SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400

32,115 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

21,035 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 form a desktop pairing that lands in the 74th percentile of all combined hardware configurations. The data shows a system with strong single-threaded leadership and solid multi-threaded capability, paired with a GPU that delivers modern features but sits near the middle of the performance pack. The result is a balanced machine for 1080p gaming and everyday productivity, though its limitations in multi-core rendering and GPU compute are clearly defined by the benchmark numbers.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance ceiling of this build is determined by the GPU in most gaming scenarios, while the CPU takes the lead in productivity and lightly-threaded tasks. The RTX 5050 scores a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 2502, placing it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. In contrast, the i5-14400 achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21315 and a single-core score of 3009, with the CPU landing in the 82nd percentile of all processors. This 16-percentage-point gap in percentiles indicates that the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, making it the less likely bottleneck in most workloads.

For gaming at high frame rates, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The RTX 5050’s PassMark G3D score of 17326 and its DirectX 12 score of 66 suggest it can handle modern titles at 1080p, but it will struggle to maintain very high frame rates in demanding scenes. The CPU, with its Geekbench single-core score of 1905 and PassMark single-thread score of 3741, is more than capable of feeding the GPU data quickly, so frame drops from CPU stalls are unlikely. The bottleneck shifts to the GPU when resolutions increase or graphical settings are raised, as the 8 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth become limiting factors.

In productivity tasks, the balance flips. The CPU’s multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a PassMark multithread score of 25080 and Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8952, carries the load in video encoding and 3D rendering. The GPU’s compute capability, measured by a PassMark GPU compute score of 9184, is modest and will not accelerate all rendering tasks significantly. For tasks like data compression (PassMark score 314995) or integer math (PassMark score 82017), the CPU is the clear workhorse, and the GPU will remain largely idle.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility is a key advantage, allowing builders to reuse existing DDR4 modules or move to DDR5 for higher bandwidth, though the memory bandwidth figure is not specified in the data. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor, providing ample bandwidth for high-speed storage and expansion cards. The RTX 5050 uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s lanes, and the data indicates the system is designed around this configuration.

The CPU’s 65 W TDP is low for a desktop part, and the GPU’s 130 W TDP is similarly modest. The suggested PSU for the system is 300 W, which leaves headroom for a more powerful GPU in the future without a full platform overhaul. The RTX 5050 requires a single 8-pin power connector, and its dual-slot design fits most standard cases. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU within the same 300 W power envelope, as the CPU’s 82nd percentile ranking suggests it has the headroom to support a faster graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. The motherboard’s support for DDR5 is the primary platform limitation, as upgrading to a newer CPU generation would require a new socket.

Benchmark Performance

The overall picture is defined by a CPU that outperforms its direct rivals by a small margin and a GPU that sits in the middle of the pack. The i5-14400’s average benchmark score is 32115, placing it essentially tied with the Intel Core i7-12800H (score 32121, delta 0%), the Intel Core i7-13705H (score 32076, delta 0.1%), and the Intel Core i5-14450HX (score 32040, delta 0.2%). It is slightly ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900 (score 32226, delta -0.3%). This tight grouping shows the i5-14400 is a well-optimized part that matches or slightly beats last-generation high-end mobile and desktop chips in overall throughput.

The RTX 5050’s average benchmark score is 21035, with its nearest rival being the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (score 21153, delta -0.6%). It performs within 1% of the AMD Radeon HD 8970M (score 21237, delta -1%) and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (score 21379, delta -1.6%), while leading the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT by 1.6% (score 20713). These deltas are tiny, indicating the RTX 5050 is a mid-tier GPU that trades blows with older high-end parts rather than establishing a clear lead. In real terms, the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2502 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 89381 show it can run modern DirectX 12 and Vulkan titles, but its PassMark DirectX 11 score of 150 and DirectX 10 score of 103 suggest weaker performance in older APIs.

Who Should Build It

This build targets the mainstream 1080p gamer who wants modern features without paying a premium for high refresh rates at higher resolutions. The CPU’s single-core performance, reflected in its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3009, ensures smooth gameplay in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU’s 66th percentile ranking is sufficient for 1080p ultra settings in most games. Content creators who work with video editing or photo processing will benefit from the CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads, which deliver a PassMark multithread score of 25080, but they should be aware that GPU-accelerated rendering will not be a strong point.

Software developers and students will find the platform appealing due to its memory flexibility and low power draw. The CPU’s support for ECC memory is a noteworthy feature for workstation tasks where data integrity is critical. Small business workstations that run office applications and light database work will see excellent responsiveness from the single-threaded performance, but heavy 3D rendering or machine learning workloads are not this system’s forte. The 74th combined percentile indicates a system that is better than the average PC but not a high-end workstation or enthusiast gaming rig.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400 is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that makes it easy to cool. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. The 10 nm process node and 215 mm² die size are typical for this generation, and the integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a basic display output for systems without a dedicated GPU.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in single-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3009 and Geekbench single-core score of 1905 place it in the top tier for everyday responsiveness. Multi-threaded performance is strong but not exceptional, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21315 and PassMark multithread score of 25080 indicating it can handle moderate rendering workloads. The PassMark results for specific tasks reveal its character: integer math (82017) and floating-point math (61549) are robust, while find prime numbers (80) and random string sorting (32346) are lower, suggesting it is better suited for general productivity than for specialized scientific computing. The data encryption score of 16731 and extended instructions score of 19816 show it handles security and modern instruction sets competently.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core i5-14400 with the RTX 5050 combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, so all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2502 and its PassMark G3D score of 17326, the RTX 5050 is positioned for 1080p gaming. In less demanding esports titles, the GPU’s strong single-threaded CPU partner should allow frame rates well above 100 FPS, as the CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3741 ensures minimal frame time variance. For AAA games with high graphical fidelity, the 8 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the limiting factor, with estimated average frame rates around 60 FPS at 1080p ultra settings. The GPU’s DirectX 12 score of 66 is lower than its DirectX 11 score of 150, which suggests that newer API titles may not scale as well as older ones.

At 1440p, the GPU’s 66th percentile ranking indicates that settings will need to be lowered to maintain playable frame rates, with estimates falling to 40-50 FPS in demanding titles. The CPU will not be the bottleneck at any resolution, as its 82nd percentile ranking provides ample headroom. The lack of measured FPS data means these figures are speculative, but the benchmark scores paint a consistent picture of a GPU that is competent for mainstream gaming but not designed for high-refresh 1440p or 4K. The RTX 5050’s support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 ensures it can run modern games, but the performance will be modest.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU’s single-core prowess (Cinebench R23 score 3009) keeps frame times low, but the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2502 caps performance. This system can hit 100+ FPS in esports titles at 1080p, but high-refresh 1440p is beyond its reach.

Streaming: The 10-core CPU with a PassMark multithread score of 25080 can handle software encoding for a single stream while gaming, but the GPU’s modest compute score (PassMark GPU compute 9184) means hardware encoding will be the better choice for quality and performance.

Video Editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21315 accelerates timeline rendering and export, while the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p editing but will struggle with 4K multi-layer timelines.

3D Rendering: The CPU is the primary renderer here, with a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2148 and R20 score of 8952. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 13.17 TFLOPS is sufficient for real-time viewport previews, but final renders will rely almost entirely on the CPU.

Software Development: The CPU’s Geekbench single-core score of 1905 ensures snappy compilation for small projects, while the 16 threads handle parallel builds. The platform’s DDR4/DDR5 support offers flexibility for large memory configurations.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3741 makes everyday tasks like web browsing and document editing feel instant. The low 65 W TDP keeps the system quiet and cool, and the integrated graphics provide a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14400 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU lists ECC memory support as a feature, which is unusual for a mainstream desktop processor and beneficial for workstation stability.

Q: What is the memory configuration for this CPU?

A: It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders the choice between older cheaper modules or newer higher-bandwidth ones.

Q: How does the RTX 5050 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT?

A: The RTX 5050 has an average benchmark score of 21035, which is 1.6% higher than the RX 5600 XT’s score of 20713. This is a small margin that does not guarantee a significant real-world performance difference.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 130 W. The suggested PSU for the system is 300 W, which provides a reasonable amount of headroom.

Q: Does the RTX 5050 support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 20 RT cores, and its architecture is Blackwell 2.0. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2502 indicates it can handle ray-traced effects, but performance will be limited.

Q: What is the PCIe interface for the RTX 5050?

A: The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, which is compatible with the CPU’s 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. This provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has a shared 20 MB L3 cache, which is a key factor in its strong multi-threaded performance scores.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using the GB207 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 16,900 million transistors. The die size is 149 mm², and the transistor density of 113.4M per mm² is high, reflecting the modern process node. The GPU has 2560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores for ray tracing and AI workloads. The base clock is 2317 MHz with a boost clock of 2572 MHz, and the memory runs at 2500 MHz effective 20 Gbps.

The 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus delivers 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a moderate figure that will be the bottleneck in high-resolution textures. The pixel rate of 82.30 GPixel/s and texture rate of 205.8 GTexel/s indicate it can fill frames quickly at 1080p, but the FP32 performance of 13.17 TFLOPS is modest for compute-heavy tasks. Benchmark results show a GPU that is stronger in older APIs, with PassMark DirectX 11 score of 150 and DirectX 9 score of 186, but weaker in newer ones, with DirectX 12 score of 66. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2502 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 89381 confirm it can run modern games, but the 66th percentile ranking shows it is not a high-performance part.

For rendering workloads, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures but will limit 4K texture packs. The tensor cores support DLSS and other AI features, but the 80 tensor cores are a lower count than higher-tier Blackwell parts. The GPU’s power draw of 130 W and 300 W suggested PSU make it a reasonable fit for small form factor builds, and its dual-slot design with one 8-pin connector simplifies installation. The display outputs include one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b, supporting modern monitors. Overall, the RTX 5050 is a competent entry-level to mid-range GPU that delivers solid 1080p performance and modern feature support, but it does not offer the raw compute power needed for demanding rendering or high-refresh 1440p gaming.