SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600KF

38,103 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

17,208 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing puts a strong 14th-core-class Intel Raptor Lake CPU against a mid-range Ampere GPU that sits in the 61st percentile of all cards. The combined system percentile is 74, which tells you immediately where the balance lies: the Intel Core i5-13600KF (86th percentile among CPUs) is the stronger half, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is the component that will set the frame-rate ceiling in games. Note that the database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than recorded playtests.

Gaming Performance

Because no measured FPS data exists for this pairing, the following picture is built entirely from the benchmark scores and percentile positions in the database. Treat every frame expectation here as an estimate.

The RTX 3070 posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3162 and a PassMark G3D score of 22214, placing it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. That is a solid mid-pack position: comfortably ahead of entry-level cards but clearly behind the fastest consumer hardware. Its nearest rivals in the database are the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (avgScore 17083, deltaPct 0.7), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (avgScore 17037, deltaPct 1), the AMD Radeon HD 7970M (avgScore 17019, deltaPct 1.1), and the NVIDIA Tesla K40c (avgScore 17468, deltaPct -1.5). In other words, the RTX 3070 scores within roughly one percent of that group on aggregate — a tightly matched cluster.

What does that mean in frame-rate terms? With 448 GB/s of memory bandwidth, 5888 shading units, and 20.31 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, this is a GPU calibrated for high-quality 1440p play rather than uncompromised 4K. At 1440p with ultra settings, estimates derived from the scores point toward high-refresh performance in most titles, with heavier ray-traced workloads pulling the experience back toward standard refresh territory. At 1080p, the card's pixel rate of 165.6 GPixel/s and the CPU's strong single-thread results (Geekbench single-core 2487, PassMark single-thread 4118) should keep frame rates very high, though the 61st-percentile GPU — not the 86th-percentile CPU — remains the limiter in nearly all modern games.

The 8 GB of GDDR6 is the caveat. At 4K, or in titles with large texture sets, VRAM pressure can force settings reductions even when raw compute would otherwise cope. Estimates should therefore be framed conservatively: this is a strong 1440p card, a capable 1080p card, and a stretch for consistent 4K ultra.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined system percentile of 74 sits between the CPU's 86 and the GPU's 61, and closer analysis shows this is a GPU-limited build in graphics workloads. The i5-13600KF brings 14 cores and 20 threads with a 5.10 GHz boost clock; its PassMark physics score of 2226 and single-thread score of 4118 indicate the CPU side is rarely the constraint. In games, the RTX 3070's Steel Nomad and G3D results will cap frame delivery long before the processor runs out of headroom.

Flip to CPU-bound workloads and the picture inverts completely. The 13600KF's multi-thread credentials — Cinebench R23 multi-core 31727, Geekbench multi-core 17933, PassMark multi-thread 37488 — leave the 8 GB Ampere card with little to contribute. The GPU's compute scores (PassMark GPU compute 11195, Geekbench OpenCL 112821, Geekbench Vulkan 21022) are respectable for content work but modest against the CPU's throughput in parallel integer and floating-point tasks.

One further scaling signal: the 3DMark thread-scaling results for the CPU (2 threads 2166, 4 threads 4282, 8 threads 7074, 16 threads 9404, max threads 10216) show near-linear gains up to 8 threads and continued improvement beyond. Games that scale across many threads will not be starved by this processor. The bottleneck, where one exists, is the graphics card.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark sheet is dense and consistent. Single-thread results — Cinebench R15 451, R20 1881, R23 4479, Geekbench 2487, PassMark 4118 — put it firmly in the upper tier for per-core responsiveness, which is what drives high-refresh gaming and lightly threaded applications. Multi-thread results — Cinebench R23 31727, Geekbench 17933, PassMark 37488 — reflect the full 14-core, 20-thread complement. The 3DMark max-threads score of 10216 versus 9404 at 16 threads shows the extra threads still earning their keep.

The aggregate average benchmark score of 38103 places the 13600KF at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals cluster astonishingly tightly: the Intel Core i5-14490F (avgScore 38149, deltaPct -0.1), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (avgScore 38194, deltaPct -0.2), the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (avgScore 38221, deltaPct -0.3), and the Intel Core i5-13600HX (avgScore 38261, deltaPct -0.4). All four sit within half a percent of this chip. Buyers comparing across those parts are, on aggregate scores, choosing between statistical equals.

On the GPU side, the RTX 3070 averages 17208 with a Steel Nomad score of 3162 and a PassMark G3D of 22214, at the 61st percentile. The PassMark DirectX results (DX9 247, DX10 150, DX11 182, DX12 85) cover legacy API behavior, while Geekbench OpenCL 112821 and Vulkan 21022 cover compute. Taken together: an upper-mid-tier graphics engine from the tail end of the Ampere generation, paired with a processor that outclasses it by 25 percentile points.

Who Should Build It

The natural owner of this build is a 1440p gamer who also does serious CPU work. The GPU scores support high-quality 1440p play, and the 61st percentile means it will not chase maximum 4K ultra settings. Gamers targeting high refresh rates at 1080p will find the CPU fully capable — the single-thread scores are elite-adjacent — but should understand the GPU is the ceiling.

Content creators are arguably the best fit. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31727 and Geekbench multi-core of 17933 make video editing, 3D rendering, and code compilation genuinely fast, and the 8 GB VRAM plus OpenCL compute score of 112821 give GPU-accelerated effects a workable (if not luxurious) buffer. Developers and students benefit directly: the PassMark integer math score of 122169, floating-point score of 90424, and data-compression score of 475505 translate to quick builds, fast archives, and snappy everyday use. Small business workstations that compile, encode, and analyze data will find the multi-thread results sufficient for sustained professional workloads. Anyone whose work depends on ECC can note the CPU's ECC support.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. With a Geekbench single-core score of 2487 and PassMark physics of 2226, the CPU side of this build is built for high frame rates. The RTX 3070's G3D score of 22214 supports high-refresh 1440p in most titles, though the heaviest settings may need trimming to sustain it.

Streaming. Encoding a stream while gaming demands both strong single-thread and spare cores, and this configuration has both: a 3DMark single-thread score of 1084 paired with 31727 in Cinebench R23 multi-core leaves overhead for concurrent encode. The 20-thread CPU carries the load comfortably.

Video editing. Timeline scrubbing and export benefit from 14 cores and the GPU's 184 tensor cores and OpenCL score of 112821. The 8 GB of VRAM is the constraint to watch on 4K timelines with heavy effects stacking.

3D rendering. Cinebench R23 multi-core of 31727 and PassMark extended instructions of 28865 indicate strong CPU rendering. GPU rendering via the 46 RT cores works, but the 61st-percentile position means viewport and final-frame GPU renders will be mid-tier.

Software development. Compiling is integer- and thread-heavy; PassMark integer math of 122169 and multi-thread 37488 make this a quick machine for large builds, containers, and local test suites.

Student and office work. This pairing is overkill for documents and browsing, but the 86th-percentile CPU means the machine will stay responsive under heavy multitasking for years of coursework, spreadsheets, and browser abuse.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 3070 is built on the GA104 die: Samsung 8 nm, 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die, giving a density of 44.4M per mm². It runs a 1500 MHz base and 1725 MHz boost clock, with memory at 14 Gbps effective across a 256-bit bus for 448 GB/s of bandwidth. The shader array comprises 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, delivering 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 (FP16 at 1:1), a pixel rate of 165.6 GPixel/s, and a texture rate of 317.4 GTexel/s.

Ray tracing and AI workloads are covered by 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores. For rendering engines that use GPU ray tracing or AI denoising, the RT core count and the Vulkan compute score of 21022 set expectations: capable but mid-tier. The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API support means current rendering features are available in full.

The 8 GB GDDR6 buffer is the defining limitation. At 1440p it is generally adequate; at 4K, or in texture-heavy scenarios, it becomes the first wall hit. The card is dual-slot, 242 mm long, draws 220 W through a single 12-pin connector, and outputs over one HDMI 2.1 plus three DisplayPort 1.4a. Its production status is end-of-life — it belongs to the GeForce 30 series, succeeded by GeForce 40.

CPU Analysis

The Core i5-13600KF is a Raptor Lake-S part on Intel's 10 nm process, with a 257 mm² die. The hybrid design provides 14 cores and 20 threads, a 3.50 GHz base, and a 5.10 GHz boost. Cache is generous: 80 KB L1 and 2 MB L2 per core, plus 24 MB of shared L3 — the L3 pool in particular helps games and latency-sensitive workloads.

The benchmark profile shows why this chip punches high. Single-thread scores (R23 4479, Geekbench 2487, PassMark 4118) drive the fast, responsive feel in games and desktop use; multi-thread scores (R23 31727, Geekbench 17933) deliver workstation-class throughput in rendering and compilation. The thread-scaling data — 4282 at 4 threads, 7074 at 8, 10216 at max — shows scaling holds through the core count, so heavily threaded software is not wasted on it.

The "KF" designation means no integrated graphics, so a discrete card is mandatory. The multiplier is unlocked, and DDR4/DDR5 support on dual-channel gives platform flexibility. Its launch MSRP was $294. Rivals in the database sit within 0.4 percent of its aggregate score, so performance, not benchmark deltas, should drive any substitution decision.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation is Intel Socket 1700 with support for both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configurations. PCIe 5.0 with 16 CPU lanes is available — ahead of the RTX 3070's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, so a future GPU upgrade can step up without a platform change. ECC memory support is present for workstation-duty users.

Power planning is straightforward. The CPU carries a 125 W TDP and the GPU draws 220 W with a suggested PSU of 550 W. That suggestion covers the pair, but sensible headroom above it leaves room for a stronger graphics card later — which is exactly where this build's most impactful upgrade lies. The GPU sits 25 percentile points below the CPU, so replacing the end-of-life RTX 3070 with a higher-percentile card would rebalance the system without touching the processor.

A memory upgrade path also exists: builders starting on DDR4 can move to DDR5 within the same socket generation. Given the 24 MB L3 cache and strong memory-adjacent PassMark results (data compression 475505, random string sorting 50851), faster memory will benefit bandwidth-sensitive workloads modestly. The sensible sequence: graphics card first, memory second, CPU last.

FAQ

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in games?

A: The GPU. The RTX 3070 sits at the 61st percentile of all GPUs while the i5-13600KF sits at the 86th percentile of CPUs, a 25-point gap. In graphics workloads the video card sets the frame-rate ceiling.

Q: What resolution is this build best suited for?

A: 1440p. With 448 GB/s of bandwidth, 8 GB of GDDR6, and a G3D score of 22214, the GPU is calibrated for high-quality 1440p. 1080p is comfortable; 4K ultra is a stretch and may require settings reductions due to VRAM limits.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing, so all frame-rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile data.

Q: How does the i5-13600KF compare to its rivals?

A: Extremely closely. Its average score of 38103 is within 0.4 percent of the i5-14490F (-0.1), Core Ultra 5 245T (-0.2), Ryzen 7 250 (-0.3), and i5-13600HX (-0.4). These parts are effectively interchangeable on aggregate performance.

Q: Is this build good for streaming while gaming?

A: Yes. The 20-thread CPU posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31727 and PassMark multi-thread of 37488, leaving substantial headroom for a concurrent encode alongside gameplay.

Q: What power supply is recommended?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 550 W, against a 220 W card TDP and a 125 W CPU TDP. Choosing above that figure provides headroom for a future graphics upgrade.

Q: Can this system be upgraded later?

A: Yes. Socket 1700, DDR4/DDR5 support, and PCIe 5.0 with 16 CPU lanes give the platform legs. The most impactful upgrade is the GPU, since the end-of-life RTX 3070 trails the CPU by 25 percentile points.