SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400

32,115 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of an Intel Core i5-14400 with an NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 creates a desktop configuration that blends a modern 14th-generation CPU with a professional-grade GPU from an older architectural era. The data shows a system where the processor is a current, high-volume mainstream part, while the graphics card is a workstation-class component that has been marked end-of-life. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All gaming and frame-rate discussions are therefore estimated from the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400 is a desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, and is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². It features 10 cores and 16 threads, a configuration that relies on a hybrid architecture to balance performance and efficiency. The processor operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, all within a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory and includes ECC memory support, making it suitable for workstation tasks that demand data integrity. It also features integrated UHD Graphics 730, though the presence of a discrete GPU makes this largely redundant for visual output.

Benchmark results indicate a strong all-round performer. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 21315 points in the multi-core test and 3009 points in the single-core test. The multi-core score suggests that the 10-core, 16-thread configuration provides substantial parallel processing capability, which translates to efficient handling of multi-threaded workloads such as video encoding and 3D rendering. The single-core score of 3009 points is respectable, indicating that the 4.70 GHz boost clock allows for snappy responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications like web browsing and office productivity. The Geekbench scores of 9807 multi-core and 1905 single-core reinforce this balanced profile, with the multi-core result being roughly five times the single-core result, a typical ratio for a processor with this thread count.

The PassMark suite offers a granular view of specific workloads. The CPU achieves a multithread score of 25080 and a single-thread score of 3741. In integer math, it scores 82017, while in floating-point math it scores 61549, showing a healthy balance between these two arithmetic types. The data compression score of 314995 and encryption score of 16731 highlight strong performance in data-intensive tasks, which is beneficial for database operations and file archiving. The physics score of 1396 is a more modest figure, suggesting that while the CPU is capable, it is not the primary driver for physics simulations in gaming, which rely heavily on single-thread performance. The extended instructions score of 19816 indicates solid support for modern SIMD instruction sets, which can accelerate certain scientific and engineering applications.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the i5-14400 has an average benchmark score of 32115, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. This puts it in a dead heat with the Intel Core i7-12800H, which has an average score of 32121, a delta of 0%. It also ties with the Intel Core i7-13705H at 32076 (0.1% slower) and the Intel Core i5-14450HX at 32040 (0.2% slower). Interestingly, it is slightly ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900, which scores 32226, but the delta is -0.3%, meaning the i5-14400 is actually marginally faster. This indicates that the i5-14400 punches above its weight, matching or exceeding the performance of higher-tier mobile and older desktop chips, making it a compelling option for users who need strong multi-core performance without stepping up to a higher core-count part.

Benchmark Performance

The combined system performance, as measured by the average benchmark score, positions this pairing in the 75th percentile of all desktop configurations. The CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, holding an 82nd percentile rank among all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 67th percentile among all GPUs. This suggests that the processor is the more capable component in this pairing, and the GPU may be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive tasks.

Focusing on the CPU, the Cinebench R20 scores of 8952 multi-core and 1263 single-core show a strong scaling from single to multi-threaded workloads. The PassMark single-thread score of 3741 is a solid figure for everyday application performance. In the context of real-world workloads, the multi-core scores indicate that the CPU can handle heavy compilation tasks, video rendering, and batch photo processing with ease. The single-core scores suggest that the CPU will not bottleneck in tasks like opening large spreadsheets or running a single-threaded game engine loop.

The GPU, an NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000, is a professional workstation card based on the Turing architecture. It scores 15616 in PassMark G3D, which places it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 21629. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, which scores 21856, a delta of -1%, meaning the Quadro is only slightly slower. It is faster than the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (21379, +1.2% faster), the AMD Radeon HD 8970M (21237, +1.8% faster), and the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21153, +2.3% faster). This data reveals that the Quadro RTX 5000, despite its professional branding and high VRAM, delivers gaming performance that is roughly on par with a mid-range consumer GPU from several generations ago. Its compute performance is more respectable, with a PassMark GPU Compute score of 6525, but its DirectX 12 score of 59 is low, indicating that it is not optimized for modern gaming APIs.

The combined picture shows a system that is heavily skewed towards CPU performance. The data suggests that for gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor, while for professional workloads that rely on the CPU, such as software development and office tasks, the system will perform admirably. The GPU’s high VRAM capacity (16 GB) is its primary saving grace, providing ample memory for large datasets, but its raw shading power is dated.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The system is built around the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports the Core 14th Gen series. The i5-14400 uses a dual-channel memory bus and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory modules. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is forward-looking and allows for the installation of the fastest available NVMe SSDs and graphics cards, though the Quadro RTX 5000 itself is limited to PCIe 3.0 x16. The motherboard platform is the foundation for a sensible upgrade path.

Given the CPU’s 65 W TDP, power supply headroom is not a primary concern for the processor. However, the GPU has a TDP of 230 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 550 W. The GPU requires 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a more modern, higher-performing model. Since the CPU is in the 82nd percentile and the GPU is in the 67th percentile, the GPU is the clear bottleneck. Upgrading the GPU to a model with a higher percentile rank would unlock the CPU’s full potential in gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks. The platform’s support for PCIe Gen 5 means that a newer GPU will not be bandwidth-limited by the CPU’s PCIe controller, even if the card uses a PCIe 4.0 interface.

The CPU’s support for DDR5 memory is a future-proofing measure. Moving from DDR4 to DDR5 could provide a modest performance uplift in memory-sensitive workloads, though the current memory type is not specified in the data. The 65 W TDP also means that a standard air cooler is sufficient, keeping the system quiet and cool. The platform is not overclockable, as the multiplier is locked, so users looking for manual tuning will need to look at K-series parts. The next logical step for this system, therefore, is not to replace the CPU or motherboard, but to focus on modernizing the graphics subsystem.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the data suggests this system will struggle to deliver high frame rates at 1080p or 1440p with ultra settings. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 15616 is close to that of the GTX 1060 6 GB, a card not known for high-refresh gaming at modern titles. The low DirectX 12 score of 59 further indicates poor performance in newer APIs. Users should expect to lower graphical settings or reduce resolution to achieve competitive frame rates.

For streaming, the CPU’s 16 threads are a significant asset. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21315 indicates that the CPU can handle encoding the video stream while simultaneously running a game. The i5-14400 is a capable CPU for this task, but the GPU’s lack of modern hardware encoders (it has Turing NVENC, but the data does not specify its quality) might lead to reliance on x264 encoding. The high multi-core score suggests this is feasible without massive frame drops.

For video editing, the system is well-suited. The CPU’s strong multi-core performance in Cinebench R23 (21315) and PassMark multithread (25080) will handle timeline scrubbing and export rendering efficiently. The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM is ample for previewing 4K or even 8K timelines, and its FP32 performance of 11.15 TFLOPS can accelerate effects rendering. However, the GPU’s age means that some newer codecs and effects may not be fully hardware-accelerated.

For 3D rendering, the CPU will be the primary workhorse. A CPU-based renderer will utilize all 16 threads, and the 21315 Cinebench R23 score ensures competitive render times. The GPU can assist with GPU-accelerated renders in applications that support CUDA, and its 16 GB VRAM is a distinct advantage for scenes that exceed the memory capacity of 8 GB cards. However, its raw compute performance (11.15 TFLOPS FP32) is modest by modern standards.

For software development, this system is excellent. The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 82017 and data compression score of 314995 indicate fast compilation speeds and quick handling of source code archives. The 16 threads allow for parallel builds, and the 20 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code segments. The GPU is largely irrelevant for this workload, but its presence does not hinder performance.

For student and office work, the system is overkill. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3741 in PassMark ensures that document processing, spreadsheet calculations, and web browsing are instantaneous. The integrated graphics could handle this workload, but the discrete GPU provides a smooth experience for any light photo editing or presentation work. The system will be responsive and efficient, though the high TDP of the GPU means it is not an energy-efficient choice for basic tasks.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need a high-performance CPU for multi-threaded professional work but do not prioritize the latest gaming GPU performance. It is ideal for software developers who want fast compilation times, as evidenced by the strong integer math and data compression scores. The 16 threads and high multi-core scores in Cinebench R23 (21315) make it suitable for video editors working with high-resolution footage, provided they use CPU-based export pipelines.

Content creators who rely on CPU rendering in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D will find the i5-14400 to be a robust performer. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is a boon for texture-heavy 3D scenes, even if its compute speed is not class-leading. Students in engineering or computer science fields will benefit from the CPU’s ability to handle simulations and compile code rapidly. Small business workstations that run accounting software, databases, or virtual machines will find the 10 cores and 16 threads to be a significant upgrade over older quad-core systems.

Gamers at 1080p with low to medium settings are the only gaming demographic that will be satisfied. The GPU’s performance, comparable to a GTX 1060, means that esports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends will run smoothly, but modern AAA titles will require significant graphical compromises. The system is not suitable for high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming. The target builder is someone who values CPU horsepower for productivity and is either on a limited budget for the GPU or has repurposed a professional card from a workstation.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a professional workstation GPU based on the Turing architecture, manufactured on a 12 nm process at TSMC. The chip, codenamed TU104, contains 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. It has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. The GPU is equipped with 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, providing hardware support for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads. Its base clock is 1620 MHz with a boost clock of 1815 MHz. The memory subsystem features 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, with an effective data rate of 14 Gbps.

In terms of raw throughput, the GPU achieves a pixel rate of 116.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 348.5 GTexel/s. Its FP32 performance is rated at 11.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 22.30 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio. The GPU has a TDP of 230 W and requires a 550 W power supply. It is a dual-slot card that is 267 mm long and 111 mm tall, featuring 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs and 1x USB Type-C. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results show a mixed picture. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 and Vulkan score of 92309 indicate decent compute capability. However, the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 59 is very low, suggesting poor performance in modern gaming APIs. The DirectX 11 score of 140 is better but still moderate. The PassMark G3D score of 15616 places it in the 67th percentile, roughly equivalent to a GTX 1060 6 GB. For rendering, the 16 GB VRAM is the standout feature, allowing for massive datasets and high-resolution textures without running out of memory. The 48 RT cores provide ray tracing acceleration, but the overall performance is limited by the older architecture, making it unsuitable for high-end gaming but viable for professional visualization tasks where memory capacity is more critical than raw speed.

Gaming Performance

Note: No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination. All figures below are estimates based on the GPU’s benchmark scores and its similarity to the GTX 1060 6 GB.

The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 15616 suggests that this system will deliver playable frame rates at 1080p resolution for most games, but only with medium to high settings. In esports titles like Fortnite or Apex Legends, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (3741 PassMark) will help push frame rates above 100 FPS, but the GPU’s rendering power will cap the maximum output. For visually demanding AAA titles, such as Cyberpunk 2077 or Red Dead Redemption 2, the system will likely manage 30-40 FPS at 1080p with low settings. At 1440p, the GPU will be severely challenged, and users should expect to drop to 1080p or lower the in-game resolution scale.

The low DirectX 12 score of 59 is a red flag, indicating that games using this API will run significantly worse than those using DirectX 11. Older titles that rely on DirectX 11 will see better performance, potentially allowing for 60 FPS at 1080p with medium settings. The 16 GB VRAM will not be a limiting factor at these resolutions, as most games do not exceed 8 GB of usage at 1080p. The CPU’s 20 MB L3 cache and high single-thread score will prevent stuttering in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU will consistently be the bottleneck. Overall, this is not a gaming system; it is a professional workstation that can play older or less demanding games on the side.

FAQ

Q: What is the primary bottleneck in this system for gaming?

A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck. It holds a 67th percentile rank among all GPUs, while the CPU holds an 82nd percentile rank. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 15616 is comparable to a GTX 1060, limiting gaming performance.

Q: How much VRAM does the Quadro RTX 5000 have?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. This is a large amount of memory, beneficial for professional workloads.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is unlocked is false, meaning the CPU is locked and cannot be overclocked. Its boost clock is 4.70 GHz.

Q: What type of memory does the i5-14400 support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this system?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 W. The GPU has a TDP of 230 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 65 W.

Q: How does the Quadro RTX 5000 compare to a GTX 1060 6 GB?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 has an average benchmark score of 21629, while the GTX 1060 6 GB has a score of 21856. The delta is -1%, meaning the Quadro is slightly slower than the GTX 1060.

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The CPU scores 21315 points in the Cinebench R23 multi-core test, indicating strong parallel processing capability for multi-threaded workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance of this system is heavily skewed towards the CPU. The i5-14400 is a modern processor in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, while the Quadro RTX 5000 is a legacy GPU in the 67th percentile. This discrepancy defines the system’s behavior across workloads.

In CPU-bound tasks such as software compilation, video encoding, and 3D rendering, the system performs exceptionally well. The CPU’s high integer math score (82017) and Cinebench R23 multi-core score (21315) ensure that these tasks are completed quickly. The GPU is largely irrelevant here, and its presence does not hinder the CPU’s performance. In GPU-bound tasks like gaming, the GPU becomes the definitive limiting factor. The FPS scaling is constrained by the GPU’s rendering power, which is only slightly better than a GTX 1060. The CPU’s high single-thread score (3741) will prevent it from being a bottleneck, but it cannot compensate for the GPU’s low DirectX 12 score of 59.

In professional GPU-accelerated workloads, the balance is more nuanced. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM allows for large datasets, but its FP32 performance of 11.15 TFLOPS is modest. The CPU will often wait for the GPU to finish compute tasks, but the large memory pool is a unique advantage. The combined percentile rank of 75% reflects this imbalance, indicating that the system is better than most, but held back by the older GPU. A user looking to rebalance the system should prioritize a GPU upgrade, as the CPU has ample headroom to support a much more powerful graphics card without becoming a bottleneck.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14400

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds