SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600T

35,305 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

117,088 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core i5-13600T is a desktop Raptor Lake-S CPU with 14 cores and 20 threads, and the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is an Ada Lovelace workstation GPU. The CPU holds an 85th-percentile ranking, the GPU a 95th-percentile ranking, and the combined build ranks at the 90th percentile. The database contains no measuredFps rows for this exact combination, so any frame-rate discussion is estimated from benchmark scores rather than measured results.

CPU Analysis

The i5-13600T is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-S processor on Intel Socket 1700. It has an 1800 MHz base clock and a 4.80 GHz boost clock, with a 35W TDP. That power target is low for a desktop part, but the benchmark results still show substantial throughput. The CPU uses Intel's 10 nm process, a 215 mm² die, and a 24 MB shared L3 cache, with 80 KB L1 per core and 1.25 MB L2 per core. Memory support covers DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, and ECC memory is reported as supported. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is also present, so the system can operate without a discrete GPU.

The average benchmark score is 35305. The nearest rival is the Intel Core i7-12700K at 35287 with a deltaPct of 0. The Core i7-12700KF scores 35365 with a deltaPct of -0.2, the Core i7-13700T scores 35403 with a deltaPct of -0.3, and the Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35428 with a deltaPct of -0.3. In other words, this 35W i5 is effectively tied with those heavier-class parts in aggregate benchmark performance. The launch MSRP is $255.

For real workloads, the 14-core/20-thread configuration matters. Cinebench R23 multicore performance is 23571, which indicates strong all-core rendering; single-core Cinebench R23 is 3327, showing high responsiveness. Geekbench multicore is 10851 and single-core is 2385. PassMark multithread is 27098, integer math is 96299, and floating-point math is 70152. The PassMark single-thread score is 3728. These numbers point to a CPU that can handle threaded productivity, code compilation, and rendering while still delivering fast single-threaded performance for everyday interaction.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core i5-13600T use?

A: Intel Socket 1700.

Q: Does the CPU include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes UHD Graphics 770.

Q: What memory types are supported?

A: DDR4 and DDR5 are supported in dual-channel mode, and ECC memory is listed as supported.

Q: How much video memory does the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation have?

A: It has 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, with 280.0 GB/s memory bandwidth.

Q: What graphics APIs does the GPU support?

A: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What display outputs does the GPU provide?

A: Four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Q: Does the GPU need an external power connector?

A: No, the power connectors field is listed as "None", and the suggested PSU is 250W.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmark set is broad. The table below lists the exact CPU scores from the database.

| Test | Score |

|---|---|

| Cinebench R15 Multicore | 2375 |

| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 335 |

| Cinebench R20 Multicore | 9899 |

| Cinebench R20 Single-Core | 1397 |

| Cinebench R23 Multicore | 23571 |

| Cinebench R23 Single-Core | 3327 |

| Geekbench Multicore | 10851 |

| Geekbench Single-Core | 2385 |

| PassMark Data Compression | 337893 |

| PassMark Data Encryption | 19320 |

| PassMark Extended Instructions | 20651 |

| PassMark Find Prime Numbers | 82 |

| PassMark Floating Point Math | 70152 |

| PassMark Integer Math | 96299 |

| PassMark Multithread | 27098 |

| PassMark Physics | 1287 |

| PassMark Random String Sorting | 36413 |

| PassMark Single Thread | 3728 |

The GPU has two benchmark entries: Geekbench OpenCL at 124812 and Geekbench Vulkan at 109364. The GPU average benchmark score is 117088, placing it in the 95th percentile of all GPUs. The CPU average benchmark score is 35305, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The combined component percentile is 90.

The GPU's nearest rivals by aggregate score are the NVIDIA GB10 at 117393 with a deltaPct of -0.3, the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 at 118976 with a deltaPct of -1.6, the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB at 114395 with a deltaPct of 2.4, and the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile at 113944 with a deltaPct of 2.8. The combined picture is a CPU that is comfortably above average and a GPU that sits near the top of the database.

Balance and Bottleneck

Without measuredFpsUltraByGame data, FPS scaling cannot be derived from game-specific runs. Balance must be inferred from component percentiles and compute scores. The CPU is at the 85th percentile while the GPU is at the 95th percentile, meaning the GPU is the more exceptional component relative to its comparison pool. In CPU-bound workloads such as physics-heavy game logic or single-threaded simulation, the i5-13600T's 4.80 GHz boost clock and PassMark single-thread score of 3728 will determine performance. In GPU-bound workloads such as high-detail rendering, the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation's 48 RT cores and 19.17 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput are the stronger assets.

The CPU's multithreaded PassMark score of 27098 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23571 show it can feed the GPU in parallel workloads, but the percentile gap suggests the GPU is less likely to be the limiting component in general compute. The 20 GB frame buffer and 280.0 GB/s memory bandwidth on the GPU also mean memory capacity is unlikely to be the primary bottleneck for content creation. The limiting factor will shift depending on workload: compilation, physics, and scene setup will lean on the CPU, while shading, ray tracing, and large-buffer rendering will lean on the GPU.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation uses the AD104 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process. The die contains 35,800 million transistors on 294 mm², with a transistor density of 121.8 million per mm². The GPU core runs at a 720 MHz base clock and a 1560 MHz boost clock. Memory runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective data rate. The 20 GB GDDR6 frame buffer is paired with a 160-bit memory bus and 280.0 GB/s bandwidth.

The shader configuration includes 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, 48 RT cores, and 192 tensor cores. Peak pixel rate is 99.84 GPixel/s, texture rate is 299.5 GTexel/s, and FP32 throughput is 19.17 TFLOPS. FP16 throughput is also 19.17 TFLOPS, listed with a 1:1 ratio. The GPU is rated at 70W, uses a dual-slot cooler, has no power connectors, and a suggested PSU of 250W. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, and the display outputs are four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a connectors.

The 95th-percentile ranking means the GPU outperforms the vast majority of GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals show a tight grouping: the NVIDIA GB10 is 0.3% higher in aggregate, the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 is 1.6% higher, while the Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB trails by 2.4% and the RTX A5500 Mobile trails by 2.8%. For rendering, the key strengths are the 20 GB memory capacity for large scenes and textures, the 48 RT cores for ray-traced workloads, and the 192 tensor cores for accelerated compute. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 109364 and OpenCL score of 124812 support the rendering and compute story.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread results are strong — Cinebench R23 single-core 3327, Geekbench single-core 2385, and PassMark single-thread 3728. The GPU is in the 95th percentile with 19.17 TFLOPS FP32 and a 99.84 GPixel/s pixel rate. This combination should handle demanding game rendering, though no measured FPS figures exist for this exact build.

Streaming: Streaming adds parallel encoding and capture work to the system. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, supported by a PassMark multithread score of 27098, provide headroom for simultaneous game and stream processing. The GPU's tensor cores and RT cores add compute capacity for effects-heavy workloads.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multicore of 23571 and GPU OpenCL of 124812 indicate a capable editing system. The 20 GB GPU memory can hold long preview timelines and high-resolution frames, while the 280.0 GB/s memory bandwidth helps move pixel data during effects processing.

3D rendering: The GPU is the centerpiece here. Its 48 RT cores, 192 tensor cores, and 20 GB GDDR6 frame buffer are aligned with ray-traced and AI-accelerated rendering. The CPU's multicore score of 23571 handles scene preparation, simulation, and export tasks around that GPU rendering core.

Software development: Compilation benefits from multicore throughput, and the i5-13600T delivers a PassMark multithread score of 27098 and Geekbench multicore of 10851. Single-thread performance matters for editor responsiveness, and the PassMark single-thread score of 3728 covers that. ECC memory support is also listed, which is relevant for data-integrity-sensitive development work.

Student and office work: The CPU's integrated UHD Graphics 770 means basic desktop operation does not require the discrete GPU. The 35W CPU TDP and 70W GPU TDP make this a moderate-power platform, while the high single-thread score supports fast application launch and browsing. This is powerful for general productivity, but the 95th-percentile GPU is far beyond office requirements.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who want both a strong workstation GPU and a capable but efficient CPU. Gamers who prioritize high-detail, ray-traced, or high-refresh rendering would benefit from the 95th-percentile GPU and its 48 RT cores. Content creators working with video, 3D scenes, and large textures would benefit from the 20 GB VRAM and 19.17 TFLOPS FP32 compute. Software developers would benefit from the 14-core, 20-thread CPU and its PassMark multithread score of 27098. Students and small business workstation buyers would find the integrated graphics and low power envelope useful, though the discrete GPU is overkill for basic office workloads. The 85th-percentile CPU and 95th-percentile GPU together create a system that is most appropriate for GPU-heavy productivity rather than pure CPU compute.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around Intel Socket 1700. Memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with ECC support listed. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so the GPU has a compatible full-bandwidth slot. The power guidance is clear: the CPU TDP is 35W, the GPU TDP is 70W, and the suggested PSU is 250W. That leaves the current pairing comfortably inside the suggested power class.

The most direct upgrade path is the CPU. It is the lower-ranked component of the pair at the 85th percentile, while the GPU is at the 95th percentile, so replacing the CPU with another LGA1700 part would be the natural way to raise system-level performance. A GPU upgrade would also be possible through the PCIe 4.0 x16 slot, but any GPU that raises power demand would require re-evaluating the 250W PSU guidance. Memory can be configured as DDR4 or DDR5, so the user has two memory platforms available depending on the motherboard.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing an Intel Core i5-13600T with an NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation. The CPU is a 35W Raptor Lake-S part with 14 cores, 20 threads, and a 4.80 GHz boost clock. The GPU is a 70W Ada Lovelace workstation part with 20 GB GDDR6, 48 RT cores, and 192 tensor cores. The combined percentile of 90 places the pairing above most the database. The CPU average benchmark score is 35305, the GPU average benchmark score is 117088, and the combination is best described as a compact, high-throughput workstation with 85th-percentile CPU performance and 95th-percentile GPU performance.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data and dataIsMeasured is false, so all frame-rate expectations must be treated as estimates from benchmark scores rather than verified results.

The CPU's single-core scores are high enough to support responsive game logic: Cinebench R23 single-core 3327, Geekbench single-core 2385, and PassMark single-thread 3728. The GPU's 95th-percentile aggregate score, 19.17 TFLOPS FP32, and 99.84 GPixel/s pixel rate all suggest strong GPU-heavy rendering. Games that rely on ray tracing should benefit from the 48 RT cores, and the 20 GB frame buffer reduces memory pressure in high-detail scenes. For CPU-bound scenes, the 4.80 GHz boost clock matters. For GPU-bound scenes, the 280.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and large VRAM capacity matter. Specific FPS numbers cannot be derived from the available data; these are qualitative expectations based on the benchmark scores.