SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600KF

38,103 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

50,951 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13600KF + AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT: Desktop Benchmark Analysis

This pairing combines Intel’s 14-core Raptor Lake processor with AMD’s RDNA 2 flagship GPU, both landing at the 86th percentile in their respective categories. The data set contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination — all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct game testing.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for this specific CPU+GPU pairing, so all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay captures. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 26732 places it at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1084 and 16-thread score of 9404 indicate strong frame pacing capability across both lightly and heavily threaded game engines. The Radeon RX 6900 XT’s 23.04 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth suggest it can drive high refresh rates at 1440p in most titles, with 4K gaming feasible at reduced settings or with upscaling technologies enabled.

For esports and lighter titles, the CPU’s boost clock of 5.10 GHz combined with the GPU’s 2250 MHz boost clock should deliver frame rates well above 144 FPS at 1080p in competitive shooters — the single-thread performance is the key enabler here, as the 3DMark 2-thread score of 2166 shows strong responsiveness in lightly threaded game logic. At 1440p with ultra settings, the 16 GB GDDR6 frame buffer provides ample capacity for high-resolution textures, and the GPU’s pixel rate of 288.0 GPixel/s should handle modern rendering workloads without immediate bottlenecks. At 4K, the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth becomes the limiting factor, but the 80 ray accelerators and 5120 shading units still permit playable frame rates in less demanding AAA titles.

The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads ensure that background tasks like Discord, streaming software, and browser tabs do not interfere with game performance, as the 3DMark max-thread score of 10216 demonstrates substantial multi-threaded headroom. The Radeon RX 6900 XT’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility align well with modern game engines that leverage these APIs for reduced draw call overhead. Overall, the estimated gaming experience is strong at 1440p, with 1080p delivering high refresh rates and 4K requiring setting adjustments — the GPU’s 86th percentile ranking and the CPU’s matching percentile suggest balanced performance across most gaming workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform with Raptor Lake architecture, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the processor, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for the latest graphics cards and NVMe storage devices. The suggested PSU for this build is 700 W, which accommodates the CPU’s 125 W TDP and the GPU’s 300 W TDP with reasonable headroom for fans, drives, and other components. The GPU requires two 8-pin power connectors and occupies a triple-slot width, so case clearance and power supply cabling must be verified before installation.

A sensible next upgrade would involve the GPU, as the RX 6900 XT is marked as end-of-life production status. The CPU’s 86th percentile ranking and robust multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 31727) suggest it can still drive newer GPUs without becoming a significant bottleneck — the PCIe Gen 5 interface ensures no bandwidth limitation for future graphics cards. Alternatively, adding more memory or transitioning from DDR4 to DDR5 (if not already adopted) could improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads, though the dual-channel memory bus keeps both options viable. The platform’s active production status for the CPU suggests continued driver and BIOS support, while the GPU’s end-of-life status means no further optimizations should be expected from AMD.

Upgrading the CPU would require a new motherboard, as Socket 1700 is limited to 12th and 13th generation Intel processors, and the 14th generation uses the same socket. However, the current CPU’s performance headroom — with an avgBenchmarkScore of 38103 and a 0.1% delta from the nearest rival — indicates that a CPU upgrade is unnecessary for most workloads. The more impactful path is GPU replacement, which would leverage the existing platform’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes and 700 W PSU headroom, though a new PSU might be required for higher-end cards with greater power demands.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s overall benchmark picture shows strong multi-threaded capability with an avgBenchmarkScore of 38103, placing it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14490F, scores 38149 — a delta of -0.1%, indicating near-identical performance. In single-thread tests, the CPU achieves a Geekbench single-core score of 2487 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4479, demonstrating excellent per-core efficiency. Multi-threaded scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core of 31727, Geekbench multi-core of 17933, and a 3DMark max-thread score of 10216, all pointing to robust parallel processing.

The GPU’s avgBenchmarkScore of 50951 places it at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA CMP 50HX, scores 51790 (a -1.6% delta), while the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 50001 (a +1.9% delta) — indicating the RX 6900 XT sits slightly below the CMP 50HX but above the older Vega 64. In compute benchmarks, the GPU achieves a PassMark GPU Compute score of 14547, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 187673, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 148525, showing strong general-purpose compute performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4079 reflects modern gaming workload performance.

Combined, the CPU and GPU present a balanced pairing where both components sit at the 86th percentile of their respective categories. The CPU’s avgBenchmarkScore and the GPU’s avgBenchmarkScore indicate no obvious performance asymmetry — the CPU does not outclass the GPU to the point of waste, and the GPU does not overwhelm the CPU’s processing capabilities. The combined percentile of 86 for the build reinforces this balance, suggesting that either component could be upgraded without creating a severe bottleneck in the opposite direction.

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark results indicate a well-balanced pairing where neither component consistently limits the other. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1084 in 3DMark and the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4079 suggest that in lightly threaded gaming scenarios, the GPU is the primary driver of frame rates, while the CPU handles game logic without becoming a bottleneck — the 5.10 GHz boost clock and 3DMark 2-thread score of 2166 support this interpretation. In multi-threaded workloads like streaming or video encoding, the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample parallel throughput, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31727, which ensures the GPU is not waiting on CPU-side processing.

The GPU’s 16 GB GDDR6 memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient data throughput for high-resolution textures and large scene data, preventing memory bandwidth bottlenecks at 1440p. However, at 4K, the GPU’s pixel rate of 288.0 GPixel/s and 23.04 TFLOPS FP32 throughput may become the limiting factor in demanding titles, as the CPU’s multi-threaded scores (PassMark multithread of 37488) indicate it can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them. Conversely, in CPU-bound scenarios like physics simulation or large-scale strategy games, the CPU’s 86th percentile ranking and PassMark physics score of 2226 suggest it handles these loads effectively, though the GPU’s 80 ray accelerators may sit idle if ray tracing is not enabled.

The FPS scaling between resolutions would exhibit typical behavior: at 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance becomes more critical, and the GPU’s high pixel rate maintains elevated frame rates; at 1440p, the balance shifts toward GPU load, where the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 5120 shading units provide consistent performance; at 4K, the GPU’s memory bandwidth and compute throughput are the primary constraints, with the CPU’s multi-threaded scores ensuring it does not further limit performance. The nearest rival data — the CPU’s 0.1% delta from the Core i5-14490F and the GPU’s 1.6% delta from the CMP 50HX — shows that neither component is an outlier in its class, reinforcing the balanced nature of this pairing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600KF features 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, built on Intel’s Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available, and provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. Cache configuration includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3 cache, which supports high-bandwidth access to frequently used data. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, as indicated by the multiplierUnlocked field set to true.

Benchmark scores reveal a CPU that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1881 and R23 single-core score of 4479 place it among the top performers for lightly threaded tasks, making it suitable for gaming, office applications, and code compilation with low latency. The multi-threaded scores, including Cinebench R20 multi-core of 13325 and Geekbench multi-core of 17933, demonstrate strong parallel processing capability for video editing, 3D rendering, and software development builds. The PassMark data compression score of 475505 and data encryption score of 26957 indicate efficient handling of data-intensive operations.

The CPU’s 14 cores likely consist of 6 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores, a common Raptor Lake configuration, though the exact breakdown is not specified in the data. This heterogeneous design allows the CPU to balance power consumption and performance — efficiency cores handle background tasks while performance cores handle demanding workloads. The 86th percentile ranking and avgBenchmarkScore of 38103, with a -0.1% delta from the Core i5-14490F, position this CPU as a strong mid-to-high-end desktop processor. Real-world workloads like video rendering, where Cinebench R23 multi-core of 31727 is relevant, benefit from the high thread count, while single-threaded tasks like web browsing or spreadsheet calculations leverage the 5.10 GHz boost clock.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1440p high-refresh displays are the primary audience for this build — the GPU’s 86th percentile ranking and 16 GB frame buffer handle modern titles at high settings, while the CPU’s 5.10 GHz boost clock and single-thread score of 1084 in 3DMark ensure frame rates stay consistently high without CPU-induced dips. Content creators working with video editing software benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31727 and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 187673, which accelerate rendering and export times. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 122169 and multithread score of 37488, providing faster build times and smoother multitasking.

Students and office workers find this build more than sufficient for daily tasks — the CPU’s high single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core of 2487) ensures responsive application use, while the GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support allows for occasional gaming or graphics work without dedicated hardware. Small business workstations handling data analysis or financial modeling benefit from the CPU’s PassMark floating point math score of 90424 and data encryption score of 26957, which accelerate spreadsheet calculations and secure data processing. The GPU’s 16 GB memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth support large datasets for machine learning inference or database visualization tasks, though the absence of tensor cores means training workloads are better suited to NVIDIA alternatives.

This build is less ideal for users prioritizing ray tracing performance — the GPU’s 80 ray accelerators, while present, are not the primary strength of the RDNA 2 architecture, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4079 does not specifically measure RT workloads. For gamers who insist on maximum ray-traced effects at 4K, a different GPU would be preferable. Similarly, users requiring massive compute throughput for AI training would need a GPU with tensor cores, which this pairing lacks.

FAQ

Q: Does this build support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in memory selection.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build’s combined percentile is 86, matching the individual percentiles of both the CPU and GPU (each at 86th percentile among their respective categories).

Q: Is the Radeon RX 6900 XT still in production?

A: No, the GPU is marked as end-of-life production status, while the CPU remains in active production.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 700 W, which accommodates the CPU’s 125 W TDP and the GPU’s 300 W TDP with sufficient headroom for other components.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in benchmark scores?

A: The CPU’s avgBenchmarkScore of 38103 is only 0.1% lower than the Intel Core i5-14490F (38149), indicating near-identical performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The Radeon RX 6900 XT has 512.0 GB/s bandwidth from 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Does this build support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 80 ray accelerators and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), though ray tracing performance is not the GPU’s primary strength compared to its rasterization capabilities.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-13600KF and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT, with a combined percentile of 86. Both components sit at the 86th percentile in their respective categories, indicating a well-matched pairing that is neither CPU-heavy nor GPU-heavy. The CPU’s avgBenchmarkScore of 38103 and the GPU’s avgBenchmarkScore of 50951 reflect strong overall performance, with the CPU’s nearest rival (Core i5-14490F) showing only a -0.1% delta, and the GPU’s nearest rival (CMP 50HX) showing a -1.6% delta. This build is positioned as a high-end desktop configuration suitable for gaming and content creation, with the CPU’s 14 cores providing ample multi-threaded headroom and the GPU’s 16 GB frame buffer supporting high-resolution textures.

The build class is desktop, confirmed by both the CPU’s market segment (Desktop) and the overall build classification. The GPU’s triple-slot width and 267 mm length require a full-size ATX case, while the 2x 8-pin power connectors demand a PSU with sufficient PCIe power outputs — the 700 W suggested PSU meets this requirement. The CPU’s Intel Socket 1700 platform offers upgrade options within the same generation, though the GPU’s end-of-life status means future GPU upgrades are the more likely path. Overall, this pairing represents a balanced high-end desktop configuration that avoids obvious bottleneck scenarios, as evidenced by the matching percentile rankings and the small deltas from nearest rivals.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using TSMC’s 7 nm process, with 26,800 million transistors on a 520 mm² die. Clock speeds include a base of 1825 MHz, a boost of 2250 MHz, and a game clock of 2015 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The GPU has 5120 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 128 render output units, with 80 ray accelerators dedicated to ray tracing workloads. Compute performance is rated at 23.04 TFLOPS FP32 and 46.08 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio), with pixel rate of 288.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 720.0 GTexel/s.

Benchmark scores show strong rasterization performance — the PassMark G3D score of 26732 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4079 indicate solid modern gaming capability. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 148525 and OpenCL score of 187673 demonstrate robust compute performance for non-gaming workloads like video encoding or scientific simulation. The GPU’s avgBenchmarkScore of 50951 places it at the 86th percentile, with the nearest rival (NVIDIA CMP 50HX) scoring 51790 — a -1.6% delta — and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 scoring 50001 — a +1.9% delta, showing the RX 6900 XT sits comfortably between these two competitors.

For rendering workloads, the GPU’s 16 GB memory capacity and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient resources for 4K texture sets and complex 3D scenes, while the 5120 shading units accelerate polygon rendering and pixel shading. The 80 ray accelerators enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the RDNA 2 architecture’s RT performance is generally less efficient than NVIDIA’s Ampere or newer architectures. The GPU’s 300 W TDP and 2x 8-pin power connectors require robust cooling and power delivery, with the 700 W suggested PSU providing appropriate headroom. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, and 1x USB Type-C, supporting high refresh rate monitors and VR headsets.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU’s 5.10 GHz boost clock and the GPU’s 2250 MHz boost clock should sustain frame rates above 144 FPS in competitive titles, as the single-thread score of 1084 in 3DMark and the GPU’s 288.0 GPixel/s pixel rate prevent frame pacing issues. At 1440p, the GPU’s 16 GB frame buffer and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth maintain high settings without memory pressure, while the CPU’s 14 cores handle background tasks without impacting frame times.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 threads (via 14 cores) allow simultaneous gaming and encoding, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31727 indicating sufficient headroom for x264 encoding at medium presets. The GPU’s compute performance (OpenCL score of 187673) can also handle hardware encoding tasks, though the absence of dedicated NVENC hardware means software encoding relies on CPU resources.

Video editing: The CPU’s multi-threaded scores, including Geekbench multi-core of 17933 and PassMark multithread of 37488, accelerate timeline scrubbing and effect rendering, while the GPU’s 23.04 TFLOPS FP32 and 16 GB memory support GPU-accelerated effects and color grading. Export times benefit from Cinebench R20 multi-core of 13325, ensuring faster renders compared to lower-core-count CPUs.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 5120 shading units and 720.0 GTexel/s texture rate accelerate viewport rendering and final frame output in applications that support GPU rendering, while the CPU’s 20 threads handle CPU-based render engines. The 16 GB frame buffer allows for large scenes without out-of-core memory swapping, though the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit extremely complex scenes.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 122169 and data compression score of 475505 speed up code compilation and data serialization tasks, while the single-thread score of 2487 in Geekbench ensures responsive IDE usage. The 14 cores allow parallel builds with minimal context switching, reducing total build times for large projects.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core of 2487) handles typical office applications with ease, while the GPU’s 86th percentile ranking provides occasional gaming capability without dedicated hardware. The 16 GB GPU memory is overkill for office tasks but allows for light photo or video editing without performance degradation, and the 700 W PSU supports future upgrades if needed.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600KF

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds