SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600T

35,305 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

27,565 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 form a desktop pairing that appears, on the surface, to be a study in contrasts. The CPU is a 35-watt efficiency-focused part from Intel’s 13th-generation Raptor Lake family, while the GPU is a 350-watt, triple-slot behemoth from the Ampere generation. The data in the FACT PACK reveals a system where the GPU is the dominant performance driver, but the CPU’s low power envelope and specific architectural choices create a distinct bottleneck profile. This analysis examines the benchmark scores, percentiles, and platform specifications to determine which workloads are CPU-limited, which are GPU-limited, and where the true balance of this unconventional pairing lies.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance relationship between the Core i5-13600T and the RTX 3090 is asymmetric, as indicated by their respective percentile rankings. The CPU sits at the 85th percentile among all processors, while the GPU is at the 73rd percentile among all graphics cards. This 12-point gap suggests that the CPU is the more capable component relative to its peers, yet the absolute performance demands of the GPU mean that the CPU will still be the limiting factor in many scenarios.

The CPU’s benchmark scores reveal a processor with strong multi-threaded capability that is constrained by its thermal and power design. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23571 is substantial, and the PassMark multithread score of 27098 places it in the upper tier of desktop processors. However, the single-threaded scores—Cinebench R23 single-core at 3327 and PassMark single-thread at 3728—are comparatively modest. This indicates that while the 14 cores and 20 threads can handle heavy parallel workloads, the 1800 MHz base clock and the 35-watt TDP limit how fast any single core can run under sustained load. For gaming, which often depends on single-thread performance, this creates a potential bottleneck where the RTX 3090’s frame generation is waiting on the CPU’s decision-making.

The GPU’s specifications reinforce this imbalance. The RTX 3090’s 35.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 936.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth are enormous, and its PassMark G3D score of 26645 confirms its high-end status. In contrast, the CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 96299 and floating-point math score of 70152 are strong but not exceptional. When the GPU is rendering frames at high resolutions, the CPU’s role diminishes, and the bottleneck shifts. At 4K, the RTX 3090’s pixel throughput is likely to be the limiting factor, while at 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance becomes the constraint. The data suggests a system that is balanced at high resolutions but CPU-limited at lower resolutions.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i5-13600T delivers a strong overall benchmark profile, with an average benchmark score of 35305. This places it in a tight competitive cluster, as shown by its nearest rivals. The Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35287, a delta of 0%, meaning the two processors are statistically identical in average performance. The Core i7-12700KF is slightly ahead at 35365, a delta of -0.2%, while the Core i7-13700T and Core 5 213PE score 35403 and 35428, respectively, with deltas of -0.3%. This grouping indicates that the i5-13600T is a remarkably efficient performer, matching the previous generation’s flagship i7 in overall output despite its much lower TDP.

Specific CPU benchmarks show a pattern of strength in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9899 and the Geekbench multicore score of 10851 are both solid figures. The PassMark data compression score of 337893 is particularly high, suggesting excellent performance in tasks that involve data movement and compression algorithms. The single-thread scores, while lower, are still respectable, with Geekbench single-core at 2385 and Cinebench R20 single-core at 1397. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking across all CPUs underscores that it is a top-tier performer, despite its power efficiency focus.

The RTX 3090’s benchmark results are equally compelling, with an average benchmark score of 27565. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5118 is a strong indicator of modern gaming performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 172758 and Vulkan score of 53927 highlight its compute capabilities. The PassMark G3D score of 26645 and the PassMark GPU compute score of 15356 further cement its position. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile with a score of 27435 and a delta of 0.5%, and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT with a score of 27425 and a delta of 0.5%. On the other side, the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 is -1% behind, and the AMD Radeon RX 7800M is -1.1% behind. This places the RTX 3090 in a competitive mid-to-high range, but notably, it is only 0.5% ahead of a mobile GPU, which is surprising given its desktop-class power envelope.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU’s single-thread scores will likely limit frame rates. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3327 is respectable, but the RTX 3090’s raw power can generate frames faster than the CPU can issue draw calls in some scenarios. The data suggests that at 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, and the system is more balanced. Frame rates in esports titles will be high, but the CPU may prevent the GPU from reaching its maximum potential at lower resolutions.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 27098 and the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23571 indicate that the CPU can handle simultaneous game rendering and video encoding tasks. The GPU’s NVENC encoder, part of the Ampere architecture, offloads this work further, making this a capable streaming setup.

Video Editing: The CPU’s multi-threaded performance is well-suited for video editing software that utilizes multiple cores. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9899 and the PassMark data compression score of 337893 suggest efficient handling of video codecs and timeline operations. The GPU’s 24 GB of VRAM and 936.2 GB/s memory bandwidth accelerate effects and rendering, making this a strong combination for 4K video work.

3D Rendering: This is where the pairing shines. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23571 is excellent for CPU-based rendering, while the GPU’s 35.58 TFLOPS of FP32 and 328 tensor cores accelerate GPU-based renderers. The combined performance suggests that this system can handle complex scenes and high-resolution outputs efficiently.

Software Development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 96299 and extended instructions score of 20651 are favorable for compilation tasks. The 20 threads allow for parallel builds, and the large L3 cache of 24 MB shared helps with frequently accessed data. This is a solid, if not spectacular, development machine.

Student and Office Work: This pairing is massively overqualified for these tasks. The CPU’s integrated UHD Graphics 770 is sufficient for basic display output, but the RTX 3090 is unnecessary for document editing or web browsing. The system’s high power draw and physical size make it impractical for a typical office environment, but the performance is there if needed.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this build is a desktop enthusiast who prioritizes GPU-heavy workloads and has a tolerance for the CPU’s power constraints. The RTX 3090’s 24 GB of VRAM makes it an excellent choice for 4K gaming, as the 936.2 GB/s memory bandwidth can handle high-resolution textures. Gamers at 4K will see the GPU as the primary driver of performance, mitigating the CPU’s single-thread limitations.

Content creators working with large video files or 3D scenes will benefit from the GPU’s compute capabilities. The 328 tensor cores and 82 RT cores accelerate AI-assisted tasks and ray-traced rendering. The CPU’s multi-threaded scores support this workload, making it a viable workstation for small studios.

Software developers and data scientists who rely on GPU compute for machine learning or simulation will find the RTX 3090’s 24 GB VRAM and 35.58 TFLOPS of FP32 to be a compelling reason to build this system. The CPU’s PassMark data encryption score of 19320 and random string sorting score of 36413 also indicate competent handling of security and data manipulation tasks.

Students in engineering or computer science fields, who need a powerful system for both gaming and coursework, could justify this build if they have the budget and space. However, for small business workstations, the combination is overkill. The CPU’s 35-watt TDP is efficient, but the GPU’s 350-watt TDP and triple-slot size make it unsuitable for most office environments.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600T uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This provides flexibility for builders, allowing them to choose between older, more affordable DDR4 or newer, faster DDR5. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation platforms, and it has a PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes from the CPU, ensuring high bandwidth for future storage and expansion cards.

The RTX 3090 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots. The GPU’s suggested PSU is 750 W, and its TDP is 350 W. The CPU’s TDP is only 35 W, so the system’s total power draw is dominated by the GPU. A 750 W power supply is the minimum recommendation, and the data suggests that a high-quality unit is necessary to handle transient power spikes.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to move to a higher-core-count CPU within the Socket 1700 family, such as the Core i7-13700T, which is a direct rival with a deltaPct of -0.3% and a slightly higher average score. This would provide a marginal performance boost without requiring a motherboard change. For the GPU, the successor to the RTX 3090 is the GeForce 40-series, but the data does not specify a direct upgrade path. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that future graphics cards will be compatible.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is based on the GA102 chip and the Ampere architecture, manufactured on Samsung’s 8 nm process. It has 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die, giving it a transistor density of 45.1M per mm². The GPU’s memory configuration is a highlight: 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, providing 936.2 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a massive amount of VRAM that supports high-resolution textures and large datasets for compute workloads.

The clock speeds are a base of 1395 MHz and a boost of 1695 MHz, with memory running at 1219 MHz or 19.5 Gbps effective. The GPU has 10496 shading units, 328 TMUs, and 112 ROPs. It also includes 82 RT cores and 328 tensor cores, which are dedicated to ray tracing and AI acceleration. The pixel rate is 189.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 556.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 35.58 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1).

The benchmark scores for the RTX 3090 show a GPU that is capable but not at the absolute top of the charts. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5118 is a modern metric, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 172758 demonstrates strong compute. The PassMark G3D score of 26645 is solid, but the GPU’s 73rd percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates that it is outclassed by newer, more efficient designs. The nearest rivals include the RTX 4070 Mobile, which matches it within 0.5%, suggesting that the desktop 3090’s performance advantage is not as large as its power draw would imply. For rendering, the 24 GB VRAM is the key asset, allowing for larger scenes and higher-resolution textures without running out of memory.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13600T compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-12700K?

A: The i5-13600T has an average benchmark score of 35305, while the i7-12700K scores 35287, a deltaPct of 0%. This indicates they have nearly identical average performance.

Q: What is the RTX 3090’s performance relative to the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT?

A: The RTX 3090 has an average benchmark score of 27565, while the RX 6700 XT scores 27425, a deltaPct of 0.5%. The RTX 3090 is slightly ahead of the RX 6700 XT in average benchmark performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 3090?

A: The RTX 3090 has a memory bandwidth of 936.2 GB/s, based on its 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and how does it compare to the GPU’s TDP?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600T has a TDP of 35 W, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 has a TDP of 350 W. The GPU consumes ten times the power of the CPU.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600T supports ECC memory, which is a feature listed in its specifications.

Q: What is the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 23571 in the Cinebench R23 multicore test.

Q: What is the GPU’s launch MSRP?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 has a launch MSRP of 1,499 USD.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the Intel Core i5-13600T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread processor from the Raptor Lake generation, designed for a 35-watt TDP. The GPU is a high-end Ampere architecture card with 24 GB of VRAM and a 350-watt TDP. The combined percentile of this pairing is 79, which places it in the upper tier of all possible CPU-GPU combinations. The CPU’s 85th percentile and the GPU’s 73rd percentile indicate a system that is more capable on the processor side relative to its peers, but the GPU provides the bulk of the raw compute power for graphics and compute tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600T is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S codename. It is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node, with a die size of 215 mm². The base clock is 1800 MHz, which is low, but the boost clock reaches 4.80 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This configuration is designed for efficiency, as evidenced by the 35-watt TDP and the ’T’ suffix in its name, which typically denotes a low-power variant.

The CPU’s benchmark scores reflect its efficiency-focused design. The Cinebench R15 multicore score is 2375, and the single-core score is 335. The Cinebench R20 scores are 9899 multicore and 1397 single-core. The Cinebench R23 scores are 23571 multicore and 3327 single-core. The Geekbench scores are 10851 multicore and 2385 single-core. The PassMark suite shows strong multi-threaded performance with a multithread score of 27098, and the data compression score of 337893 is notably high. The single-thread score of 3728 is lower, which is expected given the low base clock.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 35305 places it at the 85th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the i7-12700K, i7-12700KF, i7-13700T, and Core 5 213PE, all within a 0.3% delta. This indicates that the i5-13600T is a well-balanced processor that trades raw clock speed for power efficiency without sacrificing overall performance. The 24 MB shared L3 cache and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory make it a flexible choice for various system configurations. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output, and the CPU supports ECC memory, which is a unique feature for a desktop processor.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores and are not based on direct measurements.

Based on the benchmark data, the gaming performance of this pairing is expected to be strong but variable by resolution. The RTX 3090’s 24 GB VRAM and 936.2 GB/s memory bandwidth are ample for high-resolution textures, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5118 indicates solid modern gaming performance. The PassMark G3D score of 26645 reinforces this.

At 4K resolution, the GPU is likely to be the primary bottleneck. The RTX 3090’s pixel rate of 189.8 GPixel/s is high, but the CPU’s single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3327, should be sufficient to keep up at this resolution. Frame rates in demanding AAA titles at 4K are expected to be high, potentially exceeding 60 FPS in most games.

At 1440p, the balance shifts. The CPU’s single-thread scores may start to limit frame rates in CPU-intensive games, but the GPU’s raw power will still deliver high frame rates. At 1080p, the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor. The lower single-thread score of 3728 in PassMark means that in esports titles, the CPU may prevent the GPU from reaching its maximum frame output. However, the overall system performance, as indicated by the 79th combined percentile, suggests that this pairing is capable of delivering a high-refresh-rate gaming experience at 1440p and a solid 4K experience.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds