SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400

32,115 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

60,347 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400 sits in the Core 14th Gen family, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node from Intel. This desktop processor packs 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz that boosts up to 4.70 GHz. The 65 W TDP places it in an efficiency-focused tier, yet the core configuration tells a story of hybrid capability — the combination of performance and efficiency cores allows it to handle both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded workloads without the power draw of higher-end parts.

The cache hierarchy is substantial for a mainstream chip: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 pool. This cache design directly influences benchmark behavior, particularly in workloads that benefit from rapid data reuse. The die size of 215 mm² is modest by modern standards, but the architecture extracts strong performance from that area.

Looking at the benchmark scores, the multi-core results reveal a processor that punches above its mainstream positioning. In Cinebench R23, the i5-14400 scores 21,315 points multi-core and 3,009 single-core. The R20 results show 8,952 multi-core and 1,263 single-core, while R15 lands at 2,148 and 303 respectively. These numbers indicate a CPU that is roughly 7x stronger in multi-threaded work compared to single-threaded tasks, which is typical for a 10-core part but the absolute figures are what matter.

The Geekbench scores of 9,807 multi-core and 1,905 single-core reinforce this picture. The PassMark suite adds color: multithread score of 25,080, single-thread of 3,741, integer math at 82,017, floating-point math at 61,549, and extended instructions at 19,816. Data compression hits 314,995 and encryption reaches 16,731. These are not top-tier numbers in absolute terms, but the percentileVsAllCpus of 82 means this chip outperforms 82% of all CPUs in the database — a strong result for a 65 W part.

The nearest rivals show how tightly clustered this segment is. The Intel Core i7-12800H averages 32,121, a delta of 0% from the i5-14400's 32,115 average benchmark score. The i7-13705H is 0.1% ahead, and the i5-14450HX is 0.2% ahead. The Intel Core i9-11900 is 0.3% behind. This tells a clear story: the i5-14400 performs essentially identically to a last-generation i7 mobile chip and a desktop i9 from an older generation. For a 14th-gen i5, that is remarkable efficiency of design — it delivers near-flagship performance from previous generations while consuming far less power.

For real workloads, the 20 MB L3 cache and 10-core layout mean compiling code, running virtual machines, or processing large spreadsheet calculations will all benefit from the multi-threaded throughput. The single-core performance, while not class-leading, is strong enough for responsive application behavior and older games that rely on one or two threads.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score stands at 32,115, placing it in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs. The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, carries an average benchmark score of 60,347, sitting in the 88th percentile among all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 85, meaning this pairing outperforms 85% of all desktop combinations in the database.

The RTX 4090's benchmark results are nothing short of dominant. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 9,223. Geekbench OpenCL reaches 255,416 and Vulkan hits 271,631. The PassMark suite shows a G3D score of 38,194 and GPU compute of 26,613. DirectX 11 scores 326, DirectX 12 scores 150, and DirectX 10 scores 224 — these lower DirectX scores are typical for modern GPUs that excel in newer API workloads. The G2D score of 1,299 indicates strong 2D acceleration for desktop compositing.

The GPU's nearest rivals are curious company. The Intel Arc Pro A60 matches at 60,326 with a 0% delta. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 is 0.3% ahead, and the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M is 2.5% ahead. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 trails by 2.9%. These are professional workstation cards, not gaming GPUs, yet the RTX 4090 sits in their performance band on average benchmark score. This is because the averaging across many test types dilutes the 4090's gaming dominance — in raw rasterization and ray tracing, the gap would be far wider. The data suggests that average scores can be misleading for GPUs with specialized strengths.

The combined picture is one of extreme asymmetry. The CPU is good, sitting at the 82nd percentile, but the GPU is exceptional, sitting at the 88th percentile. When paired, the system's 85th percentile ranking reflects the GPU pulling the average upward. In gaming, this asymmetry matters — the GPU can render frames faster than the CPU can feed it in many scenarios.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform provides a clear upgrade path. The i5-14400 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility on memory choice. ECC memory support is present, which is unusual for a consumer chip and valuable for workstation reliability. The PCIe implementation includes Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast NVMe storage and future GPU bandwidth headroom, though the RTX 4090 itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a fallback display output and hardware video decoding, useful for troubleshooting or office tasks when the discrete GPU is idle. The CPU's 65 W TDP is modest, but the RTX 4090 demands far more. The GPU's TDP is 450 W, and the suggested PSU is 850 W. This means a builder needs a substantial power supply, but the CPU's low draw leaves plenty of headroom for the GPU under full load.

A sensible next upgrade on this platform would be a higher-core-count Raptor Lake part, though the data shows the i5-14400 already performs within 0.3% of an Intel Core i9-11900. The real bottleneck in this system is not the CPU — it is the GPU's immense capability relative to the CPU's output. For a pure gaming build, the i5-14400 is sufficient. For content creation workloads that scale with cores, a 14th-gen i7 or i9 would extract more from the RTX 4090 in CPU-bound tasks.

The power connector situation is notable: the RTX 4090 uses a single 16-pin connector, which simplifies cabling compared to multi-connector designs. The triple-slot cooler measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 61 mm in width, so case compatibility must be verified. The 850 W suggested PSU is non-negotiable for stable operation under sustained loads.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14400 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-14400 has an average benchmark score of 32,115, matching the Intel Core i7-12800H at 0% delta. The i7-13705H is 0.1% faster, the i5-14450HX is 0.2% faster, and the Intel Core i9-11900 is 0.3% slower. This places the i5-14400 in a tight performance cluster.

Q: What is the RTX 4090's benchmark percentile and what does it mean?

A: The RTX 4090 sits in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60,347. This means it outperforms 88% of GPUs in the database, which is exceptional for a consumer card.

Q: Does the i5-14400 bottleneck the RTX 4090?

A: The data suggests potential bottlenecking in CPU-bound scenarios. The CPU is at the 82nd percentile while the GPU is at the 88th. In gaming at lower resolutions or high frame rates, the CPU's single-thread performance of 3,009 in Cinebench R23 could limit the GPU's output.

Q: What memory types does this platform support?

A: The i5-14400 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is rare for consumer platforms and beneficial for data integrity in workstation tasks.

Q: What power supply is required for this build?

A: The suggested PSU wattage is 850 W. The CPU has a 65 W TDP and the GPU has a 450 W TDP, so the power supply must handle the GPU's demands plus system overhead.

Q: Is the RTX 4090 still in production?

A: No, the RTX 4090 has a production status of end-of-life, with a release date of 2022-09-19. Its successor is the GeForce 50 series, and its predecessor is the GeForce 30 series.

Q: What is the CPU's PCIe capability?

A: The i5-14400 provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The RTX 4090 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so the CPU's PCIe 5.0 support offers headroom for future devices.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the i5-14400 and RTX 4090 is heavily skewed toward the GPU. The GPU's 88th percentile ranking versus the CPU's 82nd percentile means the graphics card is the stronger component by a meaningful margin. In games that are GPU-bound at high resolutions, this is fine — the CPU will keep up. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as esports titles at low settings or simulation games with heavy AI, the i5-14400 could become the limiting factor.

The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,009 suggests the CPU can drive high frame rates, but the RTX 4090 is capable of frame rates that exceed what most CPUs can feed. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,741 confirms solid per-core performance, yet the gap between CPU and GPU percentiles is the key evidence. When a component sits 6 percentile points below its partner, that component will cap the system's maximum output in workloads that depend on it.

The lack of measured FPS data for this pairing means precise bottleneck analysis is impossible from the FACT PACK. However, the benchmark scores provide indirect evidence. The GPU's massive FP32 throughput of 82.58 TFLOPS and texture rate of 1,290.2 GTexel/s indicate it can produce frames far faster than a 10-core CPU can process game logic. The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 314,995 shows strong integer throughput, which helps in physics calculations, but the sheer volume of draw calls and game logic at high frame rates will strain the CPU first.

For creators, the balance is different. In video editing or 3D rendering, both components matter. The CPU's multi-core score of 21,315 in Cinebench R23 handles encoding and simulation, while the GPU's 3DMark score of 9,223 accelerates rendering. Here, the pairing is more balanced because workloads can leverage both simultaneously.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1080p or 1440p will be CPU-limited in many titles. The RTX 4090 can output frame rates well beyond what the i5-14400 can support in CPU-bound scenarios, so expect the CPU to be the bottleneck. At 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor and the pairing is more balanced.

Streaming while gaming benefits from the CPU's 16 threads and the GPU's NVENC encoder. The i5-14400 can handle game logic and encoding simultaneously, though the 65 W TDP means thermal headroom is limited. The GPU's tensor cores offload AI tasks, but the CPU must still manage the stream.

Video editing in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve uses both components. The CPU's multi-core score of 21,315 in Cinebench R23 accelerates timeline scrubbing and export encoding, while the GPU's 24 GB of VRAM and 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 speed up effects and color grading. This is a strong pairing for 4K or 8K video work.

3D rendering in Blender or Maya leverages the GPU's 16,384 shading units and 128 RT cores. The CPU's 10 cores handle scene preparation and physics simulation, but the GPU dominates the actual rendering. The 24 GB GDDR6X memory with 1.01 TB/s bandwidth handles large scenes without swapping.

Software development benefits from the CPU's multi-threaded performance. Compilation tasks use all 16 threads, and the PassMark integer math score of 82,017 indicates strong code processing. The GPU is largely idle during development, but the system's overall responsiveness is excellent.

Student and office work is overkill for this pairing. The i5-14400 alone is more than sufficient for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The RTX 4090's 450 W TDP means high electricity draw even at idle, making this a poor choice for purely productivity-focused users.

# Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 4K resolution with maximum settings are the primary audience. The RTX 4090's 88th percentile ranking ensures ultra-quality gameplay, while the i5-14400 provides adequate CPU performance for most titles. At 1440p with high refresh rates, the CPU may hold back the GPU in some games, so this pairing is best suited for 4K or high-fidelity single-player experiences.

Content creators working with video, 3D rendering, or large datasets will benefit from the combination. The CPU's 16 threads and 20 MB L3 cache handle multi-tasking, while the GPU's 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth accelerate GPU-accelerated workflows. The ECC memory support on the CPU adds reliability for long render jobs.

Developers building large codebases will appreciate the multi-threaded compile times. The PassMark multithread score of 25,080 shows strong parallel processing, and the system's overall responsiveness during builds is excellent. The GPU is unnecessary for most development but useful for game development or machine learning experimentation.

Students in engineering, data science, or creative fields will find this system capable of any coursework, though it is far more powerful than needed. Small business workstations running CAD, financial modeling, or video production will benefit from the GPU's compute power and the CPU's efficiency. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power costs down during idle, which offsets the GPU's draw.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-14400 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. The combined percentile of 85 places this system above 85% of all desktop combinations in the database. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake part with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace flagship with a 450 W TDP and 24 GB of GDDR6X memory.

The class is desktop, meaning this is a fixed workstation or gaming tower rather than a laptop. The tier is high-end, evidenced by the GPU's 88th percentile and the CPU's 82nd percentile. This is a system built for maximum graphical fidelity and substantial computational throughput, with the CPU serving as a capable but not class-leading partner to the GPU.

The asymmetry between components is the defining characteristic. The RTX 4090 is an end-of-life flagship that outperforms 88% of GPUs, while the i5-14400 is a mainstream chip that outperforms 82% of CPUs. This means the system's overall capability is closer to the GPU's tier than the CPU's, but the CPU will occasionally limit the GPU's full potential in CPU-bound tasks.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process. The AD102 chip contains 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 125.3 million per mm². The base clock runs at 2235 MHz with a boost clock of 2520 MHz, while the memory clock operates at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed.

The memory subsystem is massive: 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth. This is the highest bandwidth figure in the FACT PACK for any GPU, enabling high-resolution textures and large compute workloads without memory bottlenecks. The 16,384 shading units, 512 TMUs, and 176 ROPs provide the raw rasterization throughput, while 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores handle ray tracing and AI workloads.

The compute output is staggering. FP32 performance reaches 82.58 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 82.58 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 443.5 GPixel/s and texture rate is 1,290.2 GTexel/s. These numbers mean the GPU can fill screens and apply textures faster than any display can show, making it suitable for extreme resolutions and high refresh rates.

The benchmark results confirm this capability. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9,223 is a strong indicator of modern API performance. Geekbench Vulkan at 271,631 and OpenCL at 255,416 show compute versatility. The PassMark G3D score of 38,194 places it well above average, while GPU compute at 26,613 handles non-graphics tasks.

The nearest rivals are professional workstation GPUs, which is telling. The Intel Arc Pro A60 matches the average score, but the 4090's gaming and ray tracing performance is likely far superior. The 88th percentile ranking means only 12% of GPUs score higher, and those are likely enterprise or multi-GPU configurations. For a single consumer GPU, this is the top tier.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All frame rate discussion is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 88th percentile and the CPU's 82nd percentile provide the basis for these estimates.

The RTX 4090's raw specifications suggest it can exceed 100 FPS at 4K ultra settings in most games. The 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth are sufficient for any current title. The CPU's single-core score of 3,009 in Cinebench R23 indicates it can drive frame rates above 100 FPS in most games, but at the extremely high frame rates the 4090 is capable of (200+ FPS in esports titles), the CPU will likely cap performance.

At 1080p, the CPU is almost certainly the bottleneck. The GPU can render frames faster than the CPU can process game logic, leading to CPU-bound scenarios where frame rates plateau regardless of GPU load. At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU, but CPU limitations may still appear in poorly optimized titles. At 4K, the GPU is the primary driver, and the pairing is well-balanced.

For ray tracing, the 128 RT cores provide hardware acceleration, and the 512 tensor cores handle DLSS upscaling. The 24 GB VRAM ensures high-resolution texture packs and ray-traced effects fit without compression. The estimated gaming experience is excellent at 4K, very good at 1440p, and CPU-limited at 1080p. These are estimates, not measured results, but the benchmark data strongly supports this conclusion.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14400

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds