SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600K

37,685 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600K paired with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a desktop combination that ranks in the 91st percentile overall, blending a high-end workstation GPU with a strong enthusiast-class CPU. The data shows this is a potent pairing for professional rendering and compute tasks, though the lack of measured FPS data for this specific configuration means all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from component benchmark scores. This analysis relies exclusively on the provided benchmark results and specifications to assess where this build excels and where its limitations lie.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame rate expectations are estimates based on the individual component scores. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4124 and Geekbench single-core score of 2297 indicate very strong per-core performance, which is critical for gaming. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 146593 and Vulkan score of 123842 place it in the 95th percentile among all GPUs, suggesting it has substantial raw compute power that should translate to high frame rates in most titles.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, the estimated performance is likely to be extremely high, as the CPU’s boost clock of 5.10 GHz and the GPU’s boost clock of 2175 MHz provide a strong foundation. The CPU’s 3dmark 2-thread score of 2168 and single-thread score of 1085 suggest minimal bottlenecking in lightly-threaded game engines. The GPU’s 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 64 ROPs should handle 1080p ultra settings in most modern titles well above the 100 FPS mark, though this is an estimate.

Moving to 1440p, the estimated performance remains strong, with the GPU’s 360.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 20 GB of VRAM providing ample headroom. The CPU’s 3dmark 8-thread score of 7074 indicates that multi-threaded game logic will be handled efficiently. The combination should maintain high refresh rates at this resolution, with the GPU becoming the more significant factor as resolution increases. The lack of measured data means these figures are projections, but the component scores suggest a capable 1440p high-refresh system.

At 4K resolution, the estimated FPS will depend heavily on the GPU, and the RTX 4000 Ada Generation’s 95th percentile ranking suggests it can handle 4K ultra settings in many titles. The CPU’s 3dmark max-threads score of 10157 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 ensure that frame pacing remains stable. However, without measured FPS data, the exact figures at 4K are speculative, and the GPU’s workstation-oriented design may prioritize compute over raw rasterization in some gaming scenarios.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 37685, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435, scores 37762, a delta of -0.2%, meaning the Intel chip is essentially tied with it. The Intel Core 5 211E scores 37829, also a -0.4% delta, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H scores 37522, a +0.4% delta in favor of the i5-13600K. These results indicate the CPU sits at a performance equilibrium with its closest competitors, with no single rival holding a decisive edge.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 135218, placing it in the 95th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA A10M, scores 135230, a delta of 0%, making them statistically identical. The AMD Radeon PRO W6800 scores 135396, a -0.1% delta, while the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo scores 135774, a -0.4% delta. The AMD Radeon PRO V620 scores 136472, a -0.9% delta, meaning the RTX 4000 Ada is slightly behind this particular rival. The combined picture is a CPU that is competitive with its peers and a GPU that is among the top 5% of all graphics cards.

The combined percentile of 91st for this pairing reflects a system where both components are high-performing, but the GPU is notably stronger relative to its field. The CPU’s 86th percentile is respectable, but the GPU’s 95th percentile shows it is the more dominant component. This creates a system where compute-heavy workloads will shine, while the CPU remains a capable but not class-leading partner.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform with a Raptor Lake architecture, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU, providing a modern foundation for storage and expansion cards. The CPU’s TDP is 125 W, and it has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking if the user’s motherboard and cooling support it.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it will operate at Gen 4 speeds. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 300 W, and its TDP is 130 W, which is modest for a workstation card. This leaves significant headroom in most power supplies, as a typical desktop PSU of 650 W or higher would comfortably support both components. The GPU is single-slot and 245 mm long, making it easier to fit in compact cases.

A sensible next upgrade would be to add more memory, as the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5, but the data does not specify a maximum capacity. The GPU’s 20 GB of VRAM is substantial, so memory is unlikely to be a bottleneck in the near term. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support means future storage devices could benefit from increased bandwidth, though the GPU is limited to Gen 4. The upgrade path is solid, with the CPU’s overclocking capability and the platform’s modern features providing longevity.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a distinct imbalance in favor of the GPU in compute-heavy scenarios. The GPU’s 95th percentile ranking versus the CPU’s 86th percentile suggests that in workloads like 3D rendering or machine learning, the GPU will be the primary driver of performance, while the CPU may not fully saturate the GPU’s capabilities. The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 37680 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 are strong, but the GPU’s 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is a much larger computational resource.

In gaming, the bottleneck is more nuanced. The CPU’s single-thread performance, as indicated by its 3dmark single-thread score of 1085 and PassMark single-thread score of 4124, is excellent and should not hold back the GPU at lower resolutions. However, at 4K, the GPU is more likely to be the limiting factor, as the resolution demands more from the graphics card’s pixel and texture throughput. The GPU’s pixel rate of 139.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 417.6 GTexel/s are high, but 4K ultra settings will stress these resources.

The FPS scaling from the benchmark scores, while estimated, suggests that at 1080p the CPU and GPU are well-matched, but at higher resolutions the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. The CPU’s 3dmark 16-thread score of 9368 indicates it can handle many concurrent tasks, so in productivity workloads, the CPU will be a limiting factor only in heavily CPU-bound tasks like data compression, where its PassMark score of 476394 is notable but not exceptional.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600K features 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. It is built on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm², and it includes 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is a valuable feature for workstation reliability. Its integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output, though the dedicated GPU will be used for all demanding tasks.

Benchmark results show a strong all-rounder: the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 and Geekbench multicore score of 15575 indicate excellent multi-threaded performance for tasks like video encoding or software compilation. The single-core scores, including a Geekbench single-core score of 2297 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2000.5, are equally impressive, making the CPU responsive in daily use and fast in lightly-threaded applications. The PassMark integer math score of 122481 and floating-point math score of 90538 further demonstrate its arithmetic prowess.

For real workloads, this CPU is a strong choice for content creation, where its 20 threads can accelerate rendering and export times. The data encryption score of 27075 and extended instructions score of 28805 suggest it handles security and encryption tasks competently. The find prime numbers score of 155 is relatively low, indicating that highly parallel integer workloads may not be its forte, but the overall benchmark picture is one of a balanced, high-performance desktop processor.

Who Should Build It

This combination is ideally suited for professionals in 3D rendering and animation, as the GPU’s 20 GB of VRAM and 26.73 TFLOPS of compute power are designed for such workloads. The GPU’s 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI-based denoising, making it a capable tool for architects, product designers, and visual effects artists. The CPU’s 14 cores support these tasks by handling scene management and physics simulations.

Gamers seeking high-refresh 1440p or entry-level 4K performance would find this build compelling, given the estimated FPS from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 95th percentile ranking and the CPU’s strong single-thread performance suggest it can deliver smooth frame rates in competitive titles and visually rich single-player games. Content creators who edit video or work with large datasets will benefit from the CPU’s 20 threads and the GPU’s compute acceleration, which can speed up rendering times.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s multicore performance, while the GPU’s compute capabilities can accelerate testing or simulation. Students in engineering or computer science fields would find this build capable of handling demanding projects, and small business workstations requiring reliable compute performance for financial modeling or data analysis would also be well-served. The absence of measured FPS data means gamers should temper expectations, but the theoretical performance is high.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is built on the AD104 chip using a 5 nm process from TSMC, with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. It features 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2250 MHz with an effective speed of 18 Gbps. The GPU has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs, along with 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores.

The GPU’s compute capabilities are substantial: 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 performance (with 1:1 ratio) make it a strong choice for scientific computing and AI inference. The pixel rate of 139.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 417.6 GTexel/s indicate it can handle high-resolution rendering tasks. The benchmark scores, including a Geekbench OpenCL score of 146593 and Vulkan score of 123842, place it in the 95th percentile, showing it is a top-tier workstation GPU.

For rendering workloads, the 20 GB of VRAM is a critical advantage, allowing large scenes and textures to reside in memory without spilling to system RAM. The 48 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which is essential for photorealistic renders in applications like Blender or Autodesk Maya. The 192 tensor cores accelerate AI-based features like DLSS in games and denoising in renderers, making this GPU a versatile tool for both professional and creative work.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 91st, indicating it performs better than 91% of all systems in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600K has an average benchmark score of 37685, which is -0.2% compared to the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 at 37762, making the two essentially equal in performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 360.0 GB/s, which supports its 20 GB of VRAM and enables high-resolution texture loading and compute workloads without significant memory bottlenecks.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory, and why is this important?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is important for workstation reliability as it can detect and correct data corruption, making the system suitable for critical data processing tasks.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is in the 95th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 135218, placing it among the top 5% of graphics cards.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, which contributes to its strong single-thread performance and responsiveness in gaming and daily applications.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU pairing, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on component benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The estimated FPS at 1080p and 1440p should be very high, driven by the CPU’s single-thread score of 4124 and the GPU’s 95th percentile ranking. The GPU’s 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and the CPU’s 5.10 GHz boost clock suggest this system can drive 144Hz or higher monitors in many titles, though these figures are projections.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads, combined with a PassMark multithread score of 37680, can handle game encoding and streaming simultaneously without major performance drops. The GPU’s 192 tensor cores can also offload encoding tasks via hardware acceleration, making this a viable streaming setup.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 146593 indicate strong performance for video editing software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU’s 20 GB of VRAM is useful for handling 4K timelines and effects, while the CPU’s 20 threads accelerate export and rendering.

3D rendering: This is the system’s strongest scenario, with the GPU’s 48 RT cores and 26.73 TFLOPS providing hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The 20 GB of VRAM allows for complex scenes, and the CPU’s multicore scores ensure geometry and physics calculations are handled efficiently.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 122481 and 20 threads make compiling large codebases faster. The GPU’s compute capabilities can accelerate testing or simulation, and the support for ECC memory ensures data integrity during long build processes.

Student and office work: The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2297, makes everyday applications responsive. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display option, and the system’s 91st percentile ranking means it can handle any academic or productivity software with ease.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600K

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds