SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400

32,115 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

17,208 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 form a balanced desktop pairing that targets high-refresh 1080p and solid 1440p gaming, alongside capable productivity workloads. The CPU, with its 10 cores and 16 threads, delivers strong multi-threaded performance that rivals laptop-class i7 parts, while the GPU, despite being end-of-life, offers competitive rasterization and ray tracing performance that still sits above the 61st percentile of all GPUs. The data in this analysis is derived from synthetic benchmark scores; no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the relative performance of these components.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400 is a Raptor Lake-R architecture desktop processor built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache, which supports the processor's strong single- and multi-threaded performance characteristics.

Benchmark results show the CPU achieving a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21315 and a single-core score of 3009. The Geekbench multicore score of 9807 and single-core score of 1905 further corroborate its balanced performance profile. The PassMark multithread score of 25080 and single-thread score of 3741 indicate that the processor handles both heavily threaded workloads and lightly threaded tasks effectively. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking versus all CPUs positions it well above the median, with its average benchmark score of 32115 placing it in direct competition with the Intel Core i7-12800H, which has an average score of 32121 and a deltaPct of 0. The i5-14400 also trades blows with the Intel Core i7-13705H (32076, deltaPct 0.1) and the Intel Core i5-14450HX (32040, deltaPct 0.2), while slightly outperforming the Intel Core i9-11900 (32226, deltaPct -0.3) in the comparison.

In real workloads, the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 8952 and R15 multicore score of 2148 suggest the processor can handle video rendering and compilation tasks with relative ease. The PassMark data compression score of 314995 and integer math score of 82017 indicate strong performance in data manipulation and general productivity. The floating point math score of 61549 and extended instructions score of 19816 highlight its capability in scientific and engineering applications. With a TDP of 65 W, the CPU offers a power-efficient platform that does not require exotic cooling solutions, making it a reliable workhorse for sustained multi-threaded workloads. The lack of an unlocked multiplier means overclocking is not an option, but the stock boost behavior is sufficient to keep it competitive with higher-tier mobile parts.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is based on the Ampere architecture and the GA104 chip, manufactured by Samsung on an 8 nm process node. The GPU packs 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 44.4M per mm². It features 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units, providing a solid foundation for rasterization performance.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The memory clock operates at 1750 MHz, or 14 Gbps effective. This bandwidth is adequate for 1440p gaming and can handle most textures at that resolution, though the 8 GB capacity may become a limiting factor in future titles with very high-resolution texture packs. The core clock runs at 1500 MHz base and 1725 MHz boost, which translates to a pixel rate of 165.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 317.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is rated at 20.31 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at the same level (1:1 ratio), indicating strong compute capabilities for general-purpose workloads.

The GPU includes 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores, which support hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS technology. In benchmark tests, the RTX 3070 achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3162, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 112821, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 21022. The PassMark G3D score of 22214 and GPU compute score of 11195 demonstrate its overall graphics and compute performance. The GPU's 61st percentile ranking versus all GPUs and average benchmark score of 17208 place it near the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, which scores 17083 with a deltaPct of 0.7. It also compares to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (17037, deltaPct 1) and AMD Radeon HD 7970M (17019, deltaPct 1.1), while trailing the NVIDIA Tesla K40c (17468, deltaPct -1.5).

For rendering and graphics workloads, the high texture rate and pixel rate make the RTX 3070 well-suited for real-time rendering engines and 3D modeling applications. The presence of tensor cores provides acceleration for AI-based tasks and image processing, while the RT cores enable ray-traced effects in supported games. The 220 W TDP and suggested PSU of 550 W indicate that the card requires a decent power supply but is not excessively power-hungry, making it a practical choice for a wide range of desktop builds.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 lanes, with 16 lanes available for the CPU, ensuring compatibility with modern high-bandwidth storage and graphics cards. The RTX 3070 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, though the GPU will operate at PCIe 4.0 speeds. Integrated graphics are available via the UHD Graphics 730, providing a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 220 W, resulting in a combined thermal load that is manageable with standard mid-tower cases and air coolers. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W, which provides adequate headroom for the entire system under typical load scenarios. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is unusual for consumer desktop parts and can be beneficial for workstation use cases where data integrity is critical. However, the CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, limiting overclocking potential.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would focus on the GPU, as the CPU's 82nd percentile ranking means it still has significant headroom before becoming a bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. Moving to a higher-tier GPU would allow for better performance at 1440p and 4K resolutions, though the 8 GB VRAM of the current card might already be a constraint in some modern titles. Alternatively, users could consider adding more memory or faster storage, as the platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5, allowing for flexibility in component selection. The socket 1700 platform has been widely adopted, ensuring a broad range of compatible motherboards and coolers.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The combination of the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3009) and the GPU's high texture rate (317.4 GTexel/s) supports high-refresh 1080p gaming in esports titles. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 22214 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3162 indicate it can push high frame rates in competitive shooters, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit texture quality at higher settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads and the GPU's NVENC encoder (implied by the tensor cores and Ampere architecture) make this a viable streaming setup. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21315 ensures the CPU can handle game encoding and streaming software simultaneously, while the GPU's compute performance (Geekbench OpenCL score of 112821) assists with video processing tasks.

Video Editing: The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 25080 and the GPU's compute capabilities provide a solid foundation for video editing. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 8952 indicates strong performance in rendering timelines, and the GPU's 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects and color grading. The 8 GB VRAM might be adequate for 1080p and light 4K editing projects.

3D Rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2148 and the GPU's ray tracing cores (46 RT cores) make this a capable setup for 3D rendering. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3162 reflects its DirectX 12 performance, which is relevant for real-time renderers. However, the 8 GB VRAM could be a limitation for large scenes that exceed memory capacity.

Software Development: The CPU's high PassMark data compression score of 314995 and integer math score of 82017 indicate strong performance in compilation and code analysis tasks. The 10 cores and 16 threads allow for parallel builds, and the 65 W TDP means sustained load is manageable without excessive heat generation.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3741 and the integrated UHD Graphics 730 provide a reliable baseline for everyday productivity tasks. The platform's support for DDR4 memory keeps costs down, and the dual-channel memory bus ensures adequate bandwidth for office applications and web browsing.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who play at 1080p and 1440p resolutions. The GPU's 61st percentile ranking means it outperforms the median GPU, making it suitable for high-refresh 1080p gaming and solid 1440p performance, though users should be prepared to adjust settings in the most demanding titles. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking ensures it does not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, making this a balanced pairing for mainstream gaming.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find value in the CPU's multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21315) and the GPU's compute capabilities (Geekbench OpenCL score of 112821). The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for moderate workloads, but creators with large textures or high-resolution projects may need to manage assets carefully.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's strong integer math performance (PassMark integer math score of 82017) and data compression capabilities (314995), which speed up compilation times and reduce build wait times. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running development sessions.

Students and small business workstations benefit from the platform's flexibility with DDR4 and DDR5 memory support, allowing for cost-effective builds. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 220 W TDP mean a 550 W power supply is sufficient, keeping the overall system cost moderate.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 72, indicating it outperforms 72% of all CPU and GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14400 compare to its nearest rival in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The i5-14400 has an average benchmark score of 32115, which is effectively tied with the Intel Core i7-12800H (32121, deltaPct 0), and slightly ahead of the Intel Core i7-13705H (32076, deltaPct 0.1).

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070?

A: The RTX 3070 has a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s, based on an 8 GB GDDR6 memory configuration with a 256-bit bus width.

Q: Does the CPU support error-correcting code (ECC) memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14400 supports ECC memory, which can be beneficial for workstation and reliability-focused builds.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070?

A: The launch MSRP of the RTX 3070 is 499 USD.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and the suggested PSU for the GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 220 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W.

Q: Are there any measured FPS results for this exact CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the data; all frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is well-matched for gaming workloads, as the CPU's 82nd percentile ranking is higher than the GPU's 61st percentile ranking. This suggests that in most gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions where the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth may become constraints. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 3741) ensures it can feed the GPU with frames in CPU-bound scenarios, such as esports titles at high refresh rates.

In productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21315) is robust, but the GPU's compute capabilities (Geekbench OpenCL score of 112821) provide significant acceleration for tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering. However, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM may bottleneck large-scale rendering tasks, as textures and geometry must fit within the memory limit. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 220 W TDP mean the system draws a combined power load that a 550 W PSU can handle, leaving some headroom for other components.

The PassMark GPU compute score of 11195 indicates that the GPU is not a slouch in compute-heavy tasks, but the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 25080 suggests that heavily threaded CPU workloads are well-served. The bottleneck in this system is likely to be the GPU in gaming and rendering, while the CPU may become the limiting factor in workloads that require extremely high single-thread performance, such as certain simulation games. Overall, the pairing is balanced, with the GPU being the more likely upgrade target for future performance gains.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-14400 processor with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 graphics card. The CPU is part of the Core 14th Gen series, based on Raptor Lake architecture, while the GPU is from the GeForce 30-series, based on Ampere architecture. The combined percentile of 72 places this build in the upper tier of all systems, indicating strong overall performance for both gaming and productivity.

The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads, along with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, provide solid multi-threaded performance that rivals mobile i7 parts. The GPU's 5888 shading units and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory deliver competitive rasterization performance, with the 46 ray tracing cores adding hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering flexibility in component selection, and the 65 W CPU TDP combined with the 220 W GPU TDP makes this a manageable build for most power supplies.

The overall tier of this build is above average, with the CPU ranking in the 82nd percentile and the GPU in the 61st percentile. This means the system is well-suited for high-refresh 1080p gaming, solid 1440p gaming, and moderate productivity workloads. The 8 GB VRAM is the main limitation for future-proofing, but for current titles, this build represents a capable and balanced desktop configuration.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-14400 delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21315 and a single-core score of 3009, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. The Geekbench multicore score of 9807 and single-core score of 1905 further confirm its balanced performance. The PassMark multithread score of 25080 and single-thread score of 3741 indicate strong performance across both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The CPU's average benchmark score of 32115 places it in a tight race with the Intel Core i7-12800H (32121, deltaPct 0) and the Intel Core i7-13705H (32076, deltaPct 0.1).

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3162 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 112821. The PassMark G3D score of 22214 and GPU compute score of 11195 demonstrate its graphics and compute capabilities. The GPU's average benchmark score of 17208 places it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, with its nearest rival being the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (17083, deltaPct 0.7). The GPU's FP32 performance of 20.31 TFLOPS and memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s provide a solid foundation for gaming and rendering.

The combined picture shows a CPU that is significantly ahead of the GPU in percentile ranking, indicating that the GPU is the more likely performance limiter in gaming scenarios. The CPU's strong multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multicore 21315) and the GPU's competitive rasterization performance (PassMark G3D 22214) create a system that excels in 1080p gaming with high refresh rates, while remaining capable at 1440p with some settings adjustments. The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means these observations are derived from the relative benchmark scores, but the data consistently points to a well-balanced desktop build for mainstream users.