SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400

32,115 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

48,477 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-14400 + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT: A High-Performance Desktop Pairing

The Intel Core i5-14400 and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT form a desktop build that targets high-resolution gaming and demanding productivity tasks. This pairing combines a 14th-generation Raptor Lake refresh CPU with a RDNA 2.0 flagship GPU from the RX 6000 series. The CPU sits in the 82nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands in the 85th percentile among all graphics cards, placing the combined system in the 84th percentile overall. This is a capable mid-to-high-end desktop configuration, though it is important to note that no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the benchmark database; all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400 is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features 10 cores and 16 threads, a configuration that pairs performance cores with efficient cores to balance throughput and power draw. The base clock runs at 2.50 GHz, boosting up to 4.70 GHz under load, with a 65 W TDP that makes it suitable for standard desktop cooling solutions. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, and it includes ECC memory support, a feature typically found in workstation-class parts. The L3 cache is a shared 20 MB pool, with 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 80 KB of L1 cache per core.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,315 points is substantial, while the single-core score of 3,009 points indicates strong per-thread performance for everyday tasks. The Geekbench multi-core score of 9,807 and single-core score of 1,905 reinforce this pattern. In the PassMark suite, the multi-thread score of 25,080 and single-thread score of 3,741 demonstrate balanced capability across both parallel and sequential workloads. The data compression score of 314,995 and floating-point math score of 61,549 suggest that the CPU handles data-intensive operations well, while the integer math score of 82,017 points to strong general-purpose processing power.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 32,115 places it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, putting it ahead of roughly four-fifths of the processors in the database. Its nearest rivals illustrate the competitive landscape: the Intel Core i7-12800H scores 32,121, a 0% delta, meaning the i5-14400 essentially matches that mobile flagship. The Intel Core i7-13705H comes in at 32,076, a 0.1% difference, while the Intel Core i5-14450HX scores 32,040, a 0.2% gap. The Intel Core i9-11900, a previous-generation desktop flagship, scores 32,226, which is 0.3% higher than the i5-14400. These near-identical scores indicate that the i5-14400 delivers performance comparable to several higher-tier and mobile processors, making it a strong choice for users who need multi-core muscle without stepping up to a more expensive i7 or i9 part.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8,952 suggests the CPU can handle video encoding and 3D scene rendering with reasonable speed, while the single-core score of 1,263 ensures snappy responsiveness in applications that rely on one or two threads, such as web browsers and office suites. The PassMark physics score of 1,396 indicates solid performance in physics simulations, which can translate to gaming physics and scientific computing. The processor's integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a fallback display output, though the discrete GPU will handle all graphics duties in this build.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's single-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,009 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3,741, is sufficient to feed a high-end GPU in most gaming scenarios. The 82nd CPU percentile suggests it will not bottleneck the RX 6800 XT in most titles, though frame rates will be heavily influenced by the GPU as resolution increases.

Streaming: The 10-core, 16-thread configuration provides enough parallel processing headroom to handle game encoding and streaming software simultaneously. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,315 indicates that the CPU can manage the extra load of encoding video while maintaining game performance, especially when using the GPU's hardware encoders for the heavy lifting.

Video Editing: Multi-threaded performance is critical here, and the i5-14400 delivers. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2,148 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 25,080 suggest that timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export tasks will complete at a reasonable pace. The data encryption score of 16,731 also indicates adequate performance for encrypted project files.

3D Rendering: The CPU's rendering capability is demonstrated by the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8,952 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,315. These scores place the i5-14400 in a position where it can handle moderate 3D rendering workloads, though users with heavy production schedules might prefer a CPU with more cores. The floating-point math score of 61,549 supports this, as rendering engines often rely on floating-point calculations.

Software Development: The PassMark data compression score of 314,995 and random string sorting score of 32,346 indicate strong performance in code compilation and data processing tasks. The single-thread score of 3,741 ensures that IDEs and text editors remain responsive, while the multi-thread score of 25,080 speeds up build times for large projects.

Student and Office Work: For everyday productivity, the CPU is overkill. The Geekbench single-core score of 1,905 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,741 mean that word processors, spreadsheets, and web applications will run with no perceptible lag. The 65 W TDP also keeps power consumption reasonable for a machine that might run all day.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, using the Navi 21 chip manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process. The GPU packs 4,608 shading units, 288 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units, along with 72 ray tracing cores. The boost clock runs at 2250 MHz, with a game clock of 2015 MHz and a base clock of 1825 MHz. Memory consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The memory clock is listed at 2000 MHz, or 16 Gbps effective.

The GPU's compute capabilities are substantial. It delivers 20.74 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 41.47 TFLOPS of FP16 performance at a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 288.0 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 648.0 GTexel/s. The 16 GB of VRAM is a major asset for modern games and content creation applications, as it allows for high-resolution textures and large datasets without running out of memory. The 512.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that the GPU can feed its 4,608 shading units efficiently.

Benchmark scores reflect the GPU's position in the market. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,689 indicates strong DirectX 12 performance, which is the foundation for most modern PC games. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 171,304 and Vulkan score of 136,875 show that the GPU performs well in both compute and graphics workloads, while the Metal score of 181,337, though less relevant for Windows gaming, demonstrates raw compute power. The PassMark G3D score of 24,980 is a solid indicator of general 3D rendering capability, and the GPU compute score of 13,245 suggests it can handle non-graphics compute tasks like machine learning inference or cryptocurrency mining.

The RX 6800 XT sits in the 85th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 48,477. Its nearest rivals provide context: the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile scores 47,743, which is 1.5% lower, while the Intel Arc A550M scores 49,737, 2.5% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 49,957, a 3% advantage, and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 50,001, also 3% higher. This places the RX 6800 XT in a competitive position, roughly on par with or slightly behind these newer and mobile parts, but with the advantage of 16 GB of VRAM and a 256-bit memory bus that many of these rivals lack.

For rendering workloads, the 72 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the RDNA 2.0 implementation is not as robust as newer architectures. The FP32 throughput of 20.74 TFLOPS is more than sufficient for 3D rendering in applications like Blender or Maya, and the 16 GB VRAM allows for complex scenes with high-resolution textures. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with the latest graphics APIs.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are well-matched for most workloads, but the bottleneck direction depends on the task and resolution. The CPU's 82nd percentile and the GPU's 85th percentile are close, suggesting that neither component will dominate the other in a way that creates a severe imbalance. However, the data indicates that the GPU is slightly more capable relative to its peers than the CPU is relative to its own peers.

In gaming at lower resolutions, the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,741 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,009 are strong, but they are not top-tier. At 1080p, the CPU may struggle to feed the GPU in CPU-intensive titles, potentially capping frame rates below what the RX 6800 XT can deliver. The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-11900, scores 0.3% higher, indicating that the i5-14400 is near the ceiling for its class.

At higher resolutions like 1440p or 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck. The RX 6800 XT's 85th percentile means it is faster than most GPUs, but it will still be the limiting factor as pixel count increases. The 16 GB VRAM helps at high resolutions and with high-quality textures, but the raw compute power of 20.74 TFLOPS will eventually be overwhelmed by the demands of 4K gaming.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts toward the CPU. Video editing and 3D rendering tasks that are multi-threaded will leverage the CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads, with the GPU accelerating specific tasks like effects rendering or final export. The PassMark multi-thread score of 25,080 indicates the CPU can handle these workloads, but users with heavy rendering schedules might find the CPU to be the weaker link compared to the GPU's compute capabilities.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the benchmark database. The following frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,689 and its 85th percentile ranking, the RX 6800 XT is capable of high frame rates at 1440p in most modern titles. The 20.74 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth suggest that the GPU can handle demanding games with high settings at this resolution, with frame rates likely in the 100-144 FPS range for esports titles and 60-100 FPS for AAA games.

At 1080p, the CPU becomes more relevant. The i5-14400's single-core performance, reflected in the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,009, is sufficient to avoid major bottlenecks in most games, though CPU-intensive titles may see frame rates capped at around 120-150 FPS. The GPU will likely not be the limiting factor at this resolution, as its compute power exceeds what most games require at 1080p.

At 4K, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck. The RX 6800 XT's 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 4K textures, but the 20.74 TFLOPS of FP32 performance may struggle to maintain 60 FPS in the most demanding titles at ultra settings. Users will likely need to adjust settings to medium or high to achieve playable frame rates at this resolution.

The GPU's ray tracing capabilities, provided by the 72 RT cores, are present but not class-leading. Games that heavily utilize ray tracing may see significant frame rate drops, and users who prioritize ray tracing performance might consider a different GPU. For rasterized rendering, the RX 6800 XT is a strong performer.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count, and how does it affect performance?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 has 10 cores and 16 threads, which is reflected in its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,315. This configuration allows it to handle multi-threaded workloads like video editing and 3D rendering effectively, while the single-core score of 3,009 ensures responsive performance in everyday tasks.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and why is that important?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This large VRAM pool allows for high-resolution textures and complex scenes in both gaming and content creation without running out of memory.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 84, meaning it outperforms 84% of the systems in the database. The CPU sits in the 82nd percentile, and the GPU sits in the 85th percentile, indicating a well-balanced pairing.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14400 supports ECC memory, a feature that is uncommon in mainstream desktop processors. This makes the build suitable for workstation use where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The GPU includes 72 ray tracing cores, which provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing. However, the RDNA 2.0 implementation is not as performant as newer architectures, and games that heavily use ray tracing may see lower frame rates compared to rasterized rendering.

Q: What are the closest rival components to this CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU's nearest rival is the Intel Core i7-12800H, which scores 32,121 compared to the i5-14400's 32,115, a 0% difference. The GPU's nearest rival is the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile, which scores 47,743 compared to the RX 6800 XT's 48,477, a 1.5% difference.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 300 W. The suggested power supply for the GPU is 700 W, which should provide adequate headroom for the entire system.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-14400 demonstrates strong performance across multiple benchmark suites. In Cinebench, it scores 2,148 in R15 multi-core, 303 in R15 single-core, 8,952 in R20 multi-core, 1,263 in R20 single-core, 21,315 in R23 multi-core, and 3,009 in R23 single-core. The Geekbench scores are 9,807 for multi-core and 1,905 for single-core. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 25,080, a single-thread score of 3,741, and various specialized scores including 314,995 for data compression, 16,731 for data encryption, 19,816 for extended instructions, 80 for find prime numbers, 61,549 for floating-point math, 82,017 for integer math, 1,396 for physics, and 32,346 for random string sorting. The CPU's average benchmark score is 32,115, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs.

The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,689. In Geekbench, it scores 181,337 in Metal, 171,304 in OpenCL, and 136,875 in Vulkan. The PassMark suite shows scores of 155 for DirectX 10, 264 for DirectX 11, 100 for DirectX 12, 265 for DirectX 9, 1,030 for G2D, 24,980 for G3D, and 13,245 for GPU compute. The GPU's average benchmark score is 48,477, placing it in the 85th percentile of all GPUs.

The combined picture shows a system that is slightly stronger on the GPU side than the CPU side. The GPU's 85th percentile is three points higher than the CPU's 82nd percentile, indicating that the graphics card is a more significant contributor to the system's overall performance. The combined percentile of 84 reflects this balance, with the system outperforming the majority of builds in the database.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the Intel Core i5-14400, a 10-core, 16-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, with the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT, a 16 GB GDDR6 graphics card from the Radeon RX 6000 series. The CPU is built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process, while the GPU uses the RDNA 2.0 architecture on TSMC's 7 nm process. The CPU has a 65 W TDP and supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the GPU has a 300 W TDP and requires a 700 W power supply.

The system sits in the 84th combined percentile, placing it in the upper tier of desktop builds. The CPU's 82nd percentile and GPU's 85th percentile indicate that this is a high-performance configuration capable of handling demanding gaming and productivity workloads. The CPU's nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-12800H, Core i7-13705H, Core i5-14450HX, and Core i9-11900, all of which score within 0.3% of the i5-14400. The GPU's nearest rivals are the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile, Intel Arc A550M, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, with scores ranging from 1.5% lower to 3% higher.

The GPU's launch MSRP is $649 USD, and the CPU's launch MSRP is $221, though neither figure affects the performance analysis. The build class is desktop, confirming that this is a stationary system intended for high-performance use.

Who Should Build It

This CPU-GPU pairing is well-suited for gamers targeting high-refresh 1440p gaming. The GPU's 85th percentile and 20.74 TFLOPS of FP32 performance indicate it can handle demanding games at this resolution, while the CPU's single-core score of 3,009 ensures it can keep up with game logic and physics. The 16 GB VRAM also provides future-proofing for upcoming titles with higher texture requirements.

Content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the combination of the CPU's multi-threaded performance and the GPU's compute capabilities. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,315 and the PassMark GPU compute score of 13,245 suggest that both components contribute to faster render times and smoother editing workflows. The 16 GB VRAM is particularly valuable for 3D artists working with large scenes.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's strong integer math score of 82,017 and data compression score of 314,995, which speed up code compilation and data processing tasks. The single-thread performance ensures that IDEs remain responsive, while the multi-thread performance accelerates build times. The GPU's compute capabilities can also be leveraged for machine learning tasks or GPU-accelerated development.

Students and office workers who need a system that can handle both productivity and entertainment will find this build more than sufficient. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,741 ensures snappy application performance, while the GPU can handle occasional gaming or creative projects. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power consumption manageable for a machine that might run for long periods.

Small business workstations that rely on applications like CAD, data analysis, or video production will benefit from the system's balanced performance. The ECC memory support on the CPU is a notable feature for data integrity, and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM can handle large datasets in visualization software. The system's 84th combined percentile indicates it outperforms the majority of workstations in the database, making it a solid investment for professional use.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14400

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds