SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400

32,115 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

37,648 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core i5-14400's position relative to other CPUs in the benchmark database?

A: The Core i5-14400 sits at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32115. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-12800H, scores 32121 — a delta of 0%, meaning the two are statistically tied in overall performance. The i5-14400 is also within 0.1% of the Core i7-13705H and 0.2% of the Core i5-14450HX, while edging the Core i9-11900 by 0.3%.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 compare to its closest GPU rivals in aggregate performance?

A: The RTX 4070 holds the 81st percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37648. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA Tesla P4 at 37628 (0.1% faster), followed by the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 at 37507 (0.4% faster). The RTX 4080 Mobile is 1.3% ahead, while the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 trails by 1.3%. The data shows a tight cluster of similar-performing GPUs.

Q: What are the key memory specifications for the Core i5-14400?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. ECC memory support is enabled, which is notable for workstation or data-integrity applications.

Q: Does the RTX 4070 have dedicated ray tracing or AI acceleration hardware?

A: Yes, the RTX 4070 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and includes 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores. It has 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation processors. The GPU also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the power consumption profile for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The Core i5-14400 has a TDP of 65 W, while the RTX 4070 has a TDP of 200 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W, which provides headroom for the combined load of a typical desktop build. The GPU uses a single 16-pin power connector and is a dual-slot card measuring 240 mm in length.

Q: What is the release timeline and production status for these components?

A: The Core i5-14400 was released on 2024-01-07 and is currently marked as Active in production, with a launch MSRP of $221. The RTX 4070 was released on 2023-04-11 and is listed as End-of-life, with a launch MSRP of 599 USD. The CPU is the newer part, while the GPU is being phased out in favor of its successor, the GeForce 50 series.

Q: How does the i5-14400 perform in single-threaded versus multi-threaded workloads?

A: The benchmark data shows a strong split: Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 21315, while single-core scores 3009. Geekbench multi-core is 9807, with single-core at 1905. PassMark single-thread is 3741, while multi-thread is 25080. The multi-thread-to-single-thread ratio in Cinebench R23 is roughly 7:1, indicating substantial parallel scaling for a 10-core/16-thread part.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14400 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is the same socket family used across multiple generations of Intel desktop processors. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory technology — though the dual-channel memory bus means that higher-frequency DDR5 kits will deliver more bandwidth than DDR4 for memory-sensitive workloads. The platform offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is forward-looking for storage and GPU connectivity, though the RTX 4070 itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16, meaning the interface will not be a bottleneck.

The CPU's 65 W TDP is modest for a desktop part, which means a capable air cooler should suffice for most use cases. The GPU's 200 W TDP and suggested 550 W PSU create a system that is not power-hungry by modern standards, leaving headroom for additional drives, fans, or peripherals without requiring an oversized power supply. The RTX 4070's single 16-pin connector is the modern standard, but the modest power draw means adapter compatibility is generally not a concern for existing ATX power supplies.

A sensible next upgrade from this pairing would focus on the GPU, as the RTX 4070 is marked End-of-life and the successor GeForce 50 series exists. The CPU, being Active in production and recently released, has longer relevance. For memory, moving from DDR4 to DDR5 would be a platform-level change, requiring a new motherboard, since the socket supports both types but not simultaneously. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes on the CPU suggest that future storage devices using that interface will be supported, though the GPU's PCIe 4.0 interface means no immediate benefit for graphics.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400 is a 10-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². The base clock is 2.50 GHz, boosting up to 4.70 GHz. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. The CPU includes UHD Graphics 730 integrated graphics, which provides basic display output without a discrete GPU, and supports ECC memory, a feature typically reserved for workstation-class parts.

Benchmark results place this CPU in a strong mid-range position. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21315 is a credible result for a 65 W part, suggesting efficient power scaling. The single-core score of 3009 in the same test indicates strong per-thread performance, which is critical for lightly-threaded applications like legacy games or certain productivity tools. The Geekbench multi-core score of 9807, while lower than some competing parts, reflects the CPU's hybrid approach of balancing core count with clock speed.

The PassMark sub-tests provide insight into specialized workloads. Data compression scores 314995, which is a high number, suggesting strong integer throughput for archiving or database tasks. Data encryption at 16731 is moderate, while extended instructions at 19816 indicate decent SIMD performance. The floating-point math score of 61549 and integer math score of 82017 show a balanced ALU/FPU design. Physics simulation at 1396 is a lower score, which may indicate that the CPU's scheduling of P-cores and E-cores affects physics-heavy applications. The random string sorting score of 32346 rounds out the picture of a versatile, if not class-leading, processor.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 32115 places it at the 82nd percentile, which is a solidly above-average position. Its nearest rivals include mobile parts like the Core i7-12800H and Core i7-13705H, as well as the desktop Core i9-11900. The deltaPct values are all within 0.3%, meaning the i5-14400 is effectively equivalent to these parts in aggregate performance, despite being a lower-tier SKU with a lower TDP. This suggests that the 10 nm process and Raptor Lake architecture deliver competitive performance per watt.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a CPU-GPU pairing where both components sit at similar percentile positions — 82nd for the CPU and 81st for the GPU — which suggests a balanced system overall. However, the nature of the workloads will determine which component becomes the limiting factor. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics simulation (PassMark score of 1396) or data encryption (16731), the i5-14400 will be the constraint. In GPU-bound scenarios, such as DirectX 11 rendering (PassMark score of 244) or 3DMark Steel Nomad (3854), the RTX 4070 will dominate the frame rate.

The combined percentile of 82 for the pairing aligns closely with both individual percentiles, indicating that neither component is drastically over- or under-powered relative to the other. The CPU's multi-threaded performance in Cinebench R23 (21315) suggests that it can feed the GPU in most gaming scenarios, especially at higher resolutions where GPU load increases. However, the lower physics score hints that some simulation-heavy titles might see CPU limitations before GPU saturation occurs.

For frame rate scaling, without measured FPS data, the benchmark scores imply that at 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 3009) will be more critical, potentially causing a bottleneck in esports titles. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's workload increases, and the RTX 4070's bandwidth (504.2 GB/s) and shading throughput (29.15 TFLOPS FP32) become the primary drivers of performance. The absence of measured FPS data means these are estimates, but the percentile alignment suggests a well-matched pairing for most users.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmarks show a consistent pattern of strong multi-core and single-core performance. Cinebench R15 multi-core scores 2148, with single-core at 303. Cinebench R20 multi-core is 8952, single-core 1263. Cinebench R23 multi-core reaches 21315, single-core 3009. Geekbench multi-core is 9807, single-core 1905. PassMark single-thread is 3741, multi-thread 25080. The CPU's average benchmark score is 32115, placing it at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs.

The GPU's benchmarks show a different profile. 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 scores 3854. Geekbench OpenCL scores 154858, while Vulkan scores 174152. PassMark G3D scores 26927, with GPU compute at 14720. DirectX 10, 11, and 12 scores are 139, 244, and 103 respectively, while DirectX 9 scores 320. The G2D score is 1164. The GPU's average benchmark score is 37648, at the 81st percentile.

The combined picture is a system where both components are within one percentile point of each other, with the CPU being marginally higher. This alignment suggests that the pairing is designed for balanced performance, where neither component consistently holds back the other. The CPU's multi-threaded scores are competitive with mobile H-series parts, while the GPU's scores are in the range of mid-to-high-end desktop cards from the previous generation. The deltaPct values for both components are all under 1.3%, indicating that small performance differences separate this pairing from its closest rivals.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU combination targets desktop users who need a versatile machine for both productivity and gaming. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking and the GPU's 81st percentile ranking indicate a system that performs well above average without reaching the top tier. Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolutions will benefit from the RTX 4070's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth, which are sufficient for modern titles at high settings. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU's multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 21315) useful for export times, while the GPU's CUDA cores (5888 shading units) accelerate GPU-accelerated effects.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's support for ECC memory, which can reduce data corruption in long-running builds or server-like workloads. Students building a personal workstation will find the 65 W CPU TDP manageable for dorm-room cooling, and the GPU's 200 W TDP is within the range of standard desktop power supplies. Small business workstations that run office applications, data analysis, or light virtualization will benefit from the CPU's balanced single-thread and multi-thread performance, while the GPU provides headroom for occasional graphical tasks or CUDA-accelerated applications. The ECC memory support is a differentiator for professional environments where data integrity is critical.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's single-core score of 3009 in Cinebench R23 will likely drive high frame rates in esports titles, though the GPU's DirectX 11 score of 244 suggests that older APIs may not scale as well. At 1440p, the GPU's bandwidth and shading power become more relevant, making this a solid 144 Hz candidate for most games.

Streaming: The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads, combined with a PassMark multi-thread score of 25080, provide enough headroom for software encoding at moderate bitrates. The GPU's NVENC (via tensor cores) offers an alternative hardware encoding path that offloads work from the CPU, though the specific encoder quality is not quantified in the data.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21315 supports reasonable timeline scrubbing and export performance. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM allows for GPU-accelerated effects and color grading, while the 504.2 GB/s bandwidth helps with high-resolution footage.

3D rendering: The GPU's FP32 performance of 29.15 TFLOPS and 46 ray tracing cores make it suitable for real-time viewport rendering. The CPU's multi-thread score will contribute to CPU-based rendering tasks, though it is not a top-tier part for this workload.

Software development: The CPU's ECC memory support and balanced scores (Geekbench single-core 1905, multi-core 9807) make it suitable for compilation tasks, which are typically single-threaded or lightly threaded. The GPU is not heavily utilized in this scenario but provides flexibility for testing graphical applications.

Student and office work: The CPU's 65 W TDP and integrated UHD Graphics 730 mean that the system can operate without the discrete GPU for basic tasks, reducing power draw. The GPU's 200 W TDP only comes into play when needed, making this an efficient pairing for daily productivity.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-14400 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake refresh part on Socket 1700, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture card with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory. Both components sit at the 82nd and 81st percentiles respectively, with a combined percentile of 82, indicating a well-matched, above-average system.

The pairing is notable for its balance: the CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 200 W TDP result in a system that is power-efficient for its performance class. The suggested 550 W PSU provides adequate headroom. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders a choice between cost and performance. The GPU's end-of-life status means it is being replaced, but its benchmark scores remain competitive with current mid-range offerings.

Overall, this build occupies a sweet spot in the desktop market — not a flagship by any measure, but a capable machine that handles both productivity and gaming without significant compromises. The 82nd percentile combined ranking places it ahead of the majority of systems in the database, making it a reasonable default for users who want a single machine for diverse tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All frame rate discussions are therefore estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 3009) and the GPU's shading throughput (29.15 TFLOPS FP32) suggest that at 1080p, the system should deliver high frame rates in most titles, with the CPU potentially limiting in CPU-heavy games. At 1440p, the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth become the primary drivers, and the system should maintain playable frame rates in AAA titles on ultra settings. At 4K, the GPU's 64 ROPs and 158.4 GPixel/s pixel rate will be the limiting factor, but DLSS (via tensor cores) could extend playability.

The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 103 is notably lower than the DirectX 11 score of 244, which may indicate that the GPU's DX12 path is not as efficient as its DX11 path in this benchmark, but 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 scores 3854, suggesting that modern DX12 games can still perform well. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 174152 indicates strong Vulkan performance, which is relevant for games using that API. For esports titles, the CPU's single-thread performance will be sufficient for high refresh rates. For graphically demanding titles, the GPU's 46 ray tracing cores enable ray-traced effects at playable frame rates, though the specific performance is not quantified in the data.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD104 chip fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. The die contains 35,800 million transistors across a 294 mm² area, giving a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1920 MHz and a boost clock of 2475 MHz, with memory running at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s.

The GPU has 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, along with 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 158.4 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 455.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 29.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1), which is a notable specification for compute workloads. The GPU uses a dual-slot design, measures 240 mm in length, and requires a single 16-pin power connector with a suggested 550 W PSU.

Benchmark results show a GPU that performs well in aggregate but has some quirks. The PassMark G3D score of 26927 places it at the 81st percentile, while GPU compute scores 14720. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 154858 and Vulkan score of 174152 both indicate strong compute capability. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3854 is a modern benchmark that shows competitive DX12 performance. The DirectX 9 score of 320 is the highest among the DirectX variants, which is common for newer GPUs that excel in legacy APIs. The G2D score of 1164 is less relevant for gaming but indicates solid 2D acceleration.

For rendering workloads, the 12 GB VRAM is adequate for 1440p and some 4K textures, while the 504.2 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution assets. The ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the tensor cores provide DLSS support, which can improve frame rates in supported titles. The GPU's end-of-life status means it is no longer in production, but its benchmark scores remain competitive with the nearest rivals, which include professional and older consumer cards, indicating that it still holds up well in the current landscape.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14400

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds