SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400

32,115 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

26,011 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14400 and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT pairing represents a solid mid-range desktop foundation, combining a 10-core Raptor Lake CPU with a 12 GB RDNA 2 graphics card. The data places this combination in the 77th percentile overall, indicating a system that sits comfortably above the median performer in the database, though it does not reach the top tier of available hardware.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using the Navi 22 chip, manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC. The GPU packs 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, with a transistor count of 17,200 million on a 335 mm² die. Clock speeds are set at a 2150 MHz base, a 2495 MHz game clock, and a 2600 MHz boost clock, which helps drive a pixel rate of 166.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 416.0 GTexel/s. The memory subsystem is a highlight: 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus delivers 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, a figure that proves adequate for high-resolution texture loads in modern titles without falling back to system memory.

For ray tracing and compute, the RX 6750 XT includes 40 dedicated ray accelerators, though it lacks the tensor cores found in competing architectures. The FP32 throughput is rated at 13.31 TFLOPS, with FP16 reaching 26.62 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. Benchmark results show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2548, a Geekbench Vulkan score of 98089, and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 16360. In PassMark, the GPU posts a G3D score of 20700, with DirectX 11 and DirectX 12 scores of 180 and 80, respectively. The DirectX 9 score of 263 and DirectX 10 score of 125 suggest that legacy API performance is not the primary strength here, but modern workloads are well within reach.

The GPU’s percentile rank against all GPUs is 71, which means it outperforms roughly seven out of ten graphics cards in the database. Its nearest rivals in terms of average score are the AMD Radeon R9 M395X (deltaPct 0.5), AMD FirePro W7100 (deltaPct 0.6), AMD FirePro D700 (deltaPct 0.7), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile (deltaPct 1.1). The deltaPct values are all positive for the RX 6750 XT, indicating it holds a slight edge over each of these cards, though the margins are tight — less than 1.1% in every case. This places the GPU in a competitive band where small architectural differences, rather than raw throughput, often decide the winner.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 77, which reflects a system that is better than average but not exceptional. The CPU’s individual percentile is 82, while the GPU sits at 71, showing that the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 32115, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core i7-12800H (avgScore 32121, deltaPct 0), the Intel Core i7-13705H (avgScore 32076, deltaPct 0.1), the Intel Core i5-14450HX (avgScore 32040, deltaPct 0.2), and the Intel Core i9-11900 (avgScore 32226, deltaPct -0.3). The deltaPct figures here are remarkably small, meaning the i5-14400 is statistically indistinguishable from these four CPUs in aggregate performance.

For the GPU, the average benchmark score is 26011, with nearest rivals as listed above. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21315 and singlecore score of 3009 show strong multi-threaded capability, while the Geekbench multicore score of 9807 and singlecore score of 1905 reinforce this picture. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20700 is its most representative gaming metric, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2548 provides a modern API reference. The combined picture is one of balance: the CPU’s 82nd percentile rank ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU’s 71st percentile rank in most scenarios, making the system a coherent whole rather than a mismatched pair.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-14400 is a 14th Generation desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². The CPU features 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, and ECC memory is supported, which broadens its appeal for lower-end workstation builds. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a fallback display output, and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes is available for the CPU.

Benchmark results indicate a processor that punches above its mainstream positioning. The Cinebench R15 multicore score is 2148, with a singlecore score of 303. Moving to R20, the multicore score jumps to 8952 and singlecore to 1263. The R23 scores are 21315 multicore and 3009 singlecore, which are strong figures for a 65 W TDP part. Geekbench shows 9807 multicore and 1905 singlecore. PassMark tests reveal specific workload strengths: data compression scores 314995, data encryption scores 16731, extended instructions score 19816, floating point math scores 61549, integer math scores 82017, multithread scores 25080, physics scores 1396, random string sorting scores 32346, and single thread scores 3741. The find prime numbers score of 80 is notably low, suggesting that this CPU is not optimized for that specific integer workload, but virtually every other metric shows robust performance.

The percentile rank of 82 against all CPUs means the i5-14400 outperforms the majority of processors in the database. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-12800H, has an identical average score of 32121 with a deltaPct of 0, while the i9-11900 is slightly ahead at 32226 with a deltaPct of -0.3. This places the i5-14400 in the same performance envelope as a previous-generation i9 desktop part and a current mobile i7, which speaks to the efficiency of the Raptor Lake architecture. For real workloads, the 10-core/16-thread configuration with a 4.70 GHz boost handles multi-threaded applications like video encoding and 3D rendering with ease, while the strong single-core score of 3009 in R23 ensures responsive performance in lightly threaded tasks like web browsing and office applications.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The RX 6750 XT’s PassMark G3D score of 20700 and 12 GB VRAM with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provide enough headroom for 1080p and 1440p gaming at high refresh rates. The CPU’s singlecore Cinebench R23 score of 3009 ensures that frame pacing remains consistent, though exact FPS figures are estimates since no measured data exists for this pairing.

Streaming: The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads, reflected in a PassMark multithread score of 25080, can handle encoding workloads alongside gaming without significant frame drops. The GPU’s 40 ray accelerators do not assist with encoding, but the CPU’s strong multicore performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21315, makes x264 encoding a viable option.

Video editing: The combination of the CPU’s integer math score of 82017 and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 16360 indicates solid performance for timeline editing and effects processing. The 12 GB VRAM allows for multiple high-resolution video streams in the GPU memory, reducing the likelihood of playback stutter during multi-track edits.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multicore score of 8952 and the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 13.31 TFLOPS make this system capable of handling moderate rendering tasks. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2548 suggests that real-time viewport rendering will be fluid, while the CPU handles final frame rendering with its 20 MB of L3 cache.

Software development: The CPU’s data compression score of 314995 and extended instructions score of 19816 indicate strong performance for compilation and code analysis. The 16 threads allow for parallel builds, and the 65 W TDP means the system remains cool and quiet during long compile sessions, making it a practical choice for developers.

Student and office work: The CPU’s singlecore Geekbench score of 1905 and PassMark single thread score of 3741 deliver responsive performance for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a backup display option, but the discrete GPU is overkill for these tasks, meaning the system has substantial headroom for occasional multitasking or light content creation.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data shows a system where the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, with an 82nd percentile rank versus the GPU’s 71st percentile. This 11-point gap suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios, the processor will not be the limiting factor, but in GPU-bound scenarios, the graphics card will cap performance. For gaming at high resolutions, the GPU’s pixel rate of 166.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 416.0 GTexel/s will determine the maximum frame rate, and the 12 GB VRAM is the likely bottleneck for 4K texture-heavy titles. The CPU’s strong single-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 singlecore score of 3009, means it can feed the GPU effectively at 1080p and 1440p, where the GPU’s compute capabilities, measured by a PassMark G3D score of 20700, will be the primary constraint.

In productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 25080 will drive multi-threaded tasks like video export, while the GPU’s compute score of 9550 in PassMark will handle GPU-accelerated effects. The GPU’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, is within 1.1% in aggregate score, meaning that the RX 6750 XT is not a class-leading card, and users seeking higher FPS would need to look above this performance tier. Conversely, the CPU’s nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-11900, is only 0.3% ahead, so upgrading the CPU would yield negligible gains. The practical bottleneck is the GPU for gaming and the CPU for heavily multi-threaded productivity, but the system is balanced enough that neither component will consistently hold the other back in mixed workloads.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build is best suited for gamers targeting 1080p and 1440p resolutions at high settings, given the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and passmark G3D score of 20700. Content creators who work with 1080p or 1440p video will find the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21315 and GPU’s OpenCL score of 16360 sufficient for editing and rendering. Software developers will benefit from the CPU’s data compression score of 314995 and 16 threads, which accelerate compilation times. Students and office workers will have far more performance than needed, but the system’s 65 W CPU TDP and dual-slot GPU make it a reasonable desktop choice with the headroom for occasional gaming or creative work. Small business workstations that require ECC memory support will appreciate the CPU’s ECC capability, and the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM is useful for CAD or data visualization tasks that load large models.

The build is not ideal for 4K gaming, as the GPU’s 71st percentile rank suggests it will struggle with the highest resolutions. Similarly, professionals doing heavy 3D rendering or machine learning will find the lack of tensor cores and the GPU’s 13.31 TFLOPS FP32 performance limiting. However, for a balanced desktop that handles gaming, productivity, and development without a clear weak point, this pairing is defensible. The CPU’s 82nd percentile rank ensures the system will not feel outdated quickly, and the GPU’s 12 GB memory buffer is future-proof for the next few years of game releases.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the GPU and CPU benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2548 and PassMark G3D score of 20700 indicate that the RX 6750 XT is capable of delivering high frame rates at 1080p in most titles, with 1440p performance being solid but not class-leading. The CPU’s singlecore Cinebench R23 score of 3009 ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most games, even at lower resolutions where CPU overhead is more significant.

At 1080p ultra settings, the system is expected to exceed 60 FPS in most modern titles, with esports titles potentially hitting 144 FPS or higher given the GPU’s texture rate of 416.0 GTexel/s. At 1440p, frame rates will likely drop to the 50-70 FPS range for demanding games, though lighter titles will still push past 100 FPS. At 4K, the 12 GB VRAM is sufficient, but the GPU’s 64 ROPs and 13.31 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will limit performance to around 30-45 FPS in the most graphically intensive games. These estimates are based on the GPU’s overall percentile rank of 71 and its benchmark scores relative to the nearest rivals, which are all within 1.1% of its average score.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i5-14400 with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT. The combined percentile of 77 places it in the upper-middle tier of the database, meaning it outperforms a majority of systems but is not a top-tier enthusiast build. The CPU is a mainstream 10-core part with a 65 W TDP and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, while the GPU is a 250 W dual-slot card with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory. The CPU’s individual percentile of 82 is notably higher than the GPU’s 71, so the system’s overall rank is pulled down by the graphics card. This pairing is best described as a high-end mainstream desktop, suitable for 1080p and 1440p gaming and moderate productivity workloads, but it is not designed for extreme overclocking (the CPU multiplier is locked) or 4K gaming at high frame rates.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 77, which means it outperforms 77% of all systems in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14400 compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-11900?

A: The i5-14400 has an average benchmark score of 32115, while the i9-11900 scores 32226, resulting in a deltaPct of -0.3, meaning the i9 is 0.3% faster.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT have ray tracing hardware?

A: Yes, it includes 40 ray accelerators, which support ray tracing workloads, but it lacks tensor cores.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RX 6750 XT?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the Intel Core i5-14400 has a locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked is false), so overclocking is not supported.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile rank against all GPUs?

A: The RX 6750 XT is in the 71st percentile, meaning it outperforms 71% of all GPUs in the database.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this specific CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14400

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds