SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600T

35,305 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

19,765 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600T and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT form a desktop pairing that sits at the 75th percentile overall, a figure that reflects a balance of strong multi-threaded processing and solid 1080p-class graphics. The CPU, a 14-core Raptor Lake part, delivers outstanding compute for its 35 W TDP, while the GPU, built on RDNA 2.0, offers a substantial rendering capability. This combination is not about chasing extreme frames at 4K; it is a cohesive mid-range platform designed for high-refresh 1080p gaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking, where the processor’s versatility meets the graphics card’s practical performance. The benchmark data indicates no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the component scores.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, using the Navi 23 chip manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC. With 11,060 million transistors packed into a 237 mm² die, the GPU is a compact but fully featured design. It carries 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 280.3 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is the defining constraint of the card: at 1080p it is generally sufficient, but at higher resolutions and with high-texture packs, the 8 GB frame buffer becomes a limiting factor. The memory clock is listed at 2190 MHz, with an effective data rate of 17.5 Gbps, which is a healthy speed for this class of card.

Core clocks are aggressive for a mid-range part. The base clock is 2055 MHz, the game clock is 2410 MHz, and the boost clock reaches 2635 MHz. This high boost behavior is critical for sustained gaming performance, allowing the card to push close to its theoretical limits under load. The compute configuration includes 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operations pipelines, producing a pixel rate of 168.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 337.3 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 10.79 TFLOPS for FP32 and 21.59 TFLOPS for FP16, with the latter using a 2:1 ratio. For ray tracing, the card includes 32 dedicated RT cores, a modest count that places it behind higher-tier RDNA 2 parts but still capable of enabling the feature at playable settings in less demanding titles.

The benchmark scores paint a clear picture of the GPU’s capability. In 3DMark Steel Nomad, a DirectX 12 test, the card scores 1859, which is a moderate result for a mid-range card. More indicative of its gaming potential are the PassMark scores: the G3D score is 17166, while the G2D score is 918, showing that the card is heavily optimized for 3D workloads rather than 2D desktop acceleration. The DirectX 12 specific test yields a score of 62, which is lower than the DirectX 11 score of 169, suggesting that the card’s driver overhead may be higher in the newer API, though the absolute numbers are less relevant than the relative standing. The GPU sits at the 65th percentile against all graphics cards, meaning it outperforms the majority of installed GPUs but is not an enthusiast-tier part.

In compute-oriented tests, the card scores 7532 in PassMark GPU Compute and 10111 in Geekbench OpenCL, indicating solid performance for tasks like video encoding or GPU-accelerated filters. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 81306 and Metal score of 97969 further confirm that the card handles modern APIs well, though these are synthetic numbers that translate to real-world gains only if software is optimized for them. For rendering workloads, the 10.79 TFLOPS of FP32 power is respectable; it will accelerate Blender or Premiere Pro exports but will not be a substitute for a dedicated workstation card. The RT cores are present but sparse, so ray-traced effects should be used sparingly, at 1080p with medium settings, to maintain playable frame rates.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU’s performance is defined by a set of strong multi-threaded benchmark results. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 23571, while the single-core score is 3327. This multi-core result is what makes the i5-13600T stand out, as it places the chip at the 85th percentile against all CPUs. The Cinebench R20 scores follow the same pattern: 9899 multicore and 1397 single-core. The Geekbench 6 tests show 10851 multicore and 2385 single-core, reinforcing the processor’s balanced performance profile. The PassMark suite adds more texture: multithread score is 27098, single-thread score is 3728, and the integer math score is 96299, with floating-point math at 70152. These numbers indicate a processor that can handle both integer-heavy code (like database operations) and floating-point-heavy code (like physics simulations) with equal aplomb.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 19765, with a percentile rank of 65. This places it below the CPU’s 85th percentile, meaning the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers. The combined percentile for the system is 75, a number that reflects the average of the two components’ standings. In terms of nearest rivals, the CPU is closely matched with the Intel Core i7-12700K, which has an average score of 35287, a delta of 0% from the i5-13600T’s score. The i7-12700KF is 0.2% faster, and the i7-13700T is 0.3% faster. This shows that the 13600T, despite its lower TDP, trades blows with older high-end desktop chips, making it an exceptional efficiency pick.

The GPU’s nearest rivals are older professional cards, which is telling. The NVIDIA Tesla K40m has an average score of 19885, just 0.6% higher, and the AMD FirePro W7000 is 0.7% higher. This means the RX 6650 XT, while not a top-tier gaming card, outperforms many older workstation GPUs in raw compute, but it lacks the specialized drivers and memory configurations those cards offer. The combined picture is a system where the CPU is the star, providing top-tier multi-threaded performance that can feed the GPU without bottlenecking at 1080p, but the GPU will be the limiting factor for 1440p and above.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-13600T is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S die. It has a 10 nm process node from Intel, with a die size of 215 mm². The core configuration is a hybrid design, though the fact pack does not specify the exact P-core/E-core split; what is clear is that the 14 cores are capable of handling 20 threads, which is a typical Raptor Lake arrangement of performance and efficiency cores. The base clock is a low 1800 MHz, but the boost clock reaches 4.80 GHz, a wide range that allows the chip to idle efficiently and spike to high frequencies when needed. The 35 W TDP is remarkably low for a desktop processor with this level of performance, underscoring its design for power-constrained systems or compact builds.

The cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB of L3 cache. This large L3 cache is critical for gaming and productivity workloads where data reuse is high. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in platform cost. It also supports ECC memory, a feature that is unusual for consumer parts and valuable for data integrity in workstation tasks. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, which is a capable backup that can drive displays or handle video decode when the discrete GPU is idle. The CPU uses an Intel Socket 1700 and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, ensuring compatibility with the fastest SSDs and GPUs.

The benchmark scores translate directly to real-world performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23571 is within 1% of the Intel Core i7-12700K, a chip with a much higher TDP. This means the 13600T can handle video rendering, software compilation, and multitasking at a level that was previously reserved for high-end desktop parts a generation ago. The single-core score of 3327 in R23 is also strong, indicating excellent responsiveness in everyday tasks and gaming, where single-thread performance still matters. The PassMark integer math score of 96299 and floating-point score of 70152 suggest that the chip is balanced, with no major weakness in either type of computation. The data encryption score of 19320 is respectable, and the random string sorting score of 36413 indicates good performance in data processing tasks. This is a CPU that can serve as a workstation for developers, a render node for animators, and a gaming chip for enthusiasts, all while drawing a fraction of the power of its rivals.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this pairing is well-suited. The CPU’s single-core score of 3327 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU’s 65th percentile ranking indicate that the system can push frame rates above 144 Hz in esports titles, though the exact FPS is not measured for this combination. The 8 GB VRAM and 280.3 GB/s bandwidth are enough for most games at this resolution with high settings.

Streaming is a strong use case because the CPU’s 20 threads and 14 cores handle encoding well, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23571. The GPU’s 10.79 TFLOPS also supports hardware encoding, allowing the stream to run without a major hit to gaming performance. The low CPU TDP of 35 W means the system stays cool under sustained load, which is beneficial for long streaming sessions.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will see the CPU do the heavy lifting. The PassMark multithread score of 27098 and the Geekbench multicore score of 10851 indicate smooth timeline scrubbing and fast export times. The GPU’s 7532 PassMark compute score accelerates effects and color grading, though it is not a top-tier rendering card.

3D rendering in Blender or Cinema 4D benefits from the CPU’s 23571 Cinebench R23 score, which rivals older i7 parts. The GPU’s 21.59 TFLOPS FP16 performance can help with viewport rendering, but final frame renders will be CPU-bound.

Software development is a natural fit. The CPU’s high integer math score of 96299 and data compression score of 337893 indicate fast compilation and code execution, which are critical for developers building large projects.

For student and office work, this system is overkill but highly responsive. The single-core PassMark score of 3728 ensures snappy application launches, and the UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides a fallback if the discrete card is disabled. The 35 W CPU TDP means the system is quiet and energy-efficient for daily tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the CPU and GPU is skewed toward the processor. The i5-13600T sits at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, while the RX 6650 XT sits at the 65th percentile among GPUs. This means the GPU is the limiting factor for most gaming workloads. At 1080p, the CPU is fast enough to feed the GPU at high frame rates, but the GPU’s 65th percentile ranking will cap the maximum FPS. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as low-resolution esports games or heavy physics simulations, the CPU’s 85th percentile will shine, but the GPU will still be the bottleneck for visual fidelity.

The FPS scaling is estimated because no measured data exists for this combination. Given the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1859, the card is capable of 1080p high-refresh gaming, but at 1440p, the frame rate would drop significantly, and at 4K, the 8 GB VRAM would become a severe constraint. The CPU’s high single-core performance, evidenced by the 3327 Cinebench R23 score, ensures it will not hold the GPU back in most games, but in multi-threaded workloads like video rendering, the CPU is the stronger component and will complete tasks faster than the GPU can render them.

The bottleneck is dynamic. In gaming, the GPU is the constraint. In productivity, the CPU is the workhorse, and the GPU only accelerates specific tasks. The combined percentile of 75 reflects this balance: the system is neither CPU-limited nor GPU-limited across all workloads, but rather a well-rounded pair where the user must adjust settings based on the task.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The data is not measured, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 65th percentile and the CPU’s 85th percentile provide a reliable basis for these estimates. At 1080p with ultra settings, the RX 6650 XT should deliver playable frame rates in most modern titles, likely in the 60-90 FPS range for AAA games and well over 144 FPS in competitive shooters. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p, but some games with high-resolution textures may exceed it, causing stuttering.

At 1440p, the estimates drop significantly. The GPU’s 280.3 GB/s bandwidth and 10.79 TFLOPS are not enough for consistent 60 FPS at ultra settings in demanding titles, so users would need to lower settings to high or medium to maintain smooth gameplay. The CPU’s strong single-core performance helps, but it cannot overcome the GPU’s memory bandwidth limitation. At 4K, the system is not recommended for modern gaming, as the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus will cause severe performance drops. For older or less demanding games, the system can handle 4K at medium settings, but this is not the intended use case.

The RT performance is a separate consideration. With 32 RT cores, the card can enable ray tracing at 1080p with medium settings in games like Cyberpunk 2077, but the frame rate will drop below 60 FPS. For games with lighter RT workloads, such as Fortnite or Minecraft, the card can maintain decent performance. The estimates are grounded in the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1859 and the PassMark G3D score of 17166, which place the card firmly in the mid-range tier.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This build is for gamers who prioritize 1080p high-refresh gameplay. The CPU’s 85th percentile and the GPU’s 65th percentile combine to deliver frame rates above 100 FPS in most esports titles, and the 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for current game settings. It is also a strong choice for content creators who need a powerful CPU for video editing and rendering. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23571 is competitive with older i7 parts, making it a cost-effective option for a workstation.

Software developers will benefit from the CPU’s high integer math score of 96299, which accelerates compilation and testing. The 20 threads handle concurrent virtual machines and containers without issue. Students and office workers will find the system overkill, but the 35 W CPU TDP ensures low noise and power consumption, making it a pleasant machine for daily productivity. Small business workstations that require ECC memory support will also find this CPU appealing, as it offers data integrity features not found in most consumer chips.

The GPU’s end-of-life status means it is not a future-proof investment, but for current games at 1080p, it is a capable choice. Builders who plan to upgrade the GPU later will find the CPU has enough headroom to support a faster graphics card, given its 85th percentile standing. This is not a system for 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing, but it excels in the 1080p and entry-level 1440p space.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-13600T with the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake part with a 35 W TDP, and the GPU is an 8 GB RDNA 2.0 card. The system sits at the 75th combined percentile, indicating it outperforms three-quarters of all systems in the database. The CPU is the stronger component at the 85th percentile, while the GPU is at the 65th percentile. This pairing is a mid-range desktop solution that prioritizes CPU-heavy workloads like rendering and multitasking, while still delivering solid 1080p gaming performance.

The build class is desktop, so it is intended to be a stationary, upgradeable system. The CPU’s socket is Intel Socket 1700, and it supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders a choice of platform cost. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and is dual-slot, requiring a 450 W power supply. The overall tier is mid-range: not an entry-level system, but not an enthusiast one either. The data shows a balanced pair where the CPU will outlast the GPU in terms of relevance, making it a good foundation for future upgrades.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking against all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600T sits at the 85th percentile against all CPUs in the database, based on its average benchmark score of 35305.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i7-12700K?

A: The i5-13600T has an average score of 35305, while the i7-12700K has a score of 35287, a delta of 0%, meaning they are statistically identical in performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and size?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 280.3 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600T supports ECC memory, which is uncommon for consumer desktop processors.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking and how does it compare to the NVIDIA Tesla K40m?

A: The GPU is at the 65th percentile against all GPUs. The Tesla K40m has an average score of 19885, which is 0.6% higher than the RX 6650 XT’s score.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 75, placing the system above 75% of all configurations in the database.

Q: What are the clock speeds of the GPU?

A: The GPU has a base clock of 2055 MHz, a game clock of 2410 MHz, and a boost clock of 2635 MHz.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600T

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class and overall tier from the percentiles

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds