SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400

32,115 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

44,795 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti form a desktop pairing that targets high-performance 1440p gaming and serious content creation. The CPU, a 10-core Raptor Lake part, sits at the 82nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU, an Ada Lovelace design, ranks at the 84th percentile among all graphics cards. This places both components in the upper tier of their respective categories, with the combined system achieving an 83rd percentile ranking. The data indicates a balanced platform where neither component dramatically overshadows the other, though the processor’s performance profile will dictate outcomes in CPU-bound tasks while the graphics card will dominate GPU-accelerated workloads. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the data, so all gaming discussion is framed as estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Core i5-14400 uses Intel’s Raptor Lake architecture, built on a 10 nm process. It features 10 cores and 16 threads, a configuration that provides a strong base for both gaming and productivity. The base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, which the benchmark results show delivers robust single-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 3009 points in the single-core test and 21315 points in the multi-core test. The single-core score is particularly notable because it drives responsiveness in everyday tasks and gaming, where many engines still rely heavily on one or two threads. The multi-core score, meanwhile, reflects the ability of the 10-core design to handle parallel workloads like video encoding and 3D rendering.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 pool helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing latency in memory-sensitive applications. The Geekbench scores of 1905 single-core and 9807 multi-core further corroborate the Cinebench results, showing consistent performance across different benchmarking methodologies. In PassMark tests, the CPU achieves 3741 in single-thread performance and 25080 in multithreaded performance. The integer math score of 82017 and floating-point math score of 61549 indicate strong arithmetic throughput, which benefits scientific computing and financial modeling.

Looking at the nearest rivals, the data shows the i5-14400 sits within a narrow performance band. The Intel Core i7-12800H has an average score of 32121 with a 0% delta, meaning the two are statistically tied. The Core i7-13705H is 0.1% ahead, and the Core i5-14450HX is 0.2% ahead. The Intel Core i9-11900 trails by 0.3%. This suggests that while the i5-14400 is a strong performer, it does not decisively beat its closest competitors; instead, it trades blows within a margin of a few tenths of a percent. The CPU’s 82nd percentile ranking means it outperforms the majority of processors on the market, but it is not at the absolute top tier.

The PassMark data compression score of 314995 and data encryption score of 16731 are relevant for file archiving and security workloads. The extended instructions score of 19816 reflects the CPU’s ability to accelerate AVX-512-like operations, which can benefit certain engineering simulations. The 65 W TDP is modest for a desktop part, indicating efficient power draw under load. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes UHD Graphics 730 integrated graphics as a fallback, though the discrete GPU will be the primary display adapter. ECC memory support is present, which is a feature typically found in workstation-class processors.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 4070 Ti is built on NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The chip, designated AD104, contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.8 million per square millimeter. The GPU has 7680 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units. The clock speeds are a base of 2310 MHz and a boost of 2610 MHz. Memory is 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1313 MHz, which translates to 21 Gbps effective. This memory configuration is sufficient for high-resolution textures and complex scenes, though the 192-bit bus width is narrower than some higher-tier cards.

The RTX 4070 Ti includes 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, which are dedicated to ray tracing and AI-accelerated tasks. The pixel rate is 208.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 626.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 40.09 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 40.09 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio. This means the card does not have a separate boost for half-precision workloads, but 40 TFLOPS is substantial for both gaming and compute applications. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 5024 points. Geekbench OpenCL results show 176953 points, and Vulkan results show 213808 points. The PassMark G3D score is 31624, with a GPU compute score of 18396.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 44795, placing it at the 84th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals show interesting comparisons. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is 0.8% ahead, the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT is 1.3% ahead, and the Intel Arc A730M is 1.7% ahead. The NVIDIA RTX A6000 trails by 1.6%. These deltas are small, meaning the RTX 4070 Ti is in a tight competitive cluster. The fact that a mobile GPU and a workstation card are within a couple of percent of this desktop part underscores the performance density of the 4070 Ti. The GPU’s TDP is 285 W, with a suggested PSU of 600 W, and it requires a single 16-pin power connector. The card is dual-slot, measuring 285 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 42 mm in width. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

For rendering, the 60 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which is a key feature for modern game engines and DCC applications like Blender or Maya. The 240 tensor cores accelerate DLSS and other AI-based features, including denoising in ray-traced scenes. The 12 GB VRAM is a critical specification for 4K texture packs and complex 3D scenes; while not as large as 16 GB or 24 GB cards, it is adequate for most current titles at high settings. The bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s ensures that the GPU can feed its compute units quickly, reducing bottlenecks in texture-heavy workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance tier of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 83, placing the system above 83% of all CPU-GPU combinations in the database. The CPU is at the 82nd percentile and the GPU is at the 84th percentile, indicating a well-matched pair.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-14400 has an average benchmark score of 32115. The Intel Core i7-12800H is statistically tied at 0% delta, the i7-13705H is 0.1% ahead, the i5-14450HX is 0.2% ahead, and the i9-11900 is 0.3% behind.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i5-14400 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is a feature not always available on consumer desktop processors.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what type is it?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU’s power requirement?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 285 W, and the suggested PSU wattage is 600 W. It uses a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: What is the socket and platform for this CPU?

A: The i5-14400 uses the Intel Socket 1700 and is part of the Core 14th Gen series, based on the Raptor Lake architecture. It supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Q: Is there integrated graphics on the CPU?

A: Yes, the i5-14400 includes UHD Graphics 730, which can serve as a backup display output or for systems that do not yet have a discrete GPU installed.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a system where the CPU and GPU are closely matched in percentile terms, but the nature of workloads will determine which component becomes the limiting factor. The CPU’s 82nd percentile and the GPU’s 84th percentile suggest that, on average, neither will hold the other back significantly. However, in specific scenarios, the balance shifts. For gaming at lower resolutions, the CPU’s single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 score of 3009) becomes critical. At 1080p, the GPU may be underutilized if the CPU cannot feed frames fast enough, but the i5-14400’s strong single-core results indicate it can handle high-refresh gaming without major bottlenecks.

In contrast, at higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. The RTX 4070 Ti’s 40.09 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 504.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth will be taxed more heavily, while the CPU’s multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 score of 21315) will have ample headroom. The PassMark multithread score of 25080 supports this, showing the CPU can manage background tasks while the GPU works on rendering frames.

For productivity workloads, the balance depends on the application. Video editing in software like Premiere Pro uses both components: the CPU for decoding and timeline operations, the GPU for effects and encoding. The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads (PassMark integer math score of 82017) will handle timeline scrubbing, while the GPU’s tensor cores accelerate AI-based features like scene cut detection. 3D rendering in Blender or Cinema 4D is heavily GPU-bound, and the RTX 4070 Ti will be the primary driver, with the CPU feeding geometry data. The CPU’s L3 cache of 20 MB helps reduce memory latency in these scenarios.

The FPS scaling evidence is not available as measured data, but the benchmark scores provide a proxy. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5024 is a DX12 benchmark that stresses the GPU, while the CPU’s Cinebench scores stress the processor. The fact that both components score in the 80th percentile or above indicates a system that will remain balanced across a wide range of workloads. A significant bottleneck would only appear in extreme cases, such as CPU-heavy physics simulations or GPU-heavy 8K rendering, where one component is pushed far beyond the other’s capability.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need both strong gaming performance and credible compute capability. Gamers at 1440p will find the GPU’s 84th percentile ranking and the CPU’s 82nd percentile ranking provide a smooth experience, assuming the estimated FPS holds true. The 12 GB VRAM is suitable for high-resolution textures, and the 60 RT cores enable ray tracing without a massive performance hit. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3009 in Cinebench R23 ensures that game logic and physics updates are processed quickly.

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, will benefit from the combination. The CPU’s multi-core score of 21315 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU’s 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 performance mean that both 4K video exports and GPU-accelerated renders will be faster than average systems. The tensor cores also enable DLSS for real-time previews in DCC software. Software developers compiling large codebases will see strong performance from the 10-core CPU, with the PassMark integer math score of 82017 indicating rapid arithmetic operations. Students and small business users running office suites, web applications, and light data analysis will find the system overkill, but the headroom means it will remain relevant for years.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. Therefore, all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 31624 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5024 suggest it is a high-end part capable of running many games at high settings. The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3009 indicates minimal bottleneck in frame generation. For 1080p gaming, the CPU will likely keep pace with the GPU, and frame rates should be high, limited by the GPU’s raw rasterization power. At 1440p, the GPU will be the primary determinant, and the 12 GB VRAM should handle most current titles with ultra textures. At 4K, the GPU will be pushed harder, and users should expect lower frame rates than at 1440p, though the 40.09 TFLOPS compute capability will still deliver playable results in many titles. Ray tracing performance will benefit from the 60 RT cores, but enabling it will reduce frame rates compared to rasterized rendering. The 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for high-resolution textures, but the 192-bit bus width may become a limiting factor in some memory-intensive scenes.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 32115, with a percentile rank of 82. Its best results are in Cinebench R23 multi-core (21315) and PassMark multithread (25080). The single-thread scores are also strong: Cinebench R23 single-core at 3009 and PassMark single-thread at 3741. The Geekbench scores are 9807 multi-core and 1905 single-core. The nearest CPU rivals are all within 0.3% of the i5-14400’s average score, showing a highly competitive mid-range field. The GPU has an average benchmark score of 44795, with a percentile rank of 84. Its standout scores include Geekbench Vulkan at 213808, Geekbench OpenCL at 176953, and PassMark G3D at 31624. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score is 5024. The nearest GPU rivals are within 1.7% of the RTX 4070 Ti’s average score, with the RTX 5090 Mobile leading by 0.8% and the Arc A730M trailing by 1.7%. The combined picture is a system that sits at the 83rd percentile, meaning it outperforms 83% of all recorded CPU-GPU pairings. The CPU and GPU are both in the upper quartile of their respective categories, and the performance deltas to rivals are small, indicating a mature and well-optimized platform.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14400 uses the LGA 1700 socket, which is shared across 12th, 13th, and 14th generation Core processors. This means a user could upgrade to a higher-tier 14th Gen CPU, such as an i7 or i9, without changing the motherboard. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, so the platform is flexible depending on the motherboard chosen. PCIe Gen 5 is supported with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is future-proof for next-generation SSDs and GPUs. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe 5.0 slots; the card will operate at PCIe 4.0 speeds, which is not a bottleneck for current GPU performance. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 285 W, totaling 350 W of component power draw. The suggested PSU is 600 W, which provides headroom for the rest of the system, including drives, fans, and motherboard. A sensible next upgrade would be adding more storage or increasing memory capacity, as the CPU and GPU are already well-matched. If more GPU performance is needed, the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface will accommodate a next-generation card, though users should verify the PSU has sufficient wattage and the appropriate power connectors.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining a Core i5-14400 with a GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread processor from the Raptor Lake architecture, and the GPU is an Ada Lovelace chip with 7680 shading units and 12 GB of GDDR6X memory. The combined percentile is 83, placing this system in the upper tier of desktop configurations. The CPU’s 82nd percentile and GPU’s 84th percentile indicate a balanced pairing where both components are strong performers in their own right. The system is capable of high-refresh gaming at 1440p and can handle demanding productivity workloads like video editing and 3D rendering. The 65 W CPU TDP and 285 W GPU TDP make the thermal and power requirements manageable with a standard ATX power supply and a capable air cooler for the CPU. The build class is desktop, meaning it is intended for a stationary tower or workstation, not a mobile device.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 84th percentile ranking and the CPU’s 82nd percentile ranking suggest this system can drive high frame rates at 1440p. The CPU’s single-core score of 3009 in Cinebench R23 ensures fast game logic, while the GPU’s 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 performance handles rendering. Users can expect smooth gameplay in most titles, with the 12 GB VRAM accommodating high-resolution textures.

Streaming: The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads provide headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 25080 indicates the CPU can handle the extra load of streaming software without significantly impacting game performance. The GPU’s tensor cores could also be used for NVENC encoding, offloading the work from the CPU.

Video editing: The CPU’s multi-core score of 21315 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU’s 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth make 4K video editing feasible. The GPU’s compute score of 18396 in PassMark GPU Compute supports hardware-accelerated effects and color grading. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for complex timelines with multiple layers.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 60 RT cores and 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 performance make this system suitable for GPU-accelerated rendering in Blender or Octane. The CPU’s multi-core performance will handle scene preparation and physics, while the GPU does the heavy lifting. The 240 tensor cores also accelerate AI-based denoising.

Software development: The CPU’s integer math score of 82017 in PassMark indicates fast compilation times for large codebases. The 20 MB L3 cache helps with repetitive tasks like builds. The system’s 83rd percentile combined ranking means it will handle virtual machines and containerized development environments without issue.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for basic productivity, but the headroom means it will handle spreadsheet calculations, web browsing, and document editing instantly. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3741 in PassMark ensures snappy application launches. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is disabled for power saving.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14400

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds