SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600KF

38,103 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

42,723 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13600KF + AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

This desktop pairing combines Intel's 14-core Raptor Lake processor with AMD's RDNA 3.0 graphics card, landing at the 85th percentile among all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU scores in the 86th percentile of all processors, while the GPU sits in the 83rd percentile, making this a balanced upper-midrange build that excels in multi-threaded productivity and high-refresh 1080p gaming. The combination has no measured FPS data in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1084 and 2-thread score of 2166 indicate strong per-core performance for frame pacing in esports titles. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 places it within 1.3% of the RTX 5050 Mobile, suggesting it can drive 1080p high-refresh monitors in competitive shooters. The Radeon RX 7650 GRE's 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth provides adequate headroom for texture-heavy scenes at 1080p, though the 128-bit bus limits extreme resolutions.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads and PassMark multi-thread score of 37488 provide ample parallel resources for encoding while gaming. The 3DMark max-threads score of 10216 indicates the processor can handle simultaneous game rendering and stream encoding without significant frame drops. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which enables modern encoding features, though the data shows no specific encoder specifications.

Video Editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31727 demonstrates serious rendering muscle for timeline scrubbing and export tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 475505 and integer math score of 122169 show strong throughput for codec operations and filter processing. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109 provides hardware acceleration for effects and color grading, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit very large project previews.

3D Rendering: The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 13325 and R15 multi-core score of 3198 confirm the CPU can handle complex scene assembly and physics simulations. The GPU's FP32 performance of 22.08 TFLOPS supports real-time viewport rendering, while the 32 ray accelerators enable hardware ray tracing for preview renders. For final frame output, the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads will be the primary workhorse, with the GPU handling interactive tasks.

Software Development: PassMark integer math score of 122169 and extended instructions score of 28865 indicate rapid code compilation and execution of complex algorithms. The CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 7074 shows balanced multi-core scaling for parallel builds, while the single-thread score of 1084 ensures responsive IDE interaction. The dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support provides flexibility for large in-memory data structures during debugging.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4118 and Geekbench single-core score of 2487 handle everyday productivity applications with minimal latency. The 125 W TDP means modest cooling requirements for compact workstation builds. The GPU's dual-slot design at 204 mm length fits most mid-tower cases, and the 1x HDMI 2.1 plus 3x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs support multi-monitor setups for research and documentation tasks.

FAQ

Q: How does this CPU compare to its closest rival?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600KF has an average benchmark score of 38103, placing it 0.1% behind the Intel Core i5-14490F (38149) and 0.2% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (38194). These deltas are within measurement noise, indicating essentially identical real-world performance.

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier relative to NVIDIA cards?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE scores 42723 on average, sitting 1.2% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (43223) and 1.3% behind the RTX 5050 Mobile (43268). This places it in the upper-midrange tier, competitive with recent NVIDIA offerings.

Q: Can this CPU handle heavy multi-threaded workloads?

A: Yes, the 14-core, 20-thread design achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31727 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 37488. The 3DMark max-threads score of 10216 confirms strong scaling across all available threads.

Q: What memory types are supported?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This provides flexibility for builders to choose between legacy and current-generation memory platforms.

Q: What is the recommended power supply for this build?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 450 W, while the CPU has a 125 W TDP. Combined with the GPU's 170 W TDP, a quality 450 W unit should suffice for typical configurations, though the data shows no specific total system power recommendation.

Q: Does the GPU support modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes, the Radeon RX 7650 GRE supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with all current game engines and graphics frameworks.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance compare to its multi-thread performance?

A: The CPU scores 1084 in 3DMark single-thread and 4118 in PassMark single-thread, showing strong per-core efficiency. Multi-thread scaling is excellent, with the 3DMark 16-thread score of 9404 representing 8.7x the single-thread result.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform with Raptor Lake architecture, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for modern SSDs and expansion cards. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking to push beyond the 5.10 GHz boost clock, though the 125 W TDP should be considered for cooling requirements.

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which provides adequate bandwidth for this GPU class. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus delivers 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth, sufficient for current games at 1080p and 1440p resolutions. The GPU's 170 W TDP with a suggested 450 W PSU leaves room for CPU headroom, though users adding many drives or peripherals should consider a slightly larger unit.

A sensible next upgrade path would focus on the GPU first, as the CPU's 86th percentile ranking leaves headroom for more powerful graphics cards. The 14-core processor can feed substantially faster GPUs without bottlenecking in most scenarios. Alternatively, adding a second monitor or upgrading to a higher refresh display would leverage the existing performance without component changes. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5, so future GPUs using that interface would be compatible, though the current GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 connection is not a limitation for this class of card.

Memory upgrades represent the most straightforward improvement, with dual-channel DDR5 offering higher bandwidth than DDR4 for memory-sensitive workloads. The CPU's 24 MB shared L3 cache and per-core L2 cache provide solid on-die storage, reducing dependency on system memory bandwidth. For storage, the PCIe Gen 5 lanes can accommodate the fastest NVMe SSDs, though PCIe 4.0 drives remain cost-effective alternatives.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 85 places this pairing slightly above the GPU's individual 83rd percentile, indicating the CPU is not the limiting factor in most workloads. The CPU's 86th percentile versus the GPU's 83rd percentile suggests a slight CPU advantage, meaning the GPU will be the first component to reach its limits in graphics-intensive scenarios. In CPU-bound tasks like physics simulation or data compression, the processor's PassMark physics score of 2226 and data compression score of 475505 show it can sustain heavy compute loads.

The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 9404 versus the 2-thread score of 2166 demonstrates excellent multi-core scaling, with 4.3x improvement from 2 to 16 threads. This scaling ensures that games using more than a few cores will see proportional benefits. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2336 indicates its DX12 performance ceiling, and games optimized for RDNA 3.0 architecture will approach this limit more closely than unoptimized titles.

In gaming workloads, the balance shifts by title. Esports and older games that rely on single-thread performance will favor the CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1084, potentially leaving GPU utilization lower. Modern AAA games using multiple cores will engage more of the CPU's 20 threads, with the GPU becoming the bottleneck at higher resolutions. The 8 GB VRAM could limit texture quality at 1440p in memory-intensive titles, while the CPU's 24 MB L3 cache mitigates some memory pressure.

For productivity workloads, the CPU dominates the performance picture. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31727 versus the GPU's OpenCL score of 83109 shows that rendering tasks will scale with CPU cores, while GPU acceleration helps specific filters and effects. Data encryption (PassMark score 26957) and floating-point math (90424) are CPU-bound, meaning the processor will be the primary driver of these workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All frame rate figures below are estimates derived from benchmark scores rather than direct measurement. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 and the CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1084 provide the basis for these projections.

At 1080p with ultra settings, this pairing should deliver high frame rates in competitive titles. The GPU's position within 1.3% of the RTX 5050 Mobile suggests performance comparable to that class of graphics hardware. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (PassMark 4118) ensures that even CPU-bound games will maintain high minimum frame rates. Esports titles like shooters and MOBAs should exceed 144 FPS at 1080p ultra, while demanding AAA games will likely range from 60-100 FPS depending on optimization.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the limiting factor more frequently. The 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus will constrain texture-heavy scenes, with performance dropping to playable but not exceptional levels. The CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 7074 indicates it can keep up with GPU demands at this resolution, but the GPU's 288.0 GB/s bandwidth may cause stuttering in open-world titles with large streaming assets.

At 4K, this pairing would struggle to maintain 60 FPS in most modern games at ultra settings. The GPU's 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 performance is insufficient for 4K ultra in demanding titles, and the 8 GB VRAM would likely exceed capacity. Users targeting 4K should consider this build as entry-level 4K capable only in less demanding or older games, with reduced settings required for playable frame rates.

Who Should Build It

Gamers seeking high-refresh 1080p performance will find this pairing well-suited, with the GPU's 83rd percentile ranking and CPU's strong single-thread scores supporting high frame rates in competitive titles. Players at 1440p can expect solid performance with some settings compromises in the most demanding games. The 8 GB VRAM makes this a 1080p-focused gaming system, with 1440p as a secondary target.

Content creators working with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 20 threads and Cinebench R23 score of 31727. The GPU's OpenCL score of 83109 accelerates preview rendering and effects, while the CPU handles final exports. The dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support allows memory capacity expansion for large project files.

Software developers and data analysts will appreciate the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 122169 and extended instructions score of 28865 for compilation and data processing. The 14 cores provide parallel build capabilities, while the single-thread performance ensures responsive toolchains. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running compute tasks.

Students and small business users building a single workstation for mixed use will find this pairing handles coursework, office applications, and light creative work without compromise. The CPU's 86th percentile ensures longevity for software updates, while the GPU supports modern display outputs for multi-monitor productivity setups. The 125 W CPU TDP and 170 W GPU TDP keep cooling requirements manageable for standard desktop cases.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600KF features 14 cores and 20 threads based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die size. Base clock is 3.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, and the unlocked multiplier allows overclocking. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3 cache.

Benchmark results show strong all-around performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31727 and R20 score of 13325 demonstrate excellent rendering throughput, while the R15 single-core score of 451 and R23 single-core score of 4479 confirm competitive per-thread performance. The Geekbench multi-core score of 17933 and single-core score of 2487 align with expectations for a 14-core Raptor Lake processor.

The 3DMark results reveal scaling characteristics: single-thread 1084, 2-thread 2166, 4-thread 4282, 8-thread 7074, 16-thread 9404, and max-threads 10216. This progression shows near-linear scaling up to 8 threads, with diminishing returns beyond 16 threads. The PassMark suite shows data compression at 475505, encryption at 26957, and floating-point math at 90424, indicating broad compute capability.

With a TDP of 125 W and support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory, this CPU offers flexibility for various build configurations. The ECC memory support is notable for workstation use, and the PCIe Gen 5 interface provides future-proofing for storage and expansion. The 86th percentile ranking places it above most current processors, with nearest rivals within 0.4% performance.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i5-13600KF with the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE, creating a balanced upper-midrange system. The CPU's 14-core, 20-thread configuration handles productivity workloads, while the GPU's RDNA 3.0 architecture with 2048 shading units and 32 ray accelerators delivers modern graphics features including DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 support.

The combined percentile of 85 indicates this pairing outperforms 85% of all tested CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU's 86th percentile and GPU's 83rd percentile show good alignment, with neither component dramatically outclassing the other. This balance minimizes bottlenecking across diverse workloads, from gaming to content creation.

The GPU features 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, running at base 1720 MHz, game 2350 MHz, and boost 2695 MHz. The 170 W TDP with a single 8-pin power connector and 450 W suggested PSU keeps power requirements modest. The dual-slot cooler at 204 mm length fits standard cases, and the 1x HDMI 2.1 plus 3x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs support modern displays.

The platform uses Intel Socket 1700 with Raptor Lake architecture, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 implementation with 16 lanes provides high-bandwidth connectivity for current and future components. This pairing represents a sensible mid-range desktop configuration suitable for gaming, productivity, and development workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 38103, placing it in the 86th percentile of all processors. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14490F at 38149 (-0.1%), Intel Core Ultra 5 245T at 38194 (-0.2%), AMD Ryzen 7 250 at 38221 (-0.3%), and Intel Core i5-13600HX at 38261 (-0.4%). These minimal deltas indicate the 13600KF sits at the top of its performance class.

The GPU achieves an average benchmark score of 42723, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all graphics cards. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER at 43223 (-1.2%), NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB at 43262 (-1.2%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile at 43268 (-1.3%), and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 at 43301 (-1.3%). The GPU trails these competitors by just over one percent, showing near-parity performance.

The combined picture shows a well-matched system where the CPU slightly outranks the GPU. The CPU's 3DMark max-threads score of 10216 and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2336 represent their respective peak DX12 workloads. In productivity applications like Cinebench R23 (31727 multi-core) and PassMark multi-thread (37488), the CPU demonstrates class-leading performance. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109 confirms strong compute capability for accelerated workloads.

The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 9404 versus the GPU's Steel Nomad score of 2336 shows the CPU outperforming the GPU in raw compute by roughly 4x, though these tests measure different workloads and are not directly comparable. The balanced nature of this pairing means neither component will consistently bottleneck the other, providing consistent performance across gaming and productivity scenarios.