SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600KF

38,103 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

44,795 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a desktop combination that lands in the 85th percentile of all CPU+GPU pairings in the database, meaning it sits comfortably in the upper tier of builds without reaching halo territory. The CPU occupies the 86th percentile among all processors and the GPU the 84th percentile among all graphics cards — a near-symmetric match that suggests neither part dramatically overshadows the other. One caveat up front: no measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing in the database (dataIsMeasured is false), so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from benchmark scores rather than direct game measurements.

Balance and Bottleneck

The percentile spread between the two components is only two points — CPU at 86, GPU at 84 — which is about as balanced as a pairing gets in this dataset. That symmetry matters for bottleneck analysis. When the CPU sits slightly ahead of the GPU, the graphics card is the first thing to saturate in GPU-bound scenarios, and that is the case here: in modern AAA titles at higher resolutions, the RTX 4070 Ti's PassMark G3D score of 31624 and its raw rendering throughput define the frame ceiling, while the i5-13600KF's strong single-thread results feed it with plenty of draw calls.

Flip the workload to CPU-bound titles — competitive esports engines, large-scale simulation games, or low-resolution CPU benchmarks — and the i5-13600KF becomes the limiter, but a well-positioned one. Its 3DMark single-thread score of 1084 and Cinebench R23 single-core result of 4479 describe a processor that keeps pace in lightly threaded workloads. The scaling curve in the 3DMark CPU profile is instructive: 2166 points at 2 threads, 4282 at 4 threads, 7074 at 8 threads, and 10216 at maximum threads. The gap between 8-thread and max-thread results is modest, which indicates the hybrid core layout contributes meaningfully but not explosively beyond eight active threads. For gaming, where most engines still live in the 4-to-8-thread range, the relevant numbers are the 4-thread (4282) and 8-thread (7074) results — both healthy figures that pair naturally with a GPU of this class.

The net verdict: at 1440p and 4K the GPU limits; at 1080p and below in demanding engines the CPU limits. Neither is a serious drag on the other.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 4070 Ti is built on the AD104 die, fabbed by TSMC on a 5 nm process, packing 35,800 million transistors into a 294 mm² die for a density of 121.8 million transistors per square millimetre. Those are dense, modern silicon figures, and they translate into the throughput numbers that matter for rendering: 40.09 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 7680 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units. The pixel fill rate of 208.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 626.4 GTexel/s define how fast the card can push pixels and filtered textures — both comfortably in the range needed for high-refresh 1440p gaming.

Memory is the one place where the spec sheet invites scrutiny. The card carries 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The 192-bit width is narrower than enthusiast-class cards, and the 12 GB capacity, while adequate today, sets the practical ceiling for ultra-high-resolution texture packs and heavy ray-traced scene buffers. Effective memory speed is 21 Gbps, running at 1313 MHz natively. Clocks are 2310 MHz base and 2610 MHz boost.

Ray tracing and AI hardware are where Ada Lovelace earns its keep: 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores. The tensor count matters beyond gaming — the Geekbench OpenCL score of 176953 and Vulkan score of 213808 indicate substantial compute headroom, and the Vulkan result notably exceeding the OpenCL one suggests the card rewards modern, lower-overhead API paths. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5024 is a modern DirectX 12 stress figure that places the card solidly in the high-end band. Among nearest rivals by average score, the RTX 4070 Ti sits within touching distance of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile (deltaPct -0.8), the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (-1.3), and the Intel Arc A730M (-1.7), and slightly ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A6000 (+1.6) — a spread of roughly two points in either direction, which frames it as a card whose aggregate performance profile is remarkably mainstream-adjacent for its class despite its high-end single-card credentials.

The card is dual-slot, 285 mm long, 112 mm tall, and 42 mm wide, powered by a single 16-pin connector with a TDP of 285 W. It is end-of-life in production status, succeeded by the GeForce 50 series, but its benchmark standing remains high. Its launch MSRP was 799 USD.

Benchmark Performance

Walking through the CPU numbers methodically: in Cinebench, the i5-13600KF scores 3198 multi-core and 451 single-core in R15, 13325 multi-core and 1881 single-core in R20, and 31727 multi-core and 4479 single-core in R23. The R23 multi/single ratio of roughly 7:1 is consistent with a 14-core, 20-thread part where not all cores are equal — the hybrid design's efficiency cores lift aggregate throughput without inflating per-core speed. Geekbench reinforces the single-thread strength: 2487 single-core against 17933 multi-core. PassMark reports 37488 multithread and 4118 single-thread, with sub-tests of 122169 integer math, 90424 floating point math, 26957 encryption, 475505 data compression, 50851 string sorting, 152 prime finding, 28865 extended instructions, and 2226 physics.

Against rivals by average score, the i5-13600KF is separated from its four nearest competitors — the Intel Core i5-14490F (-0.1), Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (-0.2), AMD Ryzen 7 250 (-0.3), and Intel Core i5-13600HX (-0.4) — by less than half a percentage point in every case. That is statistical parity: within this cluster, choice between them comes down to platform features rather than performance. Note that the negative deltaPct values mean the i5-13600KF sits marginally below these rivals, but by amounts small enough to be noise in most real workloads.

On the GPU side, the aggregate average benchmark score is 44795 against the CPU's 38103, with the combined build percentile at 85. The PassMark GPU compute result of 18396 and G3D of 31624, combined with the 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 figure, paint a card that handles both rasterization and compute workloads without specialization trade-offs. PassMark's DirectX-specific rows (352 for DX9, 288 for DX11, 187 for DX10, 116 for DX12) track the older-API path tests and should not be read as relative performance between APIs, since each test uses a different scale; the modern-API figures that carry weight here are the Steel Nomad DX12 score and the Vulkan compute result.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. With a single-thread Cinebench R23 score of 4479 and a GPU pushing 626.4 GTexel/s of texture throughput, this pairing is well suited to 1440p high-refresh play. No measured FPS rows exist for this combination, so frame expectations are estimates derived from these scores — but a CPU at the 86th percentile paired with a GPU at the 84th percentile is, by the data, a configuration built for high frame rates at 1440p and playable rates at 4K.

Streaming. Streaming adds video encoding on top of gaming load, and the 14-core, 20-thread CPU provides the thread budget: a Geekbench multi-core score of 17933 and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 31727 indicate headroom for concurrent encoding plus gameplay. The 240 tensor cores on the GPU give the card a hardware AI path that is relevant to modern encoder-assisted pipelines.

Video editing. The 475505 PassMark data compression score matters for timeline scrubbing and codec handling, and the GPU's 176953 OpenCL score covers GPU-accelerated effects. The 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth and 12 GB of GDDR6X buffer timeline previews well at 1440p- and 4K-class projects, though the 192-bit bus sets a ceiling on the heaviest multi-layer 4K work.

3D rendering. Cinebench R23 multi-core of 31727 describes capable CPU rendering throughput for a 14-core part, and the 40.09 TFLOPS of GPU compute plus 213808 in Geekbench Vulkan indicate the GPU contributes meaningfully to GPU render engines. This is a genuine hybrid rendering build, not a CPU-only workstation.

Software development. Compilation scales with cores and cache: 24 MB of shared L3, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a PassMark multithread score of 37488 make for fast builds, while the 2487 Geekbench single-core score keeps single-threaded tooling responsive. Dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support covers memory needs.

Student and office work. These workloads are trivially covered — the same single-thread figures that drive gaming drive office responsiveness. The build's percentile standing is far beyond what documents, browsing, and conferencing demand.

CPU Analysis

The i5-13600KF is a Raptor Lake-S part (codename Raptor Lake, 13th Gen Core series), manufactured by Intel on its 10 nm node, with a die size of 257 mm². It offers 14 cores and 20 threads — a hybrid layout combining performance and efficiency cores, which explains the thread-count-to-core-count ratio and the scaling behavior in the 3DMark CPU profile. Base clock is 3.50 GHz with a 5.10 GHz boost. The "KF" designation means no integrated graphics (the integratedGraphics field is null), which is irrelevant in a build with a discrete RTX 4070 Ti but worth noting for troubleshooting — there is no fallback display output from the CPU.

Cache is generous for the class: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. That L3 pool is the key gaming asset, feeding the high boost clock in latency-sensitive engines. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, and ECC memory is supported — an unusual and useful trait for a gaming-class chip, opening small-workstation use cases. PCIe is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is technically ahead of the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface; the card simply runs at its own generation without penalty. The multiplier is unlocked, giving overclocking headroom for users who want it, and the TDP is 125 W. The launch MSRP was $294.

What the scores mean in practice: the R23 single-core of 4479 and Geekbench single-core of 2487 place it among responsive, modern cores; the multi-core figures place it a tier below the big 24-plus-core flagships but well above mainstream hexa- and octa-core parts. The part number is SRMBE, release date was late September 2022, and production status is Active.

Gaming Performance

To restate clearly: the database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and dataIsMeasured is false. Every frame-rate statement in this section is an estimate extrapolated from the benchmark scores, not a measurement.

The estimate logic runs as follows. The GPU's 84th-percentile standing, 31624 G3D score, 208.8 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth place it in high-end 1440p territory. The CPU's 86th-percentile standing, 1084 3DMark single-thread score, and 7074 8-thread score indicate it can feed that GPU without a significant frame-time bottleneck at 1440p and 4K. At 1440p ultra settings, the expectation from these scores is high-refresh performance in well-optimized titles, with ray tracing enabled via the 60 RT cores carrying a moderate cost that the 240 tensor cores can offset in supported upscaler paths. At 4K ultra, the estimates trend toward standard-refresh-rate territory, with the 12 GB framebuffer and 192-bit bus being the components most likely to bite first in the heaviest ray-traced scenes. At 1080p, the GPU would be underfed work and the CPU becomes the frame limiter — its single-thread scores are strong, but that configuration wastes the card's rasterization throughput. The Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5024 and the PassMark DX12 result of 116 are the closest proxies in the pack for modern-engine behavior; both are consistent with the qualitative picture above.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform anchors on Intel Socket 1700, which means the CPU is replaceable within that socket's supported range without a motherboard change. Memory flexibility is a genuine asset: DDR4 and DDR5 support lets builders start on either standard, with DDR5 being the forward-looking path given the CPU's memory bandwidth demands. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes exceeds the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, so a future graphics upgrade — the successor GeForce 50 series is a natural direction given the RTX 4070 Ti's end-of-life status — will not be bottlenecked by the slot.

Power headroom requires care rather than extravagance. The CPU's TDP is 125 W and the GPU's is 285 W, with NVIDIA's suggested PSU for the card at 600 W. That 600 W figure is the reference point for the whole system, and the modest combined draw of the two parts means the suggestion leaves reasonable margin for board, drives, and fans. The card's single 16-pin power connector and dual-slot, 285 mm-long form factor mean most standard mid-tower cases accommodate it, but case clearance for the 285 mm length and the 16-pin cable path are the physical checks before purchase. A sensible next upgrade sequence: GPU first (the card is already end-of-life), memory capacity second, CPU last — the socket keeps that final door open.

FAQ

Q: No measured FPS data exists for this pairing — how reliable are the frame-rate estimates?

A: They are extrapolations from the CPU's 86th-percentile and GPU's 84th-percentile standings plus scores like the 31624 G3D and 5024 Steel Nomad results. They describe expected behavior classes (high-refresh 1440p, playable 4K) rather than exact frame counts.

Q: How does the i5-13600KF compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It is statistically tied with the Intel Core i5-14490F, Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, AMD Ryzen 7 250, and Intel Core i5-13600HX — all within 0.4 percentage points of its average score.

Q: Is 12 GB of VRAM enough?

A: For 1440p ultra and general 4K play, the 12 GB of GDDR6X at 504.2 GB/s is adequate; the 192-bit bus and capacity are the first limits to appear under heavy 4K ray tracing with maximum texture packs.

Q: Does the "KF" suffix matter?

A: Yes for troubleshooting — the chip has no integrated graphics, so a display requires the RTX 4070 Ti to be functioning.

Q: What power supply does this build need?

A: NVIDIA's suggested PSU for the RTX 4070 Ti is 600 W, which comfortably covers the 285 W GPU and 125 W CPU TDP plus system overhead.

Q: Can this CPU be overclocked?

A: Yes — the multiplier is unlocked.

Q: Does the build support ECC memory?

A: The CPU supports ECC, which suits small-business and workstation deployments alongside its gaming credentials.

Who Should Build It

The data points to three audiences. First, high-refresh 1440p gamers: the GPU percentile, texture rate, and RT/tensor hardware are exactly the profile for that segment, with 4K as a secondary use. Second, hybrid content creators — video editors, streamers, and 3D artists — whose workloads benefit simultaneously from the 31727 R23 multi-core score, the 475505 compression result, and 40.09 TFLOPS of GPU compute. Third, developers and small-business workstation users: the unlocked multiplier, ECC support, dual DDR4/DDR5 compatibility, and Gen 5 PCIe lanes make this a flexible professional platform, and students in technical fields get workstation-class throughput in a desktop that also games at the 85th combined percentile.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class pairing (buildClass: desktop) combining Intel's 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake i5-13600KF with NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace RTX 4070 Ti on the AD104 die. The CPU sits in the 86th percentile of all processors; the GPU in the 84th percentile of all graphics cards; the combination in the 85th percentile of all pairings. That triple alignment defines the build's character: a balanced, upper-tier desktop with no weak flank — CPU-bound and GPU-bound workloads alike are handled by hardware positioned in the same performance band, and the Socket 1700 platform plus Gen 5 PCIe leave a clear upgrade corridor despite the GPU's end-of-life status. It is, in short, a well-matched high-performance desktop for gaming and creation work at 1440p and beyond.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600KF

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds