable of driving multiple 1080p displays for productivity.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance difference between the Intel Core i5-14400F and its closest rivals?

A: The i5-14400F has an average benchmark score of 32279. This is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U (score 32233), 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i9-11900 (score 32226), and 0.5% higher than the Intel Core i7-12800H (score 32121). It is 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS (score 32354).

Q: How does the Radeon RX 6600 compare to the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile?

A: The RX 6600 has an average benchmark score of 19036, which is 0.1% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile's score of 19049. In practical terms, they deliver very similar raw performance, though the RX 6600 is a desktop card.

Q: Can this system run games at 1440p?

A: Yes, but with limitations. The measured data shows that many games are playable at 1440p. For example, Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 129.5 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 runs at 91.3 FPS. However, demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (28.5 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (28 FPS) will require significant settings reductions to be playable.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor for gaming performance?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is the limiting factor. The CPU is at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 63rd percentile. The CPU can produce far more frames than the GPU can render, which is why the system's overall FPS ranking is 2876 out of 3732 pairs.

Q: What is the average frame rate across all tested games?

A: The average FPS across all games in the measured dataset is 95.2 FPS. This is skewed by high performance in esports titles and lower performance in AAA games.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No. The multiplier is unlocked, and the part number is SRN3RSRN47. The base clock is 2.50 GHz and the boost clock is 4.70 GHz, but these are fixed values.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The Radeon RX 6600 has a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s, which is provided by 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the Intel Core i5-14400F with the AMD Radeon RX 6600. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, based on the Raptor Lake architecture. The GPU is an 8 GB RDNA 2.0 card from the Radeon RX 6000 series. The combined percentile for this pair is 73, placing it above a significant portion of other builds. The system's overall tier can be described as a "mid-range desktop with a strong CPU and a mid-tier GPU," where the CPU's 83rd percentile performance is the standout feature, while the GPU's 63rd percentile performance is the main compromise. This is a build that prioritizes computational tasks and esports gaming over high-end AAA graphics.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data (dataIsMeasured is true) reveals a system that is excellent for competitive gaming at 1080p. In Valorant, the system achieves 326 FPS at 1920x1080, and in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, it reaches 317.1 FPS. These frame rates are far beyond what is needed for a 144 Hz monitor. At 2560x1440, these titles still run exceptionally well, with Valorant at 278 FPS and CS:GO at 217.6 FPS. The system is also capable of high frame rates in other popular titles, such as Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege, which runs at 169 FPS at 1080p and 111 FPS at 1440p.

For more demanding AAA games, the performance drops to a level that is playable but not high-refresh. In Cyberpunk 2077, the system achieves 41.2 FPS at 1080p, and in Red Dead Redemption 2, it gets 38 FPS. These are below the 60 FPS target for a smooth experience, indicating that settings must be lowered. At 1440p, these games become very difficult to run, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 28.5 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 28 FPS. The system's performance in some newer or poorly optimized titles is also a concern. Ark: Survival Ascended runs at just 22 FPS at 1080p, and The Medium runs at 31.5 FPS. Overall, the gaming experience is best described as "excellent for esports, playable for AAA at 1080p with adjustments."

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14400F uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is a mature platform. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory that fits their budget. It also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is forward-looking. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, so the power delivery requirements are modest.

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and has a TDP of 132 W. The suggested PSU for this GPU is 300 W, which is quite low, meaning that the entire system can be powered by a modest power supply. The GPU is 190 mm long and is a dual-slot card, making it compatible with most cases.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system would be the GPU. The CPU has significant headroom, as indicated by its 83rd percentile ranking, and can handle a much more powerful graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. A user could upgrade to a more powerful GPU from the same generation or a newer one, and the CPU would still be able to feed it frames. The platform itself is at the end of its life for new CPU releases, but the current CPU is strong enough that a CPU upgrade is likely not necessary for several years. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that a user can keep their existing memory or upgrade to a newer standard, depending on their motherboard. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU ensures that future storage devices will have access to high bandwidth.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14400F

AMD Radeon RX 6600

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds