SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600T

35,305 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

40,377 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 form a desktop pairing that combines a power-efficient 14-core processor with a current-generation Blackwell GPU. The CPU, part of the Raptor Lake family on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, is a 10 nm part with a 35 W TDP, a figure that stands out sharply against the GPU’s 250 W TDP. This asymmetry is the first hint that the data tells a story of a CPU designed for sustained, low-power throughput paired with a GPU built for raw graphical muscle. The processor’s base clock of 1800.00 MHz and boost clock of 4.80 GHz reveal a design that sips power at idle but can still reach competitive single-thread speeds when demanded. The 14 cores and 20 threads, arranged with the hybrid architecture typical of Raptor Lake, provide a solid foundation for multitasking and threaded workloads, while the 24 MB shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache offer ample staging ground for data-hungry applications. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, which adds flexibility for builders, and it includes ECC memory support, a feature often associated with workstation reliability. Integrated UHD Graphics 770 is present, which can serve as a diagnostic fallback or for basic display output, though the dedicated RTX 5070 will handle all demanding visual tasks. The 215 mm² die size and the fact that the multiplier is not unlocked indicate that this is a mainstream, efficiency-focused part rather than an overclocking enthusiast chip.

CPU Analysis

The i5-13600T’s benchmark results paint a picture of a processor that performs well above its 35 W TDP designation might suggest. In the Cinebench R23 multi-core test, the chip scores 23571, a figure that places it in the 85th percentile against all CPUs. This is not a marginal result; it indicates that the 13600T can handle heavily threaded workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering with the kind of authority one would expect from a much higher-power desktop chip. The single-core R23 score of 3327 reinforces that the boost clock of 4.80 GHz is not just a paper specification; it delivers tangible performance in lightly threaded tasks. Geekbench scores of 10851 multi-core and 2385 single-core corroborate the Cinebench story, showing a balanced processor that does not sacrifice single-thread responsiveness for multi-core throughput. The PassMark suite provides further granularity: a multi-thread score of 27098 and a single-thread score of 3728, with the integer math score of 96299 and floating-point math score of 70152 indicating strong arithmetic capabilities. Data compression in PassMark hits 337893, and encryption scores 19320, suggesting that the processor handles both mundane file archiving and more security-sensitive tasks competently.

Comparing the CPU to its nearest rivals in the database, the data shows a remarkably tight cluster. The Intel Core i7-12700K, a previous-generation enthusiast part, has an average benchmark score of 35287, which is exactly 0% delta from the i5-13600T’s average of 35305. The i7-12700KF is 0.2% behind, the i7-13700T is 0.3% ahead, and the Intel Core 5 213PE is also 0.3% ahead. This means that in aggregate benchmark scores, the 13600T is effectively indistinguishable from a last-gen i7 K-series chip, despite the massive difference in TDP (the 12700K typically has a much higher power limit). The implication is that the efficiency of the Raptor Lake architecture, combined with the 13600T’s specific binning, allows it to match the older chip’s performance while drawing a fraction of the power. This is a significant data point for system builders who prioritize low noise and heat output without wanting to compromise on compute performance. The architecture itself, Raptor Lake, is a refinement of the hybrid big.LITTLE-style design that Intel introduced with Alder Lake, and the 10 nm process node is the same base node used across the 12th and 13th generation desktop parts. The real-world workload meaning of these scores is that the CPU will not be a bottleneck for most tasks; it sits in the upper echelon of processors, and its 85th percentile ranking confirms that it outperforms the vast majority of CPUs in the database.

Benchmark Performance

The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, delivers benchmark scores that establish it as a high-tier performer, though the CPU’s scores are arguably more impressive relative to their respective fields. The RTX 5070’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5077, which is a modern, demanding test that stresses the GPU’s raw DX12 capabilities. In Geekbench compute tests, the GPU scores 172660 in OpenCL and 178923 in Vulkan, showing strong cross-API performance. The PassMark G3D score is 29137, which is a substantial number that places the GPU in the 82nd percentile against all GPUs. For context on the GPU’s position, its nearest rivals in the database are not the high-end gaming cards one might expect, but rather professional and mobile workstation parts. The AMD Radeon Pro 580 has an average score of 40318, which is 0.1% ahead of the RTX 5070’s 40377. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is 0.8% behind, the Radeon Pro 5300 is 1.2% behind, and the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile is 2% behind. This is a curious data point: the RTX 5070, a consumer gaming card, is benchmarked in the same aggregate performance tier as several professional workstation GPUs. The data suggests that the RTX 5070’s raw compute throughput is comparable to these pro cards, even though its feature set and driver optimizations are geared toward gaming and consumer content creation.

The combined picture of this CPU+GPU pairing is one of high overall system performance. The combined percentile for the build is 84, which reflects that both components are in the top 20% of their respective categories. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 35305 and the GPU’s average of 40377 are both strong, but the difference in their percentile rankings (CPU at 85, GPU at 82) is small. This near-parity is significant because it suggests that neither component is dramatically overqualified or underqualified for the other. The data shows a system that is well-balanced for a high-end desktop, capable of handling demanding workloads without a clear single point of failure. The PassMark GPU compute score of 15787 is notably lower than the G3D score, which can indicate that the GPU’s compute performance, while good, is not its primary strength compared to its graphical rendering capabilities. However, for most users, the graphical scores are the more relevant metric. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5077 is a modern benchmark that will scale with future game demands, and this score places the GPU in a strong position for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p and even entry-level 4K, based on the percentile data.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the RTX 5070’s performance, as indicated by its 82nd percentile ranking and strong 3DMark scores, is the primary driver. The CPU’s single-core score of 3327 in Cinebench R23 ensures that the processor can feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic without becoming a bottleneck in most titles. The combination is suited for 1440p high-refresh monitors, where the GPU’s raw power is the limiting factor, and the CPU’s strong single-thread performance prevents frame-time spikes.

Streaming is a workload that benefits from both CPU and GPU resources. The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads, evidenced by a multi-thread score of 23571 in Cinebench R23, can handle the encoding workload if using x264, though the GPU’s dedicated NVENC encoder is typically more efficient. The RTX 5070’s 192 tensor cores and 48 RT cores provide headroom for AI-enhanced broadcast effects and hardware-accelerated encoding, meaning the system can run a game and a stream simultaneously without severe performance degradation.

Video editing software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will utilize both components. The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 27098 and the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 172660 indicate that the system can handle 4K timeline scrubbing, color grading, and export rendering. The 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on the GPU is sufficient for holding large video buffers and effects, and the 672.0 GB/s memory bandwidth ensures that data moves quickly between the GPU and its memory.

For 3D rendering in applications like Blender or Maya, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23571 allows for complex scene simulation and physics calculations, while the GPU’s 30.87 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates final frame rendering using Cycles or similar GPU-based render engines. The 48 RT cores will also speed up ray-traced previews and final renders, making this a capable configuration for independent 3D artists.

Software development workloads are often a mix of single-threaded compilers and multi-threaded build systems. The CPU’s single-core score of 2385 in Geekbench and multi-core score of 10851 indicate that it can handle both, with the 20 threads allowing for parallel compilation of large codebases. The system’s memory flexibility with DDR4 or DDR5 support allows developers to choose a platform that fits their budget, and the ECC memory support is a bonus for long-running build servers that require data integrity.

For student and office work, this system is massively overqualified, but the data supports its capability. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3728 ensures snappy application launches and spreadsheet calculations, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 can handle basic display output, saving power when discrete GPU acceleration is not needed. The 85th percentile CPU ranking guarantees that no office task will ever stress this processor, and the 35 W TDP means the system can run cool and quiet in a dorm room or small office.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and how does it compare to the GPU’s?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600T has a TDP of 35 W, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 has a TDP of 250 W. This shows a significant power draw difference, with the CPU being highly power-efficient and the GPU being the dominant consumer of power.

Q: Does the CPU support both DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the memory support for the Intel Core i5-13600T includes both DDR4 and DDR5, in a dual-channel configuration. This gives builders the option to use either older, more affordable memory or newer, faster DDR5 modules.

Q: What is the GPU’s process node and who manufactures it?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is built on a 5 nm process node by TSMC. The chip, codenamed GB205, contains 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die.

Q: How does the CPU’s average benchmark score compare to the Intel Core i7-12700K?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600T has an average benchmark score of 35305, while the Intel Core i7-12700K has an average score of 35287. The delta is 0%, meaning they are statistically tied in aggregate performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and bus width?

A: The RTX 5070 has a memory bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s, achieved over a 192-bit bus using 12 GB of GDDR7 memory. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, which is 28 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the CPU have an integrated GPU?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600T includes integrated graphics with UHD Graphics 770. This can be used for basic display tasks or as a fallback if the discrete GPU is removed or malfunctioning.

Q: What is the recommended PSU wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is 600 W. The GPU itself has a TDP of 250 W and uses a 1x 16-pin power connector.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data suggests that this system is well-balanced, but the nature of the workloads will determine which component becomes the limiting factor. For pure gaming at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-core score of 2385 in Geekbench and 3327 in Cinebench R23 should be sufficient to keep frame rates high, but the GPU’s 82nd percentile ranking will likely be the primary constraint as resolution increases. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking against all CPUs indicates it is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU is relative to its peers, meaning that in a heavily CPU-bound scenario, the system may have more headroom on the processor side. However, the near-parity in percentile rankings (85 vs. 82) suggests that for most mixed workloads, neither component will consistently hold the other back.

In GPU-bound workloads like 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing, the RTX 5070’s raw compute, evidenced by its 30.87 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 48 RT cores, will be the limiting factor. The CPU will have ample spare capacity, as its multi-thread score of 23571 in Cinebench R23 far exceeds what most games can utilize. In CPU-bound workloads like physics simulations or complex AI calculations, the roles reverse. The CPU’s 14 cores will be taxed, while the GPU’s compute potential goes underutilized. The PassMark data shows the CPU excels at integer math (96299) and data compression (337893), which are common in compilation and archiving tasks, while the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 29137 shows its graphical superiority. The FPS scaling, though no measured data exists for this exact pair, can be inferred from the percentile gap. In a game that is heavily GPU-dependent, the frame rate will scale with GPU load, and the CPU will maintain a steady frame time floor. In a game that is CPU-dependent, the opposite will occur. The 35 W TDP of the CPU versus the 250 W TDP of the GPU also implies that the GPU will generate significantly more heat, and in a poorly ventilated case, the GPU could thermally throttle, affecting its performance more than the CPU. The balanced percentiles are the key evidence that this is not a system where one component is a glaring bottleneck, but rather a pairing where the workload dictates the limiting resource.

Who Should Build It

The data indicates this build targets users who want high performance without the power draw and heat of top-tier enthusiast parts, but who still demand strong GPU capabilities. Gamers playing at 1440p or high-refresh 1080p will find the RTX 5070’s performance, as indicated by its 82nd percentile ranking, to be more than adequate for modern titles, while the CPU’s 85th percentile ranking ensures that frame rates remain stable. Content creators, specifically those doing video editing or 3D rendering, will benefit from the combination of the CPU’s multi-threaded throughput and the GPU’s compute and RT capabilities. The 12 GB of VRAM on the GPU is enough for 4K video scrubbing and rendering complex scenes, while the CPU’s 20 threads handle timeline management and physics. Software developers who work with large codebases will appreciate the fast compilation times enabled by the CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 27098, and the ECC memory support is a unique feature for this class of desktop CPU that could appeal to developers running long compute jobs. Students and small business users who need a machine that can handle everything from office productivity to occasional gaming or creative work will find this build to be future-proof, as the CPU’s 35 W TDP makes it efficient for all-day use, and the GPU’s power is there when needed for tasks like rendering or gaming. The system is not aimed at users who want to overclock, as the CPU’s multiplier is locked, but rather at those who want a turnkey high-performance solution with a strong balance of compute and graphics power.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU, built on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The chip, designated GB205, contains 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, giving it a transistor density of 118.3M per mm². The GPU’s memory subsystem is a highlight: 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. This is a substantial amount of bandwidth, which is critical for high-resolution textures and data-heavy workloads like machine learning inference. The memory clock is listed at 1750 MHz, which is 28 Gbps effective, and the memory type is GDDR7, a new standard that offers higher density and bandwidth than previous generations. The GPU has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units, which are the core building blocks for pixel and texture processing. For ray tracing, there are 48 RT cores, and for AI acceleration, there are 192 tensor cores. The clock speeds are a base of 2325 MHz and a boost of 2512 MHz, which are high frequencies that contribute to the GPU’s pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 482.3 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 30.87 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is also 30.87 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio, which is notable for compute workloads that can utilize mixed precision.

In benchmark tests, the RTX 5070 shows strong results. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 is a modern test that stresses the GPU’s ability to handle complex geometry and shading. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 172660 and Vulkan score of 178923 show that the GPU performs well across different compute APIs. The PassMark G3D score of 29137 places the GPU in the 82nd percentile against all GPUs, confirming its high-end status. However, the PassMark DirectX 10 score of 180, DirectX 11 score of 277, and DirectX 12 score of 108 are low in absolute terms, but these are likely measuring specific legacy or synthetic scenarios that do not reflect real-world game performance. The PassMark GPU compute score of 15787 is notably lower than the G3D score, suggesting that while the GPU is excellent at rendering, its raw compute throughput is not as dominant, which could be a consideration for users who prioritize GPGPU workloads over gaming. The GPU’s nearest rivals in the database are professional workstation cards like the AMD Radeon Pro 580 and WX 7100, which have similar average scores. This is an interesting data point, as it implies that the RTX 5070’s raw compute power is in the same league as these pro cards, even though it is marketed as a consumer gaming GPU. The 250 W TDP and suggested PSU of 600 W indicate that this is a power-hungry card, and the dual-slot design with a 16-pin connector requires a modern power supply.

Build Overview

This build combines the Intel Core i5-13600T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 in a desktop-class configuration. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread processor from the Raptor Lake generation, designed for the Intel Socket 1700 platform. The GPU is a high-end Blackwell 2.0 architecture card with 12 GB of GDDR7 memory. The combined percentile for this pairing is 84, which places it in the top 16% of all possible CPU+GPU combinations in the database. This is a strong overall tier, indicating that the system is capable of handling the most demanding consumer workloads. The CPU’s individual percentile of 85 and the GPU’s percentile of 82 show that both components are closely matched in their relative performance, with the CPU being slightly stronger compared to its peers. The data shows that this is not a budget system, but rather a high-performance desktop that prioritizes a balance of CPU efficiency and GPU power. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $255, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 549 USD, but the data indicates that the combined system is greater than the sum of its parts, with the CPU’s low TDP allowing for quieter cooling solutions while the GPU delivers top-tier graphics performance. The build class is desktop, meaning it is intended for a stationary tower or similar form factor, and the components are full-size, with the GPU being 245 mm long, 115 mm tall, and 40 mm wide.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600T uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is a mature socket that supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This provides an upgrade path for users who may have existing DDR4 memory, as they can reuse it with this CPU, or they can choose to move to DDR5 for higher bandwidth. The CPU supports dual-channel memory, and the memory bus is dual-channel, so installing two sticks of memory is recommended to get full bandwidth. The CPU’s PCIe support is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is the latest standard and provides ample bandwidth for the RTX 5070, which uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. The CPU’s TDP is 35 W, which is very low, and this means that a wide range of coolers, including low-profile or stock coolers, can handle it. The GPU’s TDP is 250 W, and the suggested PSU is 600 W, which is a standard recommendation for a system with this class of GPU. The GPU uses a 1x 16-pin power connector, so the PSU must have this connector or an adapter. For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the platform is not the limiting factor. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking means it is still a very capable processor, and the motherboard socket supports future 14th-gen Intel processors, which would be a drop-in upgrade. The GPU, however, is a current-generation part, so upgrading it would not be necessary for a few years. A more likely upgrade path would be to add more memory, as the CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5, and 12 GB of VRAM on the GPU is sufficient for most tasks. The PSU headroom from the suggested 600 W unit is adequate, but if a user were to upgrade to a more power-hungry GPU in the future, they would need to check the PSU’s capacity. Overall, the platform is solid, and the main upgrade path would be to a newer CPU on the same socket or a future GPU, provided the PSU and case have the necessary clearance and connectors.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of the Intel Core i5-13600T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all FPS discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores and component percentiles. The GPU’s 82nd percentile ranking and its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5077 suggest that it is a high-end gaming card. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, indicated by a Geekbench single-core score of 2385 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3327, ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. Based on these scores, the system is estimated to be capable of high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p in most modern titles, with the GPU being the primary driver of frame rates. At 4K, the GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM and 672.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will be sufficient for most games, but frame rates will be lower than at 1440p, and the GPU will be the clear bottleneck. At 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-core performance will allow the GPU to run at its maximum potential, and the system may even be CPU-limited in esports titles with very high frame rates. The lack of measured FPS data means that these are estimates, and actual performance will vary by game and driver version. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 29137 is a strong indicator of its rasterization performance, and the 48 RT cores suggest that ray tracing performance will be good, though frame rates will be lower when ray tracing is enabled. The estimated performance for high-refresh gaming is excellent, and for 4K gaming, it is playable but not ultra-high-refresh. The data points to a system that is well-suited for competitive gaming at 1440p and immersive single-player gaming at 4K with some settings adjustments.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds