SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + AMD Radeon RX 6700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600T

35,305 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6700

30,433 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines Intel’s energy-efficient 14-core Raptor Lake desktop processor with AMD’s RDNA 2 mid-range graphics card. The data shows a desktop build with a combined performance percentile of 80, placing it above the majority of tested configurations. The CPU holds an 85th percentile rank among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 75th percentile among all graphics cards. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion in this analysis is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than derived from direct game testing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 18931 and the CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3728 indicate capable 1080p performance. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3327 provides the per-thread strength needed to drive high frame rates, while the GPU’s 320.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports texture throughput at elevated settings. The estimated frame rates suggest this build can handle 1080p high-refresh displays, though 1440p will require adjusting quality presets to maintain triple-digit FPS.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads handle encoding workloads without stealing gaming performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23571 shows substantial parallel capacity, and the PassMark multithread score of 27098 reinforces this strength. The GPU includes hardware for real-time ray tracing and tensor operations, though the stream encoding workload will likely fall to the CPU given the 35W TDP design of the i5-13600T.

Video editing: The combination of strong single-core and multicore scores makes this a viable editing workstation. Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve benefit from the CPU’s Geekbench single-core score of 2385 and multicore score of 10851. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 97841 and Vulkan score of 83974 indicate hardware acceleration for effects and color grading. Render previews and export times will be respectable, with the CPU’s 24 MB of shared L3 cache helping to keep working sets resident.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9899 and R15 multicore score of 2375 show that this processor can handle Blender and Cinema 4D workloads, though it will not match higher-core-count rivals. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 11.29 TFLOPS provides additional compute for GPU-accelerated render engines. The 10 GB of GDDR6 memory is sufficient for moderate scenes, but larger assets will spill into system memory.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 96299 and floating point math score of 70152. The PassMark extended instructions score of 20651 shows solid SIMD performance, which accelerates code vectorization. The CPU’s ECC memory support is notable for workstation reliability, and the dual-channel memory bus provides adequate bandwidth for development tools.

Student and office work: The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3728 and the GPU’s PassMark G2D score of 936 ensure responsive everyday computing. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 can drive displays when the discrete GPU is idle, though the Radeon RX 6700 will handle any graphics-accelerated tasks. The 35W CPU TDP means this build runs cool and quiet, suitable for shared spaces.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600T uses Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The dual-channel memory bus works with either generation, so builders can choose based on motherboard availability and existing memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, meaning the graphics card has full bandwidth headroom. The 35W CPU TDP is exceptionally low, leaving substantial thermal and power headroom in most systems.

The GPU’s suggested PSU of 450 W gives a clear baseline for power supply selection. The CPU’s 35W TDP and the GPU’s 175W TDP together remain well within that 450 W recommendation. A sensible next upgrade would be moving to a higher-tier Radeon RX 6000-series GPU, as the nearest rival data shows the RX 6800 sits only 1.1% above the RX 6700 in average score, indicating the platform has room for a more powerful card. The CPU’s 85th percentile rank suggests it can support a faster GPU without becoming the limiting factor.

For CPU upgrades, the Socket 1700 platform offers higher-core-count 13th-generation parts, though the 35W TDP design of the current chip means larger coolers are not required. The ECC memory support is an unusual feature for this class, appealing to users who value data integrity over raw speed. The lack of an unlocked multiplier on the i5-13600T limits overclocking, so users seeking manual tuning would need a different processor.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 35305 places it at the 85th percentile of all processors. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-12700K, scores 35287 with a 0% delta, meaning the i5-13600T is statistically tied with that older flagship. The i7-12700KF scores 35365 with a -0.2% delta, also a statistical tie. The i7-13700T scores 35403 with a -0.3% delta, and the Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35428 with a -0.3% delta. This positions the i5-13600T as performing like a previous-generation high-end chip despite its low power envelope.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 23571 multicore and 3327 single-core. The multicore result reflects the 14 cores and 20 threads, while the single-core result benefits from the 4.80 GHz boost clock. Geekbench scores of 10851 multicore and 2385 single-core corroborate this balance. PassMark results show a multithread score of 27098, physics score of 1287, and single-thread score of 3728.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 30433 places it at the 75th percentile of all graphics cards. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA CMP 70HX, scores 30476 with a -0.1% delta. The NVIDIA Tesla M60 scores 30490 with a -0.2% delta. More notably, the AMD Radeon RX 6800 scores 30095 with a 1.1% delta (meaning the RX 6700 is 1.1% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti scores 29945 with a 1.6% delta. The RX 6700 thus edges out two well-known higher-tier cards in aggregate benchmark terms.

The combined picture shows a balanced pairing where the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. The 85th percentile CPU versus 75th percentile GPU means the processor has more headroom than the graphics card, but the gap is not severe enough to create a major bottleneck in most workloads.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh play will find this build well-suited. The GPU’s 75th percentile rank and the CPU’s strong single-thread performance support high frame rates in competitive titles. Those gaming at 1440p will need to moderate quality settings, as the 10 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate but not excessive headroom for higher resolutions.

Content creators working with video and images benefit from the CPU’s multicore strength and the GPU’s compute capabilities. The 10 GB VRAM handles 4K video preview and moderate 3D scenes. The CPU’s ECC memory support appeals to professionals who need data reliability in long render sessions.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s integer and floating point math scores. The 14 cores and 20 threads accelerate parallel builds, while the single-thread performance keeps interactive tools responsive. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code and data.

Students and small business users get a responsive system for office applications, web browsing, and light media work. The low 35W CPU TDP means the system runs quietly and produces minimal heat, suitable for dorm rooms or small offices. The GPU can accelerate spreadsheet rendering and video conferencing effects when needed.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600T is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². The base clock is 1800 MHz with a boost clock of 4800 MHz, reflecting the low-power T design that trades sustained clocks for efficiency. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3.

The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23571 places this chip in the same performance class as the Intel Core i7-12700K, which scores 35287 on average with a 0% delta. This is remarkable given the 35W TDP versus the i7-12700K’s higher power envelope. The R20 multicore score of 9899 and R15 multicore score of 2375 show consistent scaling across benchmark generations.

Single-core performance is equally strong: R23 single-core scores 3327, R20 scores 1397, and R15 scores 335. Geekbench single-core of 2385 confirms that the 4.80 GHz boost clock delivers responsive single-threaded application performance. The PassMark single-thread score of 3728 supports this trend.

The PassMark data compression score of 337893 and data encryption score of 19320 indicate strong throughput for storage and security workloads. The random string sorting score of 36413 shows efficient memory access patterns. The find prime numbers score of 82 is notably low, suggesting this workload is not a strength of the architecture, but it is unlikely to matter in real-world use.

The 35W TDP makes this one of the most power-efficient processors in its performance class. The UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides a fallback display output and hardware acceleration for media playback, useful if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 uses the Navi 22 chip built on TSMC’s 7 nm process with 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die. The RDNA 2.0 architecture includes 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. The 36 ray accelerators provide hardware support for real-time ray tracing, and the FP32 throughput of 11.29 TFLOPS (with FP16 at 22.58 TFLOPS via 2:1 ratio) powers compute workloads.

The 10 GB of GDDR6 memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed across a 160-bit bus, yielding 320.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is sufficient for 1080p gaming and moderate 1440p use, though the 160-bit bus is narrower than some rivals. The pixel rate of 156.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 352.8 GTexel/s support high-resolution rendering.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 30433 at the 75th percentile shows it outperforms the Radeon RX 6800 by 1.1% and the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti by 1.6% in aggregate tested workloads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2014 provides a modern API measure. PassMark G3D score of 18931 and GPU compute score of 8240 show strong rasterization and compute performance.

API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering modern gaming and professional applications. The dual-slot design with a single 8-pin power connector keeps installation simple, and the 175W TDP aligns with the 450W suggested PSU. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting multi-monitor setups.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame-rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. With the CPU at the 85th percentile and GPU at the 75th percentile, the build should deliver smooth 1080p gameplay across most titles. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3728 and the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 18931 together indicate strong rasterization performance.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the estimated FPS ranges from 80-120 in demanding titles, 120-160 in moderately demanding titles, and 160+ in esports and competitive shooters. The GPU’s 320.0 GB/s bandwidth and 10 GB VRAM handle high-resolution textures at this resolution without issue. The CPU’s single-core strength ensures frame pacing remains consistent in CPU-bound scenes.

At 1440p, estimated FPS drops to 55-85 in demanding titles, 85-110 in moderate titles, and 110-140 in esports titles. The 10 GB VRAM becomes more important at this resolution, and the GPU’s 156.8 GPixel/s pixel rate helps maintain fill rates. Users may need to reduce certain settings like shadows or reflections to maintain high refresh rates.

At 4K, the build is less suitable for high refresh, with estimated FPS of 30-50 in demanding titles and 50-70 in lighter titles. The GPU’s 75th percentile rank limits 4K performance, and the 160-bit memory bus becomes a constraint at this resolution. Users seeking 4K gaming should consider a higher-tier GPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 80, placing this desktop build above 80% of tested configurations.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13600T compare to the Intel Core i7-12700K?

A: The i5-13600T has an average benchmark score of 35305, while the i7-12700K scores 35287 with a 0% delta, meaning they perform identically in aggregate testing.

Q: What memory types does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for the AMD Radeon RX 6700?

A: The suggested PSU for the GPU is 450 W, and the GPU itself has a 175W TDP with a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600T includes UHD Graphics 770, which can drive displays when the discrete GPU is not in use.

Q: How does the RX 6700 compare to the RTX 3070 Ti?

A: The RX 6700 has an average score of 30433, while the RTX 3070 Ti scores 29945 with a 1.6% delta, meaning the RX 6700 is 1.6% higher in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket type and PCIe support?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU’s 85th percentile rank versus the GPU’s 75th percentile creates a system where the graphics card is the more likely bottleneck in gaming workloads. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23571 and single-core score of 3327 provide substantial headroom above what most games require. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 18931 will be the limiting factor when pushing resolution or detail settings higher.

In productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU’s 35W TDP limits sustained all-core performance, so render tasks that run for extended periods may see clock throttling. The GPU’s compute score of 8240 helps offload some parallel work, but the CPU remains the primary constraint for heavily multithreaded tasks.

The FPS scaling evidence shows that at 1080p, the CPU is strong enough to feed the GPU effectively, with the GPU becoming the limit as resolution increases. At 1440p and above, the GPU’s 160-bit memory bus and 10 GB VRAM will constrain performance more than the CPU. The CPU’s nearest rivals all score within 0.3% of each other, indicating a crowded performance tier where the i5-13600T holds its own despite the low power envelope.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i5-13600T, a 14-core Raptor Lake processor with a 35W TDP, with the AMD Radeon RX 6700, a 10 GB RDNA 2 graphics card with a 175W TDP. The combined performance percentile of 80 places this system in the upper quintile of tested builds, suitable for 1080p high-refresh gaming, content creation, and development work.

The CPU’s 85th percentile rank means it outperforms 85% of all tested processors, while the GPU’s 75th percentile rank shows solid mid-range graphics capability. The i5-13600T matches the Intel Core i7-12700K in aggregate performance despite a much lower TDP, and the RX 6700 edges out the RTX 3070 Ti in benchmark scores. This pairing delivers balanced performance where the CPU has slightly more headroom than the GPU, making it a sensible choice for users who prioritize efficiency without sacrificing capability.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + AMD Radeon RX 6700

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600T

AMD Radeon RX 6700

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds