SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600T

35,305 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

16,129 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i5-13600T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti form a pairing where the data indicates a balanced profile for most workloads, but with distinct performance ceilings depending on the task type. The CPU’s 85th percentile standing among all CPUs sits well above the GPU’s 59th percentile among all GPUs, suggesting that in gaming scenarios the graphics card is likely the limiting factor for frame rate output, while in multi-threaded productivity tasks the processor carries the heavier load.

Looking at the benchmark scores, the i5-13600T delivers a PassMark multi-thread score of 27,098 and a Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 23,571. These figures place the CPU comfortably ahead of the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20,349, which measures graphics rendering performance. In practical terms, this means that when both components are stressed simultaneously—such as in a game with heavy physics calculations alongside detailed graphics—the GPU will typically saturate before the CPU does. The RTX 3060 Ti’s FP32 throughput of 16.20 TFLOPS provides a solid baseline for 1080p and 1440p rendering, but it cannot match the CPU’s relative strength in compute-heavy tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering.

The PassMark physics score of 1,287 for the CPU, combined with a floating-point math score of 70,152, indicates strong processing headroom for game logic and simulation. However, the GPU’s pixel rate of 133.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 253.1 GTexel/s will govern how many pixels can be pushed at high detail settings. For a user targeting high refresh rates at 1080p, the RTX 3060 Ti’s 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM will likely be the constraint, especially in texture-heavy titles. At 1440p, the gap widens further, and the CPU’s 85th percentile ranking does little to compensate for the GPU’s mid-pack percentile position.

The data also reveals an interesting asymmetry in single-threaded versus multi-threaded workloads. The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3,327 and Geekbench single-core score of 2,385 show strong per-thread performance, which benefits games that rely on a few fast cores. Yet the GPU’s 59th percentile rank means that even with excellent CPU headroom, frame rates will plateau at the graphics card’s limits. Conversely, in CPU-bound scenarios like physics simulation or data compression—where the PassMark data compression score reaches 337,893—the processor dominates, and the GPU idles. The takeaway from the data is clear: this is a system where the GPU is the primary bottleneck in gaming, while the CPU leads in productivity and compute tasks.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so the following gaming analysis is framed as estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The dataIsMeasured field is false, meaning all frame rate expectations are interpolated from component-level benchmarks rather than observed in-game performance.

Based on the RTX 3060 Ti’s PassMark G3D score of 20,349 and its percentile rank of 59, the GPU is positioned in the mid-range tier of graphics cards. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, scores 16,361 with a deltaPct of -1.4, meaning the RTX 3060 Ti trails that card by 1.4% in average benchmark score. The AMD Radeon RX 9060, scoring 16,014, is 0.7% ahead of the RTX 3060 Ti. These tight margins suggest that at 1080p with ultra settings, the RTX 3060 Ti should deliver playable frame rates in most titles, though not at the level of high-end cards. The 8 GB VRAM capacity and 256-bit memory bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth will handle 1080p ultra textures without issue, but 1440p ultra may strain the memory capacity in some modern games.

For esports titles and lighter games, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance—evidenced by a PassMark single-thread score of 3,728 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 3,327—should prevent CPU-induced frame drops, allowing the GPU to operate near its maximum output. Estimates place 1080p ultra performance in the 60-100 FPS range depending on the title, with more demanding games like open-world RPGs trending toward the lower end. At 1440p, the GPU’s mid-range position suggests frame rates will drop to 40-70 FPS on ultra settings, with the 8 GB VRAM potentially causing texture pop-in or reduced draw distances in VRAM-hungry titles. The GPU’s DirectX 12 score of 78 in PassMark and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,626 indicate modern API support, but the card’s 59th percentile position caps overall potential.

Ray tracing performance, supported by 38 RT cores, will be modest. The Ampere architecture’s second-generation RT cores provide functional but not class-leading ray tracing capability, so enabling ray-traced effects at 1080p will likely require DLSS or reduced settings to maintain smooth performance. The 152 tensor cores enable DLSS, which can help offset the GPU’s mid-range raw compute by rendering at a lower internal resolution and upscaling. Overall, the data supports an estimate that this pairing is best suited for 1080p gaming at high-to-ultra settings, with 1440p viable for less demanding titles or with settings adjusted downward.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600T is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². Its base clock of 1.80 GHz is notably low, but the boost clock reaches 4.80 GHz, providing a wide operating range that balances power efficiency with performance when needed. The 35 W TDP is exceptionally low for a desktop processor with this core count, making it suitable for compact or thermally constrained builds.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports the hybrid architecture typical of Raptor Lake, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact P-core/E-core split. The 20 threads from 14 cores indicate a mix of performance and efficiency cores, which allows the processor to maintain high multi-threaded throughput while keeping power draw low. Benchmark results confirm this capability: the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,571 places the CPU in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the single-core score of 3,327 shows strong per-thread performance.

The CPU’s nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-12700K, scores 35,287 in average benchmark score, with a deltaPct of 0, meaning the two processors are statistically identical in overall performance. The i7-13700T scores 35,403 with a deltaPct of -0.3, also effectively tied. This positioning shows that the i5-13600T, despite its lower TDP and smaller marketing tier, competes directly with higher-end previous-generation parts. The average benchmark score of 35,305 further reinforces this, as it sits just 18 points above the i7-12700K and 98 points below the i7-13700T.

Real-world workload analysis from the PassMark suite reveals specific strengths. The data compression score of 337,893 indicates excellent throughput for archiving and file management tasks. The floating-point math score of 70,152 and integer math score of 96,299 show strong computational performance for scientific and analytical workloads. The extended instructions score of 20,651 suggests good support for SIMD and vectorized code. However, the find prime numbers score of 82 and random string sorting score of 36,413 are lower, indicating that the processor is less optimized for certain algorithmic patterns. The encryption score of 19,320 is moderate, which may impact workloads heavily reliant on cryptographic operations.

For content creation, the multi-threaded Cinebench scores translate to solid performance in video rendering, 3D modeling, and batch processing. The Geekbench multi-core score of 10,851 corroborates this strength. The single-thread Geekbench score of 2,385 ensures responsive application performance for everyday tasks. The 35 W TDP means sustained workloads may cause the processor to throttle to its base clock more quickly than a higher-TDP part, but the boost clock of 4.80 GHz provides bursts of high performance when needed.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600T has 14 cores and 20 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, as indicated by the multiplierUnlocked field being false.

Q: What memory types does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and ECC memory is supported.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU support?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the CPU only.

Q: What is the GPU’s process node and transistor count?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured on Samsung’s 8 nm process with 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 72, placing the pairing above the majority of all possible configurations.

Q: Does the CPU include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it features Intel UHD Graphics 770.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-13600T achieves an average benchmark score of 35,305, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-12700K with an average score of 35,287 and a deltaPct of 0, the Intel Core i7-12700KF at 35,365 with a deltaPct of -0.2, and the Intel Core i7-13700T at 35,403 with a deltaPct of -0.3. These margins are negligible, indicating that the i5-13600T performs essentially identically to these higher-tier processors in aggregate benchmarks. Notably, the Intel Core 5 213PE also appears as a rival with a score of 35,428 and a deltaPct of -0.3, further confirming the i5-13600T’s position in a tightly clustered performance band.

Specific benchmark results for the CPU show a strong multi-threaded profile. Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 23,571, while Cinebench R20 multi-core scores 9,899, and Cinebench R15 multi-core scores 2,375. Single-core results are equally consistent: Cinebench R23 scores 3,327, R20 scores 1,397, and R15 scores 335. Geekbench results show 10,851 for multi-core and 2,385 for single-core. PassMark tests reveal specialized strengths: data compression at 337,893, floating-point math at 70,152, integer math at 96,299, and multi-thread at 27,098. The single-thread PassMark score is 3,728.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti achieves an average benchmark score of 16,129, placing it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 9060 with an average score of 16,014 and a deltaPct of 0.7, the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M at 16,351 with a deltaPct of -1.4, the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT at 16,361 with a deltaPct of -1.4, and the AMD Radeon R9 370X at 15,862 with a deltaPct of 1.7. The GPU trails the RX 5700 XT by 1.4% and leads the R9 370X by 1.7%, showing that it sits in a competitive mid-range band where small score differences separate cards.

GPU benchmark results include a PassMark G3D score of 20,349, a PassMark G2D score of 989, and a PassMark GPU compute score of 10,006. DirectX tests show 132 for DirectX 10, 163 for DirectX 11, 78 for DirectX 12, and 234 for DirectX 9. Geekbench OpenCL scores 78,927, and Vulkan scores 47,784. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,626. The combined percentile for the CPU and GPU pairing is 72, indicating that this configuration outperforms most alternatives in the database.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture using the GA104 chip, manufactured on Samsung’s 8 nm process with 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. The transistor density of 44.4M per mm² reflects the mature process node, which prioritizes availability and cost over transistor scaling. The GPU features 4,864 shading units, 152 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units, providing a balanced configuration for 1080p and entry-level 1440p rendering.

Memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. This bandwidth is adequate for the GPU’s compute capabilities, though the 8 GB capacity may become a limitation in future titles that exceed this VRAM footprint at high resolutions. The base clock of 1410 MHz and boost clock of 1665 MHz are modest, but the FP32 throughput of 16.20 TFLOPS provides solid raw compute for conventional rasterization.

The GPU includes 38 RT cores and 152 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS. The RT cores are second-generation Ampere designs, which provide ray tracing performance that is functional but not class-leading. The tensor cores support DLSS, which can significantly improve frame rates by rendering at lower resolutions and upscaling. The FP16 throughput matches FP32 at 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1), which is notable for compute workloads that can leverage mixed-precision arithmetic.

The pixel rate of 133.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 253.1 GTexel/s determine the GPU’s fill rate capabilities. These figures support 1080p gaming at high settings with smooth performance, but 1440p ultra settings will strain the fill rate in demanding scenes. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20,349 and its 59th percentile rank place it in the mid-range tier, roughly equivalent to the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, which it trails by 1.4% in average benchmark score. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,626 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 78,927 confirm the GPU’s position as a capable mid-range part.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting multiple monitor setups. The dual-slot design with a 242 mm length and 112 mm height fits most mid-tower cases. The power connectors require a single 12-pin, and the suggested PSU is 550 W, which is modest for the GPU’s 200 W TDP.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600T uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is compatible with 12th and 13th generation Core processors. This socket supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory also supported. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the CPU, enabling high-bandwidth NVMe storage and future GPU upgrades that can utilize PCIe 5.0 bandwidth. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU fails or is removed.

The CPU’s TDP of 35 W is remarkably low, meaning the power delivery requirements are minimal. This allows for a wide range of motherboards, including budget options with modest VRM designs. The 35 W TDP also means cooling requirements are lenient; a capable air cooler will suffice, and the low power draw opens the possibility of compact or passively cooled builds. The GPU’s 200 W TDP and suggested PSU of 550 W indicate that the total system power draw will be modest, allowing for a 550 W power supply to handle the entire configuration with headroom.

For memory, the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support provides flexibility. Users can choose DDR4 for cost savings or DDR5 for higher bandwidth, depending on motherboard selection. The memory bus width is dual-channel, so using two DIMMs is recommended to maximize bandwidth. The lack of an unlocked multiplier means overclocking is not possible, but the boost clock of 4.80 GHz provides sufficient performance for most workloads without manual tuning.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU’s 85th percentile ranking leaves headroom for more powerful graphics cards. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that a future GPU upgrade will not be bottlenecked by interface bandwidth. Alternatively, adding more memory or faster storage via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes would improve system responsiveness. The platform’s longevity is supported by the Socket 1700 compatibility with 13th generation processors, though the production status is listed as active for the CPU, ensuring continued availability.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-13600T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti in a desktop configuration. The combined percentile of 72 places this pairing above the majority of possible CPU+GPU combinations, indicating a well-balanced mid-range system. The CPU’s 85th percentile rank provides substantial compute headroom, while the GPU’s 59th percentile rank anchors the system’s gaming performance at a mid-range level.

The i5-13600T is a desktop processor from Intel’s Core 13th Gen series, featuring 14 cores and 20 threads with a 35 W TDP. Its low power draw and high boost clock make it an efficient choice for a desktop build. The RTX 3060 Ti, from NVIDIA’s GeForce 30-series, is an end-of-life product but remains a capable mid-range GPU with 8 GB of VRAM and 16.20 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The pairing is best described as a balanced mid-range desktop configuration, suitable for 1080p gaming and productivity tasks.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 35,305 and the GPU’s average score of 16,129 together produce a combined percentile of 72, meaning this system outperforms 72% of all configurations in the database. This places it in the upper-mid range, with the CPU contributing more to the overall score than the GPU. The system’s class is desktop, indicating it is intended for stationary use with the ability to upgrade individual components.

The overall tier, based on the percentiles, is solidly mid-range with a lean toward higher-end CPU performance. The GPU holds the system back from reaching higher percentiles, but the CPU’s strength ensures that productivity workloads will perform exceptionally well. For gaming, the system will deliver reliable 1080p performance with the ability to handle 1440p at adjusted settings. This is not a high-end enthusiast build, but rather a practical, balanced configuration that excels in compute-heavy tasks while providing adequate gaming performance.

# Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is well-suited for users who prioritize multi-threaded productivity performance while maintaining solid 1080p gaming capability. The i5-13600T’s 85th percentile CPU ranking and strong Cinebench and PassMark multi-thread scores make it an excellent choice for content creators, video editors, and 3D artists who work with CPU-bound rendering tasks. The 14 cores and 20 threads, combined with the 35 W TDP, provide substantial compute throughput without excessive power consumption or heat generation.

Gamers targeting 1080p resolution with high-to-ultra settings will find the RTX 3060 Ti adequate, as its 59th percentile GPU rank and 8 GB VRAM handle most titles at this resolution. The GPU’s 16.20 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth support smooth frame rates in modern games. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, evidenced by the 3,327 Cinebench R23 single-core score, ensures that CPU-bound game logic and physics calculations will not introduce stutters or frame drops.

Software developers and data analysts will benefit from the CPU’s robust multi-threaded performance, particularly in compilation, data processing, and scientific computing workloads. The PassMark data compression score of 337,893 and floating-point math score of 70,152 indicate strong performance for data manipulation and numerical analysis. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running compute tasks. Students and small business users will appreciate the low 35 W TDP, which reduces energy costs and allows for quieter cooling solutions, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback for troubleshooting or secondary displays.

The system is less ideal for users seeking high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p or 4K, as the GPU’s mid-range position will struggle to maintain high frame rates at these resolutions. Similarly, professionals requiring extensive GPU compute for machine learning or high-end 3D rendering may find the 8 GB VRAM and 59th percentile GPU rank limiting. However, for the target audience of 1080p gamers, productivity-focused users, and budget-conscious creators, this pairing offers a balanced and efficient solution.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds