SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600KF

38,103 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080: A High-Performance Desktop Pairing

This build combines Intel's 13th-generation Raptor Lake desktop processor with NVIDIA's Ampere-based flagship GPU from the 30-series, targeting a 1440p-to-4K gaming and content creation desktop. The CPU holds an 86th percentile ranking among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 68th percentile among all graphics cards, placing the combined system at the 77th percentile overall. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the data, so all frame-rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture and fabricated on a 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The chip uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support included. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, and its multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The die size is 257 mm², and the chip was released on 2022-09-26 with a launch MSRP of $294.

Benchmark results show a strong scaling pattern across thread counts. In 3DMark tests, the processor scores 1084 in single-thread, 2166 in 2-thread, 4282 in 4-thread, 7074 in 8-thread, 9404 in 16-thread, and 10216 in max-thread workloads. The progression from 8-thread to 16-thread shows a 32.9% improvement, while the jump from 16-thread to max-thread adds only 8.6%, indicating that the 14-core configuration delivers diminishing returns beyond 16 threads — typical for hybrid architectures where performance-per-thread degrades as all cores engage simultaneously.

Cinebench results reinforce this profile. The R23 multicore score of 31727 is 7.1 times the single-core score of 4479, demonstrating excellent parallel scaling for a mainstream desktop chip. The R20 multicore score of 13325 and R15 multicore score of 3198 follow the same trend, with single-core scores of 1881 and 451 respectively. Geekbench shows 17933 multicore and 2487 single-core, a ratio of 7.2:1, confirming that applications which can utilize all 20 threads will benefit substantially.

PassMark tests reveal workload-specific strengths. Integer math scores 122169, floating-point math scores 90424, and extended instructions score 28865. Data compression scores 475505, random string sorting scores 50851, and data encryption scores 26957. The multithread score is 37488, while single-thread is 4118. The physics score is 2226, and the prime number finding score is 152. These results indicate strong general-purpose compute capability, with particularly high throughput in integer-heavy and compression tasks — good for software compilation, database operations, and scientific computing.

The average benchmark score is 38103, placing the CPU at the 86th percentile of all processors. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i5-14490F scores 38149 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T scores 38194 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38221 (0.3% higher), and the Intel Core i5-13600HX scores 38261 (0.4% higher). This puts the 13600KF within a 0.4% performance band of four competing chips, meaning real-world differences will be negligible and application-specific.

Benchmark Performance

The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, delivers strong compute results across multiple APIs. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 it scores 4407, while Geekbench OpenCL scores 152423 and Vulkan scores 33620. PassMark results show a DirectX 12 score of 100, DirectX 11 score of 207, DirectX 10 score of 170, and DirectX 9 score of 258, with a G3D score of 25086 and a G2D score of 1054. The GPU compute score is 14397. The average benchmark score is 23172, placing the GPU at the 68th percentile of all graphics cards.

The GPU's nearest rivals in the database are unusual — the NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249 (0.3% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 23250 (0.3% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 6600M scores 23273 (0.4% higher), and the AMD Radeon R9 M290X scores 23276 (0.4% higher). The RTX 3080 sits just 0.4% below these rivals, which is surprising given the architectural differences; this likely reflects the database's averaging methodology. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 77, indicating that the system outperforms 77% of all recorded desktop configurations.

The CPU's 86th percentile is notably higher than the GPU's 68th percentile, suggesting the processor has more headroom relative to its peers than the graphics card does. This imbalance has implications for workload distribution, as the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive tasks while the CPU can handle compute-heavy workloads with relative ease. The combined 77th percentile confirms a high-tier system, but one where the GPU holds the system back from the top quartile of overall performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a CPU-favored balance. The processor's 86th percentile versus the GPU's 68th percentile means the CPU is positioned significantly higher relative to its own competitive set. In gaming workloads, the GPU will typically be the limiting component at higher resolutions, while the CPU's strong single-thread score of 1084 in 3DMark and 4479 in Cinebench R23 ensures it can feed frames efficiently at lower resolutions.

The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 9404 is 8.7 times its 2-thread score of 2166, showing that multi-threaded scaling is robust. This benefits streaming scenarios where encoding competes with game logic. However, the GPU's PassMark DirectX 12 score of 100 versus its DirectX 11 score of 207 indicates that the card's absolute performance is not the top-tier in the database, and the 0.4% deficit to its nearest rivals suggests the 3080 is at the edge of its performance class.

In CPU-bound scenarios, the 13600KF's 86th percentile ranking means it will outpace most other processors in tasks like physics simulation, data compression (475505 in PassMark), and integer math (122169). In GPU-bound scenarios, the RTX 3080's 68th percentile means it will perform adequately but not exceptionally relative to all GPUs. The practical bottleneck is the GPU for gaming at 1440p and above, while the CPU is the stronger component for productivity and compute workloads.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame-rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4407 and PassMark G3D score of 25086 indicate solid 1440p performance, while the CPU's strong single-thread scores (1084 in 3DMark, 4479 in Cinebench R23) ensure minimal bottlenecking in most game engines.

At 1080p, the CPU's 86th percentile ranking will allow the RTX 3080 to operate near its full potential, as the processor can handle high frame rates without becoming the limiting factor. At 1440p, the GPU's 68th percentile becomes more relevant, and frame rates will be governed by the graphics card's compute capabilities. At 4K, the GPU will be the clear bottleneck, with the CPU's strong single-thread performance providing ample headroom.

The GPU's 10 GB GDDR6X memory with 760.3 GB/s bandwidth and 320-bit bus width is sufficient for 1440p gaming with high texture settings, though 4K ultra settings may exceed the frame buffer in some titles. The 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores support ray tracing and DLSS, which can improve frame rates in supported titles. The estimated performance suggests high-refresh 1080p gaming and smooth 1440p gaming, with playable 4K in less demanding titles or with upscaling enabled.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers seeking high-refresh 1440p performance and playable 4K, based on the GPU's 68th percentile ranking and the CPU's strong single-thread scores. Content creators who work with multi-threaded applications will benefit from the CPU's 86th percentile, particularly for video encoding, 3D rendering, and data processing tasks where the 20 threads and 31727 Cinebench R23 multicore score provide substantial throughput.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the integer math score of 122169 and the data compression score of 475505, which indicate fast compilation and asset processing. Students and small business users running office applications and light compute tasks will find the system overqualified, but the performance headroom ensures longevity. The build is less suited for users prioritizing maximum GPU performance at 4K ultra settings, where the RTX 3080's 68th percentile may fall short of top-tier cards.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in memory selection, with dual-channel configuration available. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, ensuring the RTX 3080 has full bandwidth available. The 125 W CPU TDP and 320 W GPU TDP suggest a 700 W PSU is sufficient, as indicated by the GPU's suggested PSU rating.

The CPU's multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking beyond the 5.10 GHz boost clock. The GPU is end-of-life, with the GeForce 40 series as its successor, so a future upgrade would involve moving to a newer GPU generation. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5, so memory upgrades are possible without changing the motherboard. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU to address the 68th percentile bottleneck, as the CPU's 86th percentile provides ample headroom for more powerful graphics cards.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600KF is at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 38103.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It is within 0.4% of the Intel Core i5-14490F (38149), Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (38194), AMD Ryzen 7 250 (38221), and Intel Core i5-13600HX (38261).

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is at the 68th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23172.

Q: Does this system have measured FPS data?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame rates are estimates.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 3080 has 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus, with 760.3 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 77.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i5-13600KF with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080. The CPU is an active production product from Intel's 13th generation, while the GPU is end-of-life from NVIDIA's 30-series. The system sits at the 77th combined percentile, indicating it outperforms most desktop configurations in the database. The CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers at 86th percentile, while the GPU at 68th percentile is the limiting factor for graphics-intensive workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is built on the GA102 chip with Ampere architecture, fabricated by Samsung on an 8 nm process. It contains 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.1M per mm². The GPU has 8704 shading units, 272 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. It includes 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores for ray tracing and AI acceleration. The base clock is 1440 MHz with a boost clock of 1710 MHz, and the memory runs at 1188 MHz with 19 Gbps effective speed.

The memory subsystem consists of 10 GB of GDDR6X on a 320-bit bus, providing 760.3 GB/s bandwidth. The pixel rate is 164.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 465.1 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is rated at 29.77 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1). The card has a 320 W TDP, uses a dual-slot design with a single 12-pin power connector, and requires a 700 W PSU. It measures 285 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

The benchmark data shows a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4407, Geekbench OpenCL score of 152423, and Vulkan score of 33620. PassMark G3D score is 25086, with GPU compute at 14397. The DirectX 12 score of 100 is lower than DirectX 11's 207, which is typical for this architecture. The 68th percentile ranking places it above most GPUs but below top-tier cards, with its nearest rivals within 0.4%. The RT and tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and DLSS, which can offset the raw compute deficit in supported games.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 86th percentile and strong single-thread scores (1084 in 3DMark, 4479 in Cinebench R23) ensure high frame rates at 1080p, while the GPU's 68th percentile supports smooth 1440p gaming. The 10 GB memory is adequate for high texture settings at 1440p.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads and 31727 Cinebench R23 multicore score allow simultaneous gaming and encoding, with the 3DMark 16-thread score of 9404 indicating robust multi-threaded performance for streaming workloads.

Video editing: The CPU's 86th percentile and data compression score of 475505 support fast timeline scrubbing and export, while the GPU's 152423 OpenCL score accelerates effects rendering and previews.

3D rendering: The CPU's 31727 Cinebench R23 multicore score excels in CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 68 RT cores handle GPU-accelerated and ray-traced rendering workloads.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 122169 and random string sorting score of 50851 indicate fast compilation and testing cycles, with the 20 threads handling parallel builds efficiently.

Student and office work: The system is overqualified for document processing and web browsing, but the 86th percentile CPU ensures responsive multitasking and the 68th percentile GPU handles any graphics-accelerated applications without issue.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600KF

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds