SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600KF

38,103 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7400 represents a stark contrast in performance tiers. The processor is a high-end desktop part, while the graphics card sits in the entry-level segment. Benchmark data shows the CPU achieving an 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs, whereas the GPU languishes in the 17th percentile. This pairing creates a significant imbalance where the processor's capabilities far outstrip the graphics card's rendering output, making the GPU the definitive bottleneck in any graphics-intensive workload.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, utilizing the Navi 33 chip manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1452 MHz, a game clock of 2200 MHz, and a boost clock of 2300 MHz. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, translating to 18 Gbps effective. This configuration is adequate for 1080p gaming but the narrow bus width limits high-resolution texture streaming.

The GPU contains 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation processors. For ray tracing, it has 28 dedicated RT cores, though the card lacks tensor cores entirely. The compute capabilities are modest, with an FP32 throughput of 16.49 TFLOPS and FP16 of 32.97 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. Pixel rate is 147.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 257.6 GTexel/s. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring modern API compatibility.

Benchmark results paint a clear picture of the GPU's performance class. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 1103 points. PassMark results show a G3D score of 11897, but DirectX-specific tests are much lower, with scores of 59 for DirectX 10, 97 for DirectX 11, and 44 for DirectX 12. The DirectX 9 score is 176, and the G2D score is 1209. GPU compute performance is recorded at 5152. The overall average benchmark score is 2467, placing the card in the 17th percentile of all GPUs.

The nearest rivals in benchmark scores include the AMD Radeon 8040S with a score of 2440 (a 1.1% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce 710M at 2433 (1.4% delta), the Intel HD Graphics 610 at 2425 (1.8% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M at 2422 (1.9% delta). These comparisons indicate the RX 7400 is only marginally faster than integrated or very old discrete graphics solutions.

For rendering workloads, the data suggests the RX 7400 is only suitable for light 2D tasks or very basic 3D applications. The low DirectX 12 score of 44 indicates severe limitations in modern graphics pipelines. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for textures at 1080p, but the 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is restrictive for high-detail scenes. The 28 RT cores provide nominal ray tracing capability, but the low overall compute power means RT effects will incur significant performance penalties.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: The RX 7400 is not suited for high-refresh gaming. With a PassMark G3D score of 11897 and a DirectX 12 score of 44, the GPU lacks the raw throughput to drive modern titles at high frame rates. The 17th percentile ranking means most discrete GPUs outperform it, so high-refresh monitors would be wasted on this configuration.

Streaming: The absence of tensor cores and the low compute score of 5152 in PassMark GPU compute means hardware-accelerated encoding and streaming tasks will be strained. The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31727, can partially offload encoding, but the GPU will still struggle with simultaneous gaming and streaming workloads.

Video editing: The CPU's 20 threads and high single-thread performance, evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 2487, make it capable for timeline editing and export tasks. However, the GPU's low DirectX 12 score of 44 limits GPU-accelerated effects and rendering. Video editors relying on GPU acceleration will see minimal benefit from this graphics card.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 13325 and R15 multi-core score of 3198 indicate strong CPU-based rendering performance. The GPU, however, with an FP32 of 16.49 TFLOPS and a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103, is not competitive for GPU-accelerated renderers. CPU rendering will dominate, while GPU renderers will be severely constrained.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 37488 and data compression score of 475505 make compilation and build tasks efficient. The GPU's capabilities are largely irrelevant for development workloads, except for any GPU compute tasks, which the PassMark GPU compute score of 5152 suggests are limited.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for office tasks. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4118 handles spreadsheet and document workloads effortlessly. The GPU's G2D score of 1209 is adequate for 2D desktop rendering, but the entire package represents excessive cost for basic productivity.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The benchmark data reveals a severe imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU sits in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 17th percentile. This 69-point gap indicates the GPU is the overwhelming bottleneck in most scenarios. In gaming workloads, the GPU's low DirectX 12 score of 44 and G3D score of 11897 will cap frame rates well below what the CPU can feed. The CPU's 3DMark max threads score of 10216 shows it can process game logic and physics quickly, but the GPU will struggle to render frames.

For CPU-bound tasks like data compression, encryption, and multi-threaded productivity, the GPU's limitations are irrelevant. The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 122169 and floating point math score of 90424 demonstrate raw processing power that does not depend on the GPU. However, for any graphics workload, the GPU's 17th percentile ranking becomes the sole limiting factor.

The FPS scaling is not measurable from the provided data, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. However, the benchmark scores strongly suggest that in games, the GPU will be the primary constraint, while in productivity and compute tasks, the CPU's performance will shine. The combined percentile of 52 reflects the GPU dragging down the overall system performance.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600KF ranks in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 38103.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 ranks in the 17th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 2467.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RX 7400 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s and an effective memory clock of 18 Gbps.

Q: What are the CPU's core and thread counts?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600KF has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The RX 7400 is 1.1% faster than the AMD Radeon 8040S, which has an average score of 2440, and 1.4% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce 710M.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Intel Core i5-13600KF has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory for display output.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and socket?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W and uses the Intel Socket 1700.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-13600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S codename. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The CPU has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The CPU's benchmark scores are robust across various tests. In 3DMark, it scores 9404 for 16 threads, 2166 for 2 threads, 4282 for 4 threads, 7074 for 8 threads, 10216 for max threads, and 1084 for single thread. Cinebench results show a multi-core score of 3198 for R15, 13325 for R20, and 31727 for R23, with single-core scores of 451, 1881, and 4479 respectively. Geekbench reports a multi-core score of 17933 and a single-core score of 2487.

PassMark tests show a multi-thread score of 37488 and a single-thread score of 4118. Specialized tests include data compression at 475505, data encryption at 26957, extended instructions at 28865, find prime numbers at 152, floating point math at 90424, integer math at 122169, physics at 2226, and random string sorting at 50851. The average benchmark score is 38103.

The nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14490F with an average score of 38149 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T at 38194 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 250 at 38221 (0.3% higher), and the Intel Core i5-13600HX at 38261 (0.4% higher). These results place the i5-13600KF in a tight competitive band, with negligible differences to its closest peers.

For real workloads, the high multi-thread scores indicate strong performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The single-thread score of 4479 in Cinebench R23 ensures responsive application performance and good gaming IPC. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with data-heavy tasks, and the support for DDR5 memory allows for high bandwidth access.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU's 17th percentile ranking and low DirectX 12 score of 44 indicate that gaming performance will be very limited. At 1080p with ultra settings, frame rates will likely be low, struggling to maintain playable levels in modern titles. The CPU's strong single-thread performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1084, ensures the processor will not be a bottleneck, but the GPU will cap performance severely.

For esports titles and older games, the RX 7400 may provide acceptable frame rates, but the G3D score of 11897 suggests even these will be modest. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures, but the 288.0 GB/s bandwidth will cause stuttering in memory-intensive scenes. Ray tracing performance will be poor, as the 28 RT cores are too few and the FP32 throughput of 16.49 TFLOPS is too low for meaningful RT effects. Users should expect to play at lower resolutions and reduced settings to achieve playable frame rates.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 38103, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14490F, scores 38149, a marginal 0.1% difference. The GPU scores an average of 2467, in the 17th percentile of all GPUs, with its nearest rival the AMD Radeon 8040S at 2440, a 1.1% gap. The combined percentile for this pairing is 52, reflecting the GPU's significant drag on overall system performance.

Specific CPU scores include a 3DMark max threads score of 10216 and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31727. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1103, and its PassMark G3D score is 11897. The disparity between the CPU's 86th percentile and GPU's 17th percentile creates a system that is excellent for compute-heavy tasks but poor for graphics. The combined percentile of 52 places this build in the middle of all systems, but the experience will vary drastically by workload.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop build class pairing. The Intel Core i5-13600KF is a high-end unlocked desktop processor with 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Radeon RX 7400 is an entry-level discrete GPU. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking puts it in the upper tier of processors, but the GPU's 17th percentile ranking is in the bottom tier. The combined percentile of 52 indicates a mid-tier overall system, but this is misleading because the components are not balanced.

The CPU is capable of high-end productivity tasks, with launch MSRP of $294, but the GPU limits the system to basic graphics duties. This pairing is unusual, as the CPU's capabilities far exceed what the GPU can complement. The system is best described as a workstation CPU paired with a display adapter, rather than a balanced gaming or content creation rig.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This pairing is not recommended for gamers, as the GPU's 17th percentile ranking and DirectX 12 score of 44 indicate poor gaming performance at any resolution. Users seeking high-refresh gaming or even 1080p ultra settings will be disappointed. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for modern titles at high detail.

Content creators should avoid this combination for GPU-accelerated workflows. The GPU's compute score of 5152 and FP32 of 16.49 TFLOPS are too low for rendering or effects. However, CPU-based rendering workloads will benefit from the i5-13600KF's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31727, making it suitable for CPU-only rendering pipelines.

Software developers will find the CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 37488 and data compression score of 475505 excellent for compilation and build tasks. Students and office workers will benefit from the CPU's single-thread score of 4118 for responsive productivity applications, though the GPU is overkill for 2D office work. Small business workstations can leverage the CPU's strong multi-threading for database and spreadsheet tasks, but the GPU adds little value beyond basic display output.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600KF

AMD Radeon RX 7400

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds