SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600KF

38,103 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

40,377 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines Intel’s Raptor Lake 14-core desktop processor with NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU. The data shows a desktop-class build with a combined performance percentile of 84, placing it above the vast majority of systems. The CPU and GPU both sit in the upper tier of their respective categories, and the benchmark scores indicate a balanced platform for demanding workloads. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; all FPS discussion below is estimated from the component benchmark scores, not direct game testing.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 brings 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. This is a substantial pool for modern textures and high-resolution assets, though 12 GB is a capacity that requires some texture budget management at extreme settings. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective transfer, and the GPU’s base clock is 2325 MHz with a boost of 2512 MHz. The physical die, GB205, is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, containing 31,100 million transistors across a 263 mm² die — a dense package that supports the high throughput figures.

The RTX 5070 includes 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The ray tracing hardware consists of 48 RT cores, while the AI-focused silicon includes 192 tensor cores. These specifications drive the compute metrics: FP32 performance is 30.87 TFLOPS, and FP16 matches at 30.87 TFLOPS (1:1). Pixel fill rate is 201.0 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 482.3 GTexel/s. For rendering workloads, the DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support and Vulkan 1.4 API compatibility mean modern graphics pipelines are fully covered. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score is 29137, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5077; the latter is a strong indicator of rasterization performance in current AAA titles.

Regarding the GPU compute potential, the Geekbench OpenCL score is 172660, and the Vulkan score is 178923. These numbers suggest the card is well-suited for GPGPU tasks, though the PassMark GPU compute score of 15787 is notably lower relative to the G3D score. This discrepancy implies the card excels at graphics-specific operations more than raw compute throughput. The 82nd percentile ranking versus all GPUs places it in the upper echelon, but the nearest rivals — AMD Radeon Pro 580 (avg score 40318, delta 0.1%), AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 (avg score 40063, delta 0.8%), AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (avg score 40870, delta -1.2%), and NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile (avg score 39568, delta 2%) — are all workstation or mobile parts. This suggests the RTX 5070’s average benchmark score of 40377 is competitive with professional-grade GPUs, even though its gaming-oriented architecture delivers different real-world characteristics.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 and PassMark G3D score of 29137 indicate strong rasterization capability. The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1084 and PassMark single-thread score of 4118 provide enough single-core headroom to drive high frame rates. Based on these scores, this build is estimated to handle 1440p high-refresh gaming well, and it should reach triple-digit FPS in esports titles at 1080p. The 672.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports high-resolution textures without significant bottlenecks.

Streaming: The RTX 5070’s 192 tensor cores and 48 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for encoding and AI-enhanced features. The CPU’s 20 threads (14 cores) handle concurrent encoding and gaming workloads; the 3DMark 16-thread score of 9404 and max-thread score of 10216 show strong multi-threaded capacity. The PassMark data encryption score of 26957 indicates the CPU can handle stream encryption overhead, though the GPU’s dedicated hardware is the primary tool for this task.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31727 is a strong indicator for timeline rendering and export tasks. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 172660 accelerates effects and color grading. The 12 GB GDDR7 VRAM with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth allows for smooth scrubbing of high-bitrate footage. The PassMark floating point math score of 90424 on the CPU suggests solid performance for video processing algorithms, while the GPU’s FP32 of 30.87 TFLOPS handles GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 13325 and R15 multi-core score of 3198 indicate strong CPU-based rendering performance. The GPU’s 30.87 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 48 RT cores accelerate ray-traced renders in supported applications. The PassMark GPU compute score of 15787 is moderate, so pure GPU renderers may not see the same scaling as rasterization. The 14-core/20-thread CPU configuration ensures scene preparation and simulation tasks don’t stall the render pipeline.

Software development: The CPU’s Geekbench multi-core score of 17933 and PassMark integer math score of 122169 show strong compilation and code analysis performance. The 24 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache reduce latency for frequently accessed data. The GPU’s Vulkan score of 178923 is relevant for developers targeting graphics APIs. The DDR4 and DDR5 memory support allows flexibility in platform choice, and the ECC memory capability is a bonus for stability-sensitive development environments.

Student and office work: The PassMark single-thread score of 4118 and 3DMark 2-thread score of 2166 indicate snappy responsiveness for everyday applications. The 14-core processor with 20 threads handles multitasking with dozens of browser tabs, office suites, and communication tools without breaking a sweat. The GPU’s PassMark G2D score of 1305 ensures fast 2D rendering for desktop compositing, though this workload barely utilizes the RTX 5070’s capabilities.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-13600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 3.50 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.10 GHz. This is a desktop-class chip with an unlocked multiplier, meaning overclocking is supported. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled.

In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU shows a clear scaling pattern that reflects its hybrid architecture. The 3DMark single-thread score is 1084, while the 2-thread score is 2166 (roughly double), and the 4-thread score is 4282. The 8-thread score of 7074 and 16-thread score of 9404 show diminishing returns as additional cores engage, with the max-thread score of 10216 representing full utilization. This pattern indicates strong single-core performance with efficient multi-core scaling up to 8 threads, after which gains taper off — typical for a hybrid design with performance and efficiency cores.

Cinebench results reinforce this profile. The R23 multi-core score of 31727 is exceptional for a mid-range i5, while the single-core score of 4479 is competitive with higher-tier parts. The R20 multi-core score of 13325 and R15 multi-core score of 3198 follow the same trend. Geekbench multi-core of 17933 and single-core of 2487 confirm the balanced performance. PassMark results show the CPU’s strengths: multithread score of 37488, integer math of 122169, and floating point math of 90424 are all strong figures, while data compression (475505) and random string sorting (50851) indicate excellent throughput for data-heavy tasks.

The 86th percentile versus all CPUs places the 13600KF in the upper tier of desktop processors. Its nearest rivals — Intel Core i5-14490F (avg score 38149, delta -0.1%), Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (avg score 38194, delta -0.2%), AMD Ryzen 7 250 (avg score 38221, delta -0.3%), and Intel Core i5-13600HX (avg score 38261, delta -0.4%) — are all within 0.4% of its average benchmark score of 38103. This means the 13600KF trades blows with the latest mid-range parts, with no clear winner. The 125 W TDP is reasonable for the performance level, and the PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 CPU lanes provides high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and SSDs.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Gamers targeting 1440p high-refresh or 4K at high settings will find this build compelling. The GPU’s 82nd percentile ranking and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 indicate strong rasterization, while the CPU’s single-thread score of 1084 ensures no frame pacing issues. Based on the scores, 1440p is the sweet spot where both components are fully utilized; at 1080p the CPU may limit the GPU in some titles, while at 4K the GPU becomes the primary constraint.

Content creators working with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31727 and the GPU’s 30.87 TFLOPS FP32 compute. The 12 GB VRAM with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth handles 4K timelines and complex scenes. The combination of 14 CPU cores and 48 RT cores accelerates both CPU-based and GPU-based render pipelines. For GPU compute-heavy tasks, the Geekbench OpenCL score of 172660 shows solid performance, though the moderate PassMark GPU compute score of 15787 suggests some headroom limitations.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the PassMark integer math score of 122169 and Geekbench multi-core score of 17933. The 24 MB L3 cache reduces compilation times for repetitive builds. The ECC memory support is a unique advantage for developers running long, unattended build processes or test suites. The DDR4 and DDR5 support allows platform cost optimization without sacrificing CPU performance.

Students and office workers are over-served by this hardware, but the PassMark single-thread score of 4118 ensures snappy application launches and responsive multitasking. The 20 threads handle background tasks like antivirus scans, cloud sync, and video conferencing simultaneously. Small business workstations running database applications or financial modeling will benefit from the data compression score of 475505 and random string sorting score of 50851, which indicate strong throughput for data manipulation tasks.

The combined percentile of 84 and the CPU’s 86th percentile ranking suggest this is a high-tier system suitable for enthusiasts and professionals who need consistent performance across diverse workloads. The GPU’s 82nd percentile means it is slightly below the top-tier GPUs but still well above average. This is a build for users who want near-flagship CPU performance with solid upper-midrange GPU capability.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU’s 86th percentile and GPU’s 82nd percentile are closely matched, indicating good overall balance. However, the benchmark scores reveal where each component takes the lead. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31727 and Geekbench multi-core of 17933 dominate in compute-heavy tasks, while the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 and PassMark G3D of 29137 lead in graphics workloads. The PassMark GPU compute score of 15787 is significantly lower than the CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 37488, suggesting the CPU is the stronger compute processor for non-graphics tasks.

In gaming scenarios, the bottleneck shifts based on resolution and settings. At 1080p with lower graphical demands, the CPU’s single-thread score of 1084 and 3DMark 2-thread score of 2166 are likely to be the limiting factor, as the GPU has ample headroom with its 82nd percentile ranking. At 1440p and above, the GPU’s rasterization performance becomes the constraint. The CPU’s 16-thread score of 9404 and max-thread score of 10216 indicate it can feed the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth may become the limiting factor in VRAM-heavy titles at 4K.

For productivity workloads, the balance is clearer. The CPU’s 14 cores/20 threads handle multi-threaded rendering and compilation efficiently, with a max-thread score of 10216. The GPU’s compute performance, while decent (OpenCL 172660, Vulkan 178923), is not its primary strength; the PassMark GPU compute score of 15787 is modest. This means CPU-heavy tasks like code compilation or physics simulation will rely on the CPU, while GPU-accelerated rendering will use the RTX 5070’s 30.87 TFLOPS FP32. The data suggests neither component consistently bottlenecks the other; instead, workloads that favor one architecture will see that component lead.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13600KF compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14490F?

A: The i5-13600KF has an average benchmark score of 38103, while the i5-14490F scores 38149, a delta of -0.1%. This means the two processors are effectively tied in overall performance, with the 14490F holding a negligible 0.1% advantage.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 5070, and how does it affect performance?

A: The RTX 5070 has a memory bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s, achieved with 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus. This bandwidth supports high-resolution textures and smooth performance at 1440p and 4K, as indicated by the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077.

Q: Does the i5-13600KF support overclocking?

A: Yes, the i5-13600KF has an unlocked multiplier, which allows overclocking. Its base clock is 3.50 GHz, and the boost clock is 5.10 GHz; overclocking can push performance beyond these figures, though the 125 W TDP must be considered.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance, and why does it matter?

A: The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score is 1084, and its PassMark single-thread score is 4118. These scores indicate strong per-core performance, which is critical for gaming frame rates and applications that rely on single-threaded execution.

Q: What APIs does the RTX 5070 support?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with the latest graphics features and modern game engines.

Q: How does the CPU perform in multi-threaded workloads compared to its rivals?

A: The i5-13600KF’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 31727. Its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (avg score 38221, delta -0.3%) and Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (avg score 38194, delta -0.2%), are all within 0.4% of its average score of 38103, indicating near-parity in multi-threaded performance.

Q: Is the RTX 5070 better at gaming or compute tasks?

A: The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 29137 is much higher than its PassMark GPU compute score of 15787. This indicates the RTX 5070 is significantly stronger at graphics rendering tasks than general-purpose compute workloads.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 38103, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its strongest results include Cinebench R23 multi-core at 31727, Geekbench multi-core at 17933, and PassMark multithread at 37488. Single-thread performance is represented by Cinebench R23 single-core at 4479, Geekbench single-core at 2487, and PassMark single-thread at 4118. The 3DMark suite shows scaling from 1084 (single-thread) to 10216 (max-thread), demonstrating effective use of its 14 cores and 20 threads.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 40377, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all GPUs. Its flagship result is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077, with PassMark G3D at 29137. Compute scores include Geekbench OpenCL at 172660, Geekbench Vulkan at 178923, and PassMark GPU compute at 15787. The nearest GPU rivals are all within 2% of its average score: AMD Radeon Pro 580 (40318, delta 0.1%), AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 (40063, delta 0.8%), AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (40870, delta -1.2%), and NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile (39568, delta 2%).

The combined picture is a system with a combined percentile of 84, meaning it outperforms 84% of all tracked desktop builds. The CPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers (86th percentile) than the GPU (82nd percentile), but the gap is small. In CPU-bound workloads, the i5-13600KF leads; in GPU-bound tasks, the RTX 5070 takes over. The data indicates that this pairing is well-matched, with neither component dramatically outclassing the other. The CPU’s 3DMark max-thread score of 10216 and the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 together suggest a system capable of handling both high-refresh gaming and demanding productivity tasks without a clear weak point.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. It pairs the Intel Core i5-13600KF, a 14-core Raptor Lake processor with a 125 W TDP and Intel Socket 1700, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, a Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU with a 250 W TDP and a 600 W suggested PSU. The CPU was released in 2022, while the GPU launched in 2025, making this a modern platform with a current-generation graphics card.

The overall tier is high-upper-midrange based on the percentiles. The combined percentile of 84 places it above the vast majority of systems. The CPU’s 86th percentile and GPU’s 82nd percentile both indicate above-average performance relative to all tracked components. This is not a flagship system — the top-tier CPUs and GPUs would score higher — but it sits comfortably in the upper echelon. The CPU’s nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i5-14490F and AMD Ryzen 7 250, are all within 0.4% in average score, confirming the i5-13600KF is a competitive mid-range-to-high-end processor. The GPU’s rivals are professional workstation parts, which is unusual; this suggests the RTX 5070’s average score is comparable to pro-grade GPUs, though its gaming-oriented design is better suited to consumer workloads.

The pairing of a 14-core CPU with a 12 GB GPU is coherent for a desktop build aimed at high-performance gaming and productivity. The CPU’s 20 threads handle background tasks and multi-threaded applications, while the GPU’s 6144 shading units and 48 RT cores handle graphics and ray tracing. The 125 W CPU TDP and 250 W GPU TDP together require a 600 W PSU, which is a reasonable headroom for this class. This build is a solid choice for users who want strong performance across the board without stepping into flagship pricing territory.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which is the LGA 1700 platform for 12th and 13th generation Core processors. This socket is also compatible with 14th generation parts, though the fact pack does not list specific upgrade CPU names. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available. This flexibility means users can choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, though the fact pack does not specify which memory type the system currently uses.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), which is a high-bandwidth interface for the GPU and NVMe SSDs. The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, ensuring it can take full advantage of the CPU’s PCIe lanes. The GPU’s display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, supporting multiple high-resolution monitors.

The PSU headroom is defined by the GPU’s suggested PSU of 600 W, with the CPU’s TDP at 125 W and the GPU’s TDP at 250 W. This leaves approximately 225 W of headroom for other components like drives, fans, and motherboard power, assuming the 600 W figure is the total system recommendation. The GPU uses a 1x 16-pin power connector, which requires a compatible PSU cable or adapter. The dual-slot GPU design (245 mm length, 115 mm height, 40 mm width) fits in most mid-tower cases, but case clearance should be verified.

A sensible next upgrade path depends on the workload. For gaming, the GPU is the current limit at 82nd percentile; upgrading to a higher-tier NVIDIA GPU would improve rasterization scores beyond the current 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077. For productivity, the CPU’s 86th percentile has more headroom relative to the GPU, but the LGA 1700 platform is aging; a future upgrade would require a new motherboard and socket. Memory upgrades from DDR4 to DDR5 (or higher-speed DDR5) could improve bandwidth-sensitive tasks, though the fact pack does not specify current memory speed. Storage upgrades to PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives would leverage the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes, though the fact pack does not list storage configuration. The 600 W PSU provides some headroom for a more power-hungry GPU, but a significant upgrade would likely require a higher-wattage PSU.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600KF

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds