SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600T

35,305 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13600T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060: A Low-Power Desktop Analysis

This pairing combines a 35-watt, 14-core Intel Raptor Lake processor with an 8 GB Ada Lovelace GPU, creating a desktop build that prioritizes efficiency without sacrificing modern feature support. The CPU sits in the 85th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 61st percentile, yielding a combined percentile of 73. Notably, the data set contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures discussed below are estimates derived from the individual CPU and GPU benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600T uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is shared across 12th and 13th generation Core processors. This socket supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in choosing between older, widely available DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits. The CPU also supports ECC memory, a feature typically associated with workstation-class builds, which may appeal to users running long-duration compute tasks where data integrity matters. The memory controller handles both memory types, but the platform does not support the newer Core Ultra naming scheme, meaning future upgrades on this socket are limited to existing 13th-gen parts.

PCIe connectivity comes from the CPU itself, offering Gen 5 with 16 lanes. This is forward-looking for storage and GPU bandwidth, though the RTX 4060 only uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, so the GPU will not saturate the available lanes. The CPU's integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails, which is a practical redundancy for troubleshooting. The platform's power delivery is modest, given the CPU's 35-watt TDP, so most motherboards designed for Socket 1700 will handle this processor without exotic VRM cooling.

The GPU's suggested PSU is 300 W, which is remarkably low for a modern discrete graphics card. This pairs well with the CPU's 35-watt TDP, meaning a system with this combo could run on a modest power supply, though the 1x 12-pin power connector requires an adapter or a PSU with native support. The GPU measures 240 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, fitting into most mid-tower cases. Its dual-slot design keeps cooling simple, and the end-of-life production status suggests it has been on the market for a while, so availability may vary.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-tier 13th-gen CPU, such as the Core i7-13700T, which benchmarks nearly identically to the 13600T in aggregate scores. Alternatively, the GPU could be swapped for a newer GeForce 50-series part when needed, since the PCIe 4.0 x8 slot will remain compatible. The motherboard and memory can stay in place for either upgrade, making this a flexible foundation.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU occupy different performance strata, which creates a clear bottleneck dynamic. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking among all processors indicates it is a high-performing part, while the GPU's 61st percentile is more mid-pack. This suggests that in CPU-bound workloads, the processor will not hold back the GPU, but in GPU-bound scenarios, the graphics card may limit frame rates. The combined percentile of 73 reflects this imbalance, with the GPU pulling the overall score down from the CPU's level.

Benchmark data supports this interpretation. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23571 is strong for a 35-watt part, rivaling many higher-TDP desktop chips. In contrast, the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 19545, while respectable, places it near the AMD Radeon HD 7790 in aggregate performance, a much older card. This gap means that for gaming at high resolutions or with demanding graphical settings, the GPU will be the limiting factor. At lower resolutions or with lighter settings, the CPU can push higher frame rates, but the GPU will cap the ceiling.

The FPS scaling picture is estimated, not measured. Given the CPU's single-thread performance — a Geekbench single-core score of 2385 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3327 — the processor can handle high-refresh gaming workloads without struggling. However, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus with 272.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain performance in modern titles that demand more memory bandwidth. The Tensor cores and RT cores present in the GPU (96 and 24, respectively) enable DLSS and ray tracing, which can shift the balance, but these features rely on the GPU's compute resources, not the CPU.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 35305, placing it at the 85th percentile of all processors. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-12700K with a score of 35287 (0% delta), the Intel Core i7-12700KF at 35365 (-0.2% delta), the Intel Core i7-13700T at 35403 (-0.3% delta), and the Intel Core 5 213PE at 35428 (-0.3% delta). This clustering shows that the 13600T performs essentially on par with previous-generation i7 K-series parts, which is notable given its drastically lower 35-watt TDP. The CPU's multi-threaded scores are particularly strong: Cinebench R23 multi-core hits 23571, while Geekbench multi-core reaches 10851. Single-thread performance is also solid, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 3327 and Geekbench single-core at 2385.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 17639, placing it at the 61st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon HD 7790 at 17666 (-0.2% delta), the AMD Radeon 780M at 17588 (0.3% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro 560 at 17551 (0.5% delta), and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 at 17509 (0.7% delta). This is a striking comparison: the RTX 4060's aggregate score is nearly identical to a decade-old discrete GPU and several integrated or mobile parts. However, the RTX 4060's individual benchmarks reveal its strengths — the Passmark G3D score of 19545 is higher than the aggregate, while the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302 shows modern API performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 95057 and Vulkan score of 48643 indicate strong compute capabilities that older cards cannot match.

When viewed together, the combined picture is a CPU that outperforms its efficiency class and a GPU that is competent but not exceptional. The CPU's performance is closer to the top of the desktop stack, while the GPU sits in the mid-range. For workloads that are CPU-intensive, this build will feel fast; for GPU-intensive tasks, it will feel average.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU's strong single-thread performance — a Passmark single-thread score of 3728 and a Cinebench R15 single-core score of 335 — suggests it can feed the GPU adequately in most titles. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302 and Passmark G3D score of 19545 indicate it can handle modern games at 1080p with medium-to-high settings, though 1440p will require adjustments.

At 1080p, the RTX 4060's 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 272.0 GB/s memory bandwidth should deliver playable frame rates in most esports and older titles, where the CPU's single-thread speed will allow high refresh rates. For newer AAA games, the 8 GB VRAM may become a limitation at ultra settings, prompting users to lower textures or rely on DLSS via the Tensor cores. At 1440p, the GPU's 128-bit memory bus will likely cause frame rates to drop, and the 61st percentile ranking suggests it will struggle with the most demanding titles at high settings.

Ray tracing performance is supported through 24 RT cores, but the GPU's overall compute throughput suggests that enabling ray tracing will significantly impact frame rates. DLSS, powered by the 96 Tensor cores, can recover some performance, but the base rasterization performance is the limiting factor. The estimated FPS picture is one of a capable 1080p gaming machine that can dip into lower settings at higher resolutions, with the CPU never being the bottleneck in GPU-bound scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's single-thread scores — Geekbench single-core of 2385 and Passmark single-thread of 3728 — are strong enough to drive high frame rates in competitive titles. The GPU's mid-range performance will cap the maximum FPS, but at 1080p with reduced settings, this build can plausibly hit 144 Hz in less demanding games. The 35-watt CPU also means less heat and noise in a gaming session.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming while gaming. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9899 indicates solid multi-threaded throughput for x264 encoding, though the GPU's NVENC (via the Ada Lovelace architecture) offers a more efficient alternative. The 8 GB VRAM may limit simultaneous gaming and streaming at high settings.

Video Editing: The CPU's multi-core performance — Cinebench R23 multi-core of 23571 — handles timeline rendering and export tasks well. The GPU's compute scores, including Geekbench OpenCL of 95057, accelerate effects and previews. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p editing but may struggle with 4K timelines containing heavy effects.

3D Rendering: The CPU's Passmark multi-thread score of 27098 and floating-point math score of 70152 support CPU-based rendering workloads. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 15.11 TFLOPS will accelerate GPU renderers, but its 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity. The 61st percentile GPU ranking suggests it is not a top-tier renderer.

Software Development: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads allow fast compilation times, with the Passmark integer math score of 96299 indicating strong integer performance. The GPU's role in development is minor, but the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback for multi-monitor setups. The 35-watt TDP makes this an efficient workstation for coding marathons.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's single-thread performance — Cinebench R20 single-core of 1397 — handles everyday productivity tasks with ease. The GPU is overkill for office work, but the low power draw keeps electricity costs down. The integrated graphics mean the system can run even without the discrete GPU, reducing failure points.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-13600T support DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 through a dual-channel memory bus, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the power draw of the RTX 4060, and what PSU is recommended?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 115 W, and the suggested PSU is 300 W, which is low for a discrete graphics card.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i7-12700K?

A: The i5-13600T has an average benchmark score of 35305, while the i7-12700K scores 35287, a 0% delta — they are essentially identical in aggregate performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 4060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is the RTX 4060 still in production?

A: No, the production status is listed as "End-of-life," with the GeForce 50-series as its successor.

Q: What is the CPU's integrated graphics, and does it work alongside the discrete GPU?

A: The CPU includes UHD Graphics 770, which can run displays independently of the RTX 4060, providing a fallback or extra display outputs.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 73, reflecting the CPU's 85th percentile and the GPU's 61st percentile rankings.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong CPU performance but do not require top-tier GPU power. Gamers at 1080p who favor competitive or esports titles will benefit from the CPU's high single-thread scores, which enable high frame rates, while the GPU handles the rendering at reasonable settings. Content creators working with video editing or software development will find the 14-core CPU a reliable workhorse, especially given its low power consumption, which keeps systems quiet and cool in office or studio environments.

Students and small business workstations can leverage the CPU's efficiency — a 35-watt TDP means lower energy bills — while the GPU provides occasional acceleration for tasks like photo editing or light rendering. The ECC memory support adds a layer of reliability for data-intensive workloads, making this a sensible choice for users who value stability over raw GPU performance. The 61st percentile GPU ranking means it is not suited for 1440p or 4K gaming at high settings; those users should look elsewhere. This build is for the user who prioritizes a responsive, efficient CPU and only needs modest graphics capability.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the Intel Core i5-13600T, a 14-core Raptor Lake-S processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, an Ada Lovelace GPU. The CPU's 35-watt TDP and the GPU's 115-watt TDP make it an unusually power-efficient combination, and the suggested 300-watt PSU confirms this. The CPU sits at the 85th percentile of all processors, the GPU at the 61st percentile, and the combined percentile is 73, indicating a build that is stronger on the CPU side. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, while the CPU remains active, so this is a pairing of a current processor with a last-generation graphics card.

The class is desktop, and the overall tier is mid-range, driven by the GPU's position. The CPU punches above its weight class, matching the performance of the i7-12700K, but the GPU's aggregate score is comparable to much older hardware, though its modern features like DLSS and ray tracing provide capabilities that older cards lack. This is a balanced system for productivity and light gaming, not a high-end gaming rig.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600T is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². Its base clock is 1800 MHz, boosting up to 4.80 GHz, and it carries a 35-watt TDP, which is exceptionally low for a desktop CPU with this core count. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with ECC capability, and its PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes provides ample bandwidth for storage and expansion.

Benchmark results indicate strong performance for a low-power chip. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23571 places it ahead of many higher-TDP processors, and its single-core score of 3327 is competitive for gaming and everyday tasks. The Geekbench scores — 10851 multi-core and 2385 single-core — confirm this trend. The Passmark suite shows a multi-thread score of 27098 and a single-thread score of 3728, with strong integer math (96299) and floating-point math (70152) results, making it suitable for software compilation and scientific computing. The 85th percentile ranking underscores its capability, and its nearest rival, the i7-12700K, scores nearly identically, proving that the 13600T offers flagship-level performance at a fraction of the power draw. The CPU's production status is active, and it was released in January 2023 with a launch MSRP of $255.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is built on the AD107 chip using TSMC's 5 nm process, with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and its clocks run at 1830 MHz base and 2460 MHz boost, with memory at 2125 MHz (17 Gbps effective). The GPU has 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs, along with 24 RT cores and 96 Tensor cores, enabling hardware ray tracing and DLSS. Its FP32 compute is 15.11 TFLOPS, with FP16 matching at 15.11 TFLOPS (1:1). The power draw is 115 W, and it uses a single 12-pin power connector.

Benchmark scores show a mixed picture. The Passmark G3D score of 19545 is moderate, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302 indicates reasonable DirectX 12 performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 95057 and Vulkan score of 48643 highlight its compute strength, which benefits rendering and AI tasks. However, the aggregate average score of 17639 places it at the 61st percentile, with rivals like the AMD Radeon HD 7790 scoring nearly identically — a reflection of its limited memory bus and VRAM, which cap its performance in high-resolution gaming. The pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 236.2 GTexel/s are adequate for 1080p, and the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its end-of-life status and launch MSRP of 299 USD position it as a budget-friendly option at its release, but its successor, the GeForce 50-series, has since taken over.