SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

83%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600KF

38,103 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6400

6,001 Benchmark Score

Top 17% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6400 is a study in stark contrast. The CPU is a high-end desktop processor with a benchmark percentile of 86, while the GPU is an entry-level, end-of-life component sitting at the 35th percentile. This pairing creates a system where the processor’s immense capability is constrained by the graphics card’s modest output. The following analysis is based on the benchmark data provided, which contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. Consequently, all gaming performance discussions are estimated from the component benchmark scores and should be treated as projections, not empirical results.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and includes ECC memory support. It connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, and its multiplier is unlocked for overclocking.

The benchmark data for this CPU shows exceptional performance across the board. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 31,727 in multicore and 4,479 in single-core tests. This multicore result indicates a very strong capability for heavily threaded workloads such as video rendering, 3D modeling, and software compilation. The single-core score is equally impressive, suggesting excellent responsiveness in everyday tasks and applications that rely on single-thread performance, such as legacy software or certain game engines.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 38,103, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals are extremely close in performance. The Intel Core i5-14490F is only 0.1% faster, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T is 0.2% faster, the AMD Ryzen 7 250 is 0.3% faster, and the Intel Core i5-13600HX is 0.4% faster. These negligible deltas indicate that the i5-13600KF is positioned in a highly competitive performance tier, where its processing power is essentially equivalent to these other top-tier options. The 3DMark scores reinforce this, with a max-thread score of 10,216 and a 16-thread score of 9,404, demonstrating that the processor can efficiently manage a high number of concurrent tasks without significant performance degradation.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6400 is a stark contrast to the CPU. It features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 128.0 GB/s. The GPU is based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, using the Navi 24 chip manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It contains 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation pipelines. The GPU includes 12 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The core clocks are a base of 1923 MHz, a game clock of 2039 MHz, and a boost clock of 2321 MHz. The memory operates at 16 Gbps effective. The card has a TDP of 53 W and requires no power connectors, with a suggested PSU of 250 W. It connects via a PCIe 4.0 x4 interface and is a single-slot design.

The GPU's benchmark scores reveal its entry-level status. Its average benchmark score is 6,001, placing it in the 35th percentile of all GPUs. It is essentially tied with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M (0% delta), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server (0.1% faster), the AMD FirePro W4100 (0.2% faster), and the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M (0.3% faster). These rivals are all older or lower-tier parts, confirming the RX 6400's position near the bottom of the performance spectrum. In synthetic benchmarks, the GPU scores 7,673 in Passmark G3D and 32,011 in Geekbench OpenCL. The passmark DirectX 12 score of 30 is notably low, indicating that modern, graphics-intensive workloads will be a significant challenge for this card. The 128.0 GB/s bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM are limiting factors for high-resolution textures and complex scenes.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 13th Gen series. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory modules. The PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU provides high-bandwidth connectivity for modern NVMe storage and future expansion cards. However, the GPU's connection is only PCIe 4.0 x4, which could limit data transfer speeds in certain scenarios, though it is sufficient for the GPU's capabilities.

The TDP of the CPU is 125 W, while the GPU is a low-power part at 53 W. The suggested PSU for the entire system is 250 W, which is quite low, reflecting the GPU's efficiency. However, a user looking to upgrade the GPU in the future would need to consider a more robust power supply. The CPU is a high-performance part with a launch MSRP of $294, and its performance percentile of 86 suggests it has longevity. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the RX 6400 with a more powerful GPU to unlock the CPU's full potential. The CPU's 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes are ready for a high-end graphics card, but the system's power supply would likely need an upgrade to support a more demanding component. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that users can carry over existing DDR4 memory or invest in newer DDR5 modules, though the platform's architecture determines the specific benefits.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this specific CPU and GPU combination. Therefore, the following FPS discussion is framed as an estimate based on the benchmark scores. The RX 6400's performance, as indicated by its 35th percentile and low DirectX 12 scores, suggests it is suited for 1080p gaming at low to medium settings in less demanding titles. In modern AAA games, the 4 GB VRAM and 128.0 GB/s bandwidth will be limiting factors, likely causing stuttering or requiring reduced texture quality.

For esports titles and older games, the RX 6400 can deliver playable frame rates. The CPU's high single-core score of 4,479 in Cinebench R23 and 3DMark single-thread score of 1,084 will ensure that the processor is not a bottleneck for the GPU. This means that the GPU will be the primary determinant of frame rates. The estimated performance would be in the range of 60 FPS or more for games like Counter-Strike 2 or League of Legends at 1080p with competitive settings. For more demanding titles, users should expect to lower settings to achieve smooth gameplay. The data indicates that the system is not designed for high-refresh-rate 1440p or 4K gaming, as the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute power are insufficient for such loads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance disparity between the CPU and GPU creates a significant bottleneck. The CPU is in the 86th percentile, while the GPU is in the 35th percentile. This means the CPU can process frames much faster than the GPU can render them. In gaming workloads, the RX 6400 will be the limiting factor, capping the frame rate. The CPU will often be idle, waiting for the GPU to finish its work. The 3DMark max-thread score of 10,216 for the CPU versus the GPU's low DirectX 12 score of 30 highlight this imbalance.

In compute-heavy workloads, such as video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU will be the primary workhorse. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31,727 indicates that the CPU can handle intensive rendering tasks with ease, while the GPU's compute score of 2,812 in Passmark will be less relevant. Conversely, in GPU-accelerated applications like Blender or DaVinci Resolve, the RX 6400 will be a severe limitation. The system is unbalanced, with the CPU's potential being largely untapped in GPU-bound scenarios. For a more balanced system, the GPU would need to be significantly upgraded to match the CPU's performance class, while the CPU could be a good match for a mid-range or high-end graphics card.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is suited for users who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks and have a limited need for gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads. It would be an excellent choice for software developers who compile code, run virtual machines, or use multi-threaded build tools. The 20 threads and high multicore scores would significantly reduce compilation times. Students in computer science or engineering fields would benefit from the CPU's power for simulations and data processing. For small business workstations, the CPU handles spreadsheets, databases, and office productivity applications with ease, while the GPU can drive multiple displays with its 1x HDMI 2.1 and 1x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

For gamers, this build is not recommended for modern AAA titles. It would be suitable for casual gamers or those playing older or less demanding games. The system could serve as a basic media center or a secondary PC for light gaming. Content creators who work primarily with CPU-bound tasks, such as audio production or code compilation, would find the CPU excellent, but those relying on GPU rendering would be disappointed. The RX 6400 is not a workstation GPU, and its performance in professional applications is minimal.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance percentile of the Intel Core i5-13600KF?

A: The CPU is in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 38,103.

Q: How much VRAM does the AMD Radeon RX 6400 have?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 64-bit bus width and 128.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, the GPU has a TDP of 53 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 250 W.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600KF supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: What is the socket type for this CPU?

A: The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so gaming performance is estimated.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6400 is in the 35th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 6,001.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class pairing. The combination consists of a high-end 14-core Intel Core i5-13600KF processor and an entry-level AMD Radeon RX 6400 graphics card. The CPU is a top-tier performer, but the GPU is positioned near the bottom of the performance chart. The combined percentile for this system is 61, reflecting the GPU's drag on the overall performance. This pairing is not a balanced gaming machine; it is a CPU-centric platform where the graphics card is a placeholder for basic display output or light, non-demanding tasks. The overall tier is defined by the CPU's strength, but the user experience in graphics-intensive applications will be limited by the GPU's weaknesses.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-13600KF achieves an average benchmark score of 38,103, placing it in the 86th percentile. Its Cinebench R23 scores are 31,727 for multicore and 4,479 for single-core. The AMD Radeon RX 6400 achieves an average benchmark score of 6,001, placing it in the 35th percentile. The GPU's Passmark G3D score is 7,673, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 176. The combined picture shows a system with extreme CPU performance and minimal GPU performance. The CPU is within 0.4% of its nearest rivals, while the GPU is within 0.3% of its own closest competitors, which are all much older or lower-tier parts. This data indicates that the CPU will excel in processor-bound tasks, while the GPU will struggle in any GPU-bound scenario.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is not viable. The RX 6400's low benchmark scores, including a DirectX 12 score of 30, indicate it cannot sustain high frame rates in demanding games. The CPU is capable, but the GPU will cap performance at low levels, making high-refresh monitors a wasted investment.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads and high passmark multithread score of 37,488 can handle software encoding for streaming, but the GPU's limitations will prevent the system from playing modern games at acceptable quality while streaming. The encoder on the GPU is minimal, so the CPU would need to handle both encoding and game logic, which it can do, but the gameplay experience will be poor due to the low frame rates.

Video Editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31,727 is excellent for rendering and exporting video. However, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and low compute score of 2,812 will severely hinder real-time previews and GPU-accelerated effects. This system is better suited for CPU-based editing workflows with simple timelines.

3D Rendering: Similar to video editing, the CPU will handle the rendering calculations efficiently. The passmark floating-point math score of 90,424 demonstrates strong computational power. However, the GPU will not accelerate rendering in most modern engines, leading to long render times for complex scenes.

Software Development: This is an ideal scenario. The CPU's high core count and thread count, along with its passmark integer math score of 122,169, will significantly speed up code compilation and testing. The GPU is sufficient for basic display output and running an IDE.

Student and Office Work: The system is overkill for standard office tasks like word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The CPU's single-core performance of 4,479 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy responsiveness. The GPU is adequate for office applications and can drive two displays. This is a powerful workstation for a student or professional who runs heavy data analysis or programming software.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600KF

AMD Radeon RX 6400

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds