SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600KF

38,103 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9060

16,014 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600KF and AMD Radeon RX 9060 form a desktop pairing that sits in the upper-midrange of the benchmark database, with a combined percentile of 73. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake part with a 3.50 GHz base clock and 5.10 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is an RDNA 4.0 part built on the Navi 44 chip. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the individual benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600KF is a Raptor Lake-S desktop processor built on Intel's 10 nm process node, with a die size of 257 mm². It packs 14 cores and 20 threads, a configuration that splits between performance and efficiency cores, and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus. The chip carries a 125 W TDP and an unlocked multiplier, making it a candidate for overclocking on Intel Socket 1700 motherboards. Cache is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU also supports ECC memory and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark data shows a processor that scales strongly with thread count. In 3DMark tests, the chip scores 1,084 in single-thread, 2,166 in 2-thread, 4,282 in 4-thread, 7,074 in 8-thread, 9,404 in 16-thread, and 10,216 in max-thread runs. The progression from 8-thread to 16-thread shows a gain of roughly 33%, while moving from 16-thread to max-thread adds only about 8.6%, indicating that the 20-thread configuration is near its practical limit in this workload. Cinebench results reinforce the multi-core strength: R15 multicore hits 3,198, R20 multicore reaches 13,325, and R23 multicore lands at 31,727. Single-core Cinebench scores are 451 (R15), 1,881 (R20), and 4,479 (R23). Geekbench shows 17,933 multi-core and 2,487 single-core.

PassMark results add color on specialized workloads. Integer math scores 122,169, floating-point math hits 90,424, and extended instructions reach 28,865. Data compression scores 475,505, while data encryption is much lower at 26,957. Random string sorting hits 50,851, and finding prime numbers scores just 152 — a weak spot relative to other integer tasks. The multithread score is 37,488, and single-thread is 4,118. The CPU's average benchmark score is 38,103, placing it in the 86th percentile against all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i5-14490F is 0.1% ahead, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T is 0.2% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen 7 250 is 0.3% ahead, while the Intel Core i5-13600HX trails by 0.4%. This means the 13600KF is essentially at parity with a handful of modern midrange parts, and any real-world difference would likely be noise.

For real workloads, the data suggests a processor that excels in heavily threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where the 20 threads and 24 MB of L3 cache can be fully utilized. The single-thread score of 4,479 in Cinebench R23 indicates strong per-core performance for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications. The 86th percentile ranking places it above the majority of all CPUs in the database, but the narrow deltas to rivals mean it is not a standout in its immediate class.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 17,631 and its 59th percentile ranking among all GPUs suggest a midrange graphics card that should handle 1080p and 1440p gaming well, but with limitations at higher resolutions or with demanding settings.

The CPU's single-thread performance, evidenced by a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,084 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4,118, is sufficient to feed most midrange GPUs without creating a significant CPU bottleneck. The 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for background tasks during gaming, such as streaming or voice chat. In multi-threaded gaming workloads, the 3DMark 8-thread score of 7,074 indicates the CPU can handle modern game engines that utilize multiple cores.

For esports titles at 1080p, the combination of the CPU's strong single-thread score and the GPU's 21.43 TFLOPS of FP32 compute should deliver high frame rates, likely in the range that exceeds 144 Hz on competitive settings. For AAA titles at 1440p, the GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth become more critical; the 128-bit bus width is narrow by modern standards, and 8 GB of VRAM may be a limiting factor for texture-heavy games at maximum settings. At 4K, the GPU's 59th percentile ranking suggests it would struggle to maintain high frame rates in demanding titles, and the 8 GB VRAM capacity could be a hard constraint.

The GPU's ray tracing hardware includes 28 RT cores, but the architecture is RDNA 4.0, which is generally less performant in ray-traced workloads than competing NVIDIA parts. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 API compatibility mean the card is feature-complete for modern titles, but the benchmark scores do not suggest ray tracing at high settings is a strength. Frame estimates should be treated as directional, not precise, given the absence of measured data.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 38,103, placing it in the 86th percentile against all CPUs. This is a strong showing, with the nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14490F, only 0.1% ahead at 38,149. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 is 0.3% ahead at 38,221, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T is 0.2% ahead at 38,194. The Intel Core i5-13600HX trails by 0.4% at 38,261. These deltas are negligible, meaning the 13600KF is effectively tied with its closest competitors in aggregate performance.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 16,014, which places it in the 59th percentile against all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which is 0.7% ahead at 16,129. The AMD Radeon R9 370X is 1% behind at 15,862, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 is 1% behind at 15,852, and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 is 2.1% behind at 15,679. The GPU's individual benchmark scores show a mixed picture: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 scores 3,322, Geekbench OpenCL hits 88,183, and Geekbench Vulkan reaches 39,476. PassMark results are more varied, with G3D at 17,631, G2D at 1,002, and GPU compute at 9,919. DirectX-specific PassMark scores are notably low: DirectX 10 at 104, DirectX 11 at 182, DirectX 12 at 44, and DirectX 9 at 280.

The combined picture is a CPU that is far stronger relative to its peers than the GPU. The CPU sits in the 86th percentile, while the GPU sits in the 59th percentile, a gap of 27 points. The combined percentile of 73 reflects this imbalance, indicating that the system's overall performance is dragged down by the GPU relative to the CPU's capabilities. The CPU's average score is roughly 2.4 times the GPU's average score in absolute terms, though these are not directly comparable across different benchmark suites.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 59th percentile suggests the GPU is the limiting component in most workloads, particularly in gaming and graphics-intensive tasks. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,727 and PassMark multithread score of 37,488 indicate it has substantial compute headroom that the GPU cannot fully utilize in frame rendering.

In gaming, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are likely the primary constraints. The CPU's single-thread performance is strong enough to drive the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU's 59th percentile ranking means it will cap frame rates below what the CPU could theoretically support. The FPS scaling from the benchmark scores suggests that at 1080p, the GPU may be the bottleneck in demanding titles, while at lower resolutions or in esports, the CPU's single-thread advantage becomes more relevant.

In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the CPU is clearly the dominant component. The 20 threads and 24 MB of L3 cache allow it to outperform the GPU's contribution by a wide margin in these tasks. The GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 9,919 is respectable but far below the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 37,488, indicating that for non-graphics compute, the CPU is the primary workhorse.

The combined percentile of 73 reflects this imbalance: the system is better suited for CPU-heavy tasks than GPU-heavy tasks. The 27-point gap between the CPU's 86th percentile and the GPU's 59th percentile is a clear indicator that the GPU is the bottleneck in graphics workloads, and upgrading the GPU would yield a larger performance gain than upgrading the CPU in most scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p with competitive settings, the CPU's strong single-thread score of 1,084 in 3DMark and 4,118 in PassMark should support high frame rates, but the GPU's 59th percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM limit the ceiling. Estimated frame rates in esports titles should exceed 144 Hz, while AAA titles may hover near 60-100 FPS depending on settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,727 suggesting it can handle simultaneous game rendering and video encoding. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM may be a constraint if streaming software uses GPU memory, but the CPU can offload encoding tasks effectively.

Video editing: The CPU excels here, with PassMark data compression scoring 475,505 and floating-point math at 90,424. The 14 cores and 20 threads should handle 4K timeline scrubbing and export efficiently, though the GPU's 8 GB VRAM may limit effects-heavy workflows that rely on GPU acceleration.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,727 places it in the upper echelon for CPU-based rendering, and the GPU's 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 compute can accelerate GPU-based renderers. The 28 RT cores provide some ray-traced rendering capability, but the 8 GB VRAM may be insufficient for large scenes.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 122,169 and multithread score of 37,488 indicate strong compile performance. The 24 MB of L3 cache helps with repeated builds, and the 20 threads allow for parallel compilation across many source files.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance and the GPU's G2D score of 1,002 handle everyday tasks with ease. The 86th percentile CPU ranking means the system is overkill for basic productivity, but the GPU's 59th percentile is adequate for spreadsheet, document, and web workloads. The system's power consumption, with a 125 W CPU TDP and 132 W GPU TDP, is reasonable for a desktop workstation.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. Gamers at 1080p with midrange expectations will find the system capable, but those seeking 1440p or 4K high-refresh gaming should look for a stronger GPU. Content creators who work primarily in CPU-bound tasks like video editing, software development, and 3D modeling will benefit from the 86th percentile CPU, while the 59th percentile GPU handles acceleration tasks adequately. Students and small business workstations will find the system more than sufficient for their needs, though the power draw and desktop form factor are not optimized for portability. The system is a reasonable choice for a desktop workstation where the GPU can be upgraded later, as the CPU's 86th percentile provides long-term headroom for more powerful graphics cards.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is built on RDNA 4.0 architecture using Navi 44 silicon, manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process node. The chip contains 29,700 million transistors across a 199 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 149.2M per mm². The GPU features 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, along with 28 ray tracing cores. Clock speeds are a base of 1700 MHz, a game clock of 2400 MHz, and a boost clock of 2990 MHz. Memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, running at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, producing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Compute performance is rated at 21.43 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio). Pixel fill rate is 191.4 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate is 334.9 GTexel/s. The card has a 132 W TDP, requires a 300 W suggested power supply, and uses a single 8-pin power connector. It occupies a dual-slot form factor and connects via PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1b and two DisplayPort 2.1a. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark scores show a midrange performer. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3,322, Geekbench OpenCL is 88,183, and Geekbench Vulkan is 39,476. PassMark G3D is 17,631, G2D is 1,002, and GPU compute is 9,919. The average benchmark score is 16,014, placing the GPU in the 59th percentile. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, is 0.7% ahead. In rendering workloads, the 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are the primary constraints, limiting texture detail and resolution. The 28 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the overall performance suggests it is not a leading ray tracing part. The 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 compute is adequate for GPU-accelerated rendering in applications that support it, but the 8 GB memory capacity will cap scene complexity.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i5-13600KF with the AMD Radeon RX 9060. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake part with a 5.10 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is an RDNA 4.0 part with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile is 73, placing the system above the majority of all builds in the database. The CPU's 86th percentile is the stronger component, while the GPU's 59th percentile is the weaker link. This pairing is best described as a CPU-heavy midrange system, suitable for users who need strong multi-core processing but do not require top-tier graphics performance. The 125 W CPU TDP and 132 W GPU TDP suggest a system that is power-efficient relative to high-end desktops, and the dual-slot GPU with a single 8-pin connector keeps installation simple.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 73, indicating the system performs better than 73% of all builds in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14490F?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600KF has an average benchmark score of 38,103, which is 0.1% lower than the Intel Core i5-14490F's score of 38,149.

Q: How much VRAM does the AMD Radeon RX 9060 have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, producing a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600KF scores 31,727 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, with a single-core score of 4,479.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 has 28 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing features.

Q: What is the GPU's PassMark G3D score and percentile ranking?

A: The GPU scores 17,631 in PassMark G3D, placing it in the 59th percentile against all GPUs.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates from benchmark scores.