SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600KF

38,103 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13600KF + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation — Hardware Analysis

This desktop pairing combines Intel's 14-core Raptor Lake processor with NVIDIA's workstation-class Ada Lovelace GPU, positioning the build at the 91st percentile overall. The benchmark database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the synthetic benchmark scores rather than direct game testing. The CPU's average benchmark score of 38,103 places it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU's average score of 135,218 places it at the 95th percentile among all GPUs.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this specific pairing, gaming performance must be inferred from the constituent benchmark scores. The GPU's GeekBench OpenCL score of 146,593 and Vulkan score of 123,842 indicate strong raw compute throughput, which typically translates to high frame rates in modern titles. The CPU's 3DMark multi-threaded scores—9,404 for 16 threads and 10,216 for max threads—suggest ample headroom for feeding the GPU in CPU-bound scenarios.

At 1080p resolution, expect the RTX 4000 Ada Generation to deliver very high frame rates in most esports and competitive titles, given its 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 417.6 GTexel/s texture rate. The CPU's single-thread performance, evidenced by a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,084 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,479, should prevent significant bottlenecks in games that rely on one or two primary threads. For 1440p gaming, the GPU's 360.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 20 GB of GDDR6 VRAM provide sufficient capacity and throughput for high-detail textures and modern rendering techniques.

At 4K resolution, the GPU's 95th percentile ranking suggests it can handle demanding titles, though the 160-bit memory bus width may limit performance in bandwidth-heavy scenarios compared to wider-bus workstation cards. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation includes 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, which accelerate ray-traced effects and DLSS-style upscaling respectively. The pixel rate of 139.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 417.6 GTexel/s indicate strong fill-rate capabilities for high-resolution rendering. Estimated frame rates should be playable at 4K with adjusted settings, but the data does not support claims of maximum-detail 4K at ultra-high refresh rates across all titles.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 7,074 and 4-thread score of 4,282 indicate strong multi-core scaling for modern game engines that utilize multiple threads. Combined with the GPU's Vulkan score of 123,842, this pairing should sustain high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p in competitive titles, though the lack of measured FPS data prevents precise refresh-rate guarantees.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads and PassMark multi-thread score of 37,488 provide ample parallel processing capacity for encoding video while gaming. The GPU's tensor cores can also offload encoding and AI-enhanced streaming features. The CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 26,957 and data compression score of 475,505 suggest strong throughput for stream encoding workloads.

Video Editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,727 indicates robust rendering performance for timeline previews and export tasks. The GPU's OpenCL score of 146,593 accelerates effects, color grading, and GPU-accelerated encoding. The 20 GB VRAM capacity accommodates large project files and multi-layer compositions without memory pressure.

3D Rendering: The GPU's FP32 performance of 26.73 TFLOPS and 6,144 shading units deliver substantial compute throughput for viewport rendering and final-frame production. The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 13,325 supports CPU-based rendering fallbacks. The 48 RT cores accelerate ray-traced workflows in supported applications.

Software Development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 122,169 and floating-point math score of 90,424 indicate strong performance for compilation, code analysis, and testing workloads. The 14 cores and 20 threads handle parallel build systems effectively, while the 24 MB of shared L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed code segments.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's GeekBench single-core score of 2,487 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,118 deliver responsive performance for everyday applications. The GPU's 95th percentile ranking is overkill for basic productivity, but the system handles multitasking with ease given the CPU's 20-thread capacity and the GPU's 20 GB VRAM.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process node. It operates at a base clock of 3.50 GHz and boosts up to 5.10 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and includes ECC memory support—a feature typically reserved for workstation-class platforms. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the processor.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This configuration balances low-latency per-core access with a substantial shared pool for data-intensive workloads. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 9,404 versus the max-thread score of 10,216 shows good scaling beyond 16 threads, though the incremental gain of 812 points indicates diminishing returns as additional threads engage.

The Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multi-core scores of 3,198, 13,325, and 31,727 respectively show the processor's rendering capabilities scale linearly with workload duration and complexity. The single-core scores across these tests—451, 1,881, and 4,479—demonstrate strong per-thread performance, which is critical for legacy software and lightly-threaded applications. The GeekBench multi-core score of 17,933 and single-core score of 2,487 corroborate the Cinebench results, showing a roughly 7.2-to-1 ratio between multi-core and single-core throughput.

The PassMark suite provides additional insight: the multi-thread score of 37,488, integer math score of 122,169, and floating-point math score of 90,424 indicate balanced ALU and FPU performance. The find prime numbers score of 152 is notably low, suggesting the CPU's integer performance excels in general-purpose workloads but not specifically in prime-number sieving algorithms. The extended instructions score of 28,865 shows robust SIMD and specialized instruction set support.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 38,103 places it at the 86th percentile, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core i5-14490F (delta of -0.1%), Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (delta of -0.2%), AMD Ryzen 7 250 (delta of -0.3%), and Intel Core i5-13600HX (delta of -0.4%). This tight clustering shows the i5-13600KF sits within 0.5% of several comparable processors, making it a competitive mid-range desktop option.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU occupy different performance tiers: the CPU at the 86th percentile and the GPU at the 95th percentile. This 9-point gap suggests the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, meaning the CPU is more likely to become the limiting factor in certain workloads. However, the CPU's robust multi-threaded scores mitigate this imbalance in many scenarios.

In gaming workloads, the GPU's 95th percentile ranking versus the CPU's 86th percentile indicates that at lower resolutions (1080p), the CPU may bottleneck frame rates in CPU-intensive titles, particularly those with poor multi-thread optimization. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 7,074 shows strong mid-range thread utilization, but the jump to 16 threads (9,404) and max threads (10,216) shows the processor gains 23% and 8% respectively from adding more threads—suggesting that games utilizing 8-12 threads will perform well, while those using 16+ threads will see diminishing returns.

At higher resolutions (1440p and 4K), the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, which is the more balanced scenario since the GPU's 95th percentile performance provides ample headroom. The GPU's memory bandwidth of 360.0 GB/s and 20 GB VRAM capacity are sufficient for high-resolution textures, but the 160-bit bus width may limit performance in bandwidth-bound scenarios. The CPU's PassMark physics score of 2,226 is relatively low, which could impact physics simulation in games, while the GPU's 64 ROPs and 139.2 GPixel/s pixel rate handle fill-rate-bound effects efficiently.

For compute workloads, the GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 192 tensor cores significantly outpace the CPU's floating-point capabilities, making the GPU the dominant processor for rendering, AI inference, and scientific computing. The CPU's 125 W TDP versus the GPU's 130 W TDP indicates a balanced power envelope, with the suggested 300 W PSU providing sufficient headroom for the entire system.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process node. The AD104 chip contains 35,800 million transistors across a 294 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 121.8 million per square millimeter. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1500 MHz with a boost clock of 2175 MHz, and memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem consists of 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, yielding 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth. While the 20 GB capacity is generous for workstation workloads, the 160-bit bus width is narrower than typical high-end desktop GPUs, which may constrain performance in memory-bandwidth-intensive applications. The GPU includes 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs, delivering 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 26.73 TFLOPS of FP16 compute (at a 1:1 ratio).

The 48 RT cores accelerate ray-traced rendering, while 192 tensor cores provide AI acceleration for DLSS, denoising, and machine learning workloads. The pixel rate of 139.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 417.6 GTexel/s indicate strong fill-rate performance for high-resolution rendering. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

The GeekBench OpenCL score of 146,593 and Vulkan score of 123,842 place the GPU at the 95th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA A10M (delta of 0%), AMD Radeon PRO W6800 (delta of -0.1%), AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo (delta of -0.4%), and AMD Radeon PRO V620 (delta of -0.9%). The GPU's average benchmark score of 135,218 shows it trades blows with these workstation cards, with deltas of less than 1% separating the top contenders.

The single-slot form factor, 130 W TDP, and 1x 16-pin power connector make this a power-efficient workstation GPU. The 245 mm length and 112 mm height allow installation in compact workstations, while the 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-display configurations. The GPU's production status is Active, and it succeeds the Workstation Ampere generation, with Blackwell PRO W as its successor.

FAQ

Q: Does this CPU+GPU combination have measured gaming FPS data?

A: No. The benchmark database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing, so all frame-rate figures are estimates derived from the CPU's and GPU's synthetic benchmark scores.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600KF has an average benchmark score of 38,103, which is 0.1% lower than the Intel Core i5-14490F (38,149), 0.2% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (38,194), 0.3% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (38,221), and 0.4% lower than the Intel Core i5-13600HX (38,261).

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 360.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600KF includes ECC memory support, which is unusual for a consumer-oriented processor and beneficial for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this build?

A: This desktop build achieves a combined percentile of 91, indicating it outperforms 91% of all recorded CPU+GPU pairings in the benchmark database.

Q: What are the GPU's ray tracing and tensor core specifications?

A: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation includes 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, supporting ray-traced rendering and AI-accelerated workloads respectively.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance scale?

A: The 3DMark scores show 4,282 for 4 threads, 7,074 for 8 threads, 9,404 for 16 threads, and 10,216 for max threads, indicating strong scaling up to 16 threads with diminishing returns beyond that point.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 38,103 places it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs. Its most notable results include a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,727 and single-core score of 4,479, a GeekBench multi-core score of 17,933 and single-core score of 2,487, and a PassMark multi-thread score of 37,488. The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14490F, scores 38,149, a delta of -0.1% from the i5-13600KF.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 135,218 places it at the 95th percentile among all GPUs. Its GeekBench OpenCL score of 146,593 and Vulkan score of 123,842 demonstrate strong compute performance. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA A10M, scores 135,230 with a delta of 0%, while the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 scores 135,396 with a delta of -0.1%.

Combined, this desktop build achieves the 91st percentile, reflecting the GPU's high ranking (95th) partially offset by the CPU's slightly lower position (86th). The CPU's average benchmark score of 38,103 and the GPU's average of 135,218 indicate that the GPU contributes the majority of the system's overall compute capability. The pairRankByFps field is null, confirming that no direct FPS-based ranking exists for this combination in the database.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing Intel's Core i5-13600KF processor with NVIDIA's RTX 4000 Ada Generation workstation GPU. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake processor on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, released on 2022-09-26 with a launch MSRP of $294. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace workstation card with 20 GB VRAM, released on 2023-08-08, succeeding the Workstation Ampere generation.

The CPU targets the mid-range desktop segment with its 86th percentile ranking, while the GPU aims at the professional workstation market with its 95th percentile ranking. The combined 91st percentile places this build in the upper tier of desktop systems, though the CPU's lower percentile relative to the GPU creates a slight imbalance. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, providing upgrade flexibility, while the GPU's single-slot design and 130 W TDP allow for compact workstation builds.

The CPU's 125 W TDP and the GPU's 130 W TDP, with a suggested 300 W PSU, indicate a power-efficient system that doesn't require exotic cooling or oversized power supplies. The build class is desktop, and the production status of both components is Active, meaning they remain current products in the market.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1440p resolution with high refresh rates will benefit from the GPU's 95th percentile performance and the CPU's strong single-thread scores, though 4K ultra settings may require compromises in some titles. Content creators working with video editing and motion graphics will leverage the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,727 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 146,593 for accelerated rendering and effects processing.

3D artists and animators using ray-traced renderers will find the GPU's 48 RT cores and 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance well-suited for viewport interaction and final-frame rendering. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the CPU's 20 threads and PassMark integer math score of 122,169, while the ECC memory support enhances system stability for long-running build processes.

Students in engineering, data science, or creative programs will appreciate the balance between CPU multi-threading and GPU compute capabilities, though the workstation GPU may exceed the requirements of most academic workloads. Small business workstations running professional applications—CAD, simulation, financial modeling—will find the GPU's 20 GB VRAM and the CPU's robust multi-threaded performance sufficient for demanding enterprise software.

The build's 91st combined percentile makes it suitable for users who prioritize GPU-accelerated compute and rendering over raw CPU throughput. The tight clustering of CPU rivals (all within 0.4%) means the i5-13600KF offers competitive performance for its class. The GPU's position at the 95th percentile, trading within 1% of several workstation competitors, makes this pairing a strong choice for professionals who need reliable, high-performance compute in a desktop form factor.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600KF

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds