SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600K

37,685 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600K paired with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 represents a workstation-class combination where a high-end modern desktop CPU anchors a professional-grade, Turing-architecture GPU. The data set contains no measured frame-rate rows for this exact pairing; all FPS discussions are therefore estimates derived from the benchmark scores provided. The CPU’s performance is exceptional, sitting at the 86th percentile among all processors, while the GPU, now end-of-life, holds a respectable 67th percentile position. This is a system built for compute-heavy productivity, not necessarily for raw gaming dominance, though it remains capable.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a professional workstation card built on the Turing architecture, fabricated on a 12 nm process at TSMC. The die is substantial, measuring 545 mm² and housing 13,600 million transistors. The card's memory subsystem is a highlight: it features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. This capacity is crucial for large 3D scenes, high-resolution textures, and complex compute workloads that exceed the memory limits of consumer cards.

Clock speeds are modest by modern standards, with a base clock of 1620 MHz and a boost clock of 1815 MHz. The memory runs at an effective speed of 14 Gbps. The GPU contains 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation processors. For hardware acceleration, it includes 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, which are essential for real-time ray tracing and AI-accelerated tasks like denoising and deep learning inference.

The raw compute metrics show balanced capabilities. The card achieves 11.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 22.30 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (2:1 rate). Pixel fill rate is listed at 116.2 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate at 348.5 GTexel/s. In benchmark scores, the Quadro RTX 5000 achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 and a Vulkan score of 92309, indicating strong compute throughput. However, its Passmark G3D score of 15616 places it in the 67th percentile, and its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, is only 1% slower on average. This suggests that while the card has ample VRAM and professional features, its raw rasterization performance is more aligned with mid-range consumer parts from a previous generation.

For rendering, the 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are the primary assets. The benchmark scores indicate that the card is well-suited for GPU-accelerated rendering engines that rely on large datasets, but the 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 figure means it will not compete with modern high-end compute cards. The RT and tensor cores provide hardware support for accelerated ray tracing and AI workflows, but the overall performance level in these areas is limited by the older architecture.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p or 1440p, the data suggests this system can handle many titles at high settings, but the GPU's 67th percentile standing and its proximity to the GTX 1060 6 GB (only 1% faster) indicate it is not a high-refresh-rate champion. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4124 in Passmark and 2000.5 in Cinebench R23 prevents bottlenecking, but the GPU will likely limit frame rates in demanding games. Expect smooth gameplay at 60 FPS in most titles, with drops below that in the most demanding scenarios.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for x264 encoding while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 ensures that the processor can handle both game logic and encoding tasks without significant frame drops. The GPU also supports NVENC, which can offload encoding entirely, though the data does not specify its encoder generation. The system is well-balanced for a single-PC streaming setup.

Video Editing: This workload benefits from both CPU and GPU acceleration. The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 37680 and Geekbench multicore score of 15575 indicate fast export times for codecs that utilize all cores. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is advantageous for scrubbing timelines and applying GPU-accelerated effects, while the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth helps with 4K and 8K footage. The combination is strong, though newer GPUs with higher FP32 performance would render effects faster.

3D Rendering: This is the system's primary strength. The CPU's 24 MB of shared L3 cache and high multicore scores (Cinebench R20: 13373, R23: 24221) ensure rapid CPU-based viewport calculations and scene preprocessing. The GPU, with 16 GB VRAM and 3072 CUDA cores, can handle GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or Octane, but its 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance is moderate, meaning render times will be longer than with more recent workstation cards.

Software Development: The CPU is excellent for compilation. The Passmark data compression score of 476394 and integer math score of 122481 show strong throughput in code compilation and data processing. The GPU is largely irrelevant here, but the system's 125W TDP CPU and 550W suggested PSU mean it is an efficient build for a developer workstation, capable of running virtual machines and heavy IDEs without strain.

Student and Office Work: This configuration is overkill for typical office tasks, but the data shows it excels. The Passmark single-thread score of 4124 ensures snappy UI response in productivity suites, while the 14 cores handle multi-tasking with ease. For students in engineering or data science, the 16 GB GPU VRAM is a practical benefit for running local machine learning models or CAD software, though the cost is high for a basic office machine.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is centered on the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core i5-13600K. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, providing flexibility for builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or faster DDR5. The processor natively provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is essential for future high-bandwidth storage devices and next-generation GPUs.

The GPU, however, uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. While this is backward compatible, it limits the bandwidth available to the card. The system's power delivery is adequate, with a CPU TDP of 125W and a GPU TDP of 230W. The suggested PSU for the GPU alone is 550W, which leaves headroom for the CPU and other components, but a higher-wattage unit would be needed for aggressive overclocking or additional drives.

A sensible next upgrade would be a modern GPU with a PCIe 4.0 or 5.0 interface to take full advantage of the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The CPU itself is a strong performer, with an average benchmark score of 37685, so it will not need replacing for several generations. The memory can be upgraded to faster DDR5 modules if not already in use. The motherboard socket supports the latest 13th-gen and some 14th-gen CPUs, allowing for a drop-in CPU upgrade without changing the board.

Who Should Build It

This system targets professionals and prosumers who need a balanced workstation. The 16 GB VRAM on the GPU makes it ideal for 3D modelers and animators working with large scenes, engineers running simulation software that benefits from CUDA acceleration, and data scientists running inference on local models. The CPU’s 86th percentile ranking means it handles heavy multi-threaded workloads like video encoding, software compilation, and scientific computing with ease.

Gamers seeking high-refresh 1080p or 1440p play will find the GPU to be the limiting factor, as its performance is comparable to a GTX 1060 6 GB. Content creators who prioritize GPU rendering will see adequate, not spectacular, render times. The system is also suitable for small business workstations that require reliability and ECC memory support (which the CPU supports), though the GPU is end-of-life, meaning driver updates and warranty support may become a concern.

The build is less appropriate for those seeking high-end gaming performance or maximum AI compute throughput. For those users, the data suggests looking at GPUs with higher FP32 performance and more modern tensor cores. The CPU, however, is a long-lasting foundation that will serve well for years in any productivity-focused role.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU is a top-tier performer, with an average benchmark score of 37685 and a 86th percentile ranking. The GPU, with a 67th percentile ranking and an average score of 21629, is a mid-tier part. In gaming, the GPU will almost certainly be the bottleneck, limiting frame rates to what it can render. The CPU's high single-thread performance (4124 Passmark) will not be fully utilized in most game titles, which rarely scale beyond 8 cores.

In compute workloads, the balance shifts. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are essential for data-intensive tasks, and the 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance is sufficient for many professional applications. However, the CPU is so strong that it may outpace the GPU's ability to feed it data in some scenarios, though this is less common than the GPU being the limit.

The FPS scaling in gaming will be dictated by the GPU's capability. Since the data shows the GPU is only 1% faster than a GTX 1060 6 GB, frame rates will be typical of that class of card. The CPU will not be the limiting factor, as its 3dmark_8_threads score of 7074 and 3dmark_16_threads score of 9368 show it can handle modern game engines' draw calls without issue. For rendering, the bottleneck is the GPU's compute throughput, while the CPU excels at physics and simulation tasks, as evidenced by its Passmark physics score of 2258.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination of CPU and GPU; all gaming figures presented here are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 15616 and its comparison to the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (1% faster) provide a baseline. For 1080p ultra settings, this system will deliver playable frame rates in most titles, likely ranging from 50 to 80 FPS in AAA games, with esports titles easily exceeding 100 FPS.

At 1440p ultra, the 16 GB VRAM will prevent texture-related stuttering, but the GPU's raw power will struggle to maintain high frame rates. Expect around 40 to 60 FPS in demanding games. At 4K, the card will be overwhelmed in modern titles, with frame rates often dipping below 30 FPS. The CPU’s 3dmark_single_thread score of 1085 and 3dmark_2_threads score of 2168 ensure that frame pacing will be consistent, with minimal stutter from CPU limitations.

For older or less demanding games, the system will perform admirably, with the GPU’s 448.0 GB/s bandwidth ensuring smooth asset streaming. The data suggests that this is not a system for competitive high-refresh gaming; a consumer GPU from the same era as the CPU, such as a GeForce RTX 40-series card, would be significantly faster. The Quadro RTX 5000 is a professional card, and its driver optimizations are often geared toward stability and compute accuracy rather than raw gaming speed.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are uniformly strong. It achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221, a Geekbench multicore score of 15575, and a Passmark multithread score of 37680. Its single-thread performance is also excellent, with a Cinebench R23 singlecore score of 2000.5 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4124. These scores place the CPU at the 86th percentile, with its average benchmark score of 37685 nearly matching the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 (37762, -0.2% delta) and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H (37522, +0.4% delta).

The GPU’s performance is more modest. It scores 78999 in Geekbench OpenCL and 92309 in Geekbench Vulkan, which are strong compute results. However, its Passmark G3D score of 15616 and Passmark DirectX 12 score of 59 show that its gaming rasterization performance is dated. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 21629 is essentially tied with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (21856, -1%) and slightly ahead of the RTX A4000 Mobile (21379, +1.2%).

The combined picture is a system where CPU-bound tasks will see exceptional performance, while GPU-bound tasks will be limited to mid-range levels. The combined percentile is 77, reflecting the CPU’s strength pulling up the GPU’s weakness. The data shows a clear mismatch in generation and tier, with the CPU being a modern high-end part and the GPU being a professional card from 2018.

FAQ

Q: Is the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 a good GPU for gaming with this CPU?

A: No. The data shows the GPU’s Passmark G3D score is 15616, and it is only 1% faster than a GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB. The CPU is not the bottleneck, but the GPU will limit frame rates to roughly the level of that older consumer card.

Q: How much VRAM does the Quadro RTX 5000 have, and why is it important?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. This large capacity is critical for professional workloads like 3D rendering of large scenes or machine learning models that require holding substantial datasets in memory.

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600K has 14 cores and 20 threads. This configuration combines performance and efficiency cores, leading to a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221, which is excellent for multi-threaded tasks.

Q: Does this platform support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through dual-channel memory bus. Builders can choose either memory type depending on their motherboard and budget.

Q: What is the power requirement for this system?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125W, and the GPU has a TDP of 230W. The GPU’s suggested PSU is 550W, which provides a baseline for the total system power supply.

Q: What are the GPU's ray tracing capabilities compared to its peers?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 includes 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores from the Turing architecture. While present, these are older-generation units, and the GPU’s overall performance percentile is 67, indicating it is not competitive with modern RTX cards.

Q: Is the CPU likely to bottleneck the GPU in gaming?

A: No. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score is 4124, and its 3dmark_single_thread score is 1085. These high scores mean the CPU can easily feed the GPU with draw calls; the GPU’s lower performance will be the limiting factor.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600K is a Raptor Lake-S part, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. It features a hybrid architecture with 14 cores and 20 threads, combining performance and efficiency cores to balance power and throughput. The base clock is 3.50 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The TDP is rated at 125W, and the processor is unlocked, allowing for overclocking.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This large cache helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and it includes an integrated UHD Graphics 770, which is useful for troubleshooting or light tasks. Its release date was September 2022, and its launch MSRP was $319.

The benchmark data shows the CPU is a powerhouse. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 is nearly 82% higher than its single-core score of 2000.5, indicating excellent scaling. The Geekbench multicore score of 15575 versus a single-core score of 2297 shows similar scaling. The Passmark multithread score of 37680 reinforces this.

In real workloads, the data suggests the CPU excels at video encoding, 3D rendering on the CPU, software compilation, and scientific computing. The Passmark integer math score of 122481 and floating point math score of 90538 show strong arithmetic throughput. The data encryption score of 27075 indicates capable security-related processing. The CPU’s 86th percentile ranking and its average benchmark score of 37685, which is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 (37762, -0.2% delta), confirms it is a top-tier desktop processor. The CPU is the clear star of this build, providing high-end performance that will remain relevant for years, regardless of the GPU’s aging specifications.