SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600KF

38,103 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600

15,171 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis — Intel Core i5-13600KF

The Intel Core i5-13600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node. This hybrid design combines performance and efficiency cores, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support, making it suitable for workstation tasks that demand data integrity. The CPU is unlocked (multiplier unlocked), allowing overclocking for users who want to push beyond stock frequencies.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This arrangement feeds the 20 threads effectively, particularly in multi-threaded workloads where cache reuse matters. The processor connects to the platform via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing high-bandwidth connectivity for the latest graphics cards and NVMe storage.

Benchmark data shows a strong single-threaded foundation. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 4,479 points in single-core and 31,727 in multi-core. The single-core result places this chip among the fastest for everyday responsiveness, while the multi-core figure reflects the benefit of 14 physical cores. The 3DMark tests reveal scaling: 2,166 points with 2 threads, 4,282 with 4 threads, 7,074 with 8 threads, and 9,404 with 16 threads, reaching 10,216 with max threads. This scaling curve is nearly linear up to 8 threads, then flattens slightly, indicating memory bandwidth or scheduler limits beyond that point.

Geekbench scores of 2,487 single-core and 17,933 multi-core corroborate the Cinebench results. PassMark tests add nuance: integer math at 122,169, floating-point math at 90,424, and extended instructions at 28,865. The data compression score of 475,505 is particularly high, suggesting strong performance in archiving and file-handling tasks. Encryption at 26,957 and random string sorting at 50,851 are respectable for a mid-range desktop chip.

The processor's average benchmark score is 38,103, placing it in the 86th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i5-14490F scores 38,149 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T scores 38,194 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38,221 (0.3% higher), and the Intel Core i5-13600HX scores 38,261 (0.4% higher). This means the 13600KF is effectively tied with these competitors — the differences are within noise. The data shows that this CPU trades blows with newer and mobile variants, making it a durable choice for desktops.

For real workloads, the multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 31,727 suggests strong rendering capability in applications like Blender or video encoding. The single-core score of 4,479 ensures snappy UI interactions and fast compilation of lightly-threaded code. The 125 W TDP is the thermal design power, which indicates the cooling required for sustained all-core loads; a capable air cooler will handle this chip, though high-end tower coolers are advisable for overclocking sessions.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1,084 and max-thread score of 10,216 provide a baseline for gaming and productivity. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score of 13,325 and single-core of 1,881 reinforce the pattern seen in R23. The PassMark multithread score of 37,488 and single-thread of 4,118 are consistent with the CPU's 86th percentile ranking.

For the GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,310. In Geekbench, it scores 88,051 in OpenCL and 34,401 in Vulkan. PassMark results show a G3D score of 16,634, a G2D score of 984, and a GPU compute score of 8,790. The DirectX tests vary: DirectX 9 at 226, DirectX 11 at 172, DirectX 10 at 84, and DirectX 12 at 58. These numbers reflect the GPU's architecture — RDNA 3.0 with 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 15,171, placing it in the 57th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM at 15,199 (0.2% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro 560X at 15,082 (0.6% lower), the AMD Radeon 680M at 15,270 (0.7% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti at 15,063 (0.7% lower). The RX 7600 sits in a crowded mid-range segment, with performance nearly indistinguishable from these competitors in aggregate benchmarks.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 72, indicating that the overall system outperforms 72% of all tracked builds. The CPU is clearly the stronger component in this pairing — its 86th percentile ranking is 29 points higher than the GPU's 57th percentile. This gap suggests the CPU has headroom that the GPU cannot fully utilize in graphics-bound scenarios.

The PassMark data compression score of 475,505 for the CPU and the GPU's G3D score of 16,634 together paint a picture of a system that excels at multi-threaded productivity while handling modern games at mainstream resolutions. The GPU's Vulkan score of 34,401 is notably higher than its OpenCL score, indicating strong performance in Vulkan-based games and compute workloads that leverage this API.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance: the CPU ranks in the 86th percentile while the GPU ranks in the 57th percentile. This 29-point gap means the processor is capable of feeding significantly more graphics horsepower than the RX 7600 can deliver. In CPU-bound workloads — such as physics calculations (PassMark physics score of 2,226), data compression, or compilation — the system will perform admirably, with the CPU as the driving force.

In GPU-bound scenarios, such as high-resolution gaming or ray-traced rendering, the RX 7600 will be the limiting factor. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and entry-level 1440p, but the 57th percentile ranking means it will lag behind higher-tier cards in demanding titles. The CPU's 3DMark max-thread score of 10,216 suggests it can maintain high frame rates in CPU-intensive scenes, but the GPU's DirectX 12 score of 58 indicates it may struggle with the most modern graphics APIs.

The FPS scaling evidence comes from the benchmark scores themselves. The CPU's single-thread score of 1,084 in 3DMark and 4,479 in Cinebench R23 single-core indicate fast per-core performance, which translates to higher frame rates in games that rely on a few powerful threads. The GPU's passmark DirectX 11 score of 172 versus DirectX 12 score of 58 suggests that the GPU performs relatively better in older APIs — a sign that DirectX 12 titles with heavy draw calls may expose the GPU's limitations.

For 1080p gaming, the CPU will rarely be the bottleneck; the GPU will cap frame rates in most modern titles. At 1440p, the GPU's load increases further, widening the gap. At 4K, the GPU is almost certainly the limiting factor, with the CPU idle much of the time. Conversely, in productivity tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU's 86th percentile ensures it carries the system, while the GPU's compute capabilities (21.75 TFLOPS FP32) provide acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects.

The 165 W GPU TDP and 125 W CPU TDP mean the system draws moderate power, and the suggested PSU of 450 W provides sufficient headroom for both components under load. This balance — a powerful CPU paired with a mid-range GPU — suits users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads but still want capable gaming performance at mainstream resolutions.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all frame rate discussions below are estimates based on the benchmark scores and percentile positions of the components.

At 1080p ultra settings, the RX 7600's 57th percentile ranking and its PassMark G3D score of 16,634 suggest it can handle most esports and older AAA titles at high frame rates. The CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1,084) ensures that frame pacing remains consistent in CPU-light scenes. For modern AAA games at 1080p ultra, the GPU will likely deliver playable frame rates, but the 8 GB VRAM may become a limitation in texture-heavy titles.

At 1440p, the GPU's 128-bit memory bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain performance. Estimated frame rates will drop by 30-40% compared to 1080p, based on the GPU's relative position among its rivals. The CPU will remain underutilized, as the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck. The DirectX 12 score of 58 suggests that DX12 titles will be particularly demanding on this GPU, potentially requiring settings reductions to maintain smooth gameplay.

For competitive shooters like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the CPU's high single-thread score and the GPU's DirectX 9 score of 226 indicate strong performance at low to medium settings, where frame rates can exceed 144 Hz on 1080p monitors. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for background tasks like streaming or Discord while gaming.

Ray tracing performance is a notable weakness, as the RX 7600 has 32 RT cores but the benchmark data shows no specific RT scores. Given the 57th percentile overall ranking, ray-traced titles will likely require significant upscaling or reduced settings to maintain playable frame rates. The GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 compute is respectable, but RT workloads typically rely on dedicated hardware that this card lacks in abundance.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13600KF compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14490F?

A: The 13600KF has an average benchmark score of 38,103, while the i5-14490F scores 38,149, a delta of -0.1%. The two processors are statistically tied, with the 14490F holding a negligible 0.1% advantage.

Q: What is the combined percentile rank of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 72, meaning this system outperforms 72% of all tracked desktop builds. The CPU ranks in the 86th percentile, while the GPU ranks in the 57th percentile.

Q: Does the RX 7600 support the latest graphics APIs?

A: Yes, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its Geekbench Vulkan score is 34,401, which is higher than its OpenCL score of 88,051, indicating strong Vulkan performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RX 7600?

A: The GPU has a 128-bit memory bus with GDDR6 memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), providing a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. This is a key factor in its performance at higher resolutions.

Q: Is the Core i5-13600KF overclockable?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, and the TDP is 125 W. Overclocking can increase performance beyond the 5.10 GHz boost clock, but requires adequate cooling to manage the additional heat.

Q: What is the process node for each component?

A: The CPU is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process, while the GPU uses TSMC's 6 nm process. The GPU has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, while the CPU has a 257 mm² die size.

Q: How does the RX 7600 compare to the AMD Radeon 680M integrated graphics?

A: The RX 7600 has an average benchmark score of 15,171, while the Radeon 680M scores 15,270, a delta of -0.7%. The dedicated GPU is slightly slower than this high-end integrated solution in aggregate benchmarks, though it offers dedicated VRAM and higher sustained performance.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, using the Navi 33 chip fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process. The GPU contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. This compact design runs at a base clock of 1720 MHz, a game clock of 2250 MHz, and a boost clock of 2655 MHz.

Memory configuration is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is the primary limitation for higher resolutions; the 128-bit bus is narrow for a modern GPU, and 8 GB VRAM is becoming marginal for AAA titles at 1440p with high texture settings. The GPU has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, producing a pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s.

Compute performance is rated at 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 and the same for FP16 (1:1 ratio), indicating that the GPU handles both precision levels at the same throughput. The ray tracing hardware includes 32 RT cores, which are present but not top-tier; the 57th percentile ranking suggests RT performance is adequate for entry-level ray tracing but not a strength. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it fully compatible with modern game engines.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,310 places the GPU in the mid-range segment. Geekbench OpenCL score of 88,051 is solid for compute tasks, while Vulkan at 34,401 shows the RDNA 3.0 architecture's efficiency in low-level APIs. The PassMark G3D score of 16,634 and GPU compute of 8,790 indicate balanced performance between graphics and compute workloads.

Power requirements are 165 W TDP with a single 8-pin power connector, and the suggested PSU is 450 W. This makes the card easy to integrate into existing systems without major power supply upgrades. The dual-slot design, 204 mm length, and 115 mm height mean it fits in most mid-tower cases. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, supporting modern high-refresh-rate monitors.

The GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, scores 15,199, just 0.2% higher, making them direct competitors. The RX 7600 also trades blows with the AMD Radeon 680M integrated GPU, which scores 15,270, a mere 0.7% higher — a surprising result that highlights how far integrated graphics have come. The predecessor Navi II and successor Navi IV brackets this card in AMD's product stack.

# Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need strong CPU performance for productivity but are content with mid-range gaming at 1080p. Content creators working with video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation will find the Core i5-13600KF's 14 cores and 20 threads particularly useful. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,727 places it well above typical desktop processors, making it suitable for rendering tasks that scale across cores.

Software developers will benefit from the CPU's single-thread speed (Geekbench single-core score of 2,487) for compilation and code analysis, while the GPU's compute capability (21.75 TFLOPS FP32) can accelerate machine learning inference or GPU-accelerated libraries. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running computational workloads.

Gamers at 1080p will find this pairing well-matched for high-refresh-rate esports titles and playable frame rates in AAA games. The CPU's 86th percentile ensures it won't bottleneck even the most demanding modern titles at this resolution. For 1440p gaming, the RX 7600 will deliver medium to high settings in most games, but users should expect to compromise on ultra settings in the latest releases.

Students and small business workstations benefit from the balanced nature of this build. The CPU handles multi-threaded office tasks, virtualization, and data analysis, while the GPU accelerates spreadsheet rendering, video conferencing effects, and light photo editing. The active production status of both components ensures ongoing driver support and availability.

The 86th percentile CPU ranking means this system is also suitable for users who plan to upgrade the GPU later without replacing the processor. The 57th percentile GPU is the weaker link, so those who prioritize gaming above all else should consider a higher-tier GPU, while those who value CPU performance for professional workloads will find this pairing ideal.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5. The dual-channel memory bus is standard for this class, and the CPU's memory controller supports both types. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, ensuring compatibility with the latest SSDs and GPUs.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs. The 450 W suggested PSU provides headroom for the 125 W CPU and 165 W GPU, totaling 290 W under full load, leaving 160 W for other components. Future upgrades to a more powerful GPU would require a higher-wattage PSU, but the current 450 W unit is adequate for this pairing.

The CPU's unlocked multiplier enables overclocking, but the 125 W TDP means sustained all-core overclocks will push power consumption higher, potentially requiring a better cooling solution. The 10 nm process node and 257 mm² die size suggest moderate overclocking headroom, but the data does not specify thermal limits.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the RX 7600 with a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom (86th percentile vs. GPU's 57th percentile). The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU means it can handle the next generation of graphics cards without platform changes. Alternatively, adding more memory or faster DDR5 would benefit memory-heavy workloads, though the current dual-channel configuration is already balanced.

The socket 1700 platform is nearing the end of its lifecycle, as newer Intel platforms have moved to different sockets. However, the 13600KF's performance remains competitive, as shown by its near-tie with the newer Core Ultra 5 245T. This means users can expect several more years of relevant performance before a platform upgrade becomes necessary.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-13600KF with the AMD Radeon RX 7600. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 5.10 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is an RDNA 3.0-based card with 8 GB GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile rank is 72, placing this system above 72% of tracked desktop builds in overall performance.

The CPU is the dominant component, ranking in the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 57th percentile among all GPUs. This makes the system CPU-centric: it excels in productivity, rendering, and multi-threaded workloads, while providing solid but not exceptional gaming performance. The 29-point gap between CPU and GPU percentiles indicates that the processor is the stronger half of this pairing.

For gaming, this build is best suited for 1080p resolution, where the CPU's single-thread performance will ensure high frame rates and the GPU can keep up with modern titles at medium to high settings. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, and at 4K, it will struggle with demanding games. Content creators and developers will find the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads ideal for parallel workloads, while the GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS compute capability provides acceleration for GPU-accelerated tasks.

The launch MSRP for the CPU is $294, and for the GPU is 269 USD; however, these figures are historical and do not reflect current market prices. The system's overall tier is mid-range to upper-mid-range, with the CPU punching above its class and the GPU representing the mainstream segment. This pairing offers a balanced platform for users who prioritize CPU performance but want a capable GPU for gaming and light compute tasks. The upgrade path is clear: replace the GPU for more graphics horsepower, or add faster memory to further unlock the CPU's potential.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600KF

AMD Radeon RX 7600

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds