SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400

32,115 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

13,543 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400 is a 10-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh generation. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². The chip operates at a base clock of 2.50 GHz and can boost up to 4.70 GHz, which provides a solid frequency headroom for single-threaded workloads. The core configuration consists of performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact split; the 10 cores and 16 threads indicate a hybrid design typical of this generation. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and it includes ECC memory support, making it suitable for entry-level workstation tasks where data integrity matters. Integrated graphics are provided via UHD Graphics 730, which is sufficient for basic display output but not for gaming.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 allocation helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing latency in mixed workloads. The processor uses Intel Socket 1700 and is unlocked multipliers are not available, meaning the chip is not designed for overclocking. The TDP is rated at 65 W, which is modest for a 10-core part and indicates efficient power delivery for sustained all-core loads. The launch MSRP is $221, positioning it as a mid-range offering within the Core 14th Gen lineup.

Benchmark results show a balanced performer. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 21,315 and the single-core score is 3,009. The multicore figure is strong for a 65 W chip, suggesting it can handle multi-threaded rendering tasks with reasonable speed. The single-core score of 3,009 is competitive, indicating snappy responsiveness in everyday applications that rely on single-thread performance. Geekbench scores are 9,807 for multicore and 1,905 for single-core, which align with the Cinebench results and confirm consistent performance across different benchmarking methodologies. PassMark tests show a multithread score of 25,080 and a single-thread score of 3,741, with integer math at 82,017 and floating-point math at 61,549. These numbers indicate a processor that excels in integer-heavy tasks like compression and sorting, while floating-point performance is slightly lower but still robust.

The percentile rank against all CPUs is 82, meaning this processor outperforms the vast majority of desktop and mobile chips in the database. The average benchmark score is 32,115, which places it in the upper tier of mid-range processors. Nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-12800H with an average score of 32,121 (0% delta), the Intel Core i7-13705H at 32,076 (0.1% delta), the Intel Core i5-14450HX at 32,040 (0.2% delta), and the Intel Core i9-11900 at 32,226 (-0.3% delta). The i5-14400 sits squarely in the middle of this group, trading blows with mobile H-series chips and a previous-generation i9 desktop part. This suggests that for most real-world workloads, the i5-14400 delivers performance on par with those higher-tier parts, which is impressive given its lower TDP and mainstream positioning.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined system benchmark picture is defined by the CPU's strong showing and the GPU's more middling position. The CPU's average benchmark score of 32,115 places it in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, which is a strong result for a mainstream desktop processor. The GPU, an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT, has an average benchmark score of 13,543 and sits in the 55th percentile among all GPUs. This is a notable discrepancy: the CPU is a high-performer relative to its peers, while the GPU is merely average. The combined percentile for this pairing is 69, reflecting the CPU's strength pulling up a system that is otherwise held back by the GPU.

In GPU-specific benchmarks, the RX 9070 XT scores 7,260 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is a demanding modern test. Geekbench OpenCL scores 17,428 and Vulkan scores 65,879, with the Vulkan result being particularly strong, indicating good low-level API performance. PassMark G3D scores 26,795, which is a solid mid-range result, but the DirectX 12 score is only 78, which appears anomalously low compared to the DirectX 11 score of 292 and DirectX 10 score of 154. This could indicate driver overhead or a benchmark-specific quirk. PassMark GPU Compute scores 15,864, showing decent compute throughput for non-graphics workloads.

The GPU's nearest rivals are all older or lower-tier parts: the AMD Radeon HD 7770M (avg score 13,536, 0.1% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 (13,515, 0.2% delta), the NVIDIA P106-090 (13,470, 0.5% delta), and the AMD Radeon Pro 555 (13,407, 1% delta). These are all significantly older architectures with far lower feature sets, yet the average scores are remarkably close. This suggests that the RX 9070 XT's average benchmark score is depressed by the low DirectX 12 PassMark score, pulling its average down to a level that does not reflect its modern architecture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 7,260 is more representative of its actual gaming capability, as that test is designed for current-generation GPUs.

When combining CPU and GPU scores, the picture is one of imbalance. The CPU is operating in the 82nd percentile, while the GPU is in the 55th percentile. This means that in CPU-bound scenarios, the system will feel very fast, but in GPU-bound scenarios, the graphics card will be the limiting factor. The combined percentile of 69 is a weighted average that reflects this gap. For users who primarily run CPU-intensive tasks like compilation or rendering, this system will exceed expectations. For gamers, the GPU will cap performance at a mid-range level, meaning high frame rates at 1080p are likely, but 4K ultra settings may be out of reach.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in this system for graphics-heavy workloads. The CPU's 82nd percentile rank versus the GPU's 55th percentile rank creates a significant gap. In gaming scenarios, the RX 9070 XT will be the limiting factor, meaning that frame rates will be determined by the GPU's capabilities rather than the CPU's. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3,009 in Cinebench R23, 3,741 in PassMark single-thread) ensures that it can feed the GPU with data without being a bottleneck in most scenarios, but the GPU's mid-range standing will cap overall FPS.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, software compilation, or 3D rendering, the CPU will be the star. The multicore score of 21,315 in Cinebench R23 demonstrates that the i5-14400 can handle multi-threaded tasks with authority, and its 82nd percentile ranking means it will outperform the majority of CPUs in the database. In these scenarios, the GPU's lower compute scores (15,864 in PassMark GPU Compute) mean it will not accelerate these tasks as effectively as a higher-tier GPU might, but for pure CPU rendering, the CPU will dominate.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent because no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination. However, based on the benchmark scores, we can infer that at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance will keep frame rates high, but the GPU will still be the ceiling. At higher resolutions like 1440p or 4K, the GPU's load increases, and the bottleneck becomes even more pronounced. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth are ample for high-resolution textures, but the raw compute power (48.66 TFLOPS FP32) is mid-range, so the system will not sustain ultra settings at 4K in demanding titles.

The balance is skewed toward CPU performance, which is unusual for a gaming-focused build. This pairing makes more sense for a workstation that occasionally games, rather than a dedicated gaming rig. For productivity tasks, the CPU's strength will shine, and the GPU will provide adequate acceleration for tasks like video encoding (where it can offload from the CPU) and light 3D work. The 700 W suggested PSU provides ample headroom for both components, even under simultaneous full load.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 55th percentile ranking and the lack of measured FPS data mean that high-refresh gaming at 1440p is plausible but not guaranteed. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3,009 in Cinebench R23 will prevent frame dips in CPU-bound scenes, but the GPU's mid-range compute will limit maximum FPS. Expect smooth 60-100 FPS at 1440p in most titles, but not the 144+ FPS needed for top-tier esports monitors at max settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 MB of L3 cache and 10 cores provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The i5-14400's multicore score of 21,315 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can handle x264 encoding at medium preset without significant frame drops. The GPU can also offload encoding via its compute capabilities, though specific encoder hardware is not specified in the FACT PACK.

Video editing: The CPU's strong multicore performance (21,315 in Cinebench R23) will handle timeline scrubbing and export rendering efficiently. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth will accelerate effects and color grading in GPU-accelerated editors. However, the GPU's mid-range compute means complex effects might render slower than on a higher-tier card.

3D rendering: The CPU is the clear workhorse here. With a PassMark multithread score of 25,080 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 21,315, CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar will perform well, beating the vast majority of CPUs. The GPU can assist with its 48.66 TFLOPS FP32, but its 55th percentile rank means it will not provide the same acceleration as a top-tier GPU.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 82,017 in PassMark and data compression score of 314,995 indicate strong compilation and code analysis performance. The 10 cores and 16 threads will handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 65 W TDP means sustained load won't push thermals excessively. The GPU is largely irrelevant here except for any GPU compute tasks like machine learning training, where its 15,864 compute score is modest.

Student and office work: This system is massively overqualified for basic productivity. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,741 in PassMark ensures snappy application launches and smooth multitasking. The GPU's capabilities are wasted in this scenario, but the 16 GB VRAM could be useful for future GPU-accelerated coursework in data science or design. The 65 W TDP means low power draw during light use, which is beneficial for dorm rooms or small offices.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14400 uses the LGA 1700 socket, which is a mature platform with broad motherboard availability. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility on memory cost and performance. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is forward-looking for fast NVMe SSDs and future GPUs, though the current GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x16, which is fully compatible. The 65 W TDP means that even modest air coolers can handle this CPU, and the socket's power delivery requirements are not extreme.

The GPU, an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT, is a dual-slot card that requires two 8-pin power connectors. The suggested PSU is 700 W, which provides significant headroom for the combined 304 W GPU TDP and 65 W CPU TDP, leaving ample room for additional drives, fans, and peripherals. The GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x16, which is fully supported by the CPU's 16 lanes of Gen 5, so there is no bottleneck on the bus interface.

For upgrades, the most sensible next step is to replace the GPU. The CPU is already in the 82nd percentile, so it will not be the limiting factor in gaming or most productivity tasks. A higher-tier GPU would balance the system and unlock higher frame rates at 1440p and 4K. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that any future GPU will not be bandwidth-limited. On the CPU side, the LGA 1700 socket supports other 14th Gen parts, so a user could upgrade to a higher-core-count chip without changing the motherboard, though the 65 W TDP of the i5-14400 suggests that higher-TDP parts would require better cooling and potentially a motherboard with stronger VRMs.

Memory upgrades are straightforward with dual-channel support for DDR4 or DDR5. The 20 MB L3 cache benefits from fast memory, so users opting for DDR5 will see better performance in cache-sensitive workloads. The ECC memory support is a differentiator for small business workstations that require data integrity. The platform's longevity is uncertain, as LGA 1700 is not expected to support future generations beyond 14th Gen, but for the current build, there is ample headroom for mid-life upgrades.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data, so all frame rate expectations are estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 7,260 is the most relevant gaming metric, as it is a modern, demanding test. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3,009 in Cinebench R23) ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU at any resolution.

Based on these scores, at 1080p with ultra settings, the RX 9070 XT should deliver high frame rates in most titles. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for 1080p textures, and its 644.6 GB/s bandwidth prevents memory bottlenecks. The CPU's single-thread advantage will help in games that rely on physics or AI, but the GPU's mid-range compute will limit maximum FPS. Expect roughly 80-120 FPS in AAA titles at 1080p ultra, with esports titles like CS2 or Valorant potentially exceeding 200 FPS due to lower GPU demands.

At 1440p ultra, the GPU's load increases significantly. The 48.66 TFLOPS FP32 is adequate for this resolution, but not exceptional. Frame rates will likely drop to 60-90 FPS in demanding titles, with some optimization-dependent games dipping below 60. The CPU's role diminishes at this resolution, and the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. For 4K ultra, the GPU's mid-range standing will be exposed. Expect 30-50 FPS in AAA titles, with less demanding games reaching 60 FPS. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K textures, but the raw compute power is insufficient for sustained high frame rates at this resolution.

The CPU's performance in gaming is not a concern. Its 82nd percentile ranking means it outperforms most CPUs in gaming-related benchmarks. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,741 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 3,009 indicate excellent frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios. The 20 MB L3 cache helps with game asset streaming, reducing stutter. Overall, this system is a capable 1080p and 1440p gaming machine, but it is not suited for high-refresh 4K gaming.

# Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU performance and need a capable GPU for occasional gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks. Gamers at 1080p will find this system more than adequate, with the CPU ensuring high frame rates and the GPU handling most titles at high settings. At 1440p, the system is still viable, but users should expect to adjust settings in demanding games. 4K gaming is not recommended, as the GPU's mid-range compute will struggle to maintain playable frame rates.

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D renderers, will benefit from the CPU's strong multicore performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21,315 and PassMark multithread score of 25,080 indicate fast export times and smooth preview scrubbing. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is useful for GPU-accelerated effects, though its compute is not top-tier. Software developers will appreciate the CPU's integer math performance and fast compilation times, with the GPU providing adequate acceleration for any CUDA-like workloads (though the AMD GPU uses its own compute stack).

Students and small business users who need a reliable workstation for office tasks, data analysis, or light design work will find this system overqualified but future-proof. The ECC memory support is a bonus for data integrity. The 65 W CPU TDP and 700 W suggested PSU mean the system runs efficiently and quietly, making it suitable for shared spaces. The 10 cores and 16 threads handle multitasking with ease, and the integrated graphics provide a fallback if the discrete GPU fails.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 has 10 cores and 16 threads, based on a hybrid architecture with a 2.50 GHz base clock and 4.70 GHz boost clock.

Q: Does the GPU have enough VRAM for modern games?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 644.6 GB/s bandwidth, which is ample for current titles at high resolutions.

Q: What is the CPU's benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The CPU is in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32,115. This places it above the vast majority of processors in the database.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: Based on the GPU's 55th percentile ranking and lack of measured FPS data, 4K gaming is possible but not ideal. Expect 30-50 FPS at ultra settings in demanding titles.

Q: What is the power supply requirement?

A: The GPU suggests a 700 W PSU, and the CPU has a 65 W TDP. The GPU requires two 8-pin power connectors and has a 304 W TDP.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, meaning the Intel Core i5-14400 cannot be overclocked. It runs at stock speeds with a 2.50 GHz base and 4.70 GHz boost.

Q: What memory types are supported?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC memory support included.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture, using the Navi 48 chip manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. The die size is 357 mm² with 53,900 million transistors, resulting in a transistor density of 151.0M per mm². This is a modern, efficient design. The GPU has 4,096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units, along with 64 ray tracing cores. The base clock is 1660 MHz, the boost clock is 2970 MHz, and the game clock is 2400 MHz. Memory runs at 2518 MHz with 20.1 Gbps effective speed. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for high-resolution textures and GPU compute tasks.

The GPU's compute capabilities are substantial on paper: 48.66 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), a pixel rate of 380.2 GPixel/s, and a texture rate of 760.3 GTexel/s. These numbers indicate strong raw throughput for both graphics and compute workloads. The ray tracing cores (64 in number) suggest decent ray tracing performance, though the 55th percentile ranking implies that actual ray tracing performance may not match the top-tier GPUs in the database. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs and features like hardware ray tracing and variable rate shading.

Benchmark scores tell a mixed story. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 7,260 is a strong result for a modern GPU, indicating good performance in current-generation game engines. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 65,879 is excellent, showing that the GPU excels in low-level API workloads. However, the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 78 is anomalously low, especially compared to the DirectX 11 score of 292. This likely drags down the average benchmark score, which is why the GPU sits at only the 55th percentile despite its modern architecture and robust specs.

The PassMark G3D score of 26,795 is more representative of gaming performance, sitting in a mid-range position. The PassMark GPU Compute score of 15,864 indicates decent compute performance for tasks like video encoding or machine learning inference. The nearest rivals, based on average score, are all significantly older GPUs, which highlights that the average score is misleading for this card. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score is a better indicator of its actual gaming capability, suggesting it can handle modern titles at 1440p with high settings.

The GPU's display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1a, supporting high refresh rates and high resolutions. The dual-slot design and 304 W TDP require adequate cooling, and the 2x 8-pin power connectors need a suitable PSU. The 700 W suggested PSU provides headroom for the entire system. In rendering tasks, the GPU's FP32 throughput of 48.66 TFLOPS will accelerate compute workloads, but its mid-range standing means it will not outperform higher-tier GPUs in GPU-accelerated rendering. The 16 GB VRAM is a strong asset for large scenes or datasets, and the 644.6 GB/s bandwidth prevents memory bottlenecks. Overall, the GPU is a capable mid-range part with modern features, but its benchmark scores are inconsistent, and its true performance is best measured by the 3DMark Steel Nomad result rather than the average score.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14400

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds