SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600KF

38,103 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

16,129 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti — Desktop Build Analysis

This pairing combines a 14-core Raptor Lake desktop processor with an 8 GB Ampere-generation GPU, targeting a mid-range desktop configuration. The data confirms this is a desktop-class build with a combined percentile of 73 across all CPU and GPU pairings, placing it in the upper-middle tier of performance. However, no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK — the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty. All frame-rate discussions below are therefore estimates derived from the individual CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not observed gaming results.

Gaming Performance

Since the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU pairing, all gaming performance figures here are qualitative estimates based on the benchmark scores of each component. The RTX 3060 Ti's PassMark G3D score of 20,349 and its 59th percentile standing among all GPUs indicate a solid 1080p performer that can handle most modern titles at high settings, with 1440p remaining viable in less demanding games. The i5-13600KF's strong single-thread score of 1,084 in 3DMark Single Thread and 4,479 in Cinebench R23 Single Core suggest the CPU is unlikely to be the primary constraint in frame generation for most gaming scenarios.

At 1080p ultra settings, the estimated FPS would be primarily GPU-limited, with the RTX 3060 Ti's 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth providing the raw throughput needed for high-refresh 1080p gaming. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus is sufficient for most current titles at this resolution, though texture-heavy games may approach the VRAM ceiling. The GPU's 59th percentile position, roughly on par with the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (which sits 1.4% higher in average score) and the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M (1.4% lower), suggests frame rates comparable to those established mid-range cards of the previous generation.

At 1440p, the estimated FPS would drop as the GPU becomes more heavily loaded. The 3060 Ti's 80 ROPs and 133.2 GPixel/s pixel rate help maintain fill-rate-bound performance, but the 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit ultra-texture settings in newer titles. The CPU's 24 MB shared L3 cache and 14 cores (6 performance + 8 efficiency, implied by the 14-core/20-thread count) ensure that even at lower resolutions where CPU overhead is more pronounced, the processor can feed the GPU without becoming the bottleneck — the 3DMark 8-thread score of 7,074 and max-thread score of 10,216 indicate strong multi-threaded headroom for background tasks during gaming.

For 4K gaming, the data suggests this pairing would struggle at ultra settings. The GPU's 59th percentile places it firmly in mid-range territory, and the lack of measured data means estimates are speculative — but the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 78 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,626 indicate the GPU is not designed for 4K ultra workloads. The CPU, however, would remain capable — its 86th percentile among all CPUs means it has ample headroom for 4K gaming where the GPU is almost always the limiting factor.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks paint a picture of a very strong mid-range processor. The i5-13600KF achieves an average benchmark score of 38,103, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are remarkably close: the Intel Core i5-14490F scores 38,149 (-0.1%), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T scores 38,194 (-0.2%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38,221 (-0.3%). This means the 13600KF is within 0.3% of these competitors — effectively a statistical tie, but the fact that it holds its own against newer-generation parts shows strong architectural efficiency. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 31,727 and single-core score of 4,479 demonstrate balanced performance across both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded workloads. Geekbench scores of 17,933 (multi-core) and 2,487 (single-core) corroborate this balanced profile.

The GPU benchmarks show a more modest standing. The RTX 3060 Ti's average benchmark score is 16,129, placing it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 9060 at 16,014 (+0.7% for the 3060 Ti) and the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M at 16,351 (-1.4%). The 3060 Ti's PassMark G3D score of 20,349 is the most comprehensive gaming-oriented metric, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 78,927 and Vulkan score of 47,784 indicate strong compute performance for non-gaming workloads. The PassMark GPU Compute score of 10,006 suggests the GPU can handle compute tasks, but it is not a compute-focused card.

The combined picture is one of CPU-led performance. The CPU sits 27 percentile points above the GPU, indicating that the processor has significant headroom over the graphics card. In applications where both are utilized — such as gaming with background streaming or rendering tasks — the CPU will frequently wait on the GPU. This imbalance is not necessarily negative; it means the CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, but it also means the GPU is the performance ceiling for gaming workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear performance hierarchy: the CPU is substantially stronger than the GPU. The i5-13600KF's 86th percentile rank versus the RTX 3060 Ti's 59th percentile means the GPU is the limiting factor in GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolutions and 3D rendering. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31,727 and PassMark multithread score of 37,488 indicate it can handle demanding multi-threaded tasks without breaking a sweat, while the GPU's 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 and 253.1 GTexel/s texture rate define the graphics ceiling.

In gaming, the bottleneck shifts with resolution. At 1080p, the GPU is the primary limiter — the CPU's single-thread score of 1,084 in 3DMark and 4,479 in Cinebench R23 Single Core are more than sufficient to drive frame generation. As resolution increases to 1440p and 4K, the GPU bottleneck becomes even more pronounced, with the CPU's role diminishing further. The CPU's 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,166 shows strong light-thread performance, meaning even in titles that rely heavily on a few cores, the 13600KF will not become the limiting factor.

For non-gaming workloads, the CPU leads. In Cinebench R23 multicore, the 31,727 score places it far above what the GPU can handle in compute tasks. The PassMark data shows strong CPU-side performance in integer math (122,169), floating-point math (90,424), and data compression (475,505). These scores indicate that in CPU-bound productivity tasks — video encoding, software compilation, spreadsheet processing — the CPU will dominate, and the GPU will only matter for graphics-specific workloads. The combined percentile of 73 reflects this imbalance: the build is stronger than the GPU alone suggests, but weaker than the CPU alone implies.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets desktop users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads and play games at 1080p or modest 1440p settings. The i5-13600KF's 86th percentile CPU ranking makes it an excellent choice for content creators, software developers, and students who need strong multi-threaded performance for compilation, rendering, or data analysis. The 14 cores and 20 threads, combined with 24 MB of L3 cache, provide the parallel throughput needed for video encoding (Cinebench R23 multicore 31,727) and 3D rendering tasks where CPU compute dominates.

Gamers at 1080p will find the RTX 3060 Ti sufficient for high-refresh-rate play in most titles, with the 59th percentile GPU ranking placing it above the AMD Radeon RX 9060 by 0.7% and just below the RX 5700 XT by 1.4%. Those targeting 1440p should expect to adjust settings to high rather than ultra for demanding games. Small business workstations that run office productivity suites, database queries, and light graphics work would benefit from the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 37,488 and the GPU's OpenCL compute of 78,927 for acceleration in compatible applications.

This build is less suitable for 4K gaming enthusiasts or professionals requiring heavy GPU compute (such as machine learning training at scale). The 8 GB VRAM and 59th percentile GPU standing are the limiting factors. Similarly, users who need maximum single-thread performance for legacy software should note that the CPU, while strong, is not at the very top — the 3DMark single-thread score of 1,084 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 4,479 are solid but not class-leading.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the RTX 3060 Ti's 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth can drive frame rates well above 100 FPS in esports and moderately demanding titles, supported by the CPU's 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,166, which ensures minimal CPU overhead. The GPU's 59th percentile suggests it will not sustain 240+ FPS in the most demanding games at ultra settings, but high-refresh 144Hz play is realistic.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads and strong multicore scores (Cinebench R23 multicore 31,727) provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The GPU's NVENC (implied by the 152 tensor cores and Ampere architecture) can offload encoding, but the 8 GB VRAM may be strained when gaming and encoding simultaneously at high resolutions. The PassMark multithread score of 37,488 suggests the CPU alone can handle streaming without GPU assistance.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 13,325 and PassMark data compression score of 475,505 indicate strong performance for video codec operations and timeline scrubbing. The GPU's 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 and OpenCL score of 78,927 can accelerate effects and color grading. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and most 1440p editing timelines, though 4K multi-stream projects may exceed it.

3D rendering: The CPU's 31,727 Cinebench R23 multicore score makes it a competent renderer for CPU-based engines. The GPU's 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 and 152 tensor cores support GPU-accelerated rendering in compatible applications, but the 8 GB VRAM will limit scene complexity. The 59th percentile GPU rank means rendering times will be moderate compared to higher-tier cards.

Software development: The CPU's 20 threads and 86th percentile rank provide excellent parallel compilation performance. The PassMark integer math score of 122,169 indicates strong arithmetic throughput. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development tasks, though the Vulkan score of 47,784 supports graphics debugging.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 4,479) ensures responsive application usage, while the 14 cores handle multitasking with ease. The GPU's G2D score of 989 is sufficient for 2D desktop acceleration. This build is overkill for basic office tasks, but the headroom means it will remain responsive for years.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on the GA104 chip using Samsung's 8 nm process, with 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. The GPU features 4,864 shading units, 152 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output pipelines, with 38 RT cores and 152 tensor cores for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads. The base clock is 1,410 MHz with a boost of 1,665 MHz, while memory runs at 1,750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) across a 256-bit bus, yielding 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The 8 GB GDDR6 memory is the GPU's most significant limitation. At 1080p, this capacity is generally adequate, but texture-heavy titles or modded games can approach the limit. The 59th percentile ranking places it just 0.7% above the AMD Radeon RX 9060 and 1.4% below both the Radeon Pro 5600M and RX 5700 XT, indicating it sits in a crowded mid-range performance band. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,626 reflects modern API performance, while the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 78 (relative to 132 for DX10 and 234 for DX9) suggests the GPU's performance scales well with API modernity — DX12 workloads are handled relatively more efficiently.

The 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 253.1 GTexel/s texture rate define the GPU's raw throughput. For rendering, the 38 RT cores provide dedicated ray tracing hardware, though the 59th percentile position means ray-traced workloads will require reduced settings or resolutions. The 152 tensor cores support DLSS and other AI-based features, which can significantly boost effective frame rates in supported titles. The 133.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 80 ROPs handle fill-rate-bound scenarios, but the 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap performance in high-resolution, high-texture scenarios. The GPU is end-of-life per the production status, with the GeForce 40 series as its successor.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600KF is a Raptor Lake-S desktop processor manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process, with a die size of 257 mm². It features 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration and offers 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. It has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking and supports ECC memory.

The CPU's 86th percentile ranking is reflected in its benchmark scores: Cinebench R23 multicore of 31,727 and single-core of 4,479, Geekbench multicore of 17,933 and single-core of 2,487, and 3DMark max-thread score of 10,216. The PassMark suite shows particularly strong integer math (122,169), floating-point math (90,424), and data compression (475,505) scores, indicating excellent general-purpose compute. The single-thread performance is robust — the 3DMark single-thread score of 1,084 and PassMark single-thread of 4,118 ensure snappy response in lightly-threaded applications.

The 14-core/20-thread configuration suggests a hybrid architecture (performance and efficiency cores), typical of Raptor Lake. For real workloads, this means the CPU excels at both heavily-threaded tasks (rendering, encoding) and light-threaded tasks (gaming, office work). The 24 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency and improves performance in cache-sensitive workloads. The 125 W TDP is modest for a 14-core part, and the unlocked multiplier allows users to extract additional performance. The 5.10 GHz boost clock ensures high single-thread performance, supported by the 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,166. Compared to its nearest rivals (i5-14490F, Core Ultra 5 245T, Ryzen 7 250), which are all within 0.3% in average score, the 13600KF is effectively tied — a strong showing for a 2022-era part against newer generations.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600KF uses the LGA 1700 socket (Intel Socket 1700), which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configurations. This gives builders flexibility in choosing memory — DDR4 for cost-sensitive builds or DDR5 for higher bandwidth. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, leaving Gen 5 bandwidth available for future NVMe SSDs or other devices.

The RTX 3060 Ti has a 200 W TDP and requires a 550 W suggested PSU. The CPU's 125 W TDP means the combined power draw is manageable within a 550 W supply, but users adding multiple drives or overclocking both components should consider a higher-capacity PSU. The GPU uses a single 12-pin power connector and is a dual-slot card measuring 242 mm in length, 112 mm in height.

A sensible next upgrade would be the GPU, as it is the clear performance bottleneck (59th percentile vs. 86th for the CPU). Moving to a higher-tier GPU would better utilize the CPU's headroom. The CPU has no upgrade path beyond the LGA 1700 platform — users seeking more CPU performance would need a new motherboard and potentially new memory. However, the 13600KF's 86th percentile position means it remains competitive, and the platform's DDR5 support future-proofs memory bandwidth. The production status of the GPU is end-of-life, but the CPU is active, indicating the CPU will likely outlast the GPU in service life.

FAQ

Q: Is the RTX 3060 Ti sufficient for 1440p gaming with this CPU?

A: Based on the GPU's 59th percentile and 16.20 TFLOPS FP32, 1440p gaming is viable but requires settings adjustments. The 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit ultra textures, but the CPU's strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread 1,084) ensures no CPU-related frame drops.

Q: Does the i5-13600KF bottleneck the RTX 3060 Ti?

A: No. The CPU's 86th percentile and 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,166 indicate it can feed the GPU effectively at any resolution. The GPU's 59th percentile makes it the limiting factor in gaming, not the CPU.

Q: What memory should I use with this build?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode. The FACT PACK does not specify which is faster for this pairing, but the choice is flexible. DDR5 offers higher bandwidth, while DDR4 is a compatible alternative.

Q: Can this build handle ray tracing?

A: The GPU has 38 RT cores, so ray tracing is supported. However, the 59th percentile GPU ranking means ray-traced workloads will require reduced resolutions or DLSS (via 152 tensor cores) to maintain playable frame rates.

Q: Is the 550 W suggested PSU adequate?

A: Yes, for stock operation. The GPU has a 200 W TDP and the CPU has a 125 W TDP, totaling 325 W. The 550 W suggested PSU provides headroom, but overclocking (the CPU has an unlocked multiplier) or adding many peripherals may require a stronger unit.

Q: How does this CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-13600KF scores an average of 38,103, which is within 0.3% of the Intel Core i5-14490F (38,149), Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (38,194), and AMD Ryzen 7 250 (38,221). It is effectively tied with these newer parts.

Q: Is the 8 GB VRAM a problem for future games?

A: At 1080p, 8 GB is currently adequate but approaching limits in texture-heavy titles. The GPU's 59th percentile and end-of-life production status suggest it will need upgrading before the CPU for future high-settings gaming.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-13600KF (14 cores, 20 threads, 86th percentile CPU) with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (8 GB GDDR6, 59th percentile GPU). The combined percentile of 73 indicates an upper-mid-tier overall system, with the CPU significantly outperforming the GPU in relative terms. The pairing is well-suited for 1080p gaming at high settings, CPU-intensive productivity tasks, and content creation workloads where the processor's 20 threads and 24 MB L3 cache provide ample compute. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are the primary constraints for high-resolution or high-texture gaming, and the end-of-life GPU status suggests this build is best viewed as a CPU-anchored system that can accommodate a future GPU upgrade. The platform (LGA 1700, DDR4/DDR5 support) offers memory flexibility, while the 125 W CPU TDP and 200 W GPU TDP keep power requirements modest at a suggested 550 W PSU.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600KF

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds