SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600T

35,305 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9060

16,014 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600T is a Raptor Lake-S desktop processor built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². It packs 14 cores and 20 threads, combining performance and efficiency cores in the hybrid architecture typical of 13th-generation Core parts. The base clock sits at 1800 MHz, which rises to a 4.80 GHz boost clock under load, and the chip carries a 35 W TDP, indicating a power-lean design intended for systems where thermal and energy constraints matter. The cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode with ECC capability enabled.

Benchmark data reveals a processor that behaves like a mainstream desktop part with strong multi-threaded output. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 23571 places it well ahead of typical mid-range chips, while the single-core score of 3327 demonstrates that the low base clock does not cripple lightly threaded performance when boost is engaged. Geekbench results reinforce this pattern: 10851 multicore and 2385 single-core. PassMark tests show 27098 for multithreaded workloads, 3728 for single-thread, and specific subtests like 96299 in integer math, 70152 in floating-point math, and 337893 in data compression, which speak to strong general-purpose compute. The 85th percentile versus all CPUs means this chip outperforms the vast majority of installed processors, landing just above the Intel Core i7-12700K (deltaPct 0) and slightly behind the Core i7-12700KF (deltaPct -0.2), Core i7-13700T (deltaPct -0.3), and Core 5 213PE (deltaPct -0.3) in average benchmark score.

The 35 W TDP is the defining characteristic here. Unlike higher-TDP desktop parts that sustain boost clocks aggressively, this chip's modest power envelope means the 4.80 GHz boost is bursty rather than continuous. In real workloads, the Raptor Lake architecture with 24 MB of L3 cache compensates for power limits by keeping frequently accessed data close to the cores, which is why the multi-core scores remain competitive with the i7-12700K, a chip with a much higher power budget. The 9899 Cinebench R20 multicore score and the 2375 R15 multicore score both indicate that sustained rendering tasks benefit from the core count, even if the clock speeds taper under prolonged load. For office productivity, web browsing, and coding, the single-core performance is more than sufficient, and the 82 PassMark prime numbers score suggests the efficiency cores handle light background tasks without stealing resources from foreground work.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 85th percentile standing and strong single-core scores (3327 in R23, 3728 in PassMark single-thread) ensure that frame pacing in esports titles is not CPU-bound, though the ultimate FPS ceiling depends on the GPU. The 4.80 GHz boost clock is sufficient for high-refresh 1080p gaming, but the 35 W TDP means sustained all-core loads in heavily threaded titles may see clock dips.

Streaming: The 14-core/20-thread configuration provides ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The 23571 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 27098 PassMark multithread score indicate that x264 encoding at faster presets is feasible alongside a game, though the low TDP may require tuning encoder settings to avoid frame drops on the CPU side.

Video editing: Timeline scrubbing and preview rendering benefit from the 24 MB L3 cache and high single-core performance (2385 Geekbench single-core). Export times are driven by the multicore scores, and the 9899 Cinebench R20 multicore result shows this chip can handle 4K proxy workflows without bottlenecking the GPU during final renders.

3D rendering: The 23571 Cinebench R23 multicore score is the key metric. This places the i5-13600T in striking distance of the i7-12700K (deltaPct 0), making it viable for CPU-based rendering in Blender or V-Ray, though render times will be longer than a higher-TDP part with similar core counts due to clock throttling under sustained load.

Software development: Compilation tasks are heavily multi-threaded, and the 96299 PassMark integer math score plus 337893 data compression score indicate strong performance for building large codebases. The 20 threads handle parallel compiler jobs efficiently, while the single-core speed keeps interactive IDE responsiveness high.

Student and office work: The 3728 PassMark single-thread score and 10851 Geekbench multicore score are overkill for document editing, spreadsheets, and web apps. The 35 W TDP makes this a low-heat option for small form factor builds, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output without a discrete GPU.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600T uses Socket 1700, which is a mature platform with broad motherboard availability. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, allowing builders to reuse older DDR4 kits or invest in newer DDR5 for higher bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is forward-looking for storage and GPU connectivity. ECC memory support is present, which is unusual for a consumer i5 and adds appeal for workstation-oriented builds where data integrity is critical.

The 35 W TDP means the stock cooler is adequate, but the processor can accept a capable air cooler if the motherboard allows higher power limits. The suggested PSU for a system with this CPU and a discrete GPU is 300 W, which is modest and leaves headroom for a mid-range graphics card without requiring a PSU upgrade. A sensible next upgrade path involves pairing this CPU with a higher-tier GPU than the Radeon RX 9060, since the CPU's 85th percentile performance can feed faster graphics cards in most workloads. The platform's longevity is tied to the LGA 1700 socket, which supports both 12th and 13th generation Core processors, so users upgrading from an older i3 or i5 can drop in this chip without changing the motherboard. Conversely, moving to a 14-core part like the i7-13700T (deltaPct -0.3) offers negligible performance gains, so the upgrade path is more about GPU and memory than CPU.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the i5-13600T and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 is defined by the CPU's 85th percentile and the GPU's 59th percentile. The CPU is the stronger component, which means that in CPU-light workloads like gaming at lower resolutions, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU's 27098 PassMark multithread score and 3728 single-thread score are substantially above what the GPU needs to stay fed in most titles, so the bottleneck is almost always on the graphics side. The GPU's 17631 PassMark G3D score and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3322 place it at the 59th percentile, which is mid-pack, and the 0.7% delta versus the RTX 3060 Ti confirms it is not a high-end part.

In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics simulation or data compression, the CPU takes the lead. The 1287 PassMark physics score and 19320 data encryption score indicate that the processor handles these tasks efficiently, but the GPU's compute capabilities (9919 PassMark GPU compute) are less relevant here. The combined percentile of 72 suggests that the system as a whole is above average, but the gap between CPU and GPU percentiles means that any upgrade to the GPU will yield immediate gains in graphics-limited tasks, while CPU upgrades would show diminishing returns. For gaming at 1080p ultra settings, the GPU will be the limiting factor in most titles, while at 4K the GPU is even more dominant. For productivity workloads that are heavily multi-threaded, the CPU is the stronger component, and the GPU's compute capabilities are secondary.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 35305, placing it at the 85th percentile versus all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-12700K (avgScore 35287, deltaPct 0), the Core i7-12700KF (avgScore 35365, deltaPct -0.2), the Core i7-13700T (avgScore 35403, deltaPct -0.3), and the Core 5 213PE (avgScore 35428, deltaPct -0.3). This means the i5-13600T trades blows with the i7-12700K, offering essentially identical performance despite the lower TDP. The GPU's average benchmark score is 16014, at the 59th percentile versus all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (avgScore 16129, deltaPct -0.7), the AMD Radeon R9 370X (avgScore 15862, deltaPct 1), the AMD Radeon RX 7700 (avgScore 15852, deltaPct 1), and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (avgScore 15679, deltaPct 2.1). The GPU sits within a narrow band around the RTX 3060 Ti, with a delta of -0.7%, meaning it is essentially a peer of that card. The combined percentile for the system is 72, reflecting a configuration where the CPU is well above average and the GPU is modestly above average.

In specific GPU benchmarks, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3322 indicates solid DirectX 12 performance. Geekbench OpenCL yields 88183, and Vulkan yields 39476, showing that compute workloads are handled well. PassMark subtests include DirectX 9 at 280, DirectX 10 at 104, DirectX 11 at 182, DirectX 12 at 44, G2D at 1002, G3D at 17631, and GPU compute at 9919. The low DirectX 12 score relative to DirectX 11 suggests that the GPU's driver and hardware are more optimized for older APIs, which is relevant for legacy game compatibility.

# Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU muscle. Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the CPU capable of feeding the GPU in most titles, though the GPU's 59th percentile means ultra settings may require adjustments to maintain high frame rates. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, and users should expect to lower settings or rely on upscaling techniques. Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 23571 Cinebench R23 multicore score, which handles export tasks and render workloads efficiently, while the GPU's compute capabilities (88183 Geekbench OpenCL) accelerate effects and previews. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 20 threads and 27098 PassMark multithread score, which reduces build times significantly. Students and office workers building a small form factor system will value the 35 W TDP, which keeps thermals and noise low, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed. Small business workstations that run multi-threaded databases or financial modeling will find the CPU's 337893 data compression score and 19320 encryption score useful for data-heavy tasks, while the GPU's 17631 G3D score handles visualization needs.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with the Navi 44 chip on TSMC's 4 nm process, containing 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die. It features 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, with 28 ray tracing cores. The base clock is 1700 MHz, the game clock is 2400 MHz, and the boost clock reaches 2990 MHz, while memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus delivers 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Pixel rate is 191.4 GPixel/s, texture rate is 334.9 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute is 21.43 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 21.43 TFLOPS (1:1). The GPU has a TDP of 132 W and uses a single 8-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 300 W.

Benchmark results put this GPU at the 59th percentile, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3322 and a PassMark G3D score of 17631. The 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p gaming, but the 8 GB VRAM capacity may be limiting in texture-heavy titles at higher resolutions. The 28 RT cores support ray tracing, but the low DirectX 12 score of 44 in PassMark suggests that ray tracing performance is not a strength. The FP32 throughput of 21.43 TFLOPS is solid for compute workloads, and the 9919 PassMark GPU compute score reflects this. The dual-slot design with 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a outputs covers modern display connectivity. The GPU's performance is nearly identical to the RTX 3060 Ti (deltaPct -0.7), which means it is a competent 1080p card that can handle 1440p with settings tuned down.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-13600T with the AMD Radeon RX 9060. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake part with a 35 W TDP, and the GPU is an RDNA 4.0 part with 8 GB of VRAM and a 132 W TDP. The combined percentile of 72 places this system above the majority of configurations in the database, driven primarily by the CPU's 85th percentile standing. The CPU's average benchmark score of 35305 is nearly identical to the i7-12700K, making this a high-end processor paired with a mid-range GPU. The system is best described as a CPU-centric desktop that excels in multi-threaded productivity tasks while providing competent gaming performance at 1080p. The 300 W suggested PSU indicates that the overall power draw is modest, and the 35 W CPU TDP means the system runs cool under typical loads. The GPU's 59th percentile is the limiting factor for gaming, but for users whose primary workloads are CPU-bound, this is a well-balanced configuration.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's benchmark position relative to the Intel Core i7-12700K?

A: The i5-13600T has an average benchmark score of 35305, which is a deltaPct of 0 versus the i7-12700K (avgScore 35287), meaning they perform virtually identically.

Q: Does the CPU support both DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600T supports DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier compared to NVIDIA cards?

A: The Radeon RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16014, which is 0.7% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (avgScore 16129), placing it in the same performance class.

Q: What is the combined system percentile, and what does it mean?

A: The combined percentile is 72, meaning this CPU+GPU pairing outperforms 72% of all configurations in the database.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is the memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 300 W.

Q: Is the GPU's ray tracing performance strong?

A: The GPU has 28 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, but its PassMark DirectX 12 score of 44 is lower than its DirectX 11 score of 182, indicating that ray tracing workloads are not its strength.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 85th percentile and the GPU's 59th percentile suggest that at 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU will be the limiting factor in most titles. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 17631 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3322 indicate performance comparable to the RTX 3060 Ti, which typically delivers playable frame rates at 1080p ultra in most games but struggles at 1440p ultra. For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the high single-core CPU performance (3728 PassMark single-thread) and the GPU's 2990 MHz boost clock should yield high frame rates at 1080p with competitive settings. For AAA single-player games, the 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p ultra, but 1440p ultra may exceed the VRAM budget in some titles, requiring texture quality reductions. At 4K, the GPU is clearly insufficient for ultra settings, and users should expect to rely on upscaling or lower presets. The CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in any gaming scenario, as its 23571 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 3327 single-core score provide ample headroom for feeding the graphics card. Overall, this pairing is best suited for 1080p gaming with high refresh rates in less demanding titles, while newer AAA games at 1440p will require settings tuning to maintain smooth performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600T

AMD Radeon RX 9060

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds