SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + AMD Radeon RX 6800

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400

32,115 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6800

30,095 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14400 and AMD Radeon RX 6800 form a desktop pairing that sits in the upper tier of system performance. The combined percentile rank of 79 places this build ahead of the majority of configurations tracked in the database, though the exact nature of that performance varies significantly between CPU-heavy and GPU-heavy workloads. The data shows a processor that excels in multi-threaded productivity tasks paired with a graphics card that delivers strong rasterization performance, but the absence of measured frame rate data means that gaming assessments must be inferred from synthetic benchmark scores rather than direct observation.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400 is a 10-core, 16-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that suggests efficient power management for a desktop part. The chip is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node, with a die size of 215 mm², and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, along with ECC memory support. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache.

Benchmark results reveal a processor that is particularly strong in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the i5-14400 scores 21,315 points in the multi-core test, which is a substantial figure for a mid-range desktop chip. The single-core score of 3,009 points in the same test indicates that the architecture's high boost clock translates well to lightly-threaded tasks. Geekbench results show 9,807 for multi-core and 1,905 for single-core, reinforcing the pattern of strong parallel performance. Passmark tests provide additional insight: the multithread score of 25,080 and single-thread score of 3,741 both sit in competitive territory, while specialized workloads like floating-point math (61,549) and integer math (82,017) demonstrate the chip's arithmetic throughput.

The CPU's percentile rank against all processors is 82, meaning it outperforms roughly four-fifths of the CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals in the average benchmark score are the Intel Core i7-12800H (32,121 vs. 32,115, a 0% delta), the Intel Core i7-13705H (32,076, 0.1% faster), and the Intel Core i5-14450HX (32,040, 0.2% faster), while the Intel Core i9-11900 sits slightly ahead at 32,226 (-0.3% delta). This clustering suggests that the i5-14400 delivers performance comparable to higher-tier mobile and older desktop parts, which is notable given its 10-core configuration.

For real-world workloads, the multi-core strength indicates strong performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where the 16 threads can be fully utilized. The single-core performance, while not class-leading, is sufficient for responsive everyday use and applications that rely on a few fast threads. The Passmark data encryption score of 16,731 and data compression score of 314,995 suggest that the chip handles cryptographic and archival tasks with reasonable efficiency, though the extended instructions score of 19,816 and prime number finding score of 80 indicate that some specialized workloads may not scale as well.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance tier of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile rank is 79, placing this desktop build in the upper quartile of all tracked configurations, meaning it outperforms approximately 79% of systems in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-14400 has an average benchmark score of 32,115, which is virtually identical to the Intel Core i7-12800H (32,121, 0% delta) and the Intel Core i7-13705H (32,076, 0.1% faster). It also trails the Intel Core i9-11900 by only 0.3% (32,226 vs. 32,115).

Q: What memory types does the processor support?

A: The i5-14400 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it also supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer desktop chip.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Radeon RX 6800 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The RX 6800 has an average benchmark score of 30,095. It is 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti (29,945) and 0.6% ahead of the RTX 5070 Mobile (29,928), while the AMD Radeon RX 6700 is 1.1% faster (30,433).

Q: What is the processor's socket and platform?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which is the platform for Intel's 12th, 13th, and 14th generation desktop processors, and it supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Q: What is the recommended power supply for this build?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 600 W, which should provide adequate headroom for the 250 W TDP of the graphics card and the 65 W TDP of the processor.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, and the dataIsMeasured field is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The Radeon RX 6800's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,188 and Passmark G3D score of 22,067 indicate that this GPU is capable of handling modern titles at high settings, though the exact frame rates will depend on the specific game, resolution, and CPU interaction.

The GPU's percentile rank of 75 against all GPUs suggests that it sits above the median, with performance comparable to the RTX 3070 Ti (0.5% faster) and RTX 2080 Ti (1% faster) based on average scores. For 1080p gaming, the RX 6800's 16.17 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 505.2 GTexel/s texture rate should deliver high frame rates in most titles, likely exceeding 60 FPS at ultra settings in many games. At 1440p, the 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient headroom for high-resolution textures, though the exact FPS will be lower than at 1080p.

At 4K, the GPU's performance will be more constrained, but the 16 GB memory capacity is a positive factor for games that exceed 8 GB of VRAM usage. The CPU's single-core performance, as indicated by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,009, should not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions where GPU load is the dominant factor. However, in CPU-bound scenarios like competitive shooters at low settings, the i5-14400's boost clock of 4.70 GHz should provide adequate responsiveness. The estimated FPS figures are speculative, but the underlying benchmark data suggests a system that can handle 1080p and 1440p gaming with high settings, with 4K being more demanding on the GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU in this build is generally well-matched, but the data reveals different limiting factors depending on the workload. The CPU's percentile rank of 82 is higher than the GPU's percentile rank of 75, suggesting that the processor has slightly more relative headroom compared to the graphics card. In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data compression (Passmark score of 314,995), and multi-threaded rendering (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 21,315), the processor is the primary driver, and the GPU's role is minimal.

In GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolutions or 3D rendering with ray tracing, the RX 6800 becomes the limiting factor. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 22,067 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,188 indicate that it will be the constraint in graphically intensive tasks, particularly at 4K where the CPU's performance advantage becomes less relevant. The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, suggests that at 1080p, the CPU may occasionally bottleneck the GPU in lightly-threaded games, but at 1440p and above, the GPU is the clear limiting factor.

The Passmark GPU compute score of 10,864, compared to the CPU's Passmark multithread score of 25,080, shows that the CPU is significantly stronger in general compute tasks. This means that for workloads like video encoding or physics simulations that can use both CPU and GPU, the balance will shift based on how well the software utilizes each component. The memory bandwidth of the GPU (512.0 GB/s) is substantially higher than the CPU's dual-channel memory bandwidth, but the CPU's 20 MB L3 cache helps mitigate memory latency in many scenarios. Overall, the system is well-balanced for gaming and productivity, with the GPU being the primary limiter in graphics-heavy tasks and the CPU excelling in multi-threaded workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This build is well-suited for high-refresh gaming at 1080p and 1440p, where the RX 6800's 16.17 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 505.2 GTexel/s texture rate can push frame rates well above 60 FPS in most titles. The CPU's single-core score of 3,009 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame pacing remains consistent, though the exact FPS depends on the game and settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads and Passmark multithread score of 25,080 provide sufficient headroom for software encoding while gaming, though the lack of dedicated hardware encoders on the GPU (the RX 6800 has no tensor cores or NVENC equivalent) means that streaming quality will rely on the CPU's x264 encoding capabilities. The data suggests this is viable but not optimal for high-bitrate streaming.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,315 and Passmark integer math score of 82,017 indicate strong performance in video editing workloads like rendering timelines and applying effects. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth can accelerate GPU-accelerated effects and color grading, making this a capable system for 1080p and 1440p video editing.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R20 multi-core of 8,952) is strong for CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,188 and Passmark GPU compute score of 10,864 suggest it can handle GPU-accelerated rendering in applications that support OpenCL or Vulkan. The 16 GB VRAM is beneficial for large scenes and high-resolution textures.

Software development: The CPU's 16 threads and Passmark data encryption score of 16,731, along with the multithread score of 25,080, make this a solid choice for compiling code and running virtual machines. The single-thread score of 3,741 in Passmark ensures responsive IDE performance, and the 20 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 3,009) and the integrated UHD Graphics 730 provide adequate performance for everyday tasks like web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet work. The GPU is overkill for this scenario, but the system's overall responsiveness and multitasking capability are strong, with the Passmark single-thread score of 3,741 indicating fast application launches.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need a balance of multi-threaded CPU performance and strong GPU rasterization for gaming and productivity. Gamers at 1080p and 1440p resolutions will benefit from the RX 6800's performance tier, which sits 0.5% ahead of the RTX 3070 Ti and 1% ahead of the RTX 2080 Ti in average benchmark scores, ensuring high frame rates in most titles. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will appreciate the CPU's 16 threads and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM, which supports large textures and complex scenes.

Developers compiling large codebases will find the CPU's Passmark multithread score of 25,080 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,315 to be substantial assets, reducing build times compared to lower-core-count processors. Students and office workers may find the system more powerful than needed, but the CPU's efficiency (65 W TDP) and the GPU's capability ensure that the system will remain relevant for years. Small business workstations that require occasional GPU acceleration for tasks like CAD or data visualization will also benefit from this pairing, though the GPU's end-of-life production status may be a consideration for long-term procurement.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14400 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory that matches their budget and performance needs. The socket supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe SSDs. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward-compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, ensuring full bandwidth utilization.

The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 250 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 600 W, indicate that the system has modest power requirements, leaving headroom for future upgrades. A sensible next upgrade path would be to replace the GPU with a newer model that offers higher performance, as the CPU's percentile rank of 82 suggests it has more headroom than the GPU's rank of 75. Alternatively, upgrading the CPU to a higher-core-count Socket 1700 part would improve multi-threaded performance, though the current chip's performance is already competitive with the Intel Core i7-12800H and i9-11900.

The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that users can choose to upgrade memory without changing the motherboard, provided the motherboard supports the chosen type. The ECC memory support is a unique feature for a consumer chip, making this platform potentially attractive for small-scale servers or workstations that require data integrity. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a fallback display output and can be used for quick sync encoding, though the discrete GPU will handle most graphics tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs the Intel Core i5-14400 with the AMD Radeon RX 6800. The combined percentile rank of 79 places this system in the upper tier of all tracked configurations, indicating that it outperforms the majority of builds in the database. The CPU's percentile of 82 and the GPU's percentile of 75 show that the processor is relatively stronger than the graphics card, but both components are above the median.

The system is designed for users who require a balance of CPU and GPU performance, with the CPU excelling in multi-threaded productivity tasks and the GPU providing strong rasterization for gaming. The build class of "desktop" means it is intended for stationary use, with the GPU's dual-slot design and 267 mm length requiring a mid-tower or larger case. The overall tier is solidly mid-to-high range, suitable for 1080p and 1440p gaming and productivity workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 32,115, with a percentile rank of 82 against all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in this metric are the Intel Core i7-12800H (32,121, 0% delta) and the Intel Core i7-13705H (32,076, 0.1% faster), showing that the i5-14400 performs on par with mobile H-series chips. The GPU's average benchmark score is 30,095, with a percentile rank of 75 against all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti (29,945, 0.5% slower) and the RTX 5070 Mobile (29,928, 0.6% slower), while the AMD Radeon RX 6700 is 1.1% faster (30,433).

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, but the GPU is still capable of high performance in graphics workloads. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,315 and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,188 indicate that this build can handle demanding multi-threaded tasks and modern games. The Passmark data shows the CPU's strength in integer math (82,017) and floating-point math (61,549), while the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 22,067 and GPU compute score of 10,864 demonstrate its graphics and compute capabilities. The combined percentile of 79 reflects a system that is well above average, though not at the top tier.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6800 is based on the Navi 21 chip, built on TSMC's 7 nm process node with 26,800 million transistors on a 520 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 51.5M per mm². It features 3,840 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units, along with 60 ray tracing cores. The GPU has no tensor cores, which means it lacks dedicated AI acceleration hardware, but it does support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). This large memory capacity is a significant advantage for high-resolution textures and modern games that exceed 8 GB of VRAM usage. The GPU's clocks are 1700 MHz base, 1815 MHz game, and 2105 MHz boost, with pixel rate of 202.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 505.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute performance is 16.17 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

Benchmark results show the GPU's performance tier: the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,188 and Passmark G3D score of 22,067 place it in the upper mid-range, with the percentile rank of 75 confirming its position. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 115,107 and OpenCL score of 24,508 indicate strong compute performance for a range of applications. The Passmark DirectX scores vary, with DirectX 11 at 214 and DirectX 12 at 89, suggesting that the GPU is more efficient in older APIs or that the synthetic tests do not fully capture its capabilities. The GPU's TDP of 250 W, with a suggested PSU of 600 W and dual 8-pin power connectors, requires a robust power supply. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, and 1x USB Type-C, providing flexible connectivity for modern monitors. The GPU is end-of-life in production status, with a release date of 2020-10-27, and its launch MSRP was 579 USD.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + AMD Radeon RX 6800

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14400

AMD Radeon RX 6800

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds