SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + AMD Radeon RX 9070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600T

35,305 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070

23,877 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600T and AMD Radeon RX 9070 pairing represents a study in contrast: a low-power, efficiency-focused processor paired with a high-throughput, current-generation graphics card. The benchmark data indicates a desktop build where the GPU is the clear performance leader, while the CPU provides a surprisingly robust foundation given its modest power envelope. This analysis relies strictly on the provided data, with no measured frame rate data available for this specific combination, so all gaming performance discussions are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is a substantial piece of hardware built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with a 4 nm process from TSMC. The chip, codenamed Navi 48, packs 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 151.0M per mm². The GPU is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2518 MHz, which translates to 20.1 Gbps effective. This memory configuration provides ample bandwidth for high-resolution textures and compute-heavy workloads.

Clock speeds for the RX 9070 are listed with a base of 1330 MHz, a game clock of 2070 MHz, and a boost clock of 2520 MHz. The compute configuration includes 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 128 render output units. For ray tracing, the card features 56 dedicated RT cores, though the data shows no tensor cores, indicating AMD relies on its standard compute units for AI and machine learning tasks rather than dedicated tensor hardware. The pixel rate is 322.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 564.5 GTexel/s. The FP32 and FP16 performance are both listed at 36.13 TFLOPS, with the FP16 figure noted as a 1:1 ratio, meaning there is no dedicated half-precision boost.

The benchmark scores for the GPU show a mixed picture across different APIs. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the card scores 6290 points. Geekbench results are 131539 for OpenCL and 58705 for Vulkan. Passmark results show a G3D score of 25381 and a GPU compute score of 14737. The DirectX 11 score of 281 is notably higher than the DirectX 12 score of 74, which is an unusual inversion suggesting driver overhead or specific workload scaling. The DirectX 9 score of 343 and DirectX 10 score of 141 round out the legacy API performance. The G2D score of 1280 indicates solid 2D acceleration capability.

The GPU holds a percentile rank of 69 against all GPUs, placing it in the upper-middle tier of the database. Its average benchmark score is 23877. Compared to its nearest rivals, the RX 9070 is essentially neck-and-neck with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z, which has an average score of 23736 and a deltaPct of 0.6, meaning the RX 9070 is 0.6% faster. It is also closely matched with the AMD Radeon RX 6800S (24063, deltaPct -0.8), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile (23628, deltaPct 1.1), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER (24170, deltaPct -1.2). These figures indicate that while the RX 9070 is not a top-tier flagship, it performs competitively with a range of high-end cards from previous generations.

For rendering workloads, the combination of 16 GB VRAM and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth allows for large scenes and high-resolution textures without spilling into system memory. The 56 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though the lack of tensor cores means AI-accelerated features like DLSS-style upscaling are not available; the card relies on standard compute for any such tasks. The FP32 performance of 36.13 TFLOPS is sufficient for real-time rendering and moderate offline render tasks, though professional renderers that leverage FP64 or specialized AI hardware would find this card lacking.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU and GPU both have distinct performance profiles that combine to create a system with clear strengths and some limitations. The Intel Core i5-13600T achieves an average benchmark score of 35305 and holds a percentile rank of 85 against all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database. The GPU, meanwhile, has an average score of 23877 and a percentile rank of 69. The combined percentile for this pair is 77, reflecting the higher relative standing of the CPU compared to the GPU.

Looking at the CPU benchmarks in detail, the Cinebench R23 multicore score is 23571, with a single-core score of 3327. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score is 9899 and single-core is 1397. The older Cinebench R15 shows a multicore score of 2375 and single-core of 335. Geekbench results are 10851 for multicore and 2385 for single-core. Passmark multithread score is 27098, with a single-thread score of 3728. The Passmark integer math score is 96299, floating point math is 70152, and extended instructions score is 20651. Data compression is 337893, data encryption is 19320, and random string sorting is 36413. Physics score is 1287, and find prime numbers is 82.

The nearest rivals for the CPU provide context. The Intel Core i7-12700K has an average score of 35287 with a deltaPct of 0, meaning the i5-13600T performs identically. The Intel Core i7-12700KF scores 35365 with a deltaPct of -0.2, indicating the i5-13600T is 0.2% slower. The Intel Core i7-13700T scores 35403 with a deltaPct of -0.3, and the Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35428 with a deltaPct of -0.3. This places the i5-13600T in the same performance class as these other processors, despite its significantly lower TDP.

The combined picture is one of a CPU that is a high-performer relative to the broader market, but the GPU, while respectable, is positioned lower in its own percentile ranking. This suggests the system is balanced toward CPU-heavy workloads, but the GPU is still capable of handling modern gaming and rendering tasks at competitive levels. The benchmark scores do not include any measured FPS data for game titles, so the practical gaming performance must be inferred from these synthetic benchmarks.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-13600T is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S codename. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node, with a die size of 215 mm². The core configuration includes a mix of performance and efficiency cores, which is typical for this generation, though the exact split is not specified in the data. The base clock is 1800 MHz, which is notably low, but the boost clock reaches 4800 MHz, indicating significant headroom for burst workloads.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache arrangement provides fast access to frequently used data, which is critical for gaming and productivity tasks. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation-class processors. The PCIe support is Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for the GPU and NVMe storage.

The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, which provides a basic display output capability that can be useful for troubleshooting or office tasks without a discrete GPU. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, and the processor has a TDP of 35 watts. The multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not supported. The launch MSRP is $255, and the part number is SRMBL.

Benchmark results show the CPU is a strong multi-threaded performer. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23571 is high relative to the 35W TDP, indicating that efficiency does not necessarily come at the cost of raw throughput. The single-core score of 3327 in the same test shows solid single-thread performance, which is important for games and lightly-threaded applications. The Passmark multithread score of 27098 and single-thread score of 3728 align with this assessment. The integer math score of 96299 and floating point score of 70152 indicate strong general-purpose compute capability, while the extended instructions score of 20651 shows good SIMD performance for modern workloads.

The 35W TDP is a defining characteristic of this CPU. It means the processor is designed for low-power systems, which could be small form factor builds or office workstations where heat and noise are concerns. However, the benchmark scores suggest that this efficiency does not severely compromise performance, as the CPU ranks in the 85th percentile overall. The nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i7-12700K which has a much higher TDP, achieve nearly identical average scores, demonstrating that the i5-13600T offers comparable performance at a fraction of the power draw.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the Intel Core i5-13600T and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 is skewed toward the CPU in terms of relative market position, but the actual bottleneck depends on the workload. The CPU's percentile of 85 versus the GPU's percentile of 69 indicates that, on average, the CPU is more capable relative to its peers than the GPU is. This suggests that in CPU-intensive tasks, the processor is less likely to be the limiting factor compared to the GPU in GPU-intensive tasks.

For gaming, the GPU is typically the primary driver of frame rates, especially at higher resolutions and detail settings. The RX 9070, with its 16 GB of VRAM and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth, is well-suited to handle demanding graphical loads. However, the CPU's single-core performance, as measured by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3327 and Passmark single-thread score of 3728, is sufficient to feed the GPU in most scenarios. The data does not include measured FPS scaling, so it is not possible to quantify exactly where the bottleneck shifts between the CPU and GPU.

In multi-threaded workloads like video editing or 3D rendering, the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads come into play. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23571 suggests the CPU can handle complex rendering tasks, but the GPU's compute capabilities, with 36.13 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, can also accelerate certain rendering tasks. The balance here is more nuanced, as some render engines favor the CPU while others offload to the GPU.

The Passmark GPU compute score of 14737 is significantly lower than the CPU's Passmark multithread score of 27098, which could indicate that the CPU is the stronger compute performer in this pairing. However, this comparison is not entirely fair, as the benchmarks measure different types of workloads. For general productivity and office tasks, the CPU is likely the more important component, and its high percentile rank ensures it will handle such tasks with ease.

The FPS scaling, which is not measured, would typically show that the GPU is the bottleneck at high resolutions and ultra settings, while the CPU might become a bottleneck at low resolutions with high frame rates. Given the CPU's strong single-core scores, it is likely that the GPU will be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios, which is the expected behavior for a balanced gaming system. The combined percentile of 77 reflects a system where both components are above average, but the CPU has a slight edge in relative performance.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build is suitable for a range of users, but the measured performance data points to specific use cases. Gamers who play at 1440p or 4K resolution with high or ultra settings will benefit from the RX 9070's 16 GB VRAM and high bandwidth, which are essential for large textures and high-resolution rendering. The CPU's strong single-core performance ensures that frame rates remain stable, even in CPU-bound scenarios. The lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates, but the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6290 and Passmark G3D score of 25381 suggest it is capable of handling modern titles at high settings.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU's multi-threaded performance valuable. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23571 and Passmark multithread score of 27098 indicate that the CPU can handle rendering tasks efficiently, while the GPU's compute capabilities can accelerate effects and previews. The 35W TDP of the CPU makes this an energy-efficient choice for a workstation that runs for long periods.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, which are useful for compiling code and running multiple virtual machines. The support for ECC memory is a notable feature for developers who require data integrity. The PCIe Gen 5 interface provides high bandwidth for fast storage devices, which can reduce compile times and improve overall system responsiveness.

Students and small business users who need a reliable workstation for office tasks, web browsing, and light productivity will find this build more than adequate. The CPU's high percentile rank of 85 ensures smooth multitasking, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is not needed. The low TDP of the CPU means the system can be built in a compact chassis with modest cooling requirements, making it suitable for a desk or home office environment.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific combination of the Intel Core i5-13600T and AMD Radeon RX 9070. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and the `dataIsMeasured` flag is set to false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components.

From the GPU benchmarks, the RX 9070 shows strong potential for gaming. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6290 indicates solid DirectX 12 performance, which is the primary API for modern games. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 58705 suggests good Vulkan support, which is used in many cross-platform titles. The Passmark DirectX 11 score of 281 is high, indicating strong performance in older games that rely on this API. However, the DirectX 12 score of 74 is concerning, as it suggests potential driver overhead or optimization issues in this specific test, though this may not translate directly to real-world gaming performance.

The CPU's single-core performance is critical for gaming, and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3327 and Passmark single-thread score of 3728 are strong, indicating the CPU will not hold back the GPU in most games. The 14 cores and 20 threads also provide ample headroom for background tasks during gaming, such as streaming or voice chat.

For 1080p gaming, the system should deliver high frame rates in most titles, as the GPU is not bandwidth-limited at this resolution, and the CPU can keep up with the frame generation. At 1440p, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth will be utilized more heavily, but the performance is expected to remain good, with the GPU becoming the primary bottleneck. At 4K, the GPU will be the limiting factor, and users may need to adjust settings to achieve playable frame rates, though the 16 GB VRAM helps with high-resolution textures.

Overall, the gaming performance is expected to be good for a modern mid-to-high-end system, but without measured FPS data, these are qualitative estimates based on synthetic benchmarks. Users should expect smooth gameplay at 1080p and 1440p with high settings, with 4K performance being dependent on the specific game and settings.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: For gamers targeting high refresh rates at 1080p or 1440p, this system is well-suited. The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 3728 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3327 ensure it can process game logic quickly, while the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 25381 and 16 GB VRAM handle the graphical load. The estimated performance suggests that frame rates above 144 FPS at 1080p are achievable in many titles, though this is a projection from the synthetic benchmarks rather than measured data.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, combined with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23571, provide ample processing power for encoding video while gaming. The Passmark data compression score of 337893 indicates strong performance in compression tasks, which is relevant for video encoding. The GPU's compute capabilities can also assist with encoding, though the lack of tensor cores means no dedicated AI-based encoding features.

Video editing: Video editing software benefits from both CPU and GPU acceleration. The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 27098 and integer math score of 96299 provide strong processing power for timeline editing and effects, while the GPU's 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 16 GB VRAM accelerate rendering and previews. The high memory bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s is beneficial for handling large video files.

3D rendering: In 3D rendering, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23571 is a strong indicator of its capability to handle CPU-based render engines. The GPU's FP32 performance of 36.13 TFLOPS and 56 RT cores make it suitable for real-time rendering and ray-traced workloads. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for complex scenes, reducing the need to stream geometry from system memory.

Software development: Developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded performance, as indicated by the Passmark multithread score of 27098 and the 14 cores/20 threads. The support for ECC memory is a critical feature for ensuring data integrity during long compile sessions. The PCIe Gen 5 interface provides high bandwidth for NVMe storage, which can reduce build times.

Student and office work: For standard productivity tasks, the CPU's high percentile rank of 85 ensures responsive performance. The Passmark single-thread score of 3728 is more than sufficient for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheets. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup display output, and the 35W TDP of the CPU means the system runs cool and quiet, making it suitable for shared or small workspaces.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the performance difference between the Intel Core i5-13600T and the Intel Core i7-12700K?

A: The two processors are virtually identical in performance. The i7-12700K has an average benchmark score of 35287, while the i5-13600T scores 35305, resulting in a deltaPct of 0, indicating no measurable difference in overall performance.

Q: How much VRAM does the AMD Radeon RX 9070 have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The RX 9070 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2518 MHz, which is 20.1 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the TDP of the Intel Core i5-13600T, and does it support ECC memory?

A: The TDP of the i5-13600T is 35 watts, which is notably low for a 14-core processor. It does support ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation-class CPUs.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon RX 9070 have tensor cores?

A: No, the data shows no tensor cores for the RX 9070. It has 56 RT cores for ray tracing, but it relies on standard compute units for AI and machine learning tasks.

Q: What is the combined percentile rank of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the system is 77, which reflects the CPU's percentile of 85 and the GPU's percentile of 69. This indicates a system that is above average overall, with the CPU being the stronger component relative to its peers.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the AMD Radeon RX 9070?

A: The launch MSRP of the RX 9070 is 549 USD. This is stated once for informational purposes and does not reflect current market pricing.

Q: What is the process node for the AMD Radeon RX 9070, and who manufactures it?

A: The RX 9070 is manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process node. The chip, codenamed Navi 48, contains 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform for this build is based on the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 13th Gen series of processors. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving users flexibility in choosing their memory type based on availability and preference. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the CPU supports ECC memory, which is an unusual feature for a consumer platform and beneficial for workstation use.

The PCIe support is Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU, which provides high bandwidth for the GPU and other expansion cards. The RX 9070 uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, which takes full advantage of this capability. This ensures that the GPU is not bottlenecked by the bus interface, even with the high data throughput required for modern games and compute workloads.

The power supply requirement is dictated by the GPU. The suggested PSU for the RX 9070 is 550 watts, while the CPU has a TDP of 35 watts. This leaves significant headroom for additional components, such as multiple storage drives or expansion cards. The GPU uses 2x 8-pin power connectors, so users must ensure their power supply has the appropriate cables. The total system power draw is expected to be well within the 550-watt recommendation, even under load.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be to increase the memory to the maximum supported by the motherboard, as the CPU's dual-channel memory controller benefits from higher capacity for multitasking and large datasets. Alternatively, users could upgrade the GPU to a more powerful model if they require higher frame rates at 4K or in ray-traced games, though the current RX 9070 with its 16 GB VRAM and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth is already a strong performer. The CPU, with its high percentile rank and low TDP, is unlikely to require an upgrade for several generations, making the platform stable for the long term.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + AMD Radeon RX 9070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600T

AMD Radeon RX 9070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds