SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600KF

38,103 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is a desktop build with a stark performance asymmetry. The CPU is a high-end, enthusiast-class processor that sits in the 86th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU is a modest, entry-level part that sits in the 57th percentile against all GPUs. This combination creates a system where the processor is capable of far more demanding workloads than the graphics card can visually support, making the GPU the definitive limiting factor for any graphics-intensive task. The data shows a machine built for heavy computational lifting, but restrained at the display output stage.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600KF is built on the Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process, featuring 14 cores and 20 threads. This hybrid design allows it to reach a boost clock of 5.10 GHz from a base clock of 3.50 GHz, making it a formidable processor for both multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks. Benchmark results confirm this versatility; the processor achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31727 and a single-core score of 4479, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs.

In multi-threaded workloads, the processor’s scaling is impressive. The 3DMark score progression from 2166 for two threads to 10216 for max threads demonstrates excellent parallelization efficiency, which translates directly to faster rendering times in applications that can utilize all 20 threads. The Geekbench multicore score of 17933 further validates its heavy-lifting capability. For single-thread performance, the Passmark single-thread score of 4118 and Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1881 indicate that the processor can handle legacy applications and lightly-threaded tasks with ease, ensuring snappy responsiveness in everyday use.

The cache hierarchy is substantial, with 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB of L2 cache per core, which helps feed the high core count efficiently. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, offering flexibility in platform configuration. With an unlocked multiplier, it is designed for overclocking, and its 125 W TDP suggests a capable air cooler is required to maintain sustained performance under load. Compared to its nearest rivals, the data shows a near-tie with the Intel Core i5-14490F, which has a deltaPct of -0.1, meaning the 13600KF is essentially equal in performance, while it holds a slight edge over the AMD Ryzen 7 250 and Intel Core Ultra 5 245T by 0.3% and 0.2%, respectively.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the data pack. Consequently, all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components. The data indicates that the RTX 3050 OEM is the primary bottleneck in gaming scenarios, and its performance will dictate the playable settings and resolutions.

Based on the GPU’s benchmark scores, which place it in the 57th percentile, the RTX 3050 OEM is positioned as an entry-level 1080p graphics card. In modern AAA titles, it is anticipated to deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with medium to high settings, but it will not sustain high refresh rates at that resolution. For esports titles, which are less demanding, it should achieve significantly higher frame rates, potentially making use of high-refresh monitors. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle to maintain smooth frame rates in graphically intensive games, requiring reductions to low or medium settings. The FPS figures are estimates only, but the percentile data strongly suggests that the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor in gaming, as its performance is far above what the GPU can utilize.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmark data reveals a system with a significant imbalance. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 38103, placing it in the 86th percentile. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14490F (avgScore 38149, deltaPct -0.1) and the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (avgScore 38221, deltaPct -0.3), showing that the 13600KF is competitive with the best in its class. The CPU excels in integer math, scoring 122169 on Passmark, and floating-point math at 90424, indicating strong computational throughput for a wide range of tasks.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 15199, placing it in the 57th percentile. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (avgScore 15171, deltaPct 0.2) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (avgScore 15290, deltaPct -0.6), indicating that the RTX 3050 OEM is competitive with those previous-generation and entry-level cards. However, the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 11857 is only a fraction of the CPU’s multithread score of 37488, highlighting the performance disparity. The combined percentile for this pair is 72, which is heavily weighted by the CPU’s strong performance. The data suggests that in any workload that is not graphics-bound, this system will perform exceptionally well, but in graphics-bound scenarios, the GPU will anchor the system to a lower performance tier.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is well-suited for users whose primary workloads are CPU-intensive and who only need modest graphics capability. The target user is a professional or enthusiast who builds a system for productivity, not for high-end gaming.

Content Creators and Video Editors: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31727 and Geekbench multicore score of 17933 make it highly capable for video encoding and rendering. The GPU, while not powerful, provides hardware acceleration for codecs, making it a viable entry-level workstation for 1080p video editing.
Software Developers: The high single-thread performance, evidenced by the Geekbench single-core score of 2487, is excellent for compilation and code execution. The 20 threads are beneficial for parallel build processes. The Passmark data encryption score of 26957 also indicates strong cryptography performance, useful for security-related development.
Students and Small Business Workstations: For general productivity, office applications, and data analysis, this system is overpowered. The CPU handles spreadsheets, databases, and multitasking with ease, while the GPU provides ample support for dual-monitor setups and general desktop acceleration.
Gamers at 1080p: Gamers who play less demanding titles or are willing to compromise on settings will find this system acceptable. The CPU ensures that there are no frame drops from processor limitations, but the GPU will cap the maximum frame rate.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data is unambiguous in identifying the GPU as the primary bottleneck in this system. The CPU, with an 86th percentile rank, vastly outperforms the GPU, which is in the 57th percentile. This means that in gaming and other graphics-intensive 3D workloads, the RTX 3050 OEM will be at 100% utilization while the i5-13600KF will be largely idle, waiting for the GPU to render frames.

Evidence for this is the lack of measured FPS data and the significant gap in their respective benchmark scores. The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 37488 versus the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 11857 shows a clear discrepancy in raw processing power. The CPU is not the limiting factor in any workload that involves the GPU. Conversely, in purely CPU-bound tasks like data compression (Passmark score 475505) or physics calculations (Passmark score 2226), the GPU is irrelevant, and the CPU will perform at its peak capability. The system is balanced for CPU-centric tasks but unbalanced for gaming, where the GPU will always be the anchor.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is not recommended for high refresh rates in modern titles. The GPU’s 57th percentile performance will likely cap frame rates well below what the CPU can support. In esports titles, the GPU may allow for frame rates above 144 FPS at 1080p with low settings, but it is not a guarantee.
Streaming: The CPU’s 20 threads are a strong asset for software encoding. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31727 suggests that the i5-13600KF can handle the encoding load of a 1080p stream while maintaining gameplay, but the GPU will limit the in-game frame rate to lower values.
Video Editing: This is a strong scenario. The CPU will handle timeline scrubbing, effects, and rendering efficiently. The Geekbench multicore score of 17933 ensures smooth 4K video editing in most non-professional software. The GPU assists with render previews, but the CPU is the workhorse.
3D Rendering: Excellent performance for CPU-based rendering engines. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31727 is a strong indicator of fast render times in software like Blender (Cycles) or V-Ray. The GPU is too weak to be a primary renderer for complex scenes.
Software Development: Excellent performance. The single-core score of 2487 on Geekbench ensures fast code compilation and script execution. The 20 threads allow for rapid parallel builds and running multiple virtual machines or containers.
Student and Office Work: This system is severely overqualified. The Passmark single-thread score of 4118 guarantees instant application loading and fluid multitasking. The GPU is more than enough for document editing, web browsing, and 4K video playback.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is based on the Ampere architecture with a GA106 chip, manufactured on Samsung’s 8 nm process. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The card has 2304 shading units, 72 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with a boost clock of 1755 MHz. It is equipped with 18 RT cores and 72 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS, though its raw compute power for these features is limited.

The GPU’s benchmark scores place it in the 57th percentile, indicating it is a mid-range part relative to its generation. Its Passmark G3D score of 11857 suggests it is suitable for 1080p gaming at medium settings. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 57103 and OpenCL score of 60740 indicate it can handle compute tasks, but it is not designed for heavy 3D rendering or machine learning workloads. The FP32 performance of 8.087 TFLOPS is a modest figure, and the pixel rate of 56.16 GPixel/s and texture rate of 126.4 GTexel/s are consistent with its entry-level positioning. The data shows that while it has the features of a modern GPU, its performance is anchored to the lower end of the spectrum, making it a suitable companion for a powerful CPU only in non-gaming contexts.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 72, which is heavily influenced by the CPU’s high performance.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13600KF compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14490F?

A: The i5-13600KF has an average benchmark score of 38103, which is 0.1% lower than the Intel Core i5-14490F’s score of 38149, indicating they are statistically tied in performance.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile relative to all GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is in the 57th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15199.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU the limiting factor for gaming performance?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU’s 86th percentile rank vastly outperforms the GPU’s 57th percentile rank, meaning the RTX 3050 OEM will cap frame rates in most gaming scenarios.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the RTX 3050 OEM have?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s, provided by 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600KF supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and the suggested PSU for the GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 130 W. The suggested PSU for the graphics card is 300 W.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built on the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering a flexible upgrade path for memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the primary graphics slot, ensuring future graphics cards will not be bandwidth-limited. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slot.

The system has a clear upgrade path in the graphics department. The CPU’s high performance means it can easily support a more powerful GPU without bottlenecking. A future upgrade to a higher-tier graphics card would be the most logical step to improve gaming and rendering performance. The suggested PSU of 300 W for the current GPU indicates that the system has significant headroom for a more power-hungry graphics card, provided the user’s power supply unit has the necessary connectors and wattage capacity. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier also allows for overclocking to extend its lifespan, and its 125 W TDP suggests that with a good cooler, there is thermal headroom to do so. The next sensible upgrade is to replace the GPU, as the CPU is well-positioned to handle any graphics card currently available without becoming a bottleneck.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600KF

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds