SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600K

37,685 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600K paired with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is a desktop configuration that presents an unusual blend of high-end consumer processing and workstation-grade graphics acceleration. The benchmark data provided shows no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, and the `dataIsMeasured` flag is false, meaning the figures in the FACT PACK are exclusively synthetic benchmark scores. Consequently, all gaming performance discussions herein are framed as estimates derived from these CPU and GPU scores, not from direct game testing. The data indicates a pairing where a strong, unlocked 14-core processor meets a 16 GB professional GPU in a system that benchmarks in the 68th percentile overall, suggesting a capable machine for compute-heavy tasks rather than a purely gaming-focused one.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination, so frame expectations entirely through synthetic benchmark scores. The Intel Core i5-13600K posts a 3DMark single-thread score of 1085 and a 2-thread score of 2168, indicating robust single-core performance that typically translates to responsive gameplay in lightly-threaded titles. The GPU, an RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2, sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, which places it in a mid-range tier for gaming relative to other graphics cards in the database, but its architecture and memory configuration suggest it handles modern titles at high settings in 1440p.

For 1080p resolution, the CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 7074 suggests ample headroom to feed the GPU in most esports and action titles, while the GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 performance indicates raw compute that supports high frame rates at this resolution. Estimates for 1080p ultra settings would likely exceed 144 FPS in competitive shooters like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, given the single-thread strength, but drop to 80-100 FPS in demanding AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 due to the GPU’s mid-tier percentile ranking. The 16 GB VRAM buffer, however, prevents memory-related stutters at higher detail settings.

At 1440p, the bottleneck shifts more decisively to the GPU. The RTX 5000 Embedded’s 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 256-bit bus provide adequate throughput, but the 50th percentile standing means it competes with mid-range desktop cards rather than high-end ones. Estimated FPS for 1440p ultra would hover around 60-75 FPS in recent releases, with older titles or those with DLSS support (given the 304 tensor cores) potentially reaching 100+ FPS. The CPU’s 3DMark max-threads score of 10157 ensures it won’t hinder the GPU at this resolution.

For 4K gaming, the data suggests this pairing is not ideal. The GPU’s pixel rate of 188.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 510.7 GTexel/s, while respectable, place it below the thresholds typically required for consistent 60 FPS at 4K ultra in modern titles. Estimated 4K performance would fall to 30-50 FPS depending on the game’s optimization, meaning users would need to rely on scaling technologies or reduce settings to achieve playable rates. The CPU remains capable, but the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking becomes the limiting factor, making 4K a stretch goal rather than a primary target.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s aggregate benchmark picture is strong. It holds an 86th percentile position among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37685. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 at 37762 (a 0.2% difference) and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 at 37804 (0.3% ahead), showing the i5-13600K sits within a tight cluster of modern processors. In Cinebench R23, it scores 24221 multicore and 2000.5 singlecore, demonstrating a balanced profile that excels in both threaded and single-threaded workloads. The Geekbench scores reinforce this: 15575 multicore and 2297 singlecore, placing it well above average for productivity tasks.

The GPU, by contrast, has no benchmark scores listed in the FACT PACK, with an `avgBenchmarkScore` of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking. This makes direct GPU performance comparisons impossible from the data alone. However, the combined percentile for the pairing is 68, which sits between the CPU’s 86 and the GPU’s 50, indicating that while the processor is a top-tier performer, the graphics card pulls the overall system down in any combined workload metric. The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 37680 and integer math score of 122481 suggest exceptional computational throughput, while the GPU’s FP32 of 32.69 TFLOPS is solid for professional rendering but not outstanding for gaming.

The combined picture is one of asymmetry: the CPU outperforms the vast majority of its peers, while the GPU is average. In mixed workloads like game development or 3D modeling, the CPU handles physics, logic, and compilation swiftly, but the GPU becomes the constraint in viewport rendering or final frame output. For pure gaming, the CPU’s 86th percentile is wasted in most scenarios, as the GPU’s 50th percentile dictates the ceiling.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 68, reflecting a system where the CPU (86th percentile) significantly outperforms the GPU (50th percentile) in the benchmark database’s ranking.

Q: Does this system support overclocking?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier, making it overclockable, provided the motherboard and cooling solution allow it.

Q: What memory types are supported by this CPU?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus, allowing flexibility in platform choice.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what type is it?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket and what does that mean for upgrades?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which is compatible with 12th and 13th generation Core processors, but not newer 14th generation parts that may use a different socket.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing and AI acceleration?

A: Yes, the GPU has 76 RT cores for ray tracing and 304 tensor cores for AI workloads, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Is the GPU a discrete card or integrated?

A: The GPU is listed with a slot width of "IGP" (integrated graphics processor), meaning it is designed as an embedded solution, not a standard add-in card, which affects its physical installation.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows a CPU-bound system in most workloads, but the nature of the bottleneck shifts depending on the task. In single-threaded and lightly-threaded scenarios, the i5-13600K’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1085 and 2-thread score of 2168 place it in the top tier, meaning it will rarely be the limiting factor in applications that use few cores. The GPU, with its 50th percentile ranking, will cap frame rates in gaming, making it the bottleneck at any resolution above 1080p, as evidenced by the lack of FPS data and the disparity in percentile ranks.

In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads shine, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 that outpaces many rivals. Here, the GPU’s lower compute throughput (32.69 TFLOPS FP32) becomes the constraint in rendering tasks like Blender or Octane, where the CPU can pre-compute geometries faster than the GPU can render them. The Passmark floating-point math score of 90538 further indicates the CPU can process physics and simulations ahead of the GPU’s rasterization capabilities.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, supports this asymmetry. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread strength likely keeps frame delivery consistent, but the GPU’s 50th percentile means it cannot push beyond mid-range expectations. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU’s memory bandwidth and pixel rate become more critical, and its mid-tier standing means the CPU’s headroom goes unused. The combined 68th percentile is a direct reflection of this imbalance—the system is better than average overall, but the GPU drags the CPU’s potential down in graphics-intensive tasks.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is built on the AD103 chip using a 5 nm process from TSMC, with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. This is a dense chip, with a transistor density of 121.1M per mm², indicating a modern, power-efficient design. The GPU has 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, which are substantial numbers that support its professional positioning, but its base clock of 930 MHz and boost clock of 1680 MHz are modest, prioritizing stability and power efficiency over raw clock speed in an embedded form factor.

The memory subsystem is a highlight: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus delivers 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for 4K texturing and large datasets in scientific visualization or AI inference. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, with an effective rate of 18 Gbps, and the FP16 performance matches FP32 at 32.69 TFLOPS, offering 1:1 ratio for compute-heavy tasks that use mixed precision. The 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and deep learning, respectively, making this GPU suitable for real-time ray tracing in DXR titles and for training or inference in machine learning frameworks.

Benchmark scores are absent, so the 50th percentile ranking is the only comparative metric available. This places it in the middle of the GPU performance distribution, which is surprising given its professional feature set. The pixel rate of 188.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 510.7 GTexel/s are solid, but not exceptional, aligning with a mid-range desktop card like an RTX 4070 rather than a high-end workstation part. The slot width of "IGP" and absence of power connectors suggest it is intended for embedded or mobile workstations, where power draw is capped at 150 W, and thermal constraints limit sustained boost clocks.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong CPU compute for development, engineering, or content creation, but who also require a GPU with professional features like 16 GB VRAM and tensor cores for AI work. Gamers at 1080p will find the CPU overkill and the GPU adequate, but those aiming for 1440p or 4K should look elsewhere. The 86th percentile CPU performance is ideal for software developers compiling large codebases, where Passmark data compression (476394) and encryption (27075) scores show rapid throughput, and for students in computer science or engineering who run simulations or virtual machines.

Content creators editing video in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 for timeline playback and export, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and NVENC (implied by tensor cores) handle 4K footage without memory pressure. 3D artists using Blender or Maya will see fast viewport navigation from the CPU’s single-thread score of 2000.5 in Cinebench R23, but final renders using Cycles or V-Ray will be limited by the GPU’s 50th percentile standing, making this a mixed bag for rendering farms.

Small business workstations running ERP software or financial modeling will appreciate the CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 122481, which speeds up calculations, and the GPU’s 576.0 GB/s bandwidth for database visualization. However, the lack of measured gaming data means this is not a system to build for high-refresh esports or AAA gaming at high resolutions—the GPU is the bottleneck, and the CPU’s potential remains untapped in that scenario.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600K uses Socket 1700, which is a mature platform that supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing cheaper DDR4 kits or faster DDR5 modules. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is forward-looking for future NVMe SSDs or GPUs, though the embedded GPU in this pairing uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so there is no bottleneck on that front. The TDP is 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 150 W, so a power supply with adequate headroom is required, though the suggested PSU is not listed in the data.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a higher-tier discrete card, as the CPU’s 86th percentile ranking leaves significant headroom. The 14 cores and 20 threads are more than sufficient for gaming and most professional workloads, so the CPU can last several more years. Memory-wise, upgrading to DDR5 with higher bandwidth would improve performance in memory-sensitive tasks, though the dual-channel bus is already a strong foundation. The socket is a potential dead-end for future Intel generations, so a platform change would be needed for a CPU upgrade beyond 13th gen, but the current chip’s performance makes that unnecessary in the near term.

The power draw combination of 125 W CPU and 150 W GPU totals 275 W, which is manageable for a 500 W PSU, but overclocking the CPU (since it has an unlocked multiplier) would increase demand. The GPU’s embedded nature means it cannot be easily swapped, so the primary upgrade path is moving to a desktop RTX card with higher clocks and better cooling, which would also raise the system’s combined percentile from 68.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class pairing, combining Intel’s Core 13th Gen Raptor Lake architecture with NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace professional GPU. The CPU is a high-performance desktop part with 14 cores, 20 threads, and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the GPU is an embedded workstation solution with 16 GB VRAM. The combined percentile of 68 places this system in the upper-mid tier, meaning it outperforms most systems in the database but is not at the top, largely due to the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking.

The CPU’s 86th percentile is a standout, indicating it is among the best processors available, but the GPU’s average standing means the overall system is only slightly above average. This is a workstation-oriented build, given the GPU’s professional features like ray tracing and tensor cores, rather than a gaming rig, despite the i5-13600K’s gaming pedigree. The data suggests a system that excels in compute-heavy tasks like compilation, 3D rendering (CPU-side), and AI inference, but falls short in pure gaming frame rates at high resolutions.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600K is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel with a die size of 257 mm². It has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3, which is generous and supports the high benchmark scores. Its memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5, plus ECC memory, makes it flexible for workstation builds.

Benchmark results are consistently strong. In Cinebench R23, it scores 24221 multicore and 2000.5 singlecore, placing it ahead of most rivals in the database, including the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 and Intel Core Ultra 5 235H, which are within 0.4% of its average score. The Passmark multithread score of 37680 and single-thread score of 4124 (listed twice) further confirm its balanced capabilities. The 3DMark scores scale well with thread count: 2168 at 2 threads, 4283 at 4, 7074 at 8, and 10157 at max threads, showing linear scaling that benefits multi-threaded applications.

For real workloads, this CPU excels in software compilation, where Passmark data compression (476394) and integer math (122481) indicate rapid processing. The floating-point math score of 90538 supports scientific computing and physics simulations, while the extended instructions score of 28805 suggests good performance in cryptography or signal processing. The single-thread score of 2000.5 in Cinebench R23 means responsive UI interactions and fast single-threaded legacy applications, but the CPU is clearly built for throughput, making it ideal for content creation, engineering, and development environments where multi-core utilization is high.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1085 and 2-thread score of 2168 are strong enough for 144+ FPS in most titles, but the GPU’s 50th percentile caps this at mid-range levels, so estimated frame rates are 100-144 FPS in esports and 60-80 FPS in AAA games. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the limit, with estimated 60-75 FPS in demanding titles, making this a viable but not exceptional gaming system.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221, handle game capture and encoding simultaneously without significant frame drops. The GPU’s tensor cores can accelerate encoding, but the lack of measured FPS data means streaming performance is estimated to be smooth at 1080p, with CPU-based x264 encoding using spare thread headroom.

Video editing: The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 37680 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 suggest fast timeline scrubbing and export times in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth support 4K color grading and effects, but the 50th percentile GPU means effects-heavy renders will take longer than with a higher-tier card.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering in Blender or V-Ray will be fast, given the 24221 multicore score, but GPU rendering using CUDA or OptiX will be slower due to the GPU’s mid-tier FP32 performance of 32.69 TFLOPS. This scenario is CPU-bound, making the system better for pre-processing and scene setup than final frame output.

Software development: The CPU excels here, with Passmark data encryption (27075), compression (476394), and integer math (122481) scores indicating rapid build times and code analysis. The GPU is less relevant, except for shader compilation, but the 86th percentile CPU makes this an excellent workstation for developers.

Student and office work: For general productivity, the CPU’s single-thread score of 2000.5 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy application launches and spreadsheet calculations. The GPU is overkill for office tasks, but the 16 GB VRAM supports large data visualizations or CAD software, making this a premium, future-proof option for engineering or data science students, though the cost is justified only if the GPU’s professional features are used.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600K

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds