SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600T

35,305 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13600T + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

This desktop pairing combines Intel's 14-core Raptor Lake processor with NVIDIA's professional Turing-based workstation GPU, landing at the 73rd percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU sits at the 85th percentile versus all CPUs, while the GPU rests at the 61st percentile, creating a processor-heavy balance where the i5-13600T clearly outclasses the Quadro RTX 4000 in relative market position. The data shows a system optimized for multi-threaded productivity and professional applications rather than raw gaming dominance, with the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23571 providing the foundation for demanding compute workloads.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this system delivers playable but not elite performance. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15117 places it just 0.9% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 and 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon 780M, indicating mainstream 1080p capability rather than 144Hz competitive dominance. The CPU's single-thread PassMark score of 3728 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3327 ensure the processor won't bottleneck frame pacing in most titles, but the GPU's 61st percentile ranking limits ultra-high refresh potential.

Streaming workloads benefit from the asymmetric balance here. The CPU's 20 threads and 14 cores handle encoding overhead gracefully, with PassMark multi-thread score of 27098 and data compression score of 337893 indicating strong parallel throughput. Meanwhile, the GPU's 288 tensor cores and 36 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for broadcast effects and encoding tasks, though the 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth cap simultaneous gaming-plus-streaming at higher resolutions.

Video editing presents a mixed picture. The CPU's Geekbench multi-core score of 10851 and Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9899 handle timeline scrubbing and export encoding competently. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 74540 and Vulkan score of 78844 suggest capable acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects, but the 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 12 nm Turing architecture lag modern consumer cards in pure compute, making 4K multi-stream edits a stretch.

3D rendering favors the CPU strongly. The processor's Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2375 and R23 score of 23571 position it within 0.3% of the Intel Core i7-13700T and statistically tied with the i7-12700K (0% delta), making this a strong CPU rendering workstation. The GPU's 2304 shading units and 64 ROPs provide moderate viewport acceleration, but its 61st percentile ranking means GPU-based renderers like Octane or V-Ray GPU will underperform relative to the CPU side.

Software development suits this configuration well. The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 96299 and floating point math score of 70152 indicate robust compile throughput, while the 24 MB shared L3 cache reduces latency for iterative builds. The GPU's 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs plus USB Type-C support multiple monitors for code, documentation, and debugger views simultaneously.

Student and office work exceeds requirements. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3728 and Geekbench single-core score of 2385 deliver snappy application launches, while the 35 W TDP keeps thermals and noise low in shared spaces. The Quadro RTX 4000's professional driver certification ensures stability for productivity suites, though its 160 W TDP and single-slot design are overkill for basic office tasks — the integrated UHD Graphics 770 alone would suffice, making this GPU choice workload-driven rather than necessity-driven.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a pronounced CPU-favorable imbalance. The processor's 85th percentile versus all CPUs contrasts sharply with the GPU's 61st percentile, creating a 24-percentile gap that appears in nearly every workload. In CPU-bound scenarios like compilation, data compression (337893 PassMark), and physics calculations (1287 PassMark), the i5-13600T operates at near-peak efficiency while the GPU idles.

In GPU-bound tasks such as gaming, the Quadro RTX 4000 becomes the limiting factor. Its average benchmark score of 17789 sits just 0.7% above the AMD Radeon HD 7790, a far older part, indicating that frame rates will be constrained by the GPU's throughput regardless of the CPU's headroom. The 52 PassMark DirectX 12 score and 128 DirectX 11 score suggest the GPU handles modern APIs adequately but without the headroom for future titles.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated due to no measured data, points to a system where lowering resolution or graphical settings yields diminishing returns below 1080p because the CPU's strong single-thread performance (3728 PassMark single-thread) removes most CPU-side bottlenecks. Above 1080p, the GPU's 8 GB memory and 256-bit bus become the ceiling, with 416.0 GB/s bandwidth sufficient for 1440p but strained at 4K.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform provides a clear upgrade path within the same generation. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, dual-channel, with ECC memory support — a rarity for consumer platforms that benefits workstation reliability. The PCIe Gen 5 x16 interface (CPU only) offers bandwidth headroom for future GPUs, though the current Quadro RTX 4000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 and will not saturate even older lanes.

The power delivery situation is comfortable. The CPU's 35 W TDP and the GPU's 160 W TDP sum to 195 W, far below the 450 W suggested PSU rating. This leaves approximately 255 W of headroom for drives, fans, and peripheral devices, or a future GPU upgrade up to a 300 W-class card without replacing the power supply.

A sensible next upgrade would be the GPU, given the CPU's headroom. The processor's nearest rivals include the Core i7-12700K (0% delta) and i7-13700T (-0.3% delta), meaning the CPU already competes with higher-tier parts. Replacing the Quadro RTX 4000 with a modern consumer or workstation GPU would better utilize the CPU's 85th percentile standing, though the 450 W PSU and single 8-pin connector limit options to cards with similar or lower power draw.

Memory expansion is straightforward with dual-channel support, and the 24 MB shared L3 cache benefits from faster DDR5 modules. The 10 nm process node and 215 mm² die size indicate the CPU runs cool, leaving thermal headroom for sustained all-core loads without exotic cooling solutions.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming figures are estimates derived from benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The CPU's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3327, PassMark single-thread 3728) ensures that frame rates will be GPU-limited in virtually all gaming scenarios.

At 1080p ultra settings, the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15117 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873 suggest playable frame rates in esports titles and medium settings in AAA games. The 0.9% delta above the RTX 4060 in average score implies performance in the range of that mainstream card, though the Quadro's 8 GB memory and older Turing architecture may exhibit lower minimum frame rates in newer titles.

At 1440p ultra, the 416.0 GB/s bandwidth and 98.88 GPixel/s pixel rate become limiting factors. The GPU's 64 ROPs and 222.5 GTexel/s texture rate suggest frame rates will drop below 60 FPS in demanding titles, with the 12 nm process and 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 throughput preventing high-refresh play at this resolution.

At 4K ultra, the system is not recommended for gaming. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory may overflow in texture-heavy titles, and the 61st percentile GPU ranking places it below modern mid-range cards. The CPU would remain underutilized, with its 85th percentile standing doing little to overcome the GPU's throughput ceiling.

Who Should Build It

This build targets professionals who prioritize CPU compute over GPU gaming performance. The 85th percentile CPU with 14 cores and 20 threads suits engineers running simulation software, data scientists processing large datasets (PassMark data encryption 19320, random string sorting 36413), and researchers compiling code or running batch analyses. The ECC memory support and professional Quadro drivers make this viable for small business workstations where data integrity matters.

Content creators working primarily in CPU-bound workflows — video transcoding, 3D scene assembly, or software rendering — will find the i5-13600T's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23571 nearly identical to the i7-12700K, delivering high-end productivity without the K-series power draw. The GPU's 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor color-accurate setups for photo editing, though the 8 GB memory limits large texture work.

Students in engineering, computer science, or digital media programs benefit from the CPU's strong single-thread (3728 PassMark) for responsive daily use and multi-thread (27098 PassMark) for project builds. The 35 W CPU TDP keeps electricity costs low, while the 450 W suggested PSU accommodates dorm-room power strips. The system's 73rd combined percentile ensures it handles coursework without obsolescence.

Small business workstations requiring ISV certification and stable drivers will appreciate the Quadro RTX 4000's professional lineage, even at its 61st percentile. CAD viewport performance with 2304 shading units and 36 RT cores handles moderate assemblies, while the CPU's 24 MB cache accelerates repetitive geometry calculations. The single-slot, 241 mm GPU length fits compact workstation chassis.

FAQ

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600T lists ECC memory as supported, which is unusual for consumer processors and beneficial for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the CPU's power consumption?

A: The i5-13600T has a 35 W TDP, making it an extremely efficient 14-core processor. The GPU's TDP is 160 W, and the suggested PSU rating is 450 W.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i7-12700K?

A: The i5-13600T has an average benchmark score of 35305 versus the i7-12700K's 35287, a 0% delta, meaning they perform statistically identically in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: What memory types are supported?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The specific speed depends on the motherboard chosen.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 416.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false), so overclocking is not supported. The boost clock reaches 4.80 GHz out of the box.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: This CPU+GPU pairing ranks at the 73rd percentile overall, with the CPU at the 85th percentile and the GPU at the 61st percentile.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600T is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 1800 MHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a 35 W TDP that makes it one of the most efficient high-core-count desktop CPUs. The 215 mm² die houses 24 MB of shared L3 cache, with 80 KB L1 and 1.25 MB L2 per core, providing substantial cache per thread for latency-sensitive workloads.

Benchmark results show exceptional multi-threaded performance for its power class. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23571 places it within 0.3% of the Core i7-13700T and statistically tied with the i7-12700K, despite the latter having higher clocks and a 125 W TDP. This suggests the 13600T's efficiency cores contribute significantly to multi-threaded throughput, making it ideal for sustained all-core workloads in thermally constrained environments.

Single-threaded performance is equally strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3327 and Geekbench single-core score of 2385. The PassMark single-thread score of 3728 indicates responsive application performance, while the floating point math score of 70152 and integer math score of 96299 demonstrate robust ALU/FPU throughput for scientific and financial computing. The data compression score of 337893 and encryption score of 19320 highlight strong memory subsystem performance.

The CPU's 85th percentile standing versus all CPUs means it outperforms 85% of processors in the database. Its nearest rivals — the i7-12700K, i7-12700KF, i7-13700T, and Core 5 213PE — all score within 0.3% of the 13600T, indicating this is a sweet spot in Intel's lineup where power efficiency meets high-end performance. The 14-core configuration with 20 threads provides 6 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores, balancing burst workloads with sustained throughput.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i5-13600T with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000, creating a system that is fundamentally a CPU-first workstation with professional GPU capabilities. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile of 73 indicates it outperforms 73% of all recorded CPU+GPU combinations in the database, though the significant gap between CPU (85th percentile) and GPU (61st percentile) defines its character.

The CPU is a current production part (Active status) released January 2023 with a launch MSRP of $255, while the GPU is end-of-life (released November 2018, launch MSRP 899 USD). This temporal mismatch explains the performance asymmetry — the processor represents Intel's recent efficiency-focused Raptor Lake design, while the GPU stems from NVIDIA's Turing professional lineup that has since been succeeded by Ampere workstation parts.

The overall tier of this system is upper-midrange, driven primarily by the CPU's exceptional multi-threaded performance and the GPU's adequate but dated professional capability. It occupies a niche where CPU-bound productivity workloads (compilation, rendering, simulation) operate at near-high-end levels, while GPU-bound tasks (gaming, GPU rendering) perform at mainstream levels. This makes it a specialized tool rather than a balanced general-purpose system.

The GPU's professional pedigree — Quadro branding, ISV certification, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a and USB Type-C outputs, ECC-capable memory path — targets workstation use cases. Its single-slot 241 mm length and 160 W TDP fit standard ATX cases, while the 1x 8-pin power connector simplifies installation. The 450 W suggested PSU provides ample headroom for the entire system.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's aggregate benchmark picture is dominated by strong multi-threaded results. Its average benchmark score of 35305 places it at the 85th percentile, with Cinebench R23 multi-core (23571) and Geekbench multi-core (10851) leading the charge. PassMark multi-thread (27098) and integer math (96299) reinforce the processor's compute-heavy profile. Single-thread performance is respectable but not class-leading, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 3327 and PassMark single-thread at 3728.

The GPU's benchmark profile shows a capable but aging professional card. Its average benchmark score of 17789 sits at the 61st percentile, with PassMark G3D at 15117 and Geekbench OpenCL at 74540 as the standout results. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873 indicates modern API support, while the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 52 and DirectX 11 score of 128 reveal lower absolute performance in gaming workloads. PassMark GPU compute of 6176 and G2D of 846 round out the professional-oriented profile.

Comparing the two components reveals the system's character: the CPU outperforms its nearest rivals (i7-12700K at 0% delta, i7-13700T at -0.3%) while the GPU slightly edges out the Radeon HD 7790 (0.7% delta) and RTX 4060 (0.9% delta) in average score. The combined picture is a system where the processor provides high-end productivity performance, the GPU delivers mid-range professional graphics, and the 73rd combined percentile reflects a build optimized for CPU-intensive work with adequate GPU support rather than balanced gaming or pure compute performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600T

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds