SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400

32,115 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-14400 + AMD Radeon RX 7700: A Balanced Desktop Pairing for 2025

The Intel Core i5-14400 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 form a desktop-class pairing that lands in the 70th percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations in the database, a position driven by a CPU that sits in the 82nd percentile of all processors and a GPU that ranks in the 58th percentile of all graphics cards. This combination represents a mainstream-oriented build where the processor clearly outpaces the graphics card in relative standing, a dynamic that shapes every workload discussed in this analysis. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 32,115 places it within 0.1% of the Intel Core i7-12800H (32,121) and 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14450HX (32,040), while the GPU’s average score of 15,852 sits just 0.1% above the AMD Radeon R9 370X (15,862) and 1.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (16,129), establishing a clear performance hierarchy within this build.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14400 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, a socket that supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility to reuse older DDR4 modules or invest in newer DDR5 kits. The CPU’s memory controller also supports ECC memory, a feature not commonly found in mainstream desktop processors and one that could appeal to users running error-sensitive workloads. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, offering substantial bandwidth headroom for modern storage devices and future expansion cards, though the GPU itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, meaning the GPU will run comfortably within the available lanes.

The processor carries a 65 W TDP, which is modest for a 10-core part, and the GPU has a 200 W TDP, leading to a suggested PSU rating of 550 W for the combined system. This 550 W figure suggests that the pairing does not demand an oversized power supply, and the 2x 8-pin power connectors on the GPU indicate a standard mid-range power delivery requirement. A sensible next upgrade path would involve moving to a higher-core-count Intel Socket 1700 processor if more multi-threaded throughput is needed, since the platform already supports the architecture. Alternatively, the 16 GB VRAM on the GPU leaves room for high-resolution texture workloads, but a future GPU upgrade to a higher-tier Radeon RX 7000 series card would be the more likely bottleneck relief, given that the CPU already outperforms the GPU in relative percentile terms. The platform’s dual memory support also means that upgrading from DDR4 to DDR5 later is possible, though that would require a new motherboard, so the more practical near-term upgrade is likely a GPU swap rather than a platform change.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 brings 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s, a figure that positions it well for high-resolution texture-heavy workloads. The memory clock runs at 2438 MHz with an effective data rate of 19.5 Gbps, and the GPU’s base clock is 1900 MHz with a boost clock of 2459 MHz and a game clock of 2041 MHz, indicating a substantial boost headroom for sustained gaming loads. The GPU is built on RDNA 3.0 architecture using a 5 nm process from TSMC, packing 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, which gives a transistor density of 81.2M per mm² — a dense design that contributes to its 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 compute throughput.

The GPU includes 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units, along with 40 ray tracing cores, though it has no dedicated tensor cores listed, meaning AI acceleration relies on the standard compute units. The pixel rate of 236.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 393.4 GTexel/s are solid mid-range figures, and the FP16 performance matches FP32 at 25.18 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, which is notable for workloads that can leverage reduced precision. In DirectX 12, the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,865 places the GPU in a competitive position, and the PassMark G3D score of 20,974 reinforces its mid-range standing. The GPU’s 58th percentile rank among all GPUs means it outperforms a slight majority of graphics cards, but the nearest rival data shows it is nearly identical to the Radeon R9 370X (within 0.1%) and just 1.7% behind the RTX 3060 Ti, suggesting that in raw average benchmark terms, the RX 7700 is a modest performer that trades blows with older and similarly positioned cards. The 16 GB VRAM is the standout feature, as it exceeds what most mid-range GPUs offered in previous generations, making this a card that can handle large assets without hitting memory ceilings.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers a multi-core score of 21,315 in Cinebench R23 and a single-core score of 3,009 in the same test, numbers that reflect strong single-threaded performance for a mainstream processor. In Geekbench, the multi-core score of 9,807 and single-core score of 1,905 further corroborate a balanced compute profile. The PassMark multi-thread score of 25,080 and single-thread score of 3,741 align with the Cinebench results, indicating consistent performance across different benchmark suites. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 32,115 puts it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, and it trades blows with the Intel Core i7-12800H (0% delta), Intel Core i7-13705H (0.1% ahead), and Intel Core i5-14450HX (0.2% ahead), making it effectively tied with those mobile and desktop parts.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 15,852 places it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,865 and a PassMark G3D score of 20,974. The GPU is within 0.1% of the Radeon R9 370X, 1% behind the Radeon RX 9060, and 1.7% behind the RTX 3060 Ti, showing that it sits in a tight cluster of mid-range GPUs. The combined percentile of 70 for this CPU+GPU pairing indicates that the overall system outperforms 70% of all recorded combinations, but the delta between the CPU’s 82nd percentile and the GPU’s 58th percentile reveals a noticeable imbalance: the CPU is a much stronger component relative to its peers than the GPU is relative to its own peers. This means that in CPU-bound workloads, the system will perform like a top-tier build, while in GPU-bound scenarios, it will perform like a slightly-above-average mid-range machine.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this pairing is a desktop builder who prioritizes CPU-heavy productivity tasks over maximum gaming frame rates, given the CPU’s 82nd percentile standing versus the GPU’s 58th percentile. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p resolutions who play less demanding titles will find the RX 7700 adequate, but those chasing high refresh rates in the latest AAA games at 4K resolution will likely hit GPU limits first. Content creators working with video editing, software compilation, or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads, which deliver a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,315, a figure that places it well above most mid-range processors. Students and small business workstations that run office applications, web development tools, or database workloads will find the CPU’s single-thread performance of 3,009 in Cinebench R23 more than sufficient, and the 16 GB GPU memory provides headroom for large spreadsheet datasets or virtual machines.

Developers writing multi-threaded code will appreciate the PassMark data encryption score of 16,731 and the extended instructions score of 19,816, which indicate strong integer and cryptographic throughput for compilation and hashing tasks. The build class is desktop, so it is not intended for portable use, but the 65 W CPU TDP and 200 W GPU TDP mean that a 550 W PSU is sufficient, keeping the system cost and noise reasonable for an office or dorm room environment. The 10 nm Intel process for the CPU and 5 nm TSMC process for the GPU indicate a modern pairing that should remain relevant for several years, though users expecting top-tier 4K gaming performance should look at higher-GPU percentile options instead.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear bottleneck dynamic: the CPU is the stronger component, operating at the 82nd percentile, while the GPU sits at the 58th percentile, meaning the GPU will limit performance in graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming scenarios, the FPS will be constrained by the GPU’s compute capabilities, particularly at higher resolutions where the 16 GB VRAM and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth help but the raw 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 throughput sets a ceiling. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,009 suggests it can feed frames fast enough for high-refresh gaming at lower resolutions, but the GPU’s 58th percentile rank indicates that frame rates will drop off as resolution increases.

In productivity workloads, the balance flips: the CPU’s multi-core score of 21,315 in Cinebench R23 and PassMark multi-thread score of 25,080 will drive rendering and compilation tasks, while the GPU’s compute score of 10,963 in PassMark GPU Compute shows it can assist in some parallel workloads but not at the level of higher-tier GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,865 reinforces that the GPU is a mid-range part, while the CPU’s nearest rival data shows it is effectively tied with the i7-12800H, a processor found in many high-end laptops, indicating the CPU punches above its class. The combined 70th percentile means the system is balanced enough for general use, but users who push both components simultaneously — such as gaming while streaming — will notice that the GPU becomes the limiting factor for frame rates, while the CPU handles the encoding overhead without significant performance loss.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-core performance of 3,009 in Cinebench R23 will keep frame rates high in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU’s 58th percentile rank will cap maximum FPS in GPU-bound games, making this a solid 1080p high-refresh machine for esports titles but a less certain bet for the latest AAA releases. Streaming while gaming will benefit from the CPU’s 16 threads, which can handle encoding and game logic simultaneously, though the GPU’s mid-range compute may require lowering game settings to maintain smooth output. Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will see strong CPU performance from the 21,315 multi-core score in Cinebench R23, and the 16 GB VRAM will allow for smooth timeline scrubbing with large 4K assets, while the GPU’s 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 helps with effects and color grading.

3D rendering in Blender or similar tools will rely heavily on the CPU’s multi-core throughput, and the 82nd percentile CPU rank means render times will be competitive with much more expensive processors, though GPU rendering will lag behind higher-tier cards given the 58th percentile GPU rank. Software development will benefit from the CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 82,017 and data compression score of 314,995, which speed up compilation and archive operations, while the GPU is largely irrelevant for most coding tasks. Student and office work — including spreadsheets, document editing, and web browsing — will feel responsive due to the CPU’s 3,741 single-thread PassMark score, and the entire system will run quietly given the 65 W CPU TDP and 200 W GPU TDP, making it suitable for shared workspaces.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate discussions here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,865 and its 58th percentile rank suggest that at 1080p with ultra settings, this pairing should deliver playable frame rates in most games, likely above 60 FPS in moderately demanding titles, though the GPU’s 1.7% deficit relative to the RTX 3060 Ti indicates it will not outperform that card in raw rasterization. At 1440p, the 16 GB VRAM and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth will help maintain performance in texture-heavy games, but the 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 compute will likely drop frame rates below 60 FPS in the most demanding titles at ultra settings, requiring some graphical concessions.

At 4K resolution, the GPU’s 58th percentile rank places it in a position where 30-50 FPS with ultra settings is a reasonable estimate for many games, and the 16 GB VRAM prevents memory-related stuttering even at this resolution, but the pixel rate of 236.1 GPixel/s may become a limiting factor for fill-rate-heavy scenes. The CPU’s strong single-core performance ensures that it will not be the bottleneck at any resolution, so any FPS shortfalls will be attributable to the GPU. Users seeking higher frame rates should consider lowering settings to high or medium, which will likely yield a significant FPS uplift given the GPU’s mid-range compute capabilities, but exact figures cannot be provided without measured data.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core i5-14400 use?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: How much VRAM does the AMD Radeon RX 7700 have?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i5-14400 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 is 70, meaning it outperforms 70% of all recorded CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the RX 7700 compare to the RTX 3060 Ti in average benchmark score?

A: The RX 7700 has an average benchmark score of 15,852, which is 1.7% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti’s average score of 16,129.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU for the AMD Radeon RX 7700 is 550 W, which accounts for the GPU’s 200 W TDP and the CPU’s 65 W TDP.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14400 supports ECC memory, a feature that is uncommon in mainstream desktop processors and beneficial for error-sensitive workloads.

Q: What is the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 scores 21,315 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3,009 in single-core, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400 is a 10-core, 16-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a Raptor Lake-R codename, using a 10 nm process from Intel with a die size of 215 mm². The base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, and the cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and includes integrated UHD Graphics 730, which is useful for basic display output or troubleshooting without a discrete GPU. The processor has a 65 W TDP, an active production status, and was released on 2024-01-07 with a launch MSRP of $221.

The benchmark results paint a picture of a strong mid-range processor: the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,315 is competitive with much higher-TDP parts, and the single-core score of 3,009 indicates excellent per-thread performance for gaming and lightly-threaded applications. The Geekbench multi-core score of 9,807 and single-core score of 1,905 corroborate these findings, while the PassMark integer math score of 82,017 and floating point math score of 61,549 demonstrate strong compute throughput for productivity tasks. The 82nd percentile ranking places it above the vast majority of CPUs, and its nearest rivals — the i7-12800H, i7-13705H, and i5-14450HX — are all within 0.2% of its average score, indicating that this CPU punches at a level typically found in higher-tier mobile and desktop parts. The 10 nm process and 20 MB L3 cache contribute to this performance, and the 16 threads ensure that multi-threaded workloads like video encoding and 3D rendering scale effectively.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-14400, a 10-core desktop processor with a 65 W TDP, with the AMD Radeon RX 7700, a 16 GB VRAM graphics card with a 200 W TDP, resulting in a desktop-class system that sits at the 70th combined percentile. The CPU is the standout component, ranked in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 32,115, while the GPU ranks in the 58th percentile with an average score of 15,852, making this a CPU-first build where the processor’s capabilities exceed the graphics card’s relative standing. The system is designed for users who need strong multi-threaded compute performance for productivity tasks, with gaming being a secondary consideration that is still adequately served at 1080p and 1440p resolutions.

The pairing represents a mid-range desktop configuration in the Raptor Lake and Radeon RX 7000 series families, built on modern platforms with PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU and PCIe 4.0 x16 from the GPU. The 16 GB VRAM is the GPU’s most compelling feature, offering future-proofing for high-resolution textures and large datasets, while the CPU’s 16 threads and 20 MB L3 cache provide solid application performance. The overall tier is mainstream-to-upper-mid-range, with the CPU exceeding expectations for its class and the GPU performing as a competent but not exceptional mid-range card. Users building this system should prioritize CPU-heavy workloads like programming, video editing, and 3D rendering, and should set expectations for gaming performance that reflects the GPU’s 58th percentile standing rather than the system’s combined 70th percentile.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14400

AMD Radeon RX 7700

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds