SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600T

35,305 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

13,745 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600T paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is a desktop configuration that combines a high-efficiency 14-core processor with a flagship-tier graphics card. The data shows a system with significant compute potential, but one where the GPU holds a distinct performance advantage over the CPU in raw throughput metrics. This analysis examines the benchmark scores, architectural details, and performance characteristics to define what this pairing can achieve.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture and the Navi 31 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The die contains 57,700 million transistors across a 529 mm² area. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1387 MHz, a game clock of 2025 MHz, and a boost clock of 2394 MHz. Memory is a substantial 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 320-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is a standout feature, providing ample capacity and throughput for high-resolution textures and large datasets.

The GPU’s compute resources are substantial. It has 5376 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 192 raster operation units. The pixel rate is 459.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 804.4 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 51.48 TFLOPS for FP32 and 103.0 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1). For ray tracing, the chip includes 84 dedicated RT cores, though the data shows no tensor core count. In benchmark results, the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5623, which is a strong indicator of modern DirectX 12 gaming performance.

The GPU’s percentile ranking is 55th among all GPUs, which places it slightly above the median in the database. Its average benchmark score is 13745. The nearest rivals provide context, with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT scoring 13543, a delta of 1.5% higher, meaning the RX 7900 XT is 1.5% behind that newer card. Conversely, the RX 7900 XT outperforms the AMD Radeon 660M (13812, -0.5%) and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (13821, -0.5%) by 0.5%. It also leads the AMD Radeon RX 570X (13871, -0.9%) by 0.9%. These are tight margins, indicating that the RX 7900 XT sits in a competitive performance band where small percentage differences separate it from its immediate peers.

For rendering workloads, the 20 GB VRAM is critical. It allows for large scenes and high-resolution textures to reside in memory without spillover, which is a significant advantage for 3D rendering and video editing. The 800.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that data can be fed to the compute units quickly, reducing bottlenecks in texture-heavy workloads. The FP32 and FP16 throughput figures suggest strong raw compute for both single-precision and half-precision operations, which are common in rendering and compute shaders. The presence of RT cores means hardware-accelerated ray tracing is available, and the 3DMark score reflects that the GPU can handle the demands of modern rasterization at high settings.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmarks show a processor that excels in multi-threaded tasks. In Cinebench R23, the Core i5-13600T scores 23571 in multi-core and 3327 in single-core. The Geekbench scores are 10851 in multi-core and 2385 in single-core. PassMark results show a multi-thread score of 27098 and a single-thread score of 3728. The CPU’s percentile rank is 85th among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database. Its average benchmark score is 35305.

The GPU benchmarks are equally telling. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5623. In Geekbench, the GPU scores 12756 in OpenCL and 71068 in Vulkan. PassMark G3D score is 29009, and the GPU compute score is 16828. The GPU’s percentile rank is 55th, which is a moderate position, meaning it is outranked by nearly half of all GPUs in the database.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 70. This figure suggests that the system as a whole performs better than 70% of all configurations in the database. The picture is clear: the CPU is a high-performer in its class, sitting at the 85th percentile, while the GPU is more mid-pack in relative terms, sitting at the 55th percentile. This creates an imbalance where the CPU has more headroom relative to its peers than the GPU does. The CPU’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-12700K (avgScore 35287, delta 0%), the Intel Core i7-12700KF (avgScore 35365, delta -0.2%), and the Intel Core i7-13700T (avgScore 35403, delta -0.3%). The i5-13600T essentially trades blows with these chips, being within 0.3% of each, which shows it delivers performance comparable to previous-generation i7 parts.

FAQ

Q: What is the processor’s core and thread configuration?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600T has 14 cores and 20 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: How much memory and bandwidth does the GPU provide?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, providing 800.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU’s performance percentile compared to all processors?

A: The CPU ranks in the 85th percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms 85% of processors in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT?

A: The RX 7900 XT has an average benchmark score of 13745, which is 1.5% lower than the RX 9070 XT’s score of 13543, making the RX 9070 XT the slightly faster card.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 300 W. The suggested PSU for the system is 700 W.

Q: Does the CPU support error-correcting code memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600T supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 70, meaning the configuration performs better than 70% of all systems in the database.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600T uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is the platform for the 13th Gen Core series. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, allowing for high-bandwidth connectivity to compatible devices. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, which offers a basic display output capability if the discrete GPU is not present.

For the GPU, the RX 7900 XT uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slot, though it will operate at the older standard’s speed. The GPU is a dual-slot card that is 276 mm long, 110 mm high, and 51 mm wide, requiring a case that can accommodate its size and a power supply with two 8-pin connectors. The suggested PSU is 700 W, which provides the headroom for the combined 35 W TDP of the CPU and the 300 W TDP of the GPU, along with other system components.

A sensible next upgrade path on this platform would be to move to a higher-core-count processor within the same socket, such as a Core i7 or i9 from the 13th Gen series, if more multi-threaded performance is needed. The data shows the i5-13600T is already within 0.3% of the Core i7-13700T, so the upgrade would yield marginal gains. For the GPU, the data indicates the RX 7900 XT is near the end of its production life, marked as end-of-life, with a successor in the Navi IV generation. Upgrading to a newer GPU would be a more impactful change, given that the GPU’s percentile rank is 55, which is the lower-performing component in this pairing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU sits at the 85th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 55th percentile. This means the CPU is a much stronger performer relative to its peers than the GPU. In a typical gaming scenario, the GPU is usually the limiting factor at high resolutions and detail settings. Given that the GPU is at the 55th percentile, it is likely to be the bottleneck in most gaming workloads, especially at 4K or with ray tracing enabled.

The CPU’s high percentile suggests it has ample headroom to feed the GPU in most tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23571 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 27098 indicate that the CPU can handle demanding background tasks, such as streaming or recording, without heavily impacting frame rates. The single-core performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2385, is also strong enough to avoid bottlenecks in games that rely on single-thread performance.

For compute-heavy workloads, the balance shifts. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 51.48 TFLOPS is a massive number, but its 55th percentile rank suggests that other GPUs offer even more. In rendering or compute tasks that use the GPU, the RX 7900 XT will be the primary workhorse, and its performance will define the output speed. The CPU will then be secondary, handling scene management and data preparation. The data indicates that for gaming, the GPU is the bottleneck, and for CPU-intensive tasks like physics or data compression, the CPU is the bottleneck, but it is a higher-performing component than the GPU relative to its own market.

Who Should Build It

This system is a desktop configuration that targets users who need strong CPU performance for productivity but are willing to pair it with a GPU that is above average but not the absolute fastest. The CPU’s 85th percentile rank makes it an excellent choice for content creators who run multi-threaded applications. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23571 and the PassMark data compression score of 337893 show that the CPU can accelerate video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation.

For gamers at 1440p, the RX 7900 XT’s 20 GB of VRAM and 800 GB/s bandwidth provide a solid foundation for high-detail textures. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5623 indicates it can handle modern titles. However, the GPU’s 55th percentile means it is not a top-tier card, so gamers seeking 4K performance at maximum settings may find it limiting. The system is also suitable for software developers, given the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads, which can handle parallel builds and virtual machines. The ECC memory support adds a layer of stability for workstation-class tasks.

Students and small business workstations would benefit from the CPU’s efficiency, with a TDP of just 35 W, which reduces cooling and power requirements. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 can serve as a fallback for basic tasks if the discrete GPU is not needed. The system’s combined percentile of 70 indicates it is a well-rounded machine that outperforms most systems, making it a sensible choice for a high-performance workstation or a gaming PC that also handles serious compute work.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-13600T is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S codename. It is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². The base clock is 1800 MHz, and the boost clock reaches 4.80 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and has ECC memory support, which is unusual for a consumer chip.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a processor that is strong in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3327 and the Geekbench single-core score of 2385 show excellent per-core performance, which is critical for responsiveness and for games that favor higher clock speeds. The multi-threaded scores, such as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23571 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 27098, demonstrate that the 14 cores can scale well in parallel tasks.

The PassMark scores provide insight into specific workload types. The data encryption score is 19320, and the extended instructions score is 20651, showing strong performance in cryptographic and SIMD workloads. The floating-point math score is 70152, and the integer math score is 96299, indicating robust arithmetic capabilities. The physics score is 1287, which is a lower number but still indicates adequate performance for physics simulations. The random string sorting score is 36413, and the data compression score is 337893, which are high numbers that show excellent performance in data manipulation tasks.

The CPU’s nearest rival comparison shows it is effectively tied with the Intel Core i7-12700K, with a delta of 0%. This means the i5-13600T offers performance on par with a previous-generation i7, which is a strong result for a chip with a 35 W TDP. The low TDP is a key feature, as it allows for efficient cooling and lower power draw in a desktop system, making it suitable for compact builds or always-on workstations.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-13600T with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT in a desktop configuration. The CPU is a high-efficiency 14-core processor from the Core 13th Gen series, while the GPU is a high-end RDNA 3.0 card with 20 GB of VRAM. The combined percentile of 70 indicates that this system outperforms 70% of all configurations in the database.

The CPU’s performance is its strongest asset, sitting at the 85th percentile among all CPUs. This makes it a top-tier processor for multi-threaded tasks. The GPU, while powerful in absolute terms with 51.48 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, sits at the 55th percentile, which is a more average position. This creates a build where the CPU is the star, and the GPU is a capable but not class-leading companion.

The overall tier of this system is defined by its mixed performance profile. It is not a top-tier gaming rig, as the GPU’s percentile suggests, but it is a very capable workstation that can handle gaming as a secondary task. The CPU’s low TDP of 35 W is a notable feature, making this a relatively power-efficient desktop build. The GPU’s end-of-life status suggests that this is a pairing that may be superseded by newer hardware, but at the time of the data, it represents a solid balance of CPU compute and GPU rendering power.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for any game or resolution. Therefore, all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components, not direct measurements.

To estimate gaming performance, one can look at the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5623. This score is a measure of DirectX 12 gaming performance. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score is 29009. These scores suggest that the RX 7900 XT is capable of high-detail gaming at 1440p, and likely playable frame rates at 4K, though the 55th percentile rank indicates it is not at the top of the heap. The 20 GB VRAM is a strong asset for modern games that use large texture packs, and the 800 GB/s bandwidth should prevent memory-related stutters at high resolutions.

The CPU’s single-core performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2385, is sufficient to feed the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3327 confirms this. The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for background tasks, such as Discord or streaming software, without impacting frame times. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as esports titles at low resolutions, the CPU’s strong single-core performance will shine, but the GPU’s lower relative percentile may become the limiting factor at higher resolutions. Overall, the estimated gaming performance is good, but not exceptional, with the GPU being the primary determinant of frame rates.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: For 1080p and 1440p high-refresh gaming, the CPU’s strong single-core performance (Geekbench single-core score of 2385) can drive high frame rates, while the GPU’s 20 GB VRAM and 800 GB/s bandwidth handle high-detail textures without issue. The GPU’s 55th percentile suggests it can achieve high frame rates in most titles, but it may not reach the extremes seen with top-tier cards.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23571) provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The PassMark data compression score of 337893 indicates efficient handling of streaming workloads, allowing for a smooth streaming experience without sacrificing gaming performance.

Video editing: The CPU’s multi-threaded performance (PassMark multi-thread score of 27098) accelerates timeline rendering and export tasks. The GPU’s 20 GB VRAM is beneficial for handling high-resolution video previews and GPU-accelerated effects, making this a capable video editing workstation.

3D rendering: The GPU’s FP32 performance of 51.48 TFLOPS is a strong asset for GPU-based rendering engines. The 20 GB VRAM allows for loading large scenes, and the CPU’s high core count handles scene preparation and physics simulations, creating a balanced rendering system.

Software development: The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23571) are ideal for parallel compilation and running multiple virtual machines. The ECC memory support adds stability for critical development work, making this a reliable platform for developers.

Student and office work: The CPU’s low TDP of 35 W makes this an efficient system for daily tasks. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback for display output, and the CPU’s strong single-core performance (Geekbench single-core score of 2385) ensures snappy responsiveness in productivity applications, making it a fast and efficient workstation for academic and office environments.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600T

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds