SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600T

35,305 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

58,392 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600T and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT form a desktop pairing with a combined percentile rank of 87 among all CPU–GPU combinations. The CPU sits in the 85th percentile of all processors, while the GPU holds the 88th percentile among all graphics cards. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination; all gaming performance discussed here is estimated from the benchmark scores in the FACT PACK. The data indicates a balanced system for high-resolution gaming, content creation, and productivity, with a low-power CPU (35 W TDP) paired with a high-power GPU (335 W TDP).

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming — The GPU’s 88th-percentile standing, combined with a pixel rate of 295.7 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 739.2 GTexel/s, supports smooth frame rates at high resolutions. The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3327 and Passmark single-thread score of 3728 ensure responsive frame pacing. At 1440p and above, the GPU is likely the primary driver, and the 16 GB VRAM with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth prevents memory-limited stutter in modern titles.

Streaming — The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads, evidenced by a PassMark multithread score of 27098 and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 23571, handle simultaneous encoding and gaming workloads. The GPU’s compute performance, measured at 14199 in PassMark GPU Compute and 205998 in Geekbench OpenCL, can offload encode tasks. This combination supports a single-PC streaming setup without severe frame drops.

Video editing — Cinebench R20 multi-core of 9899 and Cinebench R15 multi-core of 2375 indicate strong multi-threaded rendering for timeline scrubbing and effect processing. The GPU’s 23.65 TFLOPS FP32 and 47.31 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) accelerate previews and exports in GPU-accelerated editors. The 16 GB VRAM prevents out-of-memory errors when working with high-resolution footage.

3D rendering — The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core of 23571 and Geekbench multi-core of 10851 place it in the top 15% of processors, while the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 28070 and DirectX 12 PassMark of 114 (relative) indicate strong rasterization. For CPU-based renderers, the 24 MB L3 cache and 20 threads handle complex scenes; for GPU-based renderers, the 5120 shading units and 80 RT cores accelerate both raster and ray-tracing workloads.

Software development — The CPU’s single-core performance is above average: Geekbench single-core 2385, Cinebench R23 single-core 3327, and PassMark single-thread 3728. Compilation tasks benefit from the 20 threads, and the 24 MB shared L3 cache reduces memory latency. The GPU’s compute capability (PassMark GPU Compute 14199) assists in data-parallel tasks like build acceleration.

Student and office work — The CPU’s 35 W TDP makes it efficient for light workloads, while the GPU’s high performance is unnecessary for document editing or web browsing. The combined system excels at multi-tasking with many applications open, given the 20 threads and 16 GB GPU memory. The low CPU power draw keeps overall system energy use moderate in idle states, though the GPU raises power demand under load.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 35305, with a percentile of 85 among all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i7-12700K, which scores 35287, a delta of 0%, indicating performance parity. The i7-12700KF scores 35365 (–0.2% relative), the i7-13700T scores 35403 (–0.3%), and the Core 5 213PE scores 35428 (–0.3%). These small deltas confirm the i5-13600T is a high-performance part in its generation.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 58392, with a percentile of 88. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA P102-100, which scores 58528 (–0.2%), the Intel Arc A570M scores 58239 (+0.3%), the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58657 (–0.5%), and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58085 (+0.5%). The 88th percentile places it among the top 12% of all GPUs.

In combined terms, the system ranks in the 87th percentile of all CPU–GPU pairs. The CPU’s 85th and GPU’s 88th percentiles are close, indicating a balanced pairing. Specific CPU scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core 23571 (very high), single-core 3327 (moderate-high), Geekbench multi-core 10851, single-core 2385, PassMark multithread 27098, and PassMark single-thread 3728. GPU scores include 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 4235, Geekbench OpenCL 205998, Vulkan 165212, and PassMark G3D 28070.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU percentiles are within 3 points of each other, indicating that neither component drastically outclasses the other. In gaming, the GPU is likely the limiting factor at high resolutions (1440p and 4K), where the 295.7 GPixel/s pixel rate and 576 GB/s memory bandwidth are more important than CPU speed. The CPU’s single-core performance is sufficient to keep up with the GPU’s output; its 3728 single-thread score is far above the threshold for 60+ FPS in most titles.

In CPU-bound workloads like physics simulation and data compression, the CPU’s performance is the bottleneck. PassMark physics score of 1287 and data compression of 337893 (a raw throughput metric) are strong, but the GPU is idle during these tasks. Conversely, in GPU compute tasks like Blender rendering, the GPU’s 23.65 TFLOPS far exceeds the CPU’s capability, so the CPU is not the bottleneck.

The power budget is asymmetric: the CPU has a 35 W TDP, while the GPU draws 335 W. This means the system is heavily GPU-limited in terms of total power consumption, but the CPU’s low power allows for a smaller CPU cooler and a lower overall system power draw during CPU-only tasks. The suggested PSU is 700 W, which provides ample headroom for the GPU’s peak power.

FAQ

Q: Does the i5-13600T support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with dual-channel memory bus support.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 335 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 700 W.

Q: Does the system support PCIe 5.0?

A: The CPU provides Gen 5, 16 lanes (CPU only), while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The CPU’s PCIe 5.0 lanes can be used for NVMe drives or future devices.

Q: What is the GPU’s ray-tracing capability?

A: The Radeon RX 6950 XT has 80 ray-tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), so it can handle hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though performance is not measured here.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 576 GB/s.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported. The CPU runs at a base clock of 1800 MHz and boost of 4800 MHz.

Q: What is the socket and upgrade path?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, and the GPU uses PCIe 4.0. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5, so users can choose the memory platform.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600T is built for the LGA1700 socket, which supports Intel 12th and 13th generation processors. The system can accept a CPU upgrade to a higher-core-count processor within the same socket, such as an i7 or i9 from the same generation, though specific models are not in the data. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, so a user can select either memory type when building.

The GPU is based on the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward-compatible with the CPU’s PCIe 5.0 lanes (the CPU provides Gen 5, 16 lanes, but the GPU uses Gen 4). The GPU is end-of-life and its successor is Navi III, so a future upgrade would likely be a newer RDNA card. The system’s power supply should be at least 700 W, as suggested by the GPU’s PSU requirement.

A sensible next upgrade path would be to increase the CPU to a higher-core model (e.g., i7-13700T, which is a nearest rival with a 35403 average score, only 0.3% higher) or to a newer-generation CPU, but any such change would require a new motherboard if the socket changes. The GPU could be replaced with a newer model, but given the 88th percentile, it is already a high-tier card. The platform also supports Gen 5 NVMe SSDs via the CPU’s PCIe 5.0 lanes, though the GPU uses Gen 4.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT uses the Navi 21 chip on a 7 nm process from TSMC, with 26,800 million transistors and a die size of 520 mm². It has 5120 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 128 ROPs, giving a pixel rate of 295.7 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 739.2 GTexel/s. The base clock is 1860 MHz, boost clock is 2310 MHz, and game clock is 2100 MHz. The memory is 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 576 GB/s.

In compute performance, the GPU achieves 23.65 TFLOPS FP32 and 47.31 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). It has 80 RT cores for ray tracing, and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Benchmark scores include 3DMark Steel Nomad 4232, Geekbench Metal 222653, OpenCL 205998, Vulkan 165212, PassMark G3D 28070, and PassMark GPU Compute 14199.

The GPU’s 88th percentile places it above most competing cards. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA P102-100, scores 58528, only 0.2% lower. The Intel Arc A570M scores 58239 (0.3% higher), the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58657 (0.5% lower), and the RX 5600 OEM scores 58085 (0.5% higher). This indicates the RX 6950 XT is at the very top of the performance stack, with differences of less than 1% among its rivals.

For rendering, the 16 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth are excellent for 4K textures and large scenes. The FP32 and FP16 performance support both rasterization and compute, and the 80 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects. The pixel rate of 295.7 GPixel/s ensures high fill rates, while the 739.2 GTexel/s texture rate handles high-detail textures.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600T is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S), built on a 10 nm Intel process. It has 14 cores, 20 threads, with a base clock of 1800 MHz and a boost clock of 4800 MHz. The L3 cache is 24 MB shared, with L1 cache of 80 KB per core and L2 of 1.25 MB per core. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 dual-channel memory, and has an integrated UHD Graphics 770. It uses PCIe Gen 5, 16 lanes (CPU only). The TDP is 35 W.

Benchmark results show strong performance for its TDP. Cinebench R23 multi-core is 23571, which is high for a 35 W part, and single-core is 3327. Geekbench multi-core is 10851, single-core 2385. PassMark multithread is 27098, single-thread 3728. The data compression score of 337893 and integer math of 96299 are particularly strong for a low-power chip.

The CPU’s percentile of 85 places it in the upper echelon. Its nearest rival is the i7-12700K, which scores 35287, a delta of 0, meaning the i5-13600T matches a high-end i7 from the previous generation. The i7-12700KF is 0.2% higher, the i7-13700T is 0.3% higher, and the Core 5 213PE is 0.3% higher. These tiny differences mean the i5-13600T is a top-tier CPU, especially considering its low TDP.

For real workloads, the 20 threads handle multi-threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation efficiently. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with data-heavy tasks. The base clock of 1800 MHz is low, but the boost to 4800 MHz ensures strong single-threaded performance when needed. The integrated GPU (UHD 720) is sufficient for basic display, but the discrete GPU is the main graphics solution.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-13600T with the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT. The CPU is a low-power 14-core processor, and the GPU is a high-end 16 GB card. The combined percentile of 87 indicates the system performs better than 87% of all CPU–GPU pairs in the database. The CPU is in the 85th percentile and the GPU in the 88th, so they are well-matched for a high-performance desktop.

The CPU’s 35 W TDP and the GPU’s 335 W TDP make the system power-hungry when under load, but the CPU’s efficiency allows for a smaller CPU cooler. The system uses the LGA1700 socket and can support DDR4 or DDR5 memory. The GPU is a triple-slot card, measuring 267 mm long, 120 mm high, and 50 mm wide, with two 8-pin power connectors.

This pairing is best suited for users who want high 3D and compute performance without an extreme CPU. The CPU’s 85th percentile is high, but not the highest, so it is not the bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. The GPU’s 88th percentile is excellent, so the system excels in GPU-heavy tasks like gaming, rendering, and GPU compute.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1440p and 4K high refresh rates — The GPU’s 88th percentile and 16 GB VRAM support high settings at these resolutions. The CPU’s single-thread performance of 3728 in PassMark and 3327 in Cinebench R23 ensures no frame bottleneck in most titles.

Content creators — Video editors and 3D artists will benefit from the CPU’s 20 threads and the GPU’s 23.65 TFLOPS FP32. The 16 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth allow handling large 4K and 8K projects without running out of memory.

Software developers — The CPU’s multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multi 23571, Geekbench multi 10851) accelerate compilation and testing. The low TDP allows for a quiet, efficient build that can run 24/7.

Students and small business workstations — The CPU’s low power draw is ideal for daily use, while the GPU provides power for occasional heavy tasks like video encoding or CAD. The system can handle office applications, web browsing, and light content creation without strain.

Enthusiasts who want a high-performance GPU with a moderate CPU — The pairing is balanced for 1440p gaming and creative work, where the GPU is the primary driver.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific combination, so the following performance expectations are estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s single-threaded performance (PassMark 3728, Geekbench single 2385, Cinebench R23 single 3327) indicates it can feed the GPU at high frame rates. The GPU’s 88th percentile and pixel rate of 295.7 GPixel/s suggest strong 1080p and 1440p performance.

At 1080p, the GPU is likely the bottleneck, but the high pixel and texture rates allow maximum settings at frame rates above 60 FPS in most titles. At 1440p, the 16 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for high textures and ray tracing. At 4K, the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is ample, and the 23.65 TFLOPS FP32 can handle moderate effects, though 4K ultra may require reduced settings for 60 FPS.

In esports titles (like CS:GO or Valorant), the CPU’s single-core score of 3327 in Cinebench R23 suggests very high frame rates, potentially 200+ FPS at 1080p. In AAA games, the GPU’s performance is the main factor; the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4232 indicates strong DX12 performance. The PassMark G3D of 28070 is also high, suggesting good overall 3D throughput.

Since no measured FPS is available, these are estimates. The system is well balanced, with the CPU’s 85th percentile and GPU’s 88th percentile indicating that neither will severely bottleneck the other in most workloads.