SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600KF

38,103 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13600KF + AMD Radeon RX 7700: Desktop Benchmark Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 14-core Raptor Lake desktop processor with AMD's RDNA 3.0-based Radeon RX 7700 graphics card, producing a desktop system that sits at the 72nd combined percentile across all CPU+GPU pairings in the database. The CPU alone ranks in the 86th percentile against all processors, while the GPU holds the 58th percentile against all graphics cards, indicating a CPU-heavy balance where the processor delivers substantially more compute capability relative to the broader market than the graphics component does. This analysis relies exclusively on synthetic benchmark data, as no measured frame-rate results exist for this exact combination.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which anchors this build to the 13th generation Raptor Lake architecture. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in choosing between established DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits depending on platform preferences. The socket also provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 16 lanes available from the CPU itself, enabling high-bandwidth expansion for modern storage devices and add-in cards that can exploit the newer PCIe standard.

The CPU's 125 W TDP represents the thermal design power envelope, while the Radeon RX 7700 carries a 200 W TDP rating. The combined thermal requirements suggest a power supply in the range of the GPU's suggested 550 W unit to comfortably handle both components under sustained loads. The GPU draws power through dual 8-pin connectors, which is a common configuration for mid-range graphics cards and compatible with most quality power supplies in that wattage class.

The platform supports ECC memory, a feature that adds reliability for workstation-type workloads where data integrity is paramount. The CPU is multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking headroom exists for users who want to extract additional performance beyond stock settings, though the benchmark data reflects stock operation. For a sensible next upgrade path within this platform, users could consider moving to a higher-core-count Raptor Lake processor on the same socket, as the motherboard and cooling infrastructure would carry over. The GPU upgrade path is more open-ended, with the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface on the Radeon RX 7700 being broadly compatible with newer graphics cards, though the overall system balance would shift toward GPU-bound performance with a more powerful card.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers strong multi-threaded results across several benchmark suites, with a 3DMark max-threads score of 10,216 and a 16-thread score of 9,404. Single-thread performance is equally notable, with 3DMark single-thread at 1,084 and 2-thread at 2,166. Cinebench results reinforce this picture: R23 multi-core reaches 31,727 while single-core hits 4,479, and R20 shows 13,325 multi-core with 1,881 single-core. Geekbench reports 17,933 multi-core and 2,487 single-core, while PassMark multi-thread lands at 37,488 with single-thread at 4,118.

The GPU's benchmark profile shows a PassMark G3D score of 20,974, placing it in the 58th percentile against all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields 2,865, while Geekbench OpenCL reaches 106,028. PassMark compute performance is 10,963, and legacy DirectX tests show 261 for DirectX 9, 186 for DirectX 11, and 96 for DirectX 12, with DirectX 10 at 92. The 2D score is 1,206.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU outperforms the GPU in relative market position by a substantial margin—86th versus 58th percentile. The CPU's average benchmark score of 38,103 sits nearly even with its closest rivals, including the Intel Core i5-14490F at 38,149 (0.1% faster), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T at 38,194 (0.2% faster), and the AMD Ryzen 7 250 at 38,221 (0.3% faster). The GPU's average score of 15,852 is similarly close to its nearest competitors, with the AMD Radeon R9 370X at 15,862 (0.1% faster), the AMD Radeon RX 9060 at 16,014 (1% faster), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti at 16,129 (1.7% faster). This near-parity with direct rivals means small workload differences will determine which component edges ahead in real applications.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600KF packs 14 cores and 20 threads, combining performance and efficiency cores in a hybrid arrangement typical of Raptor Lake architecture. The base clock runs at 3.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, providing a wide frequency range that scales with workload demands. The processor is built on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm², manufactured by Intel itself. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache, which supports the high-bandwidth needs of multi-threaded applications.

The benchmark scores translate to real-world capability in specific ways. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,727 indicates strong sustained rendering performance for content creation tasks, while the single-core score of 4,479 shows excellent responsiveness for lightly-threaded workloads like web browsing and office applications. The PassMark integer math score of 122,169 and floating-point math score of 90,424 demonstrate robust arithmetic throughput, useful for scientific computing and financial modeling. Data compression at 475,505 and encryption at 26,957 further round out the processing profile, with extended instructions scoring 28,865.

The 3DMark thread-scaling results tell a clear story: performance scales from 1,084 single-thread to 4,282 at 4 threads, 7,074 at 8 threads, 9,404 at 16 threads, and 10,216 at max threads. This scaling pattern shows diminishing returns beyond 16 threads, which is typical for hybrid architectures where efficiency cores contribute less per-thread performance than performance cores. The 20-thread count means heavily parallel workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering can exploit the full thread pool, but the incremental gain from 16 to 20 threads is modest at roughly 8.6%.

The CPU sits in the 86th percentile against all CPUs, placing it well above the median processor and within striking distance of the top-tier consumer chips. Its average benchmark score of 38,103 is effectively tied with the nearest rivals, all within 0.4% of each other, meaning the i5-13600KF offers comparable performance to newer Intel and AMD offerings in this segment. The 2022 release date means this is a mature platform with established BIOS support and broad software compatibility.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need strong CPU performance for productivity workloads while maintaining respectable gaming capability. The 86th percentile CPU ranking makes it well-suited for content creators who run multi-threaded applications like video editors, 3D renderers, and software compilation tasks, where the 14-core/20-thread configuration provides substantial parallel throughput. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,727 supports this use case, as does the PassMark multi-thread score of 37,488.

For gamers at 1080p and 1440p resolutions, the combination of a high-performing CPU and a mid-range GPU provides a balanced experience, though the GPU's 58th percentile ranking means it will likely be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive titles. The CPU's single-thread performance, evidenced by the 4,479 R23 single-core score, ensures that game logic and physics calculations run smoothly without bottlenecking the frame output.

Software developers benefit from the CPU's 20 threads and strong integer performance of 122,169, which accelerates code compilation and testing. Students and small business users running office suites, spreadsheets, and database applications will find the single-thread performance more than adequate, with the 2,487 Geekbench single-core score indicating snappy application responsiveness. The ECC memory support adds appeal for users who require data reliability in workstation scenarios, though this feature requires a compatible motherboard and ECC memory modules.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The system sits at the 72nd combined percentile across all CPU+GPU pairings in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14490F?

A: The i5-13600KF scores an average of 38,103, which is 0.1% lower than the i5-14490F's 38,149 average score.

Q: What memory types does this platform support?

A: The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking against all other graphics cards?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 sits in the 58th percentile against all GPUs.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600KF supports ECC memory, which is useful for data-critical workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Radeon RX 7700 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 624.1 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?

A: The RX 7700 scores an average of 15,852, which is 1.7% lower than the RTX 3060 Ti's 16,129 average score.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (4,479 in Cinebench R23 single-core) keeps frame pacing smooth, while the GPU's 58th percentile ranking delivers playable frame rates in most titles, though enthusiasts seeking maximum refresh rates may need to lower settings. The PassMark G3D score of 20,974 indicates mid-range rasterization capability that pairs well with the CPU's 86th percentile processing power.

Streaming: The 20-thread CPU provides ample headroom for encoding streams while gaming, with the multi-thread score of 37,488 in PassMark suggesting the processor can handle simultaneous game rendering and stream encoding without severe frame drops, though the GPU lacks dedicated hardware encoding claims in the data.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,727 indicates strong rendering performance for export tasks, while the 16 GB GPU memory and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth support handling large video timelines and effects-heavy projects in GPU-accelerated editors.

3D rendering: The CPU's high multi-thread scores across Cinebench and PassMark suites make it well-suited for CPU-based rendering engines, while the GPU's 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 compute and PassMark GPU compute score of 10,963 provide respectable GPU-accelerated rendering throughput for mid-range workloads.

Software development: The 14-core/20-thread configuration with 122,169 integer math score accelerates code compilation and testing, while the single-thread performance ensures responsive IDE interactions and quick build configuration parsing.

Student and office work: The single-thread scores (2,487 Geekbench, 4,118 PassMark) handle document processing, spreadsheet calculations, and web browsing with ease, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running academic simulations or database work.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than empirical measurements. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking and the GPU's 58th percentile ranking suggest that gaming performance will be primarily limited by the graphics card in most scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions.

At 1080p ultra settings, the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 20,974 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,865 indicate the card can handle modern titles at playable frame rates, though esports titles may exceed 144 FPS while demanding AAA games may fall below 60 FPS in the most graphics-heavy scenes. The CPU's single-thread performance ensures that even at lower resolutions where CPU load is higher, the processor will not become the bottleneck.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes more constrained, with estimated frame rates dropping further below the 1080p figures as pixel count increases. The 16 GB VRAM capacity is ample for current game textures and future-proofing, while the 624.1 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution texture streaming without excessive stutter. Users seeking higher frame rates at 1440p should consider reducing graphics settings from ultra to high or medium, which the GPU's architecture can accommodate given its DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 API compatibility.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i5-13600KF with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 to create a system that sits in the 72nd combined percentile of all CPU+GPU pairings. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake processor on Intel Socket 1700 with a 125 W TDP, while the GPU is a 16 GB RDNA 3.0 card with a 200 W TDP. The combined percentile places this system above the majority of configurations in the database, though the significant gap between CPU (86th percentile) and GPU (58th percentile) rankings defines its character.

The system class is desktop, meaning it is designed for stationary use with standard expansion capabilities. The CPU's average benchmark score of 38,103 and the GPU's average score of 15,852 together produce a weighted combination that yields the 72nd percentile overall, reflecting the CPU's stronger market position. This is a configuration where the processor provides headroom for future GPU upgrades, while the current graphics card handles mainstream gaming and compute tasks at respectable levels.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data clearly shows an unbalanced pairing where the CPU significantly outperforms the GPU in relative market position. The CPU's 86th percentile versus the GPU's 58th percentile indicates that in CPU-bound workloads—such as rendering, compilation, and multi-threaded productivity—the processor will dominate performance, while in GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolution and graphics rendering, the graphics card will be the limiting factor.

The FPS scaling picture, though not measured directly, can be inferred from the benchmark scores. At 1080p, where CPU load is higher relative to GPU load, the system may approach CPU-bound behavior in lighter games, allowing the GPU to work closer to its full potential. At 1440p and above, the GPU's 58th percentile ranking becomes the primary constraint, and frame rates will scale roughly with the GPU's performance tier relative to other cards.

The near-parity of the GPU with its nearest rivals—including the 0.1% difference from the R9 370X and 1.7% gap to the RTX 3060 Ti—means that the GPU's bottleneck position is well-established within its performance class. The CPU, conversely, has headroom to drive more powerful GPUs, as evidenced by its 86th percentile standing and the fact that its nearest rivals are all within 0.4% of its average score, suggesting it performs at the top of its segment. For users prioritizing gaming, a GPU upgrade would yield larger frame rate gains than a CPU upgrade, while content creators would see more benefit from the CPU's already-strong multi-threaded performance.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1900 MHz, a game clock of 2041 MHz, and a boost clock of 2459 MHz, with memory running at 2438 MHz for 19.5 Gbps effective data rate. The 16 GB GDDR6 memory sits on a 256-bit bus, delivering 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantial for a mid-range card and supports high-resolution textures and compute workloads.

The compute configuration includes 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units, along with 40 ray tracing cores. The pixel rate is 236.1 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 393.4 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 25.18 TFLOPS and FP16 at the same 25.18 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering modern graphics APIs. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C, and the card is dual-slot with dimensions of 267 mm length, 135 mm height, and 50 mm width.

The benchmark results place the GPU at 20,974 in PassMark G3D and 10,963 in GPU compute, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,865 and Geekbench OpenCL of 106,028. These scores indicate that the GPU performs in the lower-mid range of the current market, sitting at the 58th percentile. The PassMark DirectX scores show a wide variation—261 for DirectX 9, 186 for DirectX 11, 96 for DirectX 12—which reflects the card's optimization for modern APIs rather than legacy performance. The 1.7% gap to the RTX 3060 Ti and 1% gap to the RX 9060 in average score means the card is competitive with those models, though it trails slightly in overall benchmark averages.

For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth provide ample memory capacity for large scenes and textures, while the 40 ray tracing cores offer hardware-accelerated ray tracing for supported titles. The FP32 throughput of 25.18 TFLOPS supports compute-intensive tasks like physics simulations and machine learning inference, though the absence of dedicated tensor cores means AI workloads rely on general-purpose shader compute. The card's 200 W TDP and suggested 550 W PSU make it power-efficient for its performance class, and its active production status ensures ongoing driver support and availability.