SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600T

35,305 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600

15,171 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600T is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. Its hybrid design pairs performance cores with efficient cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact core distribution. The base clock is 1800 MHz, which is notably low, but the boost clock reaches 4.80 GHz, indicating significant headroom under load. This combination of a low base clock and high boost clock suggests the chip is engineered for thermally constrained environments, as reflected in its 35 W TDP. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support, which is unusual for a mainstream Core i5 part.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a substantial amount of L3, which helps with gaming and productivity workloads that benefit from larger pools of fast memory. The CPU also integrates UHD Graphics 770, providing a fallback display output without a discrete GPU, though the presence of a dedicated graphics card in this build makes that less relevant. PCIe support is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is current-generation connectivity for high-speed SSDs and future GPU bandwidth requirements.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 85th percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23571 is strong, while the single-core score of 3327 shows excellent per-thread performance. Geekbench scores of 10851 multi-core and 2385 single-core corroborate this picture. The PassMark multi-thread score of 27098 and single-thread score of 3728 further validate the chip's balanced capabilities. The average benchmark score is 35305, which is essentially identical to the Intel Core i7-12700K (35287, 0% delta) and slightly ahead of the Intel Core i7-12700KF (35365, -0.2%). This is remarkable: a 35 W TDP part matching the performance of a previous-generation unlocked i7. The Intel Core i7-13700T (35403, -0.3%) and Intel Core 5 213PE (35428, -0.3%) are also within a fraction of a percent, placing the 13600T in a tight cluster of high-performing chips.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23571 indicates strong multi-threaded rendering capability, while the single-core score of 3327 ensures snappy responsiveness in lightly threaded applications. PassMark data compression (337893) and encryption (19320) scores suggest the CPU handles archival and security tasks efficiently. The floating-point math score of 70152 and integer math score of 96299 show balanced arithmetic processing. The extended instructions score of 20651 indicates solid SIMD performance for vectorized workloads. The find prime numbers score of 82 is low in absolute terms but is a specialized test. Overall, the data shows a CPU that punches well above its power envelope, making it suitable for compact builds where thermal and power limits are tight.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13600T compare to the Intel Core i7-12700K in multi-threaded performance?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical: the i5-13600T scores 35305, while the i7-12700K scores 35287, a delta of 0%. The 13600T achieves this parity while operating at a 35 W TDP compared to the i7-12700K's unlocked design.

Q: What is the boost clock of the i5-13600T and does it compensate for the low base clock?

A: The base clock is 1800 MHz, but the boost clock reaches 4.80 GHz. The high boost clock allows the CPU to deliver competitive single-threaded performance, as shown by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3327, which is in the 85th percentile overall.

Q: Does the CPU support both DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the memory support lists both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. This provides flexibility for builders to choose either memory technology based on platform availability and cost considerations.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the i5-13600T?

A: The launch MSRP is $255. This positions it as a mid-range processor, though pricing analysis is beyond the scope of this benchmark-focused review.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes UHD Graphics 770. This is useful for troubleshooting or temporary display output, though the AMD Radeon RX 7600 in this build handles all graphics rendering.

Q: Is the i5-13600T overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false). Users seeking overclocking would need to look at unlocked K-series parts, though the 13600T's performance already rivals previous-generation unlocked chips.

Q: What is the ECC memory support situation?

A: The CPU supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation platforms. This makes the chip potentially appealing for small-scale server or workstation builds where data integrity is critical.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 71, placing it above the majority of desktop configurations. The CPU alone sits in the 85th percentile, while the GPU sits in the 57th percentile, indicating that the processor is the stronger component relative to their respective markets.

The CPU's Cinebench R15 scores are 2375 multi-core and 335 single-core. R20 scores are 9899 multi-core and 1397 single-core. R23 scores are 23571 multi-core and 3327 single-core. These scores show consistent scaling across Cinebench versions, with the multi-core results being particularly strong for a 35 W part. Geekbench multi-core of 10851 and single-core of 2385 align with expectations for a modern 14-core processor. PassMark's multi-thread score of 27098 and single-thread score of 3728 confirm the CPU's dual nature: strong parallel throughput and excellent per-core speed.

The GPU, an AMD Radeon RX 7600, delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2310. Geekbench OpenCL scores 88051, while Vulkan scores 34401. PassMark G3D scores 16634, with G2D at 984. The PassMark DirectX scores are 84 for DX10, 172 for DX11, 58 for DX12, and 226 for DX9. The GPU compute score is 8790. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 15171, placing it in the 57th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (15199, -0.2%), AMD Radeon Pro 560X (15082, +0.6%), AMD Radeon 680M (15270, -0.7%), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti (15063, +0.7%). The delta percentages are all within 1%, meaning the RX 7600 is essentially tied with these competitors in aggregate benchmark terms, despite being a much newer architecture.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU significantly outperforms the GPU in percentile terms. The 85th percentile CPU paired with a 57th percentile GPU means the processor has substantial headroom for more powerful graphics cards, but the current pairing is balanced enough for most mainstream workloads. The combined percentile of 71 reflects this mid-to-upper tier positioning.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The RX 7600's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2310 and PassMark G3D score of 16634 indicate it can handle 1080p gaming at high settings, though the 57th percentile suggests it is not a top-tier 1440p or 4K card. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core: 3327) ensures it will not bottleneck frame delivery in most games.

Streaming: The 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample parallel resources for encoding video while gaming. The PassMark data encryption score of 19320 shows the CPU can handle encryption overhead, and the multi-thread score of 27098 supports simultaneous game and encode workloads. However, the GPU lacks dedicated encoding hardware details in the FACT PACK, so streamers may rely on CPU-based encoding.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23571 is strong for timeline rendering and export tasks. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with large media files. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate memory for 1080p and some 4K editing, though the 57th percentile GPU may struggle with complex effects.

3D Rendering: The CPU's multi-threaded capabilities (PassMark multi-thread: 27098) excel at CPU-based rendering. The GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 32 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the overall GPU percentile suggests moderate rendering throughput compared to higher-end cards.

Software Development: The 14 cores and 20 threads handle parallel compilation well. Geekbench multi-core of 10851 indicates strong performance for build servers or local development. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running compile jobs.

Student and Office Work: The 35 W TDP allows for quiet, low-power operation. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup display solution. PassMark single-thread of 3728 ensures snappy UI responsiveness in office applications, and the CPU's 85th percentile ranking means it exceeds requirements for productivity tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600T uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The memory bus is dual-channel, and ECC memory is supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is forward-looking for high-bandwidth devices. The CPU's 35 W TDP is remarkably low, meaning most motherboards with Socket 1700 can easily power it.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs. The GPU has a 165 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 450 W. The CPU's 35 W TDP means total system power draw is modest, so the 450 W PSU recommendation provides ample headroom. The GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector and is dual-slot, so it fits in most cases.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU's 85th percentile performance has room to drive more powerful graphics cards. The CPU's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-12700K, which shows the 13600T is already competitive with previous-generation high-end parts, so CPU upgrades would offer diminishing returns. The platform supports DDR5, so migrating from DDR4 to DDR5 memory would be a viable incremental upgrade, though the performance impact would depend on the specific workload. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures compatibility with next-generation SSDs and GPUs.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core i5-13600T and AMD Radeon RX 7600. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2310 and PassMark G3D score of 16634, combined with its 57th percentile ranking, suggest it is a capable 1080p gaming card. At 1440p, performance would be lower, and 4K gaming would likely require reduced settings.

The CPU's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core: 3327) indicates it can feed the GPU effectively in most games. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with game data locality. The GPU's 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p textures but may be limiting at higher resolutions with ultra texture packs. The 32 RT cores provide ray tracing support, though the performance level is modest given the 57th percentile overall.

Estimated frame rates at 1080p ultra settings would likely be in the playable range for most titles, given the GPU's DirectX 12 score of 58 in PassMark. At 1440p, users would likely need to lower settings to maintain smooth gameplay. The lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates, and actual performance will vary by game title and optimization.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance: the CPU is in the 85th percentile while the GPU is in the 57th percentile. This means the processor is significantly stronger relative to its market segment than the graphics card. In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data compression (PassMark data compression: 337893), and physics calculations (PassMark physics: 1287), the CPU will be the limiting factor in the positive sense — it will not be the bottleneck. In GPU-bound workloads like high-resolution gaming and 3D rendering with ray tracing, the RX 7600 will be the limiting component.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, supports this: the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2310 is modest, and the PassMark G3D score of 16634 places it in the lower half of the GPU distribution. The CPU, by contrast, has headroom to drive a GPU that is one or two tiers higher. For gaming, this means that at 1080p, the CPU can likely push high frame rates, but the GPU will cap the maximum FPS. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. For productivity, the CPU's multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core: 23571) will handle most tasks without issue, while the GPU's compute performance (PassMark GPU compute: 8790) will limit GPU-accelerated workloads like video encoding or machine learning inference.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-13600T with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 in a desktop configuration. The combined percentile is 71, indicating it outperforms 71% of all desktop builds in the benchmark database. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread processor with a 35 W TDP, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU is an 8 GB GDDR6 card with a 165 W TDP, sitting in the 57th percentile of all GPUs.

The overall tier is mid-to-upper mainstream. The CPU provides flagship-level compute performance in a low-power envelope, while the GPU offers solid 1080p gaming and moderate compute capabilities. This is not a high-end enthusiast build, but it is a well-rounded system for general-purpose use, gaming at 1080p, and productivity work. The 35 W CPU TDP combined with the 165 W GPU TDP means the system is relatively power-efficient, and the 450 W suggested PSU provides adequate headroom.

The build class is desktop, confirming this is a stationary, full-size system rather than a laptop or mini-PC. The CPU's Socket 1700 platform and the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface are current-generation standards, ensuring compatibility with modern components.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who primarily play at 1080p resolution. The CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core: 3327) ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU's 57th percentile ranking means it can handle most games at high settings in 1080p. Users who play at 1440p would need to lower settings, and 4K gaming is not recommended with this GPU.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core: 23571). The 14 cores and 20 threads handle rendering tasks efficiently, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long render sessions. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p video editing and moderate 3D workloads.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's parallel processing capabilities for compilation. The 85th percentile CPU ranking means build times will be short, and the 24 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases. The low 35 W TDP allows for quiet operation in office environments.

Students and office workers will find this build more than adequate for everyday tasks. The CPU's single-thread performance ensures snappy application loading, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup if the discrete GPU encounters issues. The overall system is power-efficient, which translates to lower electricity costs over time.

Small business workstations that run database operations, financial modeling, or engineering simulations will benefit from the CPU's balanced compute capabilities. The PassMark integer math score of 96299 and floating-point score of 70152 indicate strong number-crunching ability. The ECC memory support is a plus for data integrity in professional workflows.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is based on the Navi 33 chip using the RDNA 3.0 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process node. It contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It includes 32 ray tracing cores, providing hardware acceleration for RT workloads, though the FACT PACK does not list tensor cores.

The clock speeds are a base of 1720 MHz, a game clock of 2250 MHz, and a boost clock of 2655 MHz. Memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective data rate. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This bandwidth is moderate by modern standards, and the 8 GB capacity may be limiting for texture-heavy games at high resolutions.

The pixel rate is 169.9 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 339.8 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is 21.75 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (at a 1:1 ratio), indicating strong compute throughput. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering all modern graphics APIs. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, providing ample connectivity for multi-monitor setups.

Benchmark performance places this GPU in the 57th percentile. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2310 is a measure of modern DX12 gaming performance. Geekbench OpenCL score of 88051 and Vulkan score of 34401 show the GPU's compute and graphics capabilities, respectively. PassMark G3D score of 16634 and G2D score of 984 indicate solid 3D and 2D rendering. The PassMark DirectX scores are 84 for DX10, 172 for DX11, 58 for DX12, and 226 for DX9, showing that the GPU performs better in older APIs relative to its DX12 score. The GPU compute score of 8790 reflects its general-purpose computing performance.

In terms of rendering, the 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 performance is sufficient for real-time 3D rendering at 1080p, and the 32 RT cores provide ray tracing capability. However, the 57th percentile ranking suggests it is not a high-end rendering card. The nearest rival, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, scores 15199 (a -0.2% delta), meaning the RX 7600 is essentially equivalent to that card in aggregate benchmarks. This places it in the entry-to-mid range of discrete GPUs, suitable for 1080p gaming and light to moderate compute workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600T

AMD Radeon RX 7600

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds