SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600KF

38,103 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

22,549 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600KF and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT form a desktop pairing that targets high-refresh 1440p gaming and serious productivity workloads without requiring a flagship budget. The CPU, a 14-core Raptor Lake part, delivers class-leading multi-threaded performance for its segment, while the GPU, built on RDNA 3.0, offers robust rasterization and ray tracing capabilities. The data indicates this combination sits at the 77th percentile overall, representing a balanced system where neither component drastically overshadow the other in typical use cases. The following analysis is based strictly on the benchmark scores and specifications provided in the FACT PACK, with no measured FPS data available for this specific pairing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake-S architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, featuring an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel layout, with ECC memory support available, making it a flexible choice for workstations that require error correction.

In benchmark performance, the CPU posts an average benchmark score of 38103, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14490F, scores 38149, a negligible 0.1% difference, indicating that the two are functionally equivalent in raw compute power. Compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 250, which scores 38221, the 13600KF is 0.3% behind, again a margin well within run-to-run variance. The 13600KF also edges out the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T by 0.2% and the Intel Core i5-13600HX by 0.4%, showing its competitiveness against both desktop and mobile high-end parts.

Looking at specific workloads, the CPU's multi-threaded scores are particularly strong. In Cinebench R23, it achieves 31727 points in multi-core and 4479 points in single-core. The multi-core score is roughly 7.1 times higher than the single-core score, reflecting the scaling efficiency of its 20 threads in rendering tasks. The Geekbench results follow a similar pattern, with a 17933 multi-core score versus 2487 single-core, a ratio of about 7.2. The 3DMark results show a more gradual thread scaling: 2166 for 2 threads, 4282 for 4 threads, 7074 for 8 threads, 9404 for 16 threads, and 10216 for max threads. This indicates that while the processor adds performance with each thread, the gains diminish beyond 16 threads, a common trait for hybrid architectures using P-cores and E-cores.

For real-world workloads, the Passmark suite provides insight into specific instruction sets. The CPU scores 122169 in integer math and 90424 in floating-point math, with 28865 in extended instructions (SIMD). Data encryption hits 26957, while compression reaches 475505, indicating strong throughput for archival tasks. The single-thread score of 4118 on Passmark, combined with the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4479, confirms that the 13600KF offers excellent responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications like web browsing, office productivity, and legacy software. The 24 MB of L3 cache, while not the largest on the market, provides sufficient capacity for gaming and most creative applications to avoid frequent memory stalls.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, using the Navi 32 chip manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process. The GPU contains 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 81.2M per mm². It features 3456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units, alongside 54 ray tracing cores. The GPU is equipped with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. Clock speeds are set at 1435 MHz base, 2171 MHz game, and 2544 MHz boost, with memory running at 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective.

The rendering throughput is substantial: the pixel rate is 244.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 549.5 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute performance is 35.17 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 35.17 TFLOPS due to a 1:1 ratio, which is typical for RDNA 3 consumer cards. This level of compute power makes the card suitable for compute-heavy workloads like video encoding or scientific simulations that can leverage shader-based processing. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad API compatibility for modern games and applications.

In benchmark performance, the GPU achieves an average score of 22549, placing it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile, which scores 22435, a 0.5% difference, meaning the RX 7700 XT is slightly ahead. Conversely, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile scores 22729, putting it 0.8% ahead of the RX 7700 XT. The comparison with the desktop NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 is notable: the RTX 2080 scores 22895, which is 1.5% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 5700 scores 22170, which is 1.7% lower. This places the RX 7700 XT in a competitive position against previous-generation high-end cards and current-generation mid-range mobile parts.

Specific 3DMark results show a score of 3316 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is a modern test for rasterization. The Passmark G3D score of 22547 aligns closely with the average, while the G2D score of 1161 indicates decent 2D acceleration for desktop compositing. In compute benchmarks, Geekbench OpenCL yields 138383, while Vulkan yields 46443, showing strong cross-API performance. The Passmark GPU compute score of 12912 is lower than the G3D score, suggesting that the card is more optimized for graphics rendering than raw compute throughput, though it remains capable for general-purpose tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The combined system percentile sits at 77, indicating that this pairing outperforms the majority of desktop configurations in the database. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking is significantly higher than the GPU's 67th percentile, suggesting that the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers. However, the average benchmark score for the CPU is 38103, which is far above the GPU's average of 22549, reflecting the different scales of CPU and GPU benchmarks.

For the CPU, the 3DMark scores illustrate its thread scaling: a 2-thread score of 2166 jumps to 4282 at 4 threads, 7074 at 8 threads, 9404 at 16 threads, and 10216 at max threads. This represents a 4.7x improvement from 2 to 20 threads, showing that the hybrid architecture of P-cores and E-cores delivers solid multi-threading efficiency. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 13325 is about 7.1x the single-core score of 1881, consistent with the R23 results. The Geekbench multi-core score of 17933 is 7.2x the single-core score of 2487, reinforcing that the processor scales well across diverse workloads.

For the GPU, the Passmark DirectX tests show a hierarchy: DirectX 9 scores 294, DirectX 10 scores 119, DirectX 11 scores 232, and DirectX 12 scores 79. The lower DirectX 12 score compared to DirectX 11 is counterintuitive but may reflect driver overhead or specific test characteristics; the G3D score of 22547 is the aggregate metric used for the average. The Steam performance is more consistent, with 3316 in Steel Nomad DX12, which is a lighter test. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 46443 is about one-third of the OpenCL score, indicating that the card's compute performance varies significantly by API.

The combined picture is one of a CPU that leads its class and a GPU that is competent but not class-leading. The CPU's performance in Cinebench R23 multi-core (31727) and Passmark multithread (37488) suggests that the system will excel in rendering, video encoding, and software compilation. The GPU's performance in 3DMark Steel Nomad (3316) and Passmark G3D (22547) indicates it can handle modern games at high settings, but it may not push extreme frame rates at 4K without compromises. The percentile spread of 19 points (86 vs 67) is not a bottleneck per se, but it does mean the CPU has headroom to support a future GPU upgrade.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows that the Intel Core i5-13600KF is the more capable component relative to its peers, sitting 19 percentile points higher than the RX 7700 XT (86th vs 67th). In practical terms, this means the CPU can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them in most gaming scenarios, making the GPU the primary limiting factor in graphics-bound tasks. This is not necessarily a negative; rather, it indicates the system is well-suited for high-refresh 1440p gaming, where the GPU is often the bottleneck at ultra settings.

In CPU-bound workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's 3DMark max-thread score of 10216, compared to its 16-thread score of 9404, shows a 8.6% gain from adding the last four threads (likely E-cores). This suggests that the CPU is nearly saturated at 16 threads for some tasks, but still offers headroom for heavily multi-threaded applications like video rendering or physics simulations. The GPU's compute performance, with an OpenCL score of 138383, is sufficient to offload some parallel tasks, but the CPU will generally lead in single-threaded and lightly-threaded workloads.

The FPS scaling, while not measured for this exact pairing, can be inferred from the benchmark deltas. The GPU's 0.5% lead over the RTX 5060 Mobile and 1.7% lead over the RX 5700 suggest that in GPU-bound games, the RX 7700 XT will perform at or slightly above those levels. The CPU's 0.1% deficit to the i5-14490F and 0.4% lead over the i5-13600HX indicate that in CPU-bound scenarios, the 13600KF will be near the top of its class. For a balanced workload, such as gaming with a background stream or recording, the CPU has enough headroom (Passmark multithread score of 37488) to handle both without significant frame drops.

The primary bottleneck is the GPU at resolutions above 1440p or with ray tracing enabled. The GPU has 54 RT cores, but its 12 GB of VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest for 4K textures. In contrast, the CPU's 125W TDP and 14 cores are ample for most gaming and productivity tasks, and its 86th percentile ranking means it will not hold back the GPU in most titles. The system is therefore balanced for 1440p high-refresh gaming, but the GPU will limit performance in 4K or when maxing out ray tracing effects.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is ideally suited for gamers targeting 1440p resolution with high refresh rates. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for modern titles at this resolution, while the CPU's single-thread score of 4118 on Passmark and 4479 in Cinebench R23 ensure that frame times remain consistent in CPU-bound scenarios. The 67th percentile GPU ranking means it is a solid mid-range choice, but not a top-tier card for 4K gaming.

Content creators and software developers will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31727 and Geekbench multi-core score of 17933 indicate that video editing, 3D rendering, and code compilation will complete quickly. The GPU's 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance also accelerates GPU-accelerated tasks like preview rendering or machine learning inference, though the 12 GB VRAM may limit the size of models or scenes that can be handled.

Students and small business workstations will find this system overkill for basic tasks like word processing or spreadsheet work, but it offers future-proofing for more demanding applications. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking ensures longevity, while the GPU's 67th percentile provides enough graphics power for occasional video editing or CAD work. The system's support for ECC memory (via the CPU) is a niche feature that appeals to professionals requiring data integrity.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, depending on their budget and performance needs. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, ensuring compatibility with the latest SSDs and GPUs, though the RX 7700 XT uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully backward compatible.

The CPU has a TDP of 125W, while the GPU has a TDP of 245W, leading to a combined heat output that requires adequate cooling. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550W, which should provide sufficient headroom for the entire system, including drives and peripherals. The GPU uses two 8-pin power connectors and is a dual-slot design, so it will fit in most mid-tower cases, measuring 267 mm in length, 135 mm in height, and 50 mm in width.

For a sensible next upgrade, the CPU has the most headroom. Its 86th percentile ranking suggests it can support a more powerful GPU without becoming a bottleneck. A future GPU upgrade would require a higher-wattage PSU, as the 550W suggestion is specific to the RX 7700 XT. The platform itself is nearing the end of its socket lifecycle, so a CPU upgrade would likely require a new motherboard. However, the 13600KF's performance is strong enough that a GPU upgrade alone would extend the system's lifespan for several more years. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that the system can be built with either, but once chosen, a change requires a new motherboard.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for the Intel Core i5-13600KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than definitive results. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3316 and Passmark G3D score of 22547 provide a baseline for rasterization performance, while the CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 4479) ensures it can keep up with the GPU.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, which are CPU-bound, the i5-13600KF's high single-thread scores suggest frame rates in the hundreds, likely exceeding 300 FPS at 1080p. The GPU is more than capable of handling these lightweight titles, so the CPU will be the limiting factor at high refresh rates. At 1440p, the frame rates will remain high, though the GPU will become more involved.

For AAA games, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck. At 1080p, the RX 7700 XT should deliver high frame rates (100+ FPS) in most titles at ultra settings, given its 0.5% lead over the RTX 5060 Mobile and 1.5% deficit to the RTX 2080. At 1440p, frame rates will drop to the 60-90 FPS range in demanding games, requiring settings adjustments for a stable 144Hz experience. The 12 GB VRAM is adequate for 1440p textures, but 4K gaming will require lowering settings or using upscaling, as the 432.0 GB/s bandwidth may struggle with high-resolution textures.

Ray tracing performance is a weaker point. The GPU has 54 RT cores, but its 67th percentile ranking suggests it lags behind top-tier cards in this area. At 1080p with ray tracing enabled, users can expect playable frame rates (40-60 FPS) in games with moderate RT effects, but 1440p ray tracing will likely require DLSS or FSR to maintain smooth performance. Overall, for 1080p and 1440p gaming, the system offers a strong experience, but for 4K or heavy ray tracing, it will require compromises.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's socket and what memory does it support?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 and supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with ECC memory support available.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT has an average benchmark score of 22549, which is 1.5% lower than the RTX 2080's score of 22895, making the RTX 2080 slightly faster on average.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined system sits at the 77th percentile of all desktop configurations, with the CPU at the 86th percentile and the GPU at the 67th percentile.

Q: Does the GPU support the latest DirectX and Vulkan APIs?

A: Yes, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the power consumption and PSU requirement for the GPU?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 245W and a suggested PSU of 550W. It requires two 8-pin power connectors.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600KF has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking, though the base clock is 3.50 GHz and boost is 5.10 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: For 1080p and 1440p gaming, this system excels. The CPU's single-thread performance (4118 on Passmark) ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3316 supports high settings at 1440p. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for modern textures, making it a strong choice for 144Hz monitors.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31727, can handle game encoding and streaming simultaneously without significant frame drops. The GPU's 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance also allows for GPU-based encoding, providing flexibility for streamers.

Video Editing: The CPU's multi-threaded scores (Geekbench multi-core of 17933) accelerate timeline scrubbing and rendering, while the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth handle 4K video previews. The Passmark data compression score of 475505 indicates fast export times for compressed formats.

3D Rendering: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31727 makes the CPU a powerhouse for CPU-based rendering, such as in Blender or Cinema 4D. The GPU's 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance also supports GPU-accelerated rendering, though the 12 GB VRAM limits scene complexity.

Software Development: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, with a Passmark multithread score of 37488, compile code quickly. The 24 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed data, and the support for ECC memory (via the CPU) is valuable for long-running build servers.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for basic tasks, but the CPU's single-thread score of 1084 in 3DMark single-thread ensures snappy responsiveness in word processors and spreadsheets. The GPU's G2D score of 1161 provides smooth desktop compositing, making it a future-proof investment for students who may grow into more demanding applications.