SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400

32,115 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

16,504 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14400 pairs a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake design with a 65 W TDP, making it a highly efficient foundation for a desktop build. Its base clock of 2.50 GHz and boost clock of 4.70 GHz, combined with a 20 MB shared L3 cache, deliver strong single-threaded responsiveness and solid multi-threaded throughput. The CPU’s architecture splits the cores into performance and efficiency groups, which is a key reason it achieves a strong balance in mixed workloads. The 10 nm process node and 215 mm² die size indicate a mature design that prioritizes power efficiency over raw transistor density. With support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, this CPU offers flexibility in platform configuration, though the PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes is reserved for the primary graphics card. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a basic display output, but the system’s real graphical capability comes from the discrete GPU. The i5-14400’s benchmark scores place it in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, signaling that it outperforms the majority of processors currently available. In Cinebench R23, it scores 21315 points in multi-core and 3009 points in single-core, which shows a strong preference for multi-threaded tasks while still maintaining excellent per-thread performance. The Geekbench scores of 9807 multi-core and 1905 single-core reinforce this profile. The Passmark suite further breaks down its strengths: integer math scores 82017 and floating-point math scores 61549, indicating robust computational ability for both general and scientific tasks. Data encryption at 16731 and compression at 314995 highlight its efficiency in data handling, while the single-thread score of 3741 confirms its capability for lightly threaded applications. Compared to its nearest rivals, the i5-14400’s average benchmark score of 32115 is virtually identical to the Intel Core i7-12800H, with a delta of 0%. It is 0.1% ahead of the Core i7-13705H and 0.2% ahead of the Core i5-14450HX, while being 0.3% behind the Core i9-11900. These small deltas show that the i5-14400 sits in a highly competitive performance band, where day-to-day differences are negligible. For real workloads, this means the CPU can handle demanding multi-tasking, compile code efficiently, and process large datasets without becoming the limiting factor. The 65 W TDP is remarkable for this performance level, as it allows for quieter cooling solutions and lower system power draw, which is a practical advantage for long-duration workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The data for this exact combination contains no measured FPS rows, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21315 and single-core score of 3009 set a high baseline for processor-bound tasks. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16504 is its sole benchmark entry, and it represents the raw graphics throughput in a modern API. The CPU’s Passmark multi-thread score of 25080 and single-thread score of 3741 further quantify its processing power. The combined percentile for this pairing is 71, which places the whole system above the majority of other desktop configurations. Looking at the GPU’s position, its percentile versus all GPUs is 59, meaning it outperforms nearly six out of ten graphics cards in the database. The CPU, however, sits higher at the 82nd percentile, indicating a notable gap in relative performance between the two components. The nearest rivals to the GPU are the NVIDIA T400 with an average score of 16508 and a delta of 0%, the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 at 16415 with a 0.5% delta, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell at 16408 with a 0.6% delta, and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT at 16361 with a 0.9% delta. These deltas are extremely tight, showing that the RTX 5090 D V2’s measured score is comparable to workstation-oriented cards that have similar raw compute in this specific test. It is important to note that the GPU’s average benchmark score of 16504 is exactly its Steel Nomad score, meaning there is no other data to cross-reference. The combined picture shows a CPU that is a top-quartile performer paired with a GPU that is slightly above average in its single benchmark. This creates an imbalance where the CPU can easily feed the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU’s relative standing suggests it may not be the strongest component in the system. The CPU’s avgBenchmarkScore of 32115 is nearly double the GPU’s 16504, which highlights the disparity in their overall database standing. For practical purposes, the system will excel in CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where the i5-14400’s 16 threads and high multi-core scores shine. The GPU’s performance, while adequate, does not match the CPU’s elite status, so GPU-bound workloads will see less impressive relative performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a significant performance gap between the CPU and GPU, with the CPU ranking at the 82nd percentile and the GPU at the 59th percentile. This suggests that in most workloads, the CPU is capable of driving the GPU to its limits, but the reverse is not true. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21315 and Passmark multi-thread score of 25080 show a processor with substantial headroom for parallel tasks. In contrast, the GPU’s 3DMark score of 16504 is its only data point, and its nearest rivals show it is closely matched with cards like the T400 and RX 5700 XT, which are not top-tier gaming GPUs. This implies that the RTX 5090 D V2 is the limiting factor in high-refresh gaming scenarios, especially at lower resolutions where CPU load is higher. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-core score of 3009 in Cinebench R23 and 3741 in Passmark will likely allow it to maintain high frame rates, but the GPU’s rendering capability will cap the maximum FPS. The CPU’s 82nd percentile versus the GPU’s 59th percentile reinforces that the GPU is the bottleneck for graphics-intensive tasks. However, the CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 575 W TDP create a power consumption imbalance, meaning the GPU demands significantly more power and cooling. In productivity workloads like 3D rendering, the CPU’s multi-core performance will be the primary driver, and the GPU’s role is less critical. The data shows the CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 82017 and floating-point score of 61549 are strong, allowing it to handle complex calculations without stalling. The GPU’s pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s are decent, but they do not place it among the top-tier graphics cards. For balanced performance, the system will perform best in CPU-bound applications like video editing, where the i5-14400’s 16 threads can process multiple streams, and the GPU accelerates effects and encoding. In gaming, the bottleneck will shift depending on the title; CPU-heavy games like strategy or simulation will see the i5-14400 performing well, while GPU-heavy games will be limited by the RTX 5090 D V2’s capability. The combined percentile of 71 reflects this overall balance, showing that the system is above average but not exceptional.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU’s single-core performance is strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3009 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3741, which supports high frame rates in most games. However, the GPU’s performance, as indicated by its 3DMark score of 16504 and 59th percentile, suggests it will be the limiting factor for achieving ultra-high refresh rates at demanding settings. At 1080p, the system can likely push high FPS, but at 1440p or 4K, the GPU will struggle to maintain maximum refresh rates.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads and 20 MB L3 cache provide ample resources for encoding and streaming simultaneously. The Passmark data encryption score of 16731 and data compression score of 314995 indicate the CPU can handle the overhead of streaming software without significant frame drops. The GPU’s dedicated hardware, including 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores, can assist with encoding tasks, but its overall compute is not exceptional.

Video Editing: The CPU’s multi-core performance is excellent for video editing, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21315 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 9807. This allows for smooth timeline scrubbing and fast export times. The GPU’s 24 GB of VRAM is generous for handling large projects and effects, but its raw compute power is not top-tier, so GPU-accelerated effects may not be as fast as with higher-performing cards.

3D Rendering: In CPU-based rendering, the i5-14400 is a strong performer, with a Passmark multi-thread score of 25080 and a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8952. This makes it suitable for tasks like Blender’s Cycles engine or architectural visualization. The GPU’s 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is respectable, but its 59th percentile ranking suggests other GPUs would render faster.

Software Development: The CPU’s high single-thread performance and multi-core capability make it ideal for compiling code and running virtual machines. The Geekbench single-core score of 1905 and multi-core score of 9807 indicate fast build times and responsive development environments. The GPU’s role is minimal in this scenario, and the system’s balance favors CPU-intensive tasks.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a backup display output, but the discrete GPU handles all graphical tasks. For office applications and web browsing, the CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads are overkill, but they ensure smooth multitasking. The system’s 65 W CPU TDP means it runs cool and quiet, making it suitable for a shared workspace.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance for productivity tasks while still having a dedicated GPU for moderate gaming. Content creators who edit video or render 3D scenes will benefit from the CPU’s 16 threads and high multi-core scores, as well as the GPU’s 24 GB of VRAM for handling large assets. Software developers can leverage the CPU’s strong single-thread performance and multi-core throughput for faster builds and test runs. Students and small business users who need a reliable workstation for office tasks, data analysis, and light creative work will find the system capable, though the GPU is not essential for these workloads. Gamers at 1080p will see good performance, but those targeting 1440p or 4K high-refresh gaming will be disappointed by the GPU’s relative standing. The CPU’s 82nd percentile and the GPU’s 59th percentile suggest that this is a productivity-first build. The GPU’s launch MSRP is 2,299 USD, which is a significant investment for a card that does not rank in the top 40% of GPUs. For users who need CUDA acceleration for professional applications, the GPU’s 21760 shading units and 170 RT cores provide compute capability, but the performance is not as strong as other options in its price range. The system is best suited for a single-user workstation where CPU-bound tasks dominate. The 65 W TDP CPU allows for a compact and quiet build, but the 575 W TDP GPU requires substantial cooling, making a large case necessary. The combined percentile of 71 indicates the system is above average, but it is not a high-end gaming rig. For those who play esports titles at 1080p, the system will provide a smooth experience, but for AAA games at high settings, the GPU will be the constraint.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using the GB202 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. The GPU features 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 1.34 TB/s, which is ample for high-resolution textures and large datasets. The core clock runs at 2017 MHz with a boost clock of 2407 MHz, while the memory operates at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed. The GPU has 21760 shading units, 680 TMUs, and 176 ROPs, which contribute to its pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 104.8 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is also 104.8 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, indicating balanced compute for general and AI workloads. The 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS. The GPU supports PCIe 5.0 x16 interface and has a TDP of 575 W, requiring a 950 W suggested PSU and a single 16-pin power connector. The dual-slot design measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, which is a large card that requires a spacious case. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, supporting modern high-resolution monitors. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the GPU scores 16504, which places it at the 59th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA T400 with a score of 16508 and a 0% delta, the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 at 16415 with a 0.5% delta, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell at 16408 with a 0.6% delta, and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT at 16361 with a 0.9% delta. These close scores indicate that the RTX 5090 D V2 performs similarly to professional workstation cards in this specific benchmark, which is surprising given its consumer-oriented name. The GPU’s average benchmark score is also 16504, confirming that this is the only data point. For rendering workloads, the GPU’s high VRAM capacity and bandwidth are beneficial for storing large scenes, but its raw compute is not exceptional. The 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance is decent, but the 59th percentile suggests many other GPUs offer higher performance. The GPU’s transistor density of 122.9M / mm² is high due to the 5 nm process, but this does not translate to superior benchmark results.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. All gaming performance figures below are estimates based on the CPU’s and GPU’s individual benchmark scores. The CPU’s strong single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3009 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3741, suggests it can maintain high frame rates in CPU-bound games. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16504 and its 59th percentile ranking indicate that its gaming capability is moderate. At 1080p resolution, the system should be able to run most games at high settings with good frame rates, as the CPU will not be a bottleneck. The GPU’s 24 GB of VRAM is more than sufficient for 1080p gaming, allowing for high texture quality. At 1440p, the GPU’s performance will be the limiting factor, and frame rates will drop significantly compared to 1080p. The GPU’s pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s are adequate for 1440p but not outstanding. At 4K resolution, the system will struggle to maintain playable frame rates in demanding titles, as the GPU’s compute power is not in the top percentile. For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the CPU’s high single-thread performance will drive very high FPS, but the GPU will still cap the maximum at around 144-240 FPS depending on the game. For AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin’s Creed, the GPU will be the bottleneck, and players will need to lower settings to achieve smooth gameplay. The GPU’s support for ray tracing via its 170 RT cores will help in games that use this feature, but the overall performance will still be limited by its raw compute. The CPU’s 20 MB L3 cache helps reduce memory latency, which is beneficial for gaming. The system’s combined percentile of 71 suggests that it is better than average for gaming, but it is not a high-end gaming rig. The estimates indicate that the system is best suited for 1080p gaming at high settings, with playable performance at 1440p in less demanding games. For users who prioritize gaming, this GPU’s performance is underwhelming given its name, and other GPU options may provide better frame rates.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 has 10 cores and 16 threads, which is a combination of performance and efficiency cores.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32115, which is identical to the Intel Core i7-12800H with a 0% delta. It is 0.1% ahead of the Core i7-13705H and 0.2% ahead of the Core i5-14450HX, while being 0.3% behind the Core i9-11900.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 1.34 TB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is useful for professional workstations that require data integrity.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance percentile?

A: The GPU is at the 59th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it performs better than 59% of graphics cards in the database.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 71, indicating that the system outperforms 71% of all desktop builds.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a launch MSRP of $221, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 2,299 USD.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is compatible with both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing for flexible upgrades. The memory bus is dual-channel, so adding more RAM is straightforward. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the primary graphics card, ensuring future GPUs can utilize the full bandwidth. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU fails or is removed. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, which is low, so upgrading to a higher-TDP CPU in the same socket may require a better cooler. The GPU requires a 575 W TDP and a 950 W suggested PSU, so the power supply must have sufficient headroom. The GPU uses a single 16-pin power connector, which is standard for modern high-end cards. The GPU is a dual-slot design measuring 304 mm in length, so the case must accommodate this size. The CPU’s nearest rivals show that it is at the top of its performance band, so upgrading the CPU to a higher-tier model like an i7 or i9 may not yield significant gains. The GPU’s nearest rivals include workstation cards like the NVIDIA T400 and AMD Radeon PRO W7500, suggesting that the GPU is positioned for professional use. A sensible next upgrade would be to increase system memory to 32 GB or more, as the CPU supports dual-channel DDR5. The PCIe 5.0 interface ensures that the GPU is not bandwidth-limited. The CPU’s low TDP allows for quieter cooling, but the GPU’s high TDP requires robust airflow. The platform supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for data-critical applications. The GPU’s 24 GB of VRAM is ample for future game textures and professional workloads. The CPU’s 10 nm process is mature, and the socket 1700 platform has been widely adopted. The system’s upgrade path is limited by the GPU’s relatively low performance percentile, so replacing the GPU with a higher-performing model would be the most impactful upgrade. The CPU’s performance is sufficient for most tasks, so upgrading the GPU would provide a more balanced system. The 65 W TDP CPU also allows for a smaller power supply if the GPU were upgraded to a lower-TDP model. The PCIe 5.0 slot is future-proof for several generations of GPUs. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives users the choice of upgrading to newer memory technology without changing the motherboard.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14400

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds