SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600T

35,305 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

26,011 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600T and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT form a desktop pairing that sits in the upper-midrange tier of the benchmark database. The processor, a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-S part, posts an average benchmark score of 35305, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The graphics card, built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, achieves an average score of 26011, placing it in the 71st percentile of all GPUs. Together, this combination yields a combined percentile of 78, indicating a system that is well above average in overall performance but not at the extreme enthusiast level. The data shows a balanced pairing where the CPU’s strong multi-threaded output complements the GPU’s solid rasterization performance, though neither component is the absolute top of its class.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600T is a Raptor Lake-S desktop processor built on Intel’s 10 nm process node, with a die size of 215 mm². It features 14 cores and 20 threads, which breaks down into a hybrid architecture of performance and efficiency cores, a design characteristic of the 13th generation. The base clock is 1800.00 MHz, which is notably low, but the boost clock reaches 4.80 GHz, allowing for significant single-thread performance when workloads demand it. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35 W, a low figure that suggests this is a power-efficient part designed for systems where heat and power draw are considerations, such as compact desktops or small form factor builds.

In terms of cache, the CPU has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This cache hierarchy is designed to feed the cores efficiently, particularly in multi-threaded workloads. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it also supports ECC memory, which is a feature often sought after in workstation environments. The memory bandwidth is not specified in the data, but the dual-channel support means that memory throughput will be adequate for most tasks, though not exceptional.

Benchmark results for the i5-13600T are strong across the board. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 23571, while the single-core score is 3327. The multi-core score indicates that this CPU can handle heavily threaded workloads like video rendering and 3D modeling with considerable ease. The single-core score of 3327 is also impressive, suggesting that day-to-day tasks and lightly threaded applications will feel responsive. In Geekbench, the multi-core score is 10851 and the single-core score is 2385. These numbers reinforce the picture of a CPU that is capable in both parallel and sequential tasks.

The PassMark scores provide further insight. The multi-thread score is 27098, and the single-thread score is 3728. The integer math score is 96299, while the floating-point math score is 70152. These numbers indicate strong arithmetic performance, which is relevant for scientific computing and financial modeling. The data compression score is 337893, and the encryption score is 19320, showing that the CPU can handle data-heavy tasks like file archiving and secure communications. The extended instructions score is 20651, which is useful for workloads that leverage modern instruction sets like AVX-512.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the i5-13600T is essentially neck-and-neck with the Intel Core i7-12700K, which has an average score of 35287, a delta of 0%. It is also within 0.2% of the Core i7-12700KF and within 0.3% of both the Core i7-13700T and the Core 5 213PE. This means that in terms of raw benchmark performance, the i5-13600T is a match for a previous-generation i7, which is a significant achievement for a lower-TDP part. The 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs means that it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database, making it a strong choice for a wide range of workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU in this system is a critical aspect of its overall performance. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 35305 and the GPU’s average score of 26011 indicate that the CPU is the stronger component in absolute terms. However, in gaming scenarios, the GPU is often the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions. The data shows that the CPU is in the 85th percentile, while the GPU is in the 71st percentile, suggesting that the GPU is more likely to be the bottleneck in graphics-intensive tasks.

Looking at specific benchmark scores, the CPU’s single-core performance is robust, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2385 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3327. These scores are sufficient to drive high frame rates in games that are not heavily multi-threaded. However, the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20700 is solid but not exceptional, indicating that it may struggle to maintain ultra-high frame rates at 4K resolution in demanding titles.

The combined percentile of 78 suggests that the two components work well together for the majority of tasks. In CPU-bound workloads, such as software compilation or data processing, the i5-13600T will be the primary driver, and its high multi-core score of 23571 in Cinebench R23 ensures that these tasks are completed quickly. In GPU-bound workloads, such as 3D rendering with ray tracing, the RX 6750 XT’s 40 ray accelerators and 13.31 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will be the main contributors, though its performance is not top-tier.

The FPS scaling between resolutions would likely show that at 1080p, the CPU can keep up with the GPU, but at 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. This is a common pattern in mid-range systems, where the CPU has headroom to spare, but the GPU is pushed to its limits. The data suggests that for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p, the system is well-balanced, but for 4K gaming, the GPU will be the bottleneck.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-13600T delivers a comprehensive set of benchmark scores that place it firmly in the upper echelon of consumer CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 35305, which is 85th percentile among all CPUs. This is a remarkable result for a processor with a 35 W TDP. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 9899, and the single-core score is 1397. In Cinebench R15, the multi-core score is 2375, and the single-core score is 335. These scores indicate that the CPU scales well with increasing thread counts, which is a hallmark of a well-designed multi-core processor.

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, on the other hand, has an average benchmark score of 26011, placing it in the 71st percentile of all GPUs. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2548, which is a modern benchmark that stresses the GPU’s ability to handle DirectX 12 workloads. In Geekbench, the GPU scores 137249 in Metal, 16360 in OpenCL, and 98089 in Vulkan. These scores show that the GPU is capable in both compute and graphics tasks, though the OpenCL score is notably lower than the Metal and Vulkan scores, which may be due to driver optimizations.

The PassMark scores for the GPU provide a mixed picture. The G3D score is 20700, which is strong for a mid-range card. The G2D score is 972, which is lower but less relevant for gaming. The DirectX 9 score is 263, DirectX 10 is 125, DirectX 11 is 180, and DirectX 12 is 80. These scores suggest that the GPU performs better in older DirectX versions, which is typical for AMD cards. The GPU compute score is 9550, indicating that it can handle compute workloads reasonably well.

When comparing the GPU to its nearest rivals, the RX 6750 XT is within 0.5% of the AMD Radeon R9 M395X, within 0.6% of the AMD FirePro W7100, within 0.7% of the AMD FirePro D700, and within 1.1% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile. This is an interesting comparison, as it shows that the RX 6750 XT is not significantly faster than these older or mobile parts in raw benchmark terms. However, the RX 6750 XT has the advantage of modern features like ray tracing and DirectX 12 Ultimate support, which are not captured in these average scores.

The combined picture is that of a system that is well above average in performance. The CPU is in the top 15% of all processors, and the GPU is in the top 29% of all graphics cards. This makes the system suitable for a wide range of tasks, from gaming to content creation, though it is not the fastest available in either category.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, this system is well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming. The CPU’s single-core performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2385, is sufficient to drive frame rates above 144 Hz in most titles. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20700 ensures that it can maintain high frame rates in less demanding games, though it may struggle in the most graphically intensive titles at ultra settings.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads, combined with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23571, make it capable of handling game streaming simultaneously with gaming. The GPU’s support for modern APIs like DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 also helps in encoding tasks, though the lack of dedicated encoder hardware on AMD cards may require the CPU to handle some of the encoding load, which it is well-equipped to do.

Video Editing: In video editing, the CPU’s multi-threaded performance is critical. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23571 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 27098 indicate that the CPU can handle 4K video editing and rendering with ease. The GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM and 432.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth also help with effects and color grading, though the GPU is not the fastest in this class.

3D Rendering: For 3D rendering, the CPU is the primary workhorse. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9899 shows that it can render complex scenes quickly. The GPU’s 2560 shading units and 13.31 TFLOPS of FP32 performance also contribute to GPU-accelerated rendering, making this a capable system for hobbyist or semi-professional 3D work.

Software Development: Software developers will benefit from the CPU’s high multi-threaded performance. The PassMark data compression score of 337893 is particularly relevant for build times, as it indicates fast file I/O and compression. The CPU’s support for ECC memory is also a plus for developers who need data integrity.

Student and Office Work: For student and office work, this system is overkill. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 71st percentile ranking are far more than needed for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. However, the low 35 W TDP of the CPU and the efficiency of the GPU make this a quiet and cool system for a desk environment.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so the data set contains no measuredFps data. Consequently, all FPS discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s single-core performance, as evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 2385 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3327, is strong enough to avoid being a bottleneck in most games. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20700 suggests that it is capable of running most modern games at 1080p with high settings, and at 1440p with medium to high settings.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, which are CPU-bound, the system should easily achieve frame rates above 200 FPS at 1080p, given the CPU’s high single-thread score. For AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Red Dead Redemption 2, which are GPU-bound, the system would likely achieve 60-80 FPS at 1080p on ultra settings, and 40-60 FPS at 1440p. At 4K, the GPU would be the limiting factor, and frame rates would likely drop below 40 FPS in demanding titles.

The GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM is sufficient for most games at 1080p and 1440p, though some games may require reducing texture quality at 4K. The 432.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth is adequate for the GPU’s 192-bit bus, though it is not as high as some competing cards. Overall, the gaming performance is expected to be solid for 1080p and acceptable for 1440p, but not suited for high-refresh-rate 4K gaming.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance relative to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600T has an average benchmark score of 35305, which is exactly 0% different from the Intel Core i7-12700K, and within 0.3% of the Core i7-13700T. This means it performs essentially identically to a previous-generation i7.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. This is sufficient for most gaming workloads at 1080p and 1440p.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600T supports ECC memory, which is a feature often sought after in workstation environments for data integrity.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is in the 71st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26011.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600T has a TDP of 35 W, which is notably low for a desktop processor with 14 cores, making it power-efficient.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile of the Intel Core i5-13600T and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is 78, indicating that the system is well above average in overall performance.

Q: Is the GPU’s production status active?

A: No, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is end-of-life, meaning it is no longer in active production, though it may still be available in some channels.

Who Should Build It

This system is ideal for gamers who primarily play at 1080p and want high refresh rates, as the CPU’s strong single-core performance and the GPU’s solid rasterization power will deliver high frame rates in most titles. It is also well-suited for content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering at a hobbyist or semi-professional level, given the CPU’s excellent multi-threaded scores. Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s high multi-thread performance and ECC memory support, which is useful for build servers or development workstations. Students and office workers who need a reliable and fast desktop for everyday tasks will find this system more than capable, though it may be overkill for their needs. Small business workstations that run multi-threaded applications like data analysis or accounting software will benefit from the CPU’s high performance.

Build Overview

The Intel Core i5-13600T and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT form a desktop build that targets the upper-midrange segment. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-S processor with a 35 W TDP, making it a power-efficient choice. The GPU is a RDNA 2.0-based card with 12 GB of VRAM and a 250 W TDP. The combined percentile of 78 places this system in the top quarter of all builds in the database. This is a system that offers strong performance for both productivity and gaming, though it is not the fastest available. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 71st percentile ranking indicate that the CPU is the stronger component, but the GPU is still capable of handling modern games and applications.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, using the Navi 22 chip manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC. The chip contains 17,200 million transistors on a die size of 335 mm², with a transistor density of 51.3M / mm². The GPU has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. It features 40 ray accelerators, which provide hardware support for ray tracing, though the performance is not as strong as newer RDNA 3 or NVIDIA RTX 40-series cards.

The GPU’s memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The base clock is 2150 MHz, the game clock is 2495 MHz, and the boost clock is 2600 MHz. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. This configuration provides a pixel rate of 166.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 416.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 13.31 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is 26.62 TFLOPS (2:1).

In terms of benchmark scores, the GPU achieves a PassMark G3D score of 20700, which is in the 71st percentile of all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2548, indicating decent performance in modern DX12 titles. The Geekbench scores are 137249 in Metal, 16360 in OpenCL, and 98089 in Vulkan. These scores show that the GPU is strong in graphics and compute tasks, though the OpenCL score is relatively low. The GPU’s nearest rival is the AMD Radeon R9 M395X, which is within 0.5% in average score, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, which is within 1.1%. This suggests that the RX 6750 XT is a solid mid-range card, but it is not a performance leader.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600T uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is compatible with 12th and 13th generation Core processors. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which allows for high-bandwidth connections to GPUs and NVMe SSDs. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, which can be used for basic display output or as a fallback if the discrete GPU fails.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slot, though it will operate at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The GPU has a TDP of 250 W and requires a 600 W power supply, as suggested by the suggestedPsu field. It uses 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors, which are standard for mid-range cards. The GPU is dual-slot and measures 267 mm in length, so it should fit in most mid-tower cases.

For an upgrade path, the most sensible next step would be to upgrade the GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking means it is unlikely to be a bottleneck for a more powerful GPU. A builder could also upgrade the memory to DDR5 if they are currently using DDR4, though the performance gains may be modest. The platform supports up to 13th generation Core processors, so a future upgrade to a higher-tier processor like an i7 or i9 is possible without changing the motherboard. However, the 35 W TDP of the current CPU suggests that the system is designed for efficiency, and a higher-TDP CPU may require a better cooler and power supply.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600T

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds