SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600KF

38,103 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600KF paired with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is a desktop combination that presents a distinct split in performance character. The processor is a high-end desktop part, while the graphics card is a professional mobile-class component. The data for this page contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and component specifications, not from empirical testing. This distinction is critical for interpreting the analysis that follows.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists in the database for this specific combination, gaming frame rates must be treated as projections based on the underlying performance metrics. The CPU’s benchmark results are strong, with a 3dmark_single_thread score of 1084 and a 3dmark_max_threads score of 10216, indicating it can handle both the per-core demands of game logic and the multi-threaded requirements of modern titles. The GPU, however, is the limiting factor for gaming resolution and quality scaling.

The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is not a conventional gaming card, despite its "50-series" naming. Its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for 1440p and 4K textures. The Ada Lovelace architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), so it can render the latest graphical effects. However, with a boost clock of 1680 MHz and 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, its raw rasterization throughput is more in line with a mid-range desktop GPU than a flagship gaming model.

For 1080p gaming, the CPU’s single-thread performance suggests it will keep frame pacing smooth, but the GPU may struggle to push very high refresh rates in demanding titles. At 1440p, expect playable frame rates in most games, with the 16 GB VRAM preventing texture-related stutters. At 4K, the GPU will likely be the bottleneck, and users should expect to lower settings to maintain acceptable performance. Frame rates are estimates only; the data does not confirm these figures.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are comprehensive and position it well within its class. It achieves an 86th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 38103. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-14490F, which scores 38149, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the 13600KF is effectively tied with that part. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (38194, -0.2%) and AMD Ryzen 7 250 (38221, -0.3%) are also extremely close, indicating that the 13600KF sits at a competitive performance plateau. The Intel Core i5-13600HX (38261, -0.4%) is the only mobile chip in the comparison, and the desktop part still holds a slight edge.

The GPU presents a different picture. Its percentileVsAllGpus is 50, placing it exactly at the median of all GPUs in the database. Its avgBenchmarkScore is 0, and it has no benchmark entries or nearest rivals listed, which suggests that the database lacks sufficient data on this professional mobile component to give it a reliable score. This makes direct comparisons difficult, but the 50th percentile implies it is neither a top-tier performer nor a weak one; it is an average GPU in the grand scheme of all graphics cards.

When combined, the pairing yields a combinedPercentile of 68. This indicates that the system as a whole is better than the GPU alone, thanks to the CPU’s high standing. The combined score is dragged down by the GPU’s median position, showing that the graphics card is the weaker link in this duo.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process node. It has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The die size is 257 mm², and it uses the Intel Socket 1700. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it has ECC memory support, which is unusual for a consumer chip. The CPU is unlocked, meaning it can be overclocked, and it has no integrated graphics, hence the "KF" suffix.

The cache layout is a mix of per-core and shared allocations: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a large pool of fast memory for a mid-range processor, which helps with gaming and productivity workloads that benefit from data locality. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes (CPU only) provides ample bandwidth for modern storage and graphics cards.

Benchmark results show a strong single-thread score of 451 in Cinebench R15, 1881 in R20, and 4479 in R23, which are all indicative of excellent per-core performance for a desktop chip. Multi-thread scores scale well: 3198 in R15, 13325 in R20, and 31727 in R23. The Geekbench scores are 2487 single-core and 17933 multi-core. PassMark results are also strong: 4118 single-thread, 37488 multi-thread, and 122169 in integer math. These scores confirm that the CPU is a capable all-rounder, excelling in both lightly-threaded tasks like gaming and heavily-threaded tasks like video encoding.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread score of 1084 in 3dmark_single_thread is more than sufficient to drive high frame rates in esports titles. The GPU’s median percentile (50) will be the limiting factor, so while the CPU will not hold back performance, the framerate will be capped by the graphics card’s ability to render quickly.

Streaming: The 20 threads and a multi-thread score of 10216 in 3dmark_max_threads provide enough headroom to encode video while gaming. The GPU’s lack of a dedicated NVENC mention in the data does not preclude streaming, but the CPU is well-equipped to handle software encoding without a significant impact on game performance.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31727 is a strong indicator of rendering capability. Timeline scrubbing and effects processing will be smooth, and the CPU will handle 4K footage reasonably well. The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM can help with GPU-accelerated effects, but its compute power is not top-tier.

3D rendering: The CPU’s high multi-thread scores will benefit CPU-based renderers. The GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is respectable, but its 50th percentile ranking suggests it is not a primary rendering workhorse compared to dedicated desktop GPUs.

Software development: Compilation tasks are heavily multi-threaded, and the 14 cores and 20 threads will speed up build times. The PassMark integer math score of 122169 is excellent for code compilation and logic-heavy workloads.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread performance of 4118 in PassMark single-thread ensures responsive everyday computing. Office applications, web browsing, and spreadsheet work will feel instantaneous, and the 20 threads provide ample multitasking capability for dozens of open tabs and documents.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data points to a clear imbalance. The CPU is in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 50th percentile. This means the GPU is the primary bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, the CPU’s high single-thread score (1084 in 3dmark_single_thread) will not be the limiting factor; instead, the GPU’s median performance will cap frame rates. The combined percentile of 68 reflects this, sitting between the two individual scores.

For productivity workloads that are CPU-bound, such as video encoding or compilation, the CPU will be the dominant performer, and the GPU’s lower standing will have less impact. However, for tasks that leverage GPU compute, such as 3D rendering or machine learning, the GPU’s 50th percentile will drag overall system performance down. The FPS scaling, if it existed, would show diminishing returns at higher resolutions as the GPU becomes more saturated, but since no measured data exists, this is an inference from the percentile gap.

FAQ

Q: Does this combination support overclocking?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600KF has an unlocked multiplier, making it overclockable. The GPU is an embedded mobile part and does not have such flexibility.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth, driven by 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i5-14490F?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 38103, while the i5-14490F scores 38149, a delta of -0.1%, meaning they are effectively identical in performance.

Q: Is the GPU suitable for 4K gaming?

A: The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking and 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 compute suggest it is not ideal for 4K gaming at high settings. It has enough VRAM (16 GB) for 4K textures, but raw performance is likely insufficient for demanding titles.

Q: What is the CPU’s process node?

A: The CPU is built on Intel’s 10 nm process node, while the GPU is built on TSMC’s 5 nm process.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the "KF" designation indicates that the integrated graphics are disabled, so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combinedPercentile is 68, which reflects the CPU’s strong performance (86th) tempered by the GPU’s average performance (50th).

Who Should Build It

This build is for users who need heavy CPU compute but have modest GPU requirements. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p with mid-range expectations would fit, as the CPU will not bottleneck and the GPU can handle those resolutions. Content creators who work with CPU-heavy workflows, such as software developers compiling code or video editors working with proxy files, will benefit from the 20 threads and high Cinebench scores. Students and office workers will find the system overkill but responsive, though they could get away with a cheaper GPU. Small business workstations that run complex spreadsheets, databases, or virtualization will appreciate the CPU’s multi-threading, but the GPU’s 50th percentile means it is not suited for GPU-accelerated tasks like AI training or high-end 3D modeling.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build, per the buildClass field. It pairs a high-end desktop CPU with a professional mobile GPU. The CPU is a Raptor Lake-S part with 14 cores and 20 threads, designed for enthusiast desktops. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace generation part, but it is the "Embedded" variant, typically found in mobile workstations, not desktop gaming rigs. The overall tier, based on the combinedPercentile of 68, places this system in the upper-middle range of all possible builds. It is not a top-tier gaming rig, but it is a solid workstation with a strong processor and a sufficient, if unspectacular, graphics card.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is built on the AD103 chip using TSMC’s 5 nm process. It contains 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.1M / mm². The GPU has a base clock of 930 MHz and a boost clock of 1680 MHz. Memory runs at 2250 MHz, with an effective speed of 18 Gbps, delivering 576.0 GB/s across a 256-bit bus. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory is ample for large datasets and high-resolution textures.

Its compute resources include 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs. It has 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores, supporting ray tracing and AI workloads. The pixel rate is 188.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 510.7 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 32.69 TFLOPS, with FP16 matching at 32.69 TFLOPS (1:1). The TDP is 120 W, and it uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The GPU’s benchmark standing is poor due to a lack of data, but the 50th percentile is a clear signal that it is an average performer. The 112 ROPs are decent, but the 1680 MHz boost clock is low compared to desktop gaming cards. This suggests its rendering capabilities are adequate for professional visualization and moderate gaming, but not for high-end competitive play or heavy 3D rendering. The 304 tensor cores and 76 RT cores do provide hardware acceleration for AI and ray tracing, but the overall compute power is not exceptional.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600KF

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds