SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400

32,115 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

26,331 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400 sits in the Core 14th Gen desktop lineup, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a Raptor Lake-R refresh codename. This is a 10-core, 16-thread processor fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node with a 215 mm² die size. The core configuration combines six performance cores with four efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact core mix. The base clock runs at 2.50 GHz with a boost ceiling of 4.70 GHz, and the chip carries a 65 W TDP, indicating a power-efficient mainstream part rather than an enthusiast-class processor.

The cache hierarchy is substantial for the segment: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 pool. This arrangement benefits workloads that exhibit temporal locality, as the generous L3 cache reduces trips to system memory. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, and ECC memory is supported, which broadens its appeal for workstation-adjacent tasks where data integrity matters. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a fallback display output, though the pairing with a discrete GPU makes this secondary.

Benchmark results place this CPU at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32115. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score reaches 21315, while single-core hits 3009. The R20 results show 8952 multi-core and 1263 single-core, and the older R15 test yields 2148 multi-core and 303 single-core. Geekbench scores are 9807 multi-core and 1905 single-core. These numbers indicate a processor that excels in threaded workloads relative to its power envelope. The PassMark suite reinforces this: multi-thread score of 25080, single-thread of 3741, integer math at 82017, floating-point math at 61549, and extended instructions at 19816. Data compression reaches 314995, while encryption hits 16731, and random string sorting lands at 32346. Physics simulation scores 1396, and prime number finding is 80.

The nearest rivals provide context for positioning. The Intel Core i7-12800H matches almost exactly with an average score of 32121 and a deltaPct of 0. The Core i7-13705H trails by 0.1 percent with 32076, and the Core i5-14450HX is 0.2 percent behind at 32040. The Intel Core i9-11900 leads by 0.3 percent with 32226. This clustering means the i5-14400 is effectively performance-equivalent to a range of mobile and desktop processors from different generations, which speaks to the efficiency of the Raptor Lake refresh design. The 10 nm process, while not the most advanced node, delivers competitive throughput when combined with the high boost clock and substantial cache.

For real workloads, the multi-core scores suggest strong performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation tasks. The single-core scores indicate responsiveness in everyday applications and games that rely on fewer threads. The 82nd percentile ranking means this processor outperforms roughly four out of five CPUs in the database, which is notable for a 65 W part. The data compression and encryption scores are particularly relevant for file archiving and disk encryption workloads. The floating-point and integer math results point to solid scientific computing and financial modeling capabilities, though not at the level of high-core-count workstation chips.

The locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked is false) means overclocking is not an option, but the boost clock of 4.70 GHz is already high enough that manual tuning would yield diminishing returns. The 10-core, 16-thread configuration is a sweet spot for users who need more than six cores for productivity but do not require the full 24-thread count of higher-tier parts. The 65 W TDP allows for modest cooling solutions, and the active production status ensures availability for new builds.

# Benchmark Performance

The GPU side brings a different performance profile. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 sits at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26331. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the score is 3628. Geekbench OpenCL reaches 112787, and Vulkan scores 113321. PassMark results show G3D at 20891, GPU compute at 10899, and G2D at 1154. DirectX tests vary: DirectX 9 scores 225, DirectX 10 scores 127, DirectX 11 scores 200, and DirectX 12 scores 77. These DX scores are likely limited by driver or test methodology, as the G3D and compute numbers are far more representative of actual gaming performance.

The GPU's nearest rivals are instructive. The AMD Radeon 860M scores 26401, which is 0.3 percent higher. The NVIDIA GeForce MX550 scores 26421, also 0.3 percent higher. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26553, 0.8 percent higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 26011, which the RTX 5060 leads by 1.2 percent. This grouping with integrated graphics and lower-tier discrete GPUs is surprising for a 50-series card, but the average score is an aggregate that includes compute and older DirectX tests, which may not reflect modern gaming performance accurately. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3628 is more indicative of current DX12 gaming capability.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 77, which places the overall system above most configurations in the database. The CPU is stronger relative to its peers than the GPU — 82nd versus 72nd percentile — meaning the processor has more headroom than the graphics card in balanced workloads. The data shows a system that can handle CPU-intensive tasks with ease while the GPU handles 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings, though the exact FPS figures are not measured for this combination.

The PassMark GPU compute score of 10899 indicates the card can handle general-purpose compute tasks, which is relevant for content creators using GPU acceleration. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3628 suggests the card is capable of running modern DX12 titles at playable frame rates, though the percentile ranking implies there are faster options available. The deltaPct values against rivals are all within 1.2 percent, showing that performance is tightly clustered in this segment.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14400 compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-12800H?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical — the i5-14400 scores 32115 while the i7-12800H scores 32121, a deltaPct of 0. This means the desktop i5 matches a mobile i7 from a previous generation in overall CPU throughput.

Q: What is the RTX 5060's VRAM capacity and memory type?

A: The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective data rate.

Q: Does the i5-14400 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is uncommon in mainstream desktop processors. This makes it suitable for entry-level workstations where memory error correction is desirable.

Q: What is the RTX 5060's transistor count and die size?

A: The GPU contains 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. This yields a transistor density of 121.0 million transistors per mm².

Q: How does the RTX 5060 compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT in average benchmark score?

A: The RTX 5060 scores 26331, which is 1.2 percent higher than the RX 6750 XT's score of 26011. This is the only rival that the RTX 5060 leads among its nearest competitors.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and TDP?

A: The i5-14400 boosts to 4.70 GHz from a base of 2.50 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. This makes it a low-power, high-clocking processor suitable for compact builds.

Q: Does the RTX 5060 support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14400 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is shared across 12th, 13th, and 14th generation Core processors. This socket supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory based on budget and availability. The dual-channel memory bus is standard for the platform. The CPU provides Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes from the processor, which means the primary graphics card slot can run at PCIe 5.0 speeds. The RTX 5060 uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, which is compatible with the CPU's 16 lanes and will run at x8 speed, though the bandwidth is more than sufficient for the GPU's 8 GB frame buffer and 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth.

The RTX 5060 has a TDP of 145 W and a suggested PSU rating of 300 W. When combined with the CPU's 65 W TDP, the total system power draw is modest, allowing for a wide range of power supply options. The GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector, which is universally supported by modern PSUs. The card is dual-slot in width, measuring 241 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, making it compatible with most mid-tower and even some compact cases. The display outputs include one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b connectors, supporting multi-monitor setups.

For a sensible next upgrade, the socket 1700 platform has reached the end of its generational support with 14th Gen, so upgrading the CPU further would require a motherboard change to a newer socket. However, the i5-14400's performance at the 82nd percentile means it has plenty of headroom. A more meaningful upgrade path would be increasing memory capacity or speed, as the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5, though the FACT PACK does not specify maximum supported speeds. The GPU could be upgraded to a higher-tier card in the future, but the 300 W suggested PSU would need to be reconsidered, as higher-end GPUs typically require more power. The 65 W CPU TDP means there is significant PSU headroom before reaching typical 500-600 W power supplies, so the current configuration is well-balanced for its class.

The 1x 8-pin power connector on the GPU is a limiting factor for future overclocking or power delivery, but the card's 145 W TDP is well within the connector's rated capacity. The PCIe 5.0 interface ensures the GPU is not bandwidth-limited, and the 16 CPU lanes provide room for additional Gen 5 devices, such as NVMe SSDs, without bottlenecking the graphics card.

# Who Should Build It

The Intel Core i5-14400 + RTX 5060 combination targets users who need strong CPU performance for productivity tasks and solid GPU performance for gaming at mainstream resolutions. Gamers playing at 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rates will benefit from the CPU's strong single-core score of 3009 in Cinebench R23 and 3741 in PassMark single-thread tests, which drive high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3628 indicates it can handle modern DX12 games, though the 8 GB VRAM may be a limitation at higher resolutions with heavy textures.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU's multi-core scores compelling. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21315 and PassMark multi-thread score of 25080 indicate strong performance in applications that leverage all 16 threads. The GPU's compute capability, evidenced by the PassMark GPU compute score of 10899 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 112787, accelerates rendering and encoding tasks. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running workloads.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's compilation performance, supported by the PassMark integer math score of 82017 and data compression score of 314995. The 10-core, 16-thread configuration handles parallel builds efficiently, and the 65 W TDP keeps power costs low for always-on development machines. Students and small business users building workstations will benefit from the platform's memory flexibility (DDR4 or DDR5) and the integrated UHD Graphics 730 as a backup, should the discrete GPU fail or be removed for troubleshooting.

The 82nd CPU percentile and 72nd GPU percentile place this build in the upper-midrange tier. It is not a top-tier enthusiast system, but it outperforms the majority of existing systems. The RTX 5060's 8 GB GDDR7 memory, while smaller than some rivals, is fast, and the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures data moves quickly. The 5 nm process node and 21,900 million transistors suggest the GPU is architecturally modern, even if the memory capacity is conservative.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB206 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. The die contains 21,900 million transistors across 181 mm², yielding a high transistor density of 121.0 million per mm². The GPU features 3840 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. Ray tracing is handled by 30 RT cores, while AI workloads are accelerated by 120 tensor cores. The clock speeds are 2280 MHz base and 2497 MHz boost, with memory running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem uses 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a notable configuration: the bandwidth per byte of VRAM is high relative to the capacity, which suggests the card is designed for 1080p and 1440p gaming where 8 GB is sufficient. The pixel rate is 119.9 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 299.6 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill-rate capabilities for resolutions up to 1440p. The FP32 compute is 19.18 TFLOPS, with FP16 running at the same rate (1:1), which is unusual and indicates the card does not have dedicated FP16 acceleration.

The benchmark scores paint a mixed picture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3628 is the most representative of modern gaming performance, and it places the card in the 72nd percentile. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 112787 and Vulkan score of 113321 are strong, suggesting good compute and API-level performance. The PassMark G3D score of 20891 is respectable, while the GPU compute score of 10899 is moderate. The older DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12 scores (225, 127, 200, and 77 respectively) are low, but these are likely legacy tests that do not reflect the card's actual capability in modern titles.

The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 860M and NVIDIA GeForce MX550, both of which score slightly higher on average (26401 and 26421, respectively). However, these are integrated and entry-level discrete GPUs, respectively, so the RTX 5060's performance is comparable to lower-tier parts in aggregate benchmarks. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26553, 0.8 percent higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 26011, 1.2 percent lower. This clustering suggests the RTX 5060 is positioned at the boundary between mid-range and entry-level performance in the database's scoring methodology.

For rendering workloads, the 30 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which will improve lighting and shadow effects in supported games. The 120 tensor cores enable DLSS and other AI-based features, though the FACT PACK does not specify which DLSS version is supported. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p textures, but users aiming for 4K with high-resolution texture packs may need to reduce settings. The 128-bit memory bus is a limiting factor for bandwidth-hungry workloads, but the GDDR7 memory's high effective speed compensates to some degree.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's 82nd percentile and the GPU's 72nd percentile indicate that the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers. In balanced workloads, the CPU will not be the limiting factor; instead, the GPU will cap frame rates in games. The CPU's single-core score of 3009 in Cinebench R23 and 3741 in PassMark single-thread ensure that even at high frame rates, the processor can feed the GPU with draw calls and physics calculations. The multi-core score of 21315 in Cinebench R23 means that in CPU-intensive scenarios such as large-scale strategy games or simulation titles, the processor has ample headroom.

The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus are the most likely bottlenecks in this system. At 1080p, the 8 GB capacity is typically sufficient, but at 1440p with ultra settings, some games may exceed this limit, causing texture streaming issues. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for the card's compute capability, but it is lower than what higher-tier cards offer. The PassMark GPU compute score of 10899 is lower than the CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 25080, suggesting that in compute-heavy workloads, the CPU could outperform the GPU, which is unusual but not problematic for gaming.

The FPS scaling evidence is not available as measured data, but the benchmark scores imply that the GPU will be the bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. The CPU can support frame rates well above what the GPU can deliver, so the system will be GPU-limited at 1080p and 1440p. In productivity tasks that use the CPU heavily, the GPU will be idle or lightly loaded, and the CPU's performance will be the determining factor. In GPU-accelerated rendering, the RTX 5060's 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 compute will be the primary driver, and the CPU will wait on the GPU.

The combined percentile of 77 suggests that the pairing is well-matched overall, but the delta between CPU and GPU percentiles (10 points) indicates a slight imbalance. This is not a problem in practice, as the CPU's extra headroom allows for future GPU upgrades without needing to replace the processor. The 65 W CPU TDP and 145 W GPU TDP mean the system is power-efficient, and the 300 W suggested PSU provides enough headroom for both components at full load.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-14400 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake processor from the Core 14th Gen series, running at 2.50 GHz base and 4.70 GHz boost with a 65 W TDP. The GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture card with 8 GB of GDDR7 memory, 3840 shading units, and a 145 W TDP. The combined percentile of 77 places this system above the majority of configurations in the database, with the CPU at the 82nd percentile and the GPU at the 72nd percentile.

The system's overall tier is upper-midrange. The CPU's average benchmark score of 32115 is competitive with mobile i7 processors and older desktop i9 parts, as shown by the nearest rivals. The GPU's average score of 26331 is comparable to mid-range cards like the RX 6750 XT, though the aggregate score may understate gaming performance. The CPU is the stronger component, providing a solid foundation for productivity tasks while the GPU handles gaming at mainstream resolutions.

This pairing is suitable for a balanced desktop that can handle both work and play. The 10-core CPU handles multi-threaded workloads efficiently, while the GPU's 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores bring modern graphics features to games. The 8 GB VRAM is a limitation for future-proofing at higher resolutions, but for a 1080p or 1440p build, this is a reasonable trade-off. The system's power requirements are modest, allowing for compact builds with lower-capacity PSUs.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS discussion is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximate rather than empirical results.

The CPU's strong single-core performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3009 and PassMark single-thread score of 3741, suggests that the i5-14400 can sustain high frame rates in CPU-bound games. The 4.70 GHz boost clock and 20 MB L3 cache support this, as modern game engines benefit from high clock speeds and large caches. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3628 indicates the RTX 5060 can run DX12 titles at playable frame rates, but the 72nd percentile ranking places it below many dedicated gaming GPUs.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the system is likely GPU-bound in most titles. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures, and the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth allows for smooth texture streaming. Frame rates in esports titles such as competitive shooters will be high, driven by the CPU's single-thread capability. In AAA games, the GPU will limit performance to roughly mid-range levels, with the 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 compute providing enough raw power for 60+ FPS in most titles, though demanding games may see drops below that threshold.

At 1440p, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck, as the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus will struggle with larger textures and higher resolutions. Frame rates will be lower than at 1080p, but the card's pixel rate of 119.9 GPixel/s and texture rate of 299.6 GTexel/s suggest it can maintain playable performance in less demanding titles. The CPU's headroom means there is no processor-induced stuttering, and the system will deliver consistent frame pacing as long as the GPU can keep up.

Ray tracing performance is supported by the 30 RT cores, but the card is not a top-tier ray tracing solution. At 1080p, some ray-traced effects may be enabled at lower settings, while at 1440p, users may need to disable RT to maintain frame rates. DLSS, enabled by the 120 tensor cores, can help recover performance, but the FACT PACK does not specify the DLSS version.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core score of 3741 in PassMark supports high frame rates in competitive titles, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3628 provides enough rendering power for 1080p high-refresh displays, though 8 GB VRAM may limit texture quality at higher resolutions.

Streaming: The 10-core CPU with a 25080 PassMark multi-thread score can handle game capture and encoding simultaneously, while the GPU's NVENC (implied by the NVIDIA architecture) offloads encoding, though the FACT PACK does not specify NVENC capabilities directly.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21315 accelerates timeline rendering and export, while the GPU's compute score of 10899 and 8 GB VRAM handle effects and color grading, making this a capable system for 1080p and light 1440p editing.

3D rendering: The CPU's 16 threads will handle CPU-based rendering, and the GPU's 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerates GPU-based renderers, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity in GPU-rendered projects.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 82017 and data compression score of 314995 indicate strong compilation and version-control performance, while the 65 W TDP keeps power costs low for development workstations.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core performance and UHD Graphics 730 fallback make this system responsive for productivity applications, while the GPU provides acceleration for any graphics tasks, though it is overkill for basic office workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14400

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds