SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600K

37,685 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13600K + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000: A Desktop Workstation Paradox

This pairing marries a high-end 13th Gen desktop CPU with a professional workstation GPU from the Turing era. The data reveals a fascinating split: the processor ranks in the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the graphics card sits at the 61st percentile. This is a build designed for compute-heavy professional work rather than pure gaming, though the combination of a strong multi-core CPU and a workstation GPU creates an interesting balance for specific workloads. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $319 and the GPU is 899 USD.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's overall performance ranking?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600K ranks in the 86th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37685. This places it in the upper tier of desktop processors, significantly ahead of most consumer chips.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-13600K's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 (deltaPct -0.2), AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 (deltaPct -0.3), and Intel Core 5 211E (deltaPct -0.4). It is essentially tied with these, showing a difference of less than half a percent in average score.

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 sits at the 61st percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17789. It is notably close to the GeForce RTX 4060, which has an avgScore of 17639 (deltaPct 0.9), suggesting similar overall compute capability in some respects.

Q: What kind of memory does the CPU support?

A: The i5-13600K supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is a key feature for professional workstation reliability.

Q: Does the GPU have ray tracing capabilities?

A: Yes, the Quadro RTX 4000 features 36 ray tracing cores and 288 tensor cores. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 APIs.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 74, reflecting the substantial gap between the CPU's high performance and the GPU's mid-range standing. The dataIsMeasured field is false, meaning there are no FPS numbers for this exact combination.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Quadro RTX 4000 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 416.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory clocks are rated at 1625 MHz (13 Gbps effective).

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-13600K delivers exceptional multi-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23, it scores 24221 in multicore and 2000.5 in single-core tests. This translates to a 12x advantage in multi-threaded work relative to its single-thread score. The 3DMark results show a scaling pattern: 2168 for 2 threads, 4283 for 4 threads, 7074 for 8 threads, 9368 for 16 threads, and 10157 for max threads. This indicates strong scaling up to 16 threads, with diminishing returns beyond that point. The PassMark multithread score of 37680 confirms this trend, while the single-thread score of 4124 is equally strong.

The GPU's benchmark picture is different. The Quadro RTX 4000 scores 15117 in PassMark G3D and 6176 in GPU compute. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 74540 and Vulkan score is 78844. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields 1873. The DirectX 12 PassMark score is notably low at 52, while DirectX 11 scores 128, suggesting the architecture's strength lies in professional compute rather than modern gaming API paths. The FP32 performance is 7.119 TFLOPS, with FP16 reaching 14.24 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its rivals by a small margin (0.4% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H) while the GPU is essentially tied with the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (deltaPct 0.7). This is a workstation pairing where the CPU provides the bulk of processing power for simulations, compilation, and data processing, while the GPU handles professional rendering and CUDA-accelerated tasks at a moderate level.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile while the GPU occupies the 61st percentile—a 25 percentile point gap. For CPU-bound workloads like code compilation, data compression (PassMark data compression score of 476394), and prime number finding (155), the i5-13600K will be the limiting factor only in terms of its absolute speed, but it is far ahead of the GPU's capabilities.

For GPU-bound workloads, the Quadro RTX 4000 becomes the bottleneck. Its PassMark G3D score of 15117 is only 40% of what the CPU achieves in PassMark multithread (37680). In gaming scenarios, the GPU will likely be the constraint, especially at higher resolutions. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads can feed the GPU effectively, but the GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 performance will cap frame rates.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured directly, can be inferred from the benchmark scores. The CPU's single-thread score of 4124 in PassMark suggests it can handle game logic and physics well, but the GPU's DirectX 12 score of 52 indicates it will struggle with modern gaming workloads. For professional applications like 3D rendering, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 will drive CPU-based renderers, while the GPU's compute score of 6176 will handle GPU-accelerated tasks with moderate efficiency.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets professionals who need a powerful CPU for compute-intensive tasks and require a workstation GPU with certified drivers and professional features. The i5-13600K's 86th percentile CPU ranking makes it suitable for software developers compiling large codebases, data analysts running simulations, and researchers working with complex mathematical models. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running computations.

Content creators working with 4K video editing will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multicore 24221) for rendering timelines, while the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle 4K previews and effects. The GPU's 288 tensor cores provide acceleration for AI-assisted editing tools, though the 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest by modern standards.

Students in engineering and computer science programs will find the CPU's 20 threads useful for parallel programming assignments, while the GPU's professional driver support (OpenGL 4.6) aids in CAD and scientific visualization coursework. Small business workstations requiring ECC memory and professional GPU features for financial modeling or architectural rendering will appreciate this combination, though the GPU's end-of-life status (production status: End-of-life) may be a consideration for long-term deployment.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15117 and DirectX 12 score of 52 indicate that this is not a high-refresh gaming build. Estimated FPS at 1080p ultra settings would likely fall below 60 in modern titles, with 1440p and 4K being even more challenging. The CPU's single-thread score of 4124 can support high frame rates in CPU-bound games, but the GPU will limit overall performance.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, combined with a PassMark multithread score of 37680, provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The GPU's 288 tensor cores can assist with AI-based encoding features, but the overall gaming FPS will be constrained by the GPU's 61st percentile ranking.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 accelerates export and rendering in applications like Premiere Pro. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth handle 4K timeline preview, while the OpenGL 4.6 support ensures compatibility with professional editing suites. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74540 indicates reasonable GPU acceleration for effects.

3D rendering: CPU-based renderers will excel with the 20-thread i5-13600K, as shown by the 24221 Cinebench R23 multicore score. GPU-based renderers using CUDA will see moderate performance from the Quadro RTX 4000's 2304 shading units and 7.119 TFLOPS FP32, with the 36 RT cores providing ray tracing acceleration for hybrid renderers.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 476394 and integer math score of 122481 make it excellent for code compilation and data processing. The 80 KB L1 cache per core and 2 MB L2 cache per core reduce latency for frequent access patterns, while the 24 MB shared L3 cache benefits multi-threaded workloads.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for basic productivity but excels at compute-heavy academic tasks. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking, while the GPU's professional driver stability supports specialized scientific software requiring OpenGL or CUDA.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), allowing for fast NVMe storage or future GPU upgrades. The 125W TDP is manageable for most mid-range coolers, and the unlocked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked: true) enables overclocking for additional performance.

The GPU connects via PCIe 3.0 x16, which is a generation behind the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support. This means the GPU bandwidth is limited, but the 416.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for the 8 GB VRAM. The suggested PSU is 450 W, which is modest for a system with a 125W CPU and 160W GPU, leaving headroom for additional drives or peripherals.

A sensible next upgrade would be a newer GPU in the same price class, given the Quadro RTX 4000 is end-of-life. The CPU has enough PCIe Gen 5 lanes to support a modern GPU fully, and the 450W PSU may need an upgrade depending on the new GPU's power draw. The motherboard's DDR5 support would also allow for a memory upgrade to increase bandwidth for compute workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600K features 14 cores and 20 threads, combining performance cores with efficiency cores under the Raptor Lake architecture. The base clock is 3.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, built on Intel's 10 nm process. The die size is 257 mm², and the cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3 cache.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2000.5 is strong, while the multicore score of 24221 demonstrates excellent scaling across the 20 threads. The 3DMark max threads score of 10157 is 4.7x higher than the 2-thread score of 2168, showing good parallel efficiency. The PassMark physics score of 2258 indicates solid performance for physics simulations in games and scientific applications.

The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output, though the discrete Quadro RTX 4000 will handle all graphics tasks. The ECC memory support is a notable feature for workstation reliability, allowing error correction in memory-intensive computations. The 125W TDP, combined with the 5.10 GHz boost clock, suggests that adequate cooling is necessary for sustained multi-threaded workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) pairing a high-end consumer CPU with a professional workstation GPU. The combined percentile of 74 reflects the disparity between the CPU's 86th percentile ranking and the GPU's 61st percentile. The overall tier is upper-mid-range, with the CPU providing top-tier compute performance while the GPU offers professional features at a moderate performance level.

The build is best described as a CPU-centric workstation. The i5-13600K delivers exceptional performance for software development, data analysis, and CPU-based rendering, while the Quadro RTX 4000 provides certified drivers, ECC support (via the CPU), and professional display outputs (3x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C). The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for professional workflows but will limit gaming performance.

The pairing makes sense for users who prioritize CPU performance and require professional GPU features like NVIDIA's workstation drivers and 36 RT cores for ray tracing in CAD or DCC applications. The 288 tensor cores add AI acceleration, though the overall GPU compute score of 6176 in PassMark is modest.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores.

Based on the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15117 and the DirectX 12 score of 52, modern games at ultra settings would likely struggle to maintain 60 FPS at 1080p. The DirectX 11 score of 128 suggests better performance in older titles, while the DirectX 9 score of 205 indicates legacy games will run well. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873 is low, suggesting the GPU is not optimized for current-generation gaming APIs.

For high-refresh gaming (144Hz+), this build would not be suitable. The CPU's single-thread score of 4124 can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU's 61st percentile ranking will cap FPS well below what the CPU can deliver. Games with ray tracing will be particularly limited by the 36 RT cores and 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 performance. At 1080p medium settings, estimated FPS might reach 60-80 in esports titles, but 1440p and 4K gaming would be severely constrained by the 8 GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is built on the Turing architecture with the TU104 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 12 nm process. It has 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die, with a transistor density of 25.0M per mm². The GPU features 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, providing a pixel rate of 98.88 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 222.5 GTexel/s.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 416.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Base clock is 1005 MHz with a boost clock of 1545 MHz, and memory runs at 1625 MHz (13 Gbps effective). The GPU includes 36 RT cores for ray tracing and 288 tensor cores for AI acceleration, supporting FP16 at 14.24 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

The benchmark results show a GPU that performs better in compute than in graphics. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74540 and Vulkan score of 78844 indicate strong compute capability, while the PassMark DirectX scores are low (52 for DX12, 128 for DX11). The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1873 confirms limited gaming performance. The 61st percentile ranking places it near the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (deltaPct 0.7) and GeForce RTX 4060 (deltaPct 0.9), though the RTX 4060's score of 17639 is slightly lower than the Quadro's 17789 average.

The GPU's single-slot design, 160W TDP, and 1x 8-pin power connector make it easy to install in most workstations. The 450W suggested PSU is modest, and the PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, while older, does not bottleneck the 416.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. The 3x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C outputs support professional multi-monitor setups. The end-of-life production status and 2018 release date suggest that this GPU is at the end of its lifecycle, though its professional features and 288 tensor cores still offer value for CUDA-based workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600K

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds