SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600KF

38,103 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

48,477 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die size. This hybrid design pairs performance cores with efficiency cores, and the unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking. The chip runs at a 3.50 GHz base clock and boosts up to 5.10 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, includes 24 MB of shared L3 cache, and provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 16 CPU lanes. ECC memory support is present, and the CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform.

The benchmark data reveals a processor that excels in threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31727 places this chip firmly in high-performance desktop territory, while the single-core score of 4479 indicates strong per-thread performance. The 3DMark results show scalable threading: 2166 with 2 threads, 4282 with 4 threads, 7074 with 8 threads, 9404 with 16 threads, and 10216 with max threads. This scaling pattern means the CPU gains substantial performance as more threads are utilized, though the gains diminish beyond 16 threads — a typical characteristic for a hybrid architecture with 8 performance cores and 12 efficiency threads.

Geekbench scores of 2487 single-core and 17933 multi-core reinforce the picture of a balanced performer. The PassMark suite adds depth: integer math at 122169, floating-point math at 90424, extended instructions at 28865, and data compression at 475505. These numbers indicate strong arithmetic capability and data handling throughput. The single-thread PassMark score of 4118 confirms that even lightly-threaded applications will run well. The average benchmark score of 38103 places the i5-13600KF at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market.

The nearest rivals illustrate the competitive landscape. The Intel Core i5-14490F scores 38149 on average, just 0.1% higher, making the 13600KF effectively a statistical tie with its newer sibling. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T scores 38194 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38221 (0.3% higher), and the Intel Core i5-13600HX scores 38261 (0.4% higher). These sub-one-percent deltas indicate that the 13600KF sits in a tightly contested performance band where generational and architectural differences translate to negligible real-world gains.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 13325 and R15 multi-core score of 3198 both confirm that heavily multithreaded tasks like video rendering, 3D modeling, and software compilation will be handled with ample headroom. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 4479 ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and solid performance in lightly-threaded applications. The PassMark find prime numbers score of 152 is modest, but this is a synthetic edge-case workload that rarely reflects typical usage.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture for this CPU+GPU pairing is strong, with the system achieving an 86th combined percentile. This places the build above the majority of desktop configurations in the database. The CPU contributes an 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the GPU holds an 85th percentile position among all GPUs — a well-matched pair where neither component dramatically outclasses the other.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3689 demonstrates solid DirectX 12 rendering capability. The Geekbench compute results show 171304 in OpenCL, 136875 in Vulkan, and 181337 in Metal — the Metal score being notably higher, suggesting the GPU may perform particularly well in macOS environments if used in a Hackintosh context, though the primary target here is Windows. The PassMark G3D score of 24980 reinforces the GPU's strong rasterization performance, while the G2D score of 1030 indicates capable 2D acceleration.

The CPU's 3DMark max-threads score of 10216 shows that the processor can feed the GPU effectively in gaming scenarios. The disparity between 3DMark 16-thread (9404) and max-thread (10216) scores — only an 8.6% increase — suggests that the additional efficiency cores provide diminishing returns for gaming workloads, which typically scale to 8-16 threads at most. This aligns with the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 37488, which is respectable but not class-leading.

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. All frame rate discussions below are therefore estimates drawn from the component benchmark scores and their percentile positions relative to known performance tiers.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS values are available for this pairing, all gaming figures discussed here are estimates based on the CPU and GPU benchmark scores. The CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark 4118, Geekbench single-core 2487) is sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in most scenarios, while the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 24980 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3689 indicate strong rasterization throughput.

At 1080p, this combination should deliver high refresh rate gaming in esports titles. The CPU's 3DMark 2-thread score of 2166 and 4-thread score of 4282 suggest that games relying on a few fast cores — typical of competitive shooters and MOBAs — will run at framerates exceeding 144 FPS on high settings. The GPU's 4608 shading units and 288 texture mapping units provide ample pixel-pushing capability for these lighter workloads.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes more of a limiting factor. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth ensure that high-resolution textures and detail settings won't exhaust VRAM capacity in current titles. The 20.74 TFLOPS FP32 compute throughput positions this GPU for strong 1440p performance in AAA games, likely averaging 80-120 FPS on ultra settings depending on the title's optimization. The 72 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though RDNA 2's RT implementation is less robust than competing architectures — expect lower RT frame rates than rasterized ones.

At 4K, this pairing will struggle to maintain high refresh rates in demanding titles. The GPU's pixel rate of 288.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 648.0 GTexel/s are sufficient for 60 FPS gaming in many titles at 4K with adjusted settings, but ultra settings with ray tracing enabled will likely push framerates below 60 FPS in the most demanding games. The CPU's performance headroom at 4K is less relevant since the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at this resolution.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core strength (Geekbench single-core 2487, PassMark single-thread 4118) combined with the GPU's strong rasterization (PassMark G3D 24980) supports 144 Hz gaming at 1080p and 1440p in most titles. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 7074 indicates that modern games utilizing 8 threads will run smoothly.

Streaming: The 14-core, 20-thread configuration provides enough parallelism to encode video while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31727 shows substantial headroom for x264 encoding alongside game rendering, though dedicated encoder hardware on the GPU would be preferable for minimal performance impact.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-core prowess (Geekbench multicore 17933, PassMark multithread 37488) handles timeline scrubbing and export rendering efficiently. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM (memory size 16 GB) and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerate effects processing and preview rendering in GPU-accelerated editors.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31727 makes CPU-based rendering viable for smaller projects. For GPU rendering, the Radeon RX 6800 XT's 20.74 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 41.47 TFLOPS FP16 throughput provide solid performance in OpenCL-based renderers, though the 300 W TDP means sustained rendering loads will demand adequate cooling.

Software development: The PassMark data compression score of 475505 and integer math score of 122169 indicate rapid code compilation and data processing. The 24 MB L3 cache (shared) helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing compile times for large projects. The 86th CPU percentile ensures this build handles development workloads comfortably.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for document editing and web browsing, but the CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread 1084, PassMark single-thread 4118) ensures instant responsiveness. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM future-proofs the system for any GPU-accelerated coursework or research applications.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT is built on the Navi 21 chip using RDNA 2.0 architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 7 nm process. The die contains 26,800 million transistors across a 520 mm² area, yielding a transistor density of 51.5M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1825 MHz, with a game clock of 2015 MHz and a boost clock of 2250 MHz. Memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective data rate.

The memory subsystem comprises 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This capacity and bandwidth combination is substantial for 1440p gaming and adequate for 4K, allowing high-resolution textures without VRAM overflow in most current titles. The 4608 shading units, 288 texture mapping units, and 128 render output units provide robust rasterization throughput, evidenced by the 288.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 648.0 GTexel/s texture rate.

Compute performance is rated at 20.74 TFLOPS FP32 and 41.47 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). The 72 ray tracing cores deliver hardware-accelerated RT, though the implementation is first-generation RDNA — functional but not as efficient as newer architectures. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, and 1x USB Type-C, providing flexible monitor connectivity.

The GPU's benchmark results show a PassMark G3D score of 24980 and a GPU compute score of 13245, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3689. The 85th GPU percentile confirms strong overall performance. The nearest rivals show interesting positioning: the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile scores 47743 (1.5% higher), the Intel Arc A550M scores 49737 (2.5% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 49957 (3% lower), and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 50001 (3% lower). These deltas indicate the RX 6800 XT sits between mobile professional GPUs and newer desktop offerings, though the comparison is complicated by the different GPU classes involved.

The GPU requires a 300 W TDP with dual 8-pin power connectors and a 700 W suggested PSU. The dual-slot cooler measures 267 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 50 mm in width, requiring adequate case clearance. The production status is end-of-life, meaning availability may be limited to remaining stock or used markets.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers seeking high-refresh 1440p performance without stepping into flagship GPU pricing territory. The GPU's 85th percentile ranking and 16 GB VRAM handle current AAA titles with high detail settings, while the CPU's 86th percentile ensures no significant bottleneck at this resolution. The system is also well-suited for content creators working with 1080p or 1440p video, where the CPU's multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 31727) accelerates rendering and the GPU's compute capability (20.74 TFLOPS) speeds up effects and exports.

Developers and data analysts will benefit from the CPU's integer math throughput (122169) and data compression scores (475505), making builds and data processing tasks faster. Students in engineering or computer science programs gain a system that handles simulation software and compilation workloads without frustration, though the power draw may be excessive for dorm environments. Small business workstations requiring occasional GPU-accelerated tasks — CAD visualization, video conferencing with background effects, or light 3D modeling — will find this configuration performant, though the 300 W GPU TDP means the system runs hot and loud under sustained load.

The build's combined 86th percentile places it above most desktop configurations, making it a sensible choice for users who want a single system that excels at both productivity and gaming without extreme compromises in either direction.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU percentiles — 86 and 85 respectively — are closely matched, indicating a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically exceeds the other. However, workload-specific bottlenecks do emerge. In CPU-bound scenarios like software compilation, data compression (PassMark 475505), or heavily threaded physics simulations, the CPU will be the limiting factor, though its 86th percentile ensures this is rarely a frustration point.

In GPU-bound scenarios like high-resolution gaming or GPU rendering, the RX 6800 XT becomes the constraint. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3689 and PassMark G3D score of 24980 define the GPU's ceiling. At 1080p, the CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 7074 suggests it can feed the GPU adequately in most titles, but at 4K the GPU's pixel rate (288.0 GPixel/s) and FP32 compute (20.74 TFLOPS) become the limiting factors. The FPS scaling between resolutions would show diminishing returns as resolution increases, with the GPU bottleneck dominating at 4K.

The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread to max-thread scaling (9404 to 10216, an 8.6% gain) indicates that gaming workloads — which rarely use more than 16 threads — won't benefit much from the efficiency cores. This means the CPU's 20 threads are more valuable for productivity than gaming. In mixed workloads like streaming while gaming, the CPU's threading headroom (Cinebench R23 multi-core 31727) helps maintain stream encoding quality without stealing frames from the game, but the GPU's lack of a dedicated hardware encoder comparable to competitors means the CPU may need to handle encoding duties.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-13600KF have integrated graphics?

A: No. The "KF" designation indicates no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU like the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT is required for display output.

Q: What memory types does this CPU support?

A: The i5-13600KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, giving builders flexibility in platform cost and performance priorities.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 6800 XT have?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth — sufficient for high-resolution textures in current games.

Q: Is the RX 6800 XT still in production?

A: No, the production status is end-of-life. Availability may be limited to existing retail stock or the used market.

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile ranking?

A: The i5-13600KF ranks at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 38103.

Q: Does this GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RX 6800 XT includes 72 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in compatible games.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU rating is 700 W, and the GPU requires two 8-pin power connectors.

Build Overview

This pairing combines the Intel Core i5-13600KF desktop processor with the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT graphics card in a desktop-class build. The CPU, from the Core 13th Gen series with Raptor Lake architecture, delivers 14 cores and 20 threads with a 5.10 GHz boost clock. The GPU, from the Radeon RX 6000 series with RDNA 2.0 architecture, provides 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 20.74 TFLOPS FP32 compute.

The combined system achieves an 86th percentile ranking, with the CPU and GPU individually at 86th and 85th percentiles respectively. This places the build in the upper tier of desktop configurations — not flagship territory, but comfortably above the majority of systems. The CPU's nearest rivals (Core i5-14490F at 38149 average score, Core Ultra 5 245T at 38194, Ryzen 7 250 at 38221, Core i5-13600HX at 38261) all fall within 0.4% of its average benchmark score of 38103, indicating tight competition at this performance level. The GPU's nearest rivals (RTX A1000 Mobile at 47743, Arc A550M at 49737, RTX 5070 Ti at 49957, RX Vega 64 at 50001) show a wider spread, with the RX 6800 XT's average score of 48477 placing it between mobile professional and newer desktop offerings.

This is a high-performance desktop build suited for gaming at 1080p and 1440p with high refresh rates, content creation with substantial multi-threaded headroom, and productivity workloads that benefit from both CPU parallelism and GPU compute acceleration. The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means gaming performance is estimated from component benchmarks, but the percentile alignment suggests a coherent, well-balanced system.