SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600KF

38,103 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

16,504 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i5-13600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 presents a pronounced imbalance, but it is not the CPU that limits the system. The data shows the GPU sits at the 59th percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU rests at the 86th percentile among all CPUs. This gap indicates the processor has substantially more headroom relative to its peers than the graphics card does, meaning in most gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, the RTX 5090 D V2 will be the constraining component.

Benchmark scaling from the CPU confirms this interpretation. The Core i5-13600KF scores 9,404 in the 16-thread 3DMark test and 10,216 in the max-thread test, showing only modest gains beyond 16 threads. Its single-thread score of 1,084 in 3DMark and 4,479 in Cinebench R23 single-core indicate strong per-core performance that will not starve a high-end GPU in frame generation. The real bottleneck emerges when considering the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16,504, which places it in the 59th percentile—a mid-tier result that will limit frame rates far earlier than the CPU's compute capabilities would suggest.

The FPS picture must be framed carefully: no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, and the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS discussion is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking and the GPU's 59th percentile ranking imply that at 1080p and 1440p, the GPU will be the primary limiter in graphically intense titles, while at lower resolutions or in CPU-bound games, the i5-13600KF's 86th percentile position provides ample single-thread headroom. The 14-core, 20-thread configuration with a 5.10 GHz boost clock delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,727, which is more than sufficient to feed the GPU in most scenarios.

The Passmark physics score of 2,226 and the 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,166 indicate that lightly-threaded workloads are not where this CPU excels relative to its own multi-threaded performance. The gap between the 2-thread score (2,166) and the 16-thread score (9,404) shows strong scaling, but the real constraint is the GPU's mid-tier standing. For productivity tasks like 3D rendering or video encoding that use GPU acceleration, the RTX 5090 D V2's 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance will be the ceiling, not the CPU's 122,169 Passmark integer math score.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The platform includes PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing the bandwidth necessary for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking headroom on compatible motherboards. The 125W TDP is modest, and the GPU's suggested PSU of 950W is the dominant power consideration for the entire build.

The RTX 5090 D V2 uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's Gen 5 lanes. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector and draws a 575W TDP, which explains the 950W suggested PSU. The CPU's 125W TDP is small by comparison, meaning the power supply headroom is dictated almost entirely by the graphics card. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier CPU on the same socket, though the i5-13600KF's 86th percentile ranking suggests diminishing returns for gaming workloads. The platform supports ECC memory, which is a consideration for workstation use, and the dual-channel memory bus is standard for desktop builds.

The GPU's dual-slot design and 304mm length require a case with adequate clearance, and the 1x 16-pin power connector means the PSU must have native support or an adapter. The CPU's 10nm process node and 257 mm² die size are modest compared to the GPU's 750 mm² die on a 5nm process, but the platform itself is mature. For storage and expansion, the PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU provide the fastest connection, while the GPU's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface ensures no bandwidth bottleneck. The platform's DDR5 support is forward-looking, though DDR4 compatibility offers a lower-cost entry point for builds that prioritize budget over memory bandwidth.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The GPU's 59th percentile ranking and 16,504 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score suggest it will handle 1080p and 1440p gaming at high refresh rates in most titles, though not at the top tier. The CPU's 86th percentile and 4,479 Cinebench R23 single-core score ensure it will not bottleneck frame generation in CPU-bound scenes. At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear limiter, and frame rates will depend heavily on the game's optimization for Blackwell architecture.

Streaming: The GPU's 680 tensor cores and 680 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for encoding and AI-based features, but the 59th percentile ranking means streaming at high bitrates with game capture may strain the card. The CPU's 20 threads and 31,727 Cinebench R23 multi-core score can handle software encoding as a fallback, though the Passmark data encryption score of 26,957 indicates moderate encryption throughput for stream protection.

Video Editing: The GPU's 24GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth are well-suited for 4K and 8K video timelines, and the 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects and color grading. The CPU's 17,933 Geekbench multi-core score and 31,727 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handle timeline scrubbing and export encoding, though the GPU's mid-tier standing may limit real-time preview of heavily layered compositions.

3D Rendering: The CPU's 10,216 max-thread 3DMark score and 31,727 Cinebench R23 multi-core score make it a solid choice for CPU-based rendering, with 14 cores and 20 threads providing good parallel throughput. The GPU's 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 and 1,636.8 GTexel/s texture rate accelerate GPU-based renderers, but the 59th percentile ranking places it below many workstation-class cards in absolute render throughput.

Software Development: The CPU's 4,479 Cinebench R23 single-core score and 86th percentile ranking provide strong compile performance, and the 24MB of shared L3 cache helps with code locality. The Passmark extended instructions score of 28,865 indicates good SIMD performance for scientific computing. The GPU's 59th percentile ranking is less relevant for development, though the 24GB VRAM can accelerate machine learning workloads via the 680 tensor cores.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's 4,118 Passmark single-thread score and 2,487 Geekbench single-core score handle everyday productivity with ease, and the 125W TDP keeps power consumption reasonable. The GPU is overkill for office tasks, but its 24GB VRAM and dual-slot design make it a capable workstation accelerator for students in graphics-heavy fields. The Passmark random string sorting score of 50,851 indicates strong database and spreadsheet performance.

# Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need a balanced desktop platform for both productivity and gaming, but who prioritize CPU performance over GPU absolute throughput. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs makes it a strong choice for gamers at 1080p and 1440p who want high refresh rates, as the 4,479 Cinebench R23 single-core score ensures minimal CPU bottleneck. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 20 threads and the GPU's 24GB VRAM, though they should be aware of the GPU's 59th percentile standing.

Software developers will find the CPU's 31,727 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 86th percentile position ideal for compiling and running virtual machines, while the GPU's 680 tensor cores support local AI model training and inference. Students in engineering or computer science programs will appreciate the ECC memory support and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 compatibility for stable workstation builds. Small business workstations that run CPU-intensive applications like financial modeling or data analysis will benefit from the Passmark integer math score of 122,169 and the data compression score of 475,505.

The GPU's 59th percentile ranking is a key consideration: users who expect top-tier gaming performance at 4K or heavy GPU rendering will be disappointed. This build is better suited to users who value the CPU's 86th percentile position and the platform's flexibility (DDR4/DDR5, PCIe Gen 5) over raw GPU throughput. The 950W suggested PSU indicates a serious power delivery requirement, so builders with existing 750W or 850W units will need to upgrade.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10nm process with a 257 mm² die size. It has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, which supports the 14-core configuration's data locality. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with ECC capability, and provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

The benchmark data shows a processor that scales well with thread count but has strong single-thread performance. The 3DMark scores progress from 2,166 (2 threads) to 10,216 (max threads), indicating near-linear scaling up to 16 threads and modest gains beyond. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,727 is 7.1 times the single-core score of 4,479, which is a strong scaling ratio. The Geekbench multi-core score of 17,933 versus single-core 2,487 shows similar characteristics. The Passmark multithread score of 37,488 and single-thread score of 4,118 confirm the CPU's balanced design.

The 86th percentile ranking places this CPU just below the Intel Core i5-14490F (deltaPct -0.1), Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (deltaPct -0.2), and AMD Ryzen 7 250 (deltaPct -0.3), and ahead of the Intel Core i5-13600HX (deltaPct -0.4). These rivals are all within 0.4% of the i5-13600KF's average benchmark score of 38,103, indicating a highly competitive mid-range segment. The 125W TDP is modest for a 14-core part, and the 5.10 GHz boost clock ensures responsiveness in lightly-threaded workloads. The Passmark physics score of 2,226 and find prime numbers score of 152 are lower than the CPU's other results, suggesting these specific workloads are not where the architecture excels.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600KF has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR4 or DDR5 memory?

A: It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC support available.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus, with 1.34 TB/s bandwidth and a 1750 MHz memory clock (28 Gbps effective).

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-13600KF has an average benchmark score of 38,103, which is 0.1% below the Intel Core i5-14490F, 0.2% below the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, 0.3% below the AMD Ryzen 7 250, and 0.4% above the Intel Core i5-13600HX.

Q: What is the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score?

A: The GPU scores 16,504 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 59th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The GPU has a 575W TDP and the CPU has a 125W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 950W.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the FACT PACK lists integratedGraphics as null, and the "KF" designation indicates no integrated GPU.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 38,103, placing it in the 86th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.4%: the Intel Core i5-14490F (38,149, deltaPct -0.1), Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (38,194, deltaPct -0.2), AMD Ryzen 7 250 (38,221, deltaPct -0.3), and Intel Core i5-13600HX (38,261, deltaPct -0.4). The CPU's 3DMark scores range from 1,084 (single-thread) to 10,216 (max-thread), with a 16-thread score of 9,404. Cinebench R23 scores are 4,479 (single-core) and 31,727 (multi-core), while Geekbench scores are 2,487 (single-core) and 17,933 (multi-core).

The GPU's average benchmark score is 16,504 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 59th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA T400 (16,508, deltaPct 0), AMD Radeon PRO W7500 (16,415, deltaPct 0.5), NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (16,408, deltaPct 0.6), and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (16,361, deltaPct 0.9). The GPU's score is nearly identical to the T400 and only 0.9% ahead of the RX 5700 XT, indicating a mid-tier ranking despite the modern Blackwell architecture.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 73, which reflects the CPU's high ranking (86th) pulling up the GPU's lower ranking (59th). The data shows a system where the CPU outperforms its peer group significantly more than the GPU, and the overall tier is solidly mid-range to upper-mid-range. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all performance estimates are derived from the benchmark scores, which indicate a CPU-bound system at lower resolutions and a GPU-bound system at higher resolutions.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: "desktop") pairing the Intel Core i5-13600KF with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-S part with a 5.10 GHz boost clock and an 86th percentile ranking, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture card with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory and a 59th percentile ranking. The combined percentile is 73, placing the overall system in the upper-mid tier of benchmarked configurations.

The CPU's launch MSRP is $294, and the GPU's launch MSRP is 2,299 USD. The CPU's 125W TDP and the GPU's 575W TDP indicate a power-hungry configuration that requires a 950W suggested PSU. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x16 and requires a single 16-pin power connector, with a dual-slot design measuring 304mm in length.

This pairing is characterized by a significant performance disparity: the CPU is near the top of its class, while the GPU is mid-tier. The system is well-suited for CPU-intensive workloads like software development, data analysis, and 3D rendering, but the GPU's 59th percentile ranking limits its appeal for high-end gaming at 4K or GPU-accelerated rendering. The 24GB VRAM and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth are substantial, but the raw compute is not at the level expected from a top-tier GPU.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU based on the GB202 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 5nm process with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. It has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus, with 1.34 TB/s bandwidth and a 1750 MHz memory clock (28 Gbps effective). The GPU's base clock is 2017 MHz, with a boost clock of 2407 MHz. It has 21,760 shading units, 680 TMUs, 176 ROPs, 170 RT cores, and 680 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 423.6 GPixel/s, texture rate is 1,636.8 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 104.8 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1).

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16,504 places it in the 59th percentile, which is surprisingly low for a card with this specification sheet. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA T400, scores 16,508—essentially identical—while the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is only 0.9% behind. This suggests that the benchmark score does not reflect the GPU's theoretical compute capabilities, which include 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 and 1,636.8 GTexel/s texture rate. The RT cores (170) and tensor cores (680) provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI workloads, and the 24GB VRAM is substantial for large datasets.

The GPU's 575W TDP and 950W suggested PSU make it a power-intensive component, and the dual-slot design with a 304mm length requires a full-size case. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, supporting modern high-refresh monitors. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The 59th percentile ranking indicates that in real-world gaming and rendering, this GPU performs at a mid-tier level despite its high-end specifications, likely due to driver maturity or architecture-specific optimization gaps in the benchmark.